Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Food designated as “gluten free” really isn’t


Heather0515

Recommended Posts

Heather0515 Newbie

Hi everyone. I am new to this forum. I was diagnosed with celiac two years ago. I am writing today because I have learned something about gluten free labeling that has me concerned. I started using a protein shake  that had the gluten free designation on the front. It also was promoted to me as gluten free because their original was not gluten-free and it was suggested I use the “gluten free” one since I had celiac. Fast forward a few weeks on the shake and my skin breaks out into full blown dermatitis herpetiformis and I had two migraines in a week (neither happen to me unless there’s an exposure to gluten). So after searching through what I was eating I learned that the shake was made in a facility that also processes wheat. How can a product be promoted as safe and “gluten free” if it is not? I also learned that companies  don’t even have to put an allergen warning on the back of their products so products that say “gluten free” could still be processed in a facility that also processed wheat and we don’t even know it by looking at the box/bag. These two things really shook me up because I try so hard to make sure I am not exposed. Any insight or explanation on how we can fight this? Has anyone else had the same issue with labeling?  Is there a place where people are working on fighting this because I’d like to be proactive. Thank you. 
 

Heather


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



trents Grand Master

Welcome to the forum, Heather!

According to FDA guidelines, food products may use the "gluten free" label as long as the concentration of gluten does not exceed 20ppm. So, according to regulatory standards they can still have very small amounts of gluten and advertise as gluten free. This standard works for the majority of celiacs but there are some who are much more sensitive for whom 20ppm will cause a reaction. 

The other possibility is that some batches of the gluten free product, for whatever reason, did not meet the requirement. They don't test every batch. In fact, my understanding of the FDA regulations is that the companies aren't required to test at all unless challenged to do so by some consumer action against them. However, I'm pretty sure most of them will not be willing to take that chance and will test to make sure, at least at intervals.

My suggestion is that you look for the label "Certified Gluten Free" as opposed to "Gluten Free". Certified gluten-free products are held to stricter standards.

RMJ Mentor

This organization fights for accurate labeling (hope I’m allowed to link her site here).

Gluten Free Watchdog

Heather0515 Newbie
  On 8/24/2022 at 7:27 PM, trents said:

Welcome to the forum, Heather!

According to FDA guidelines, food products may use the "gluten free" label as long as the concentration of gluten does not exceed 20ppm. So, according to regulatory standards they can still have very small amounts of gluten and advertise as gluten free. This standard works for the majority of celiacs but there are some who are much more sensitive for whom 20ppm will cause a reaction. 

The other possibility is that some batches of the gluten free product, for whatever reason, did not meet the requirement. They don't test every batch. In fact, my understanding of the FDA regulations is that the companies aren't required to test at all unless challenged to do so by some consumer action against them. However, I'm pretty sure most of them will not be willing to take that chance and will test to make sure, at least at intervals.

My suggestion is that you look for the label "Certified Gluten Free" as opposed to "Gluten Free". Certified gluten-free products are held to stricter standards.

Expand Quote  

Thank you very much for this insight. I am and will be much stricter about what I’m choosing off the shelves! 

  On 8/24/2022 at 8:08 PM, RMJ said:

This organization fights for accurate labeling (hope I’m allowed to link her site here).

Gluten Free Watchdog

Expand Quote  

The link worked, thank you! 

PME Explorer
  On 8/24/2022 at 7:27 PM, trents said:

Welcome to the forum, Heather!

According to FDA guidelines, food products may use the "gluten free" label as long as the concentration of gluten does not exceed 20ppm. So, according to regulatory standards they can still have very small amounts of gluten and advertise as gluten free. This standard works for the majority of celiacs but there are some who are much more sensitive for whom 20ppm will cause a reaction. 

The other possibility is that some batches of the gluten free product, for whatever reason, did not meet the requirement. They don't test every batch. In fact, my understanding of the FDA regulations is that the companies aren't required to test at all unless challenged to do so by some consumer action against them. However, I'm pretty sure most of them will not be willing to take that chance and will test to make sure, at least at intervals.

My suggestion is that you look for the label "Certified Gluten Free" as opposed to "Gluten Free". Certified gluten-free products are held to stricter standards.

Expand Quote  

Thanks so much for the heads-up about "Certified Gluten Free" labeling, Trents! Hard to find but worth seeking! 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,790
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    BeckiM
    Newest Member
    BeckiM
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      71.2k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Okay, then. It definitely looks like TTG-IGA to me and your score far exceeds the 10x or greater that is becoming the new standard for official celiac disease diagnosis criteria without biopsy.  Talk to your physician about this.  
    • Pinkdoglady
      Thank you the reference range was 0.1 to 3.9
    • trents
      Do you have a reference range for the Serum Tissue Transglutimate? Different labs used different reference ranges so just giving the raw score of >100 is necessarily helpful. And the terminology they employed for that one is unusual. So, I'm not sure if they are referring to what we call "total IGA" or what we abbreviate normally as TTG-IGA? I think it is the latter and the "greater than" symbol suggests it exceeded the scale they were using. If I'm correct in this assumption, that is a very strong indicator of celiac disease and may qualify you for an official diagnosis without an endoscopy/biopsy. It is becoming increasingly common in Europe and the UK to declare an official diagnosis of...
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @alannahP! Excellent question but I don't know that I have ever seen any TTG-IGA score be "0". But then again, I only see TTG-IGA scores of people who have celiac disease. It would be interesting to know if people who don't have celiac disease would necessarily have a "0" TTG-IGA score or if a very low TTG-IGA score is normal for non celiacs. In other words, is a little TTG-IGA antibody count normal as part of the total IGA antibody immune spectrum? We also know that elevated TTG-IGA scores can be caused by some other health issues since it is less than 100% specific. I would be careful here not to obsess over this.
    • Pinkdoglady
      Hi my blood result were Ser Tiss transglutimate >100 for the endomysial antibody lga is just says positive I don’t know how celiac this makes me    
×
×
  • Create New...