Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Food and heart symptoms

nimzabo
 Share

Recommended Posts

knitty kitty Grand Master
knitty kitty
Posted

And this one...

Glyphosate, pathways to modern diseases II: Celiac sprue and gluten intolerance

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3945755/

 

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


knitty kitty Grand Master
knitty kitty
Posted

And one more about a person who drank glyphosate and his medical support included Thiamine.

Glyphosate Poisoning with Acute Pulmonary Edema

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4413421/

 

nimzabo Rookie
nimzabo
Posted
  • Author
11 hours ago, knitty kitty said:

And this one...

Glyphosate, pathways to modern diseases II: Celiac sprue and gluten intolerance

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3945755/

 

Scott Adams had already send a link leading to that study.

When studying to my thesis I already had seen such a study and more works from Stephanie Seneff including videos I saw on youtube and even a paper from investigators I respect (Antoniou and Mesnages) criticizing some of her assertions (https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00316/full ). She's not a laboratory researcher and she comes from an area related to computers if I'm not mistaken. Her basic formation is not biology.

Anyway she got interested in autism and through that concern on glyphosate. She says that because she is not a real cientific investigator, has more time to read all the research that comes to light than 'real cientists' do.

She is somewhat known for speculating and not rarely she confuses correlation with causation. Some of her opinions aren't really suported by science or experimentation. That doesn't mean her opinion should not be heard or read. Only that it must be taken with caution.

I bought and read her last book about glyphosate, most of which surpasses my basic knowledge.

https://www.amazon.com/Toxic-Legacy-Weedkiller-Glyphosate-Environment/dp/1603589295/ref=sr_1_1?qid=1659189077&refinements=p_27%3AStephanie+Seneff&s=books&sr=1-1

 

See these for example

https://www.diseaseglyphosategmos.info/

https://jennifermargulis.net/glyphosate-and-covid-19-connection/

 

Blue-Sky Enthusiast
Blue-Sky
Posted

@kitty kitty

Yes I did read your link. I also read this one and I am not sure it matches very well with the other one.

https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/MVMS-HealthProfessional/

knitty kitty Grand Master
knitty kitty
Posted

High dose Thiamine is not a mainstream practice yet.

 

  • 3 months later...
nimzabo Rookie
nimzabo
Posted
  • Author

Hi again.

I'm not sure this is the best place but I'm sharing two links that might be of use:

https://www.annualreviews.org/page/nutrition-health

https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100047148611666

 

  • 9 months later...
DanMc Rookie
DanMc
Posted

I know this is an older topic, but I just wanted to say that the heat intolerance/arrhythmia made me wonder if this was Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome, or POTS

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postural_orthostatic_tachycardia_syndrome

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


knitty kitty Grand Master
knitty kitty
Posted

@DanMc,

POTS is seen in Thiamine Deficiency Disorders.  

Vitamin B1 deficiency in patients with postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS)

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28531358/

One can have a deficiency in Thiamine while still showing "normal" blood levels.  Blood levels are not an accurate measurement of how well Thiamine is being utilized in tissues and organs.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,557
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Graham Builders
    Newest Member
    Graham Builders
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.3k
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Just got Celiac blood test results back and they seem crazy high!

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the forum, @TexasCeliacNewbie! The test results you posted strongly point to celiac disease. It is likely that your physician will want to perform an endoscopy with biopsy of the small bowel lining to confirm the results of the celiac antibody bloodwork results you just posted. It is important that you not cut back on gluten consumption until the endoscopy/biopsy is complete, assuming, that is, one is forthcoming.  Can you post the actual reference ranges used by the lab for the tests to determine positive/negative/normal/high/low? Scales used by these labs are different from one place to the other so the raw numbers don't mean much without the scale used by the lab. There aren't industry standards for this. By the way, you probably won't be able to edit the original post so please post the extra info in new post. May we ask about the cancer you mentioned? There are some things that can elevate the antibody test scores, at least mildly, besides celiac disease.
    • TexasCeliacNewbie
      Just got Celiac blood test results back and they seem crazy high!

      By TexasCeliacNewbie · Posted

      Hi, I have been having a lot of back pain and gut issues for 8 weeks or so.  I saw the GI on Monday and my results just came in from the lab.  Some of these number are high and off the little chart from the lab.  I am reading this correctly that I most likely have Celiac, right???  It would explain a lot of things for me that otherwise are worrying me that my previous cancer is recurring.  Thank you for all of your expertise in this area! Immunoglobulin A, Qn, Serum 140 (normal) Deamidated Gliadin Abs, IgA 256 (High) Deamidated Gliadin Abs, IgG 65 (High) t-Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA 31 (High) t-Transglutaminase (tTG) IgG 10 (High)
    • trents
      New Guy Here...

      By trents · Posted

      So, I would assume it means that if the risk of developing celiac disease in the general population is 1%, people with the DQ2 gene have a 10% risk of developing celiac disease. So, have you or your physician concluded that you have celiac disease?
    • TerryinCO
      New Guy Here...

      By TerryinCO · Posted

      Here's the test result I was refering to.  I may not be understanding this correctly.
    • trents
      New Guy Here...

      By trents · Posted

      Thanks for the update @TerryinCO! Would you elaborate what you mean when you say your genetic tests show that you are "10x higher" for developing celiac disease? 10x higher than what? There are two main genes, HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8, that have been identified as providing the potential for developing celiac disease. Since 40% of the population carries one or both of these genes but only 1% of the population actually develops celiac disease, the genetic test cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease, simply to establish the potential for developing it. Gene testing is usually done to rule out celiac disease vs. NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). In other words, if gluten consumption is definitely causing someone problems but they don't have the genetic potential for developing celiac disease then the diagnosis would be NCGS. We also know that having both DQ2 and DQ8 puts one at higher risk for developing celiac disease than having just one or the other. But I'm not sure I've ever seen it quantified as in "10x higher". Not sure what you mean by this.
×
×
  • Create New...