Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Gold Standard. is it necessary and why


OmaDeb

Recommended Posts

OmaDeb Rookie

 Hey y'all,  I have a young friend, 40 ish, female, RN, recently diagnosed with celiac.  She was diagnosed by her lab work only, no endoscopy/biopsy  done.  and she is mad as she got kicked out of a Celiac support group because of this.  The rules state you must have been dx'd with endoscopy and biopsy.  I know I was.  She states her GI doctor told her that her levels were high enough that  a endoscopy was not necessary and has risks. 

  so it just made me wonder why this is the Gold Standard.   I know many people that have gluten sensitivities but not celiac disease.  what are your thoughts or knowledge on this? 

  Thanks for listening  ,  I'm just curious, and was entertained by this


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Estes Contributor

This happened to me too.  I was told I did not need an endoscopy to confirm but now I can not participate in studies.  I also sometimes doubt my diagnosis.  I wish I had that endoscopy.

RMJ Mentor

I’m guessing it may be partly because endoscopy/biopsy was a procedure long before the blood tests were available.

OmaDeb Rookie
  On 5/19/2022 at 10:09 PM, Estes said:

This happened to me too.  I was told I did not need an endoscopy to confirm but now I can not participate in studies.  I also sometimes doubt my diagnosis.  I wish I had that endoscopy.

Expand Quote  

I guess there is a school of thought that maybe it is not totally necessary, maybe younger docs. That's too bad about the studies, can you get one if you do the gluten challenge for awhile?

  On 5/19/2022 at 11:44 PM, RMJ said:

I’m guessing it may be partly because endoscopy/biopsy was a procedure long before the blood tests were available.

Expand Quote  

my thoughts also.  Thank you

Scott Adams Grand Master
  On 5/19/2022 at 9:46 PM, OmaDeb said:

 Hey y'all,  I have a young friend, 40 ish, female, RN, recently diagnosed with celiac.  She was diagnosed by her lab work only, no endoscopy/biopsy  done.  and she is mad as she got kicked out of a Celiac support group because of this.  The rules state you must have been dx'd with endoscopy and biopsy.  I know I was.  She states her GI doctor told her that her levels were high enough that  a endoscopy was not necessary and has risks. 

Expand Quote  

What kind of "celiac support group" would require this for participation? It does not seem very supportive, but more exclusionary based on an increasingly archaic viewpoint on the traditional way it has been diagnosed. 

There is a section in this article with links to the latest studies which support the current and future way it will be diagnosed, and that is with blood testing alone, at least for those who are 5-10x the positive level for their TTG results:

  On 5/19/2022 at 10:09 PM, Estes said:

This happened to me too.  I was told I did not need an endoscopy to confirm but now I can not participate in studies.  I also sometimes doubt my diagnosis.  I wish I had that endoscopy.

Expand Quote  

I do understand why a study may require this, because trying to get FDA approval has very high standards which likely require much more evidence that the participants actually had active celiac disease AND gut damage. 

OmaDeb Rookie
  On 5/20/2022 at 5:31 PM, Scott Adams said:

What kind of "celiac support group" would require this for participation? It does not seem very supportive, but more exclusionary based on an increasingly archaic viewpoint on the traditional way it has been diagnosed. 

There is a section in this article with links to the latest studies which support the current and future way it will be diagnosed, and that is with blood testing alone, at least for those who are 5-10x the positive level for their TTG results:

I do understand why a study may require this, because trying to get FDA approval has very high standards which likely require much more evidence that the participants actually had active celiac disease AND gut damage. 

Expand Quote  

Right?  I kind of thought it was laughable, it is a FaceBook group, which totally explains it.  but thank you for your reply and information.   

Kat Pearlson Rookie

This is exactly what I was wondering. I did a mail in celiac probability type kit (Imaware) a few years ago and I received my results back saying that my chances of having celiac was over 90% bc I had certain bio markers present. After talking to their online doctors they said I could only know for sure by having an endoscopy. I wasn’t at a place in my life where I could afford to do that so I just kind of forgot about it. I only did the test at that point because my dad had celiac and my sister had read that your chances of having it if your parent has it are increased, I wasn’t  having any symptoms that I was aware of. Now over two years later I’ve been having terrible stomach pain so looking into getting diagnosed or ruling it out. I found a functional medicine clinic that I reached out to and she said that they do not need to do an endoscopy-they can confidently diagnose it with only a blood test. I made an appointment and my care provider actually has celiac disease so I’m sure she is very knowledgeable on the subject. I have also read that sometimes your endoscopy won’t show any damage but you may still have celiac. I recently did the blood test (and a stool test) with this clinic, but I’m still waiting to get my results back so that’s why I’ve been on this site. Thank you for posting this question, have been wondering the same thing. 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



OmaDeb Rookie
  On 5/22/2022 at 1:22 AM, Kat Pearlson said:

This is exactly what I was wondering. I did a mail in celiac probability type kit (Imaware) a few years ago and I received my results back saying that my chances of having celiac was over 90% bc I had certain bio markers present. After talking to their online doctors they said I could only know for sure by having an endoscopy. I wasn’t at a place in my life where I could afford to do that so I just kind of forgot about it. I only did the test at that point because my dad had celiac and my sister had read that your chances of having it if your parent has it are increased, I wasn’t  having any symptoms that I was aware of. Now over two years later I’ve been having terrible stomach pain so looking into getting diagnosed or ruling it out. I found a functional medicine clinic that I reached out to and she said that they do not need to do an endoscopy-they can confidently diagnose it with only a blood test. I made an appointment and my care provider actually has celiac disease so I’m sure she is very knowledgeable on the subject. I have also read that sometimes your endoscopy won’t show any damage but you may still have celiac. I recently did the blood test (and a stool test) with this clinic, but I’m still waiting to get my results back so that’s why I’ve been on this site. Thank you for posting this question, have been wondering the same thing. 

Expand Quote  

It seems to be a sneaky disease!  I got diagnosed 22 years ago at age 46, had symptoms starting in my 20's, but thought they were just normal annoying things. Maybe pregnancies triggered celiac to be active(?). 

 My 7 year older sister, who was failure to thrive early on, wasn't diagnosed until 10 years after me. Due to osteoporosis not responding to. any treatments. FINALLY an Endocrinologist heard her when she said "my sister has celiac". 

23&me also tells us we are very likely to have it, lol. so family history matters a LOT. 

since it lies dormant until triggered for many people, seems like the endoscopy is not 24k

 Good luck,  I hope you get helpful answers

Scott Adams Grand Master
  On 5/22/2022 at 1:22 AM, Kat Pearlson said:

This is exactly what I was wondering. I did a mail in celiac probability type kit (Imaware) a few years ago and I received my results back saying that my chances of having celiac was over 90% bc I had certain bio markers present. After talking to their online doctors they said I could only know for sure by having an endoscopy. I wasn’t at a place in my life where I could afford to do that so I just kind of forgot about it. I only did the test at that point because my dad had celiac and my sister had read that your chances of having it if your parent has it are increased, I wasn’t  having any symptoms that I was aware of. Now over two years later I’ve been having terrible stomach pain so looking into getting diagnosed or ruling it out. I found a functional medicine clinic that I reached out to and she said that they do not need to do an endoscopy-they can confidently diagnose it with only a blood test. I made an appointment and my care provider actually has celiac disease so I’m sure she is very knowledgeable on the subject. I have also read that sometimes your endoscopy won’t show any damage but you may still have celiac. I recently did the blood test (and a stool test) with this clinic, but I’m still waiting to get my results back so that’s why I’ve been on this site. Thank you for posting this question, have been wondering the same thing. 

Expand Quote  

Welcome to the forum! Were you eating around 2 slices of wheat bread daily for at least 6-8 weeks before your blood test?

If one of your parents has celiac disease, an Mayo Clinic study indicates that you have a ~44% chance of also having it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,126
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Malyngo
    Newest Member
    Malyngo
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.2k
    • Total Posts
      71.4k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Not sure about the state of my osteopenia. I haven't had a DEXA scan done since about age 50 and I'm now 74. No fractures, though. I have significant curvature of the upper spine (kyphosis) but that was well along by the time I was diagnosed with celiac disease almost 25 years ago. So, I think it may have been arrested at least.
    • trents
      Zinc is also a very important supplement when it comes to infection resistance.
    • Jessica H
      I've got my initial appointment with a gastro for a month from now and then I'm assuming we'll schedule my endoscopy from there for a confirmation of the diagnosis. I feel like it's pretty clear since my results are 18x the normal range but I know an endoscopy is the standard. I'll definitely post how that goes. How are you doing with your osteopenia since your diagnosis? Have you found any relief? Thank you for the support and answering my questions. This is all kind of overwhelming. 
    • knitty kitty
      Have you tried adding in additional thiamine in the form called Benfotiamine?  Athletes need extra thiamine.  We need more thiamine when we're physically ill and also when we're emotionally stressed.  A regular B Complex or multivitamin probably doesn't have enough thiamine.  Check the label for which type of thiamine is in your vitamins.   Thiamine Mononitrate is not desirable.  Benfotiamine has been shown to improve athletic performance and stamina, as well as improve recovery time.  
    • Jordan Carlson
      @knitty kittyExtra strength multivitamin, B complex, magnesium, Vitamin D, vitamin C and electrolytes first thing in the AM and in the evening. Blood work was always full pannel. Only thing off thats reoccurring in my blood work is that my b12 level is always sitting around 750-830 and has not moved from prior to diagnosis to now. 
×
×
  • Create New...