Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Larazotide, drug to treat celiac disease, discontinued in Phase 3


Adam 50

Recommended Posts

Adam 50 Rookie

  In the past few years, I have followed the news about Larazotide phases, the only drug for celiac disease that was on phase 3. I noticed today that it has been discontinued in phase 3. Basically what it said in this article doesn't make any sense. Nevertheless, the news was disappoining. We may be able to have easier life in the near future, but we will still need to wait at least another few years.  

  Find out more about the other phases of celiac disease drugs in this link. Most are in phase 1 and few are in phase 2.  


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



RMJ Mentor
Quote

An interim analysis of patient data in the CedLara trial found that the size of the treatment group that would be needed to determine a significant clinical outcome between study participants receiving the drug and those getting a placebo was too large to support continuation of the trial, the company said in a press release.

Translation:  The observed benefit (improvement of symptoms) was very small.

FDA requires statistically significant results.  In order to see a statistically significant result for a small change, a lot of subjects are required.  

It looks like they will be analyzing the data to see if there is a subgroup of patients that the drug helps more.  For example, maybe women over 60, or people who have had celiac disease for X years (these are made up examples). If so, then they can do a clinical trial in a reasonable number of people in that subgroup.

Adam 50 Rookie
34 minutes ago, RMJ said:

Translation:  The observed benefit (improvement of symptoms) was very small.

FDA requires statistically significant results.  In order to see a statistically significant result for a small change, a lot of subjects are required.  

It looks like they will be analyzing the data to see if there is a subgroup of patients that the drug helps more.  For example, maybe women over 60, or people who have had celiac disease for X years (these are made up examples). If so, then they can do a clinical trial in a reasonable number of people in that subgroup.

In 2018 or 2019, when I was following the news about this drug, the update said that Phase 3 would end by 2020, and that the drug would be available to the public by then. During the pandemic, we did not have an update until it was completely canceled. Can you tell me how long Phase 3 usually lasts? If it continues until the end, of course.

RMJ Mentor

I don’t think there is a “usual” for Phase 3 length.  There are a lot of factors that can affect how fast subjects can be enrolled:  number of clinical sites, prevalence of disease in the population, how hard the investigators (doctors) work to enroll patients, how strict the inclusion/exclusion criteria are, etc.  My guess is that enrollment really slowed down during the pandemic.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,653
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Mary Miller A
    Newest Member
    Mary Miller A
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.3k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Jenn D
      Hi. Did your ema levels ever go negative? My son is 2 years in gluten free and they are still positive.  I'm scared he has refractory celiac disease. Please if anyone has any info greatly appreciate it. His ttg is 3 which is considered normal.
    • MomofGF
      I will have that info soon but it was a laundry list of a test and 9 viles. ok so there were some days she was gluten she barely ate because of the reactions. I told her 3 weeks of atleast 10g’s a day and no gluten-free days. Thanks so much for your help! I didn’t know my suggestion for gluten-free days would have hurt her.    I will come back with the list to make sure the req was proper!! 
    • trents
      A "gluten challenge" of two weeks would be the bare minimum for expecting to render valid testing, and that would have been paired with eating a minimum of 10 g of gluten each day (the equivalent of 4-6 slices of wheat bread). And with the three gluten free days in the midst of that two week gluten challenge I would not have confidence in the results of the testing. Was there a blood test done for IGA deficiency? Can you post the test names that were done with the scores and with the reference ranges used by the lab? By the way, with celiac disease the issue is not being able to digest gluten. Celiac disease is an autoimmune disorder defined by the fact that ingestion of gluten triggers an immune system response that attacks the membrane that lines the small bowel. The immune system mistakenly identifies the protein gluten as a biologic invader.
    • MomofGF
      Hey all!! M i want to thank everyone for their suggestions and advice - I am a single mother of 4 (now 3) and was helping with my oldest leaving the nest. I have another child with medical issues and with work (it’s our end year), life has been crazy and I haven’t had the time to answer.    so we got a blood test done for my daughter that can’t digest gluten. She had been eating gluten for 2 weeks. The blood work came back normal? How is that possible. I see her with my own eyes and it’s not normal. Is that not long enough?  I am thinking about having her eat gluten another week then go to the hospital and see what they say.    She did have 3 gluten-free days in those 2 weeks but she was getting afraid to eat and I told her to may take a day off - was this a bad thing to do? Girl was having constant back pains and muscle soreness as well. Headaches/migraines…should I wait longer. I did see 4-6 weeks of Gluten consumption prior to testing… kind of at a loss now.    Thanks to everyone for whatever advice you can give.   Enjoy your Sunday 😃👋👋      
    • Scott Adams
      This article has some detailed information on how to be 100% gluten-free, so it may be helpful (be sure to also read the comments section.):    
×
×
  • Create New...