Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Food designated as “gluten free” really isn’t

Heather0515
 Share

Recommended Posts

Heather0515 Newbie
Heather0515
Posted

Hi everyone. I am new to this forum. I was diagnosed with celiac two years ago. I am writing today because I have learned something about gluten free labeling that has me concerned. I started using a protein shake  that had the gluten free designation on the front. It also was promoted to me as gluten free because their original was not gluten-free and it was suggested I use the “gluten free” one since I had celiac. Fast forward a few weeks on the shake and my skin breaks out into full blown dermatitis herpetiformis and I had two migraines in a week (neither happen to me unless there’s an exposure to gluten). So after searching through what I was eating I learned that the shake was made in a facility that also processes wheat. How can a product be promoted as safe and “gluten free” if it is not? I also learned that companies  don’t even have to put an allergen warning on the back of their products so products that say “gluten free” could still be processed in a facility that also processed wheat and we don’t even know it by looking at the box/bag. These two things really shook me up because I try so hard to make sure I am not exposed. Any insight or explanation on how we can fight this? Has anyone else had the same issue with labeling?  Is there a place where people are working on fighting this because I’d like to be proactive. Thank you. 
 

Heather

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


trents Grand Master
trents
Posted

Welcome to the forum, Heather!

According to FDA guidelines, food products may use the "gluten free" label as long as the concentration of gluten does not exceed 20ppm. So, according to regulatory standards they can still have very small amounts of gluten and advertise as gluten free. This standard works for the majority of celiacs but there are some who are much more sensitive for whom 20ppm will cause a reaction. 

The other possibility is that some batches of the gluten free product, for whatever reason, did not meet the requirement. They don't test every batch. In fact, my understanding of the FDA regulations is that the companies aren't required to test at all unless challenged to do so by some consumer action against them. However, I'm pretty sure most of them will not be willing to take that chance and will test to make sure, at least at intervals.

My suggestion is that you look for the label "Certified Gluten Free" as opposed to "Gluten Free". Certified gluten-free products are held to stricter standards.

RMJ Mentor
RMJ
Posted

This organization fights for accurate labeling (hope I’m allowed to link her site here).

Gluten Free Watchdog

Heather0515 Newbie
Heather0515
Posted
  • Author
59 minutes ago, trents said:

Welcome to the forum, Heather!

According to FDA guidelines, food products may use the "gluten free" label as long as the concentration of gluten does not exceed 20ppm. So, according to regulatory standards they can still have very small amounts of gluten and advertise as gluten free. This standard works for the majority of celiacs but there are some who are much more sensitive for whom 20ppm will cause a reaction. 

The other possibility is that some batches of the gluten free product, for whatever reason, did not meet the requirement. They don't test every batch. In fact, my understanding of the FDA regulations is that the companies aren't required to test at all unless challenged to do so by some consumer action against them. However, I'm pretty sure most of them will not be willing to take that chance and will test to make sure, at least at intervals.

My suggestion is that you look for the label "Certified Gluten Free" as opposed to "Gluten Free". Certified gluten-free products are held to stricter standards.

Thank you very much for this insight. I am and will be much stricter about what I’m choosing off the shelves! 

20 minutes ago, RMJ said:

This organization fights for accurate labeling (hope I’m allowed to link her site here).

Gluten Free Watchdog

The link worked, thank you! 

PME Explorer
PME
Posted
On 8/24/2022 at 3:27 PM, trents said:

Welcome to the forum, Heather!

According to FDA guidelines, food products may use the "gluten free" label as long as the concentration of gluten does not exceed 20ppm. So, according to regulatory standards they can still have very small amounts of gluten and advertise as gluten free. This standard works for the majority of celiacs but there are some who are much more sensitive for whom 20ppm will cause a reaction. 

The other possibility is that some batches of the gluten free product, for whatever reason, did not meet the requirement. They don't test every batch. In fact, my understanding of the FDA regulations is that the companies aren't required to test at all unless challenged to do so by some consumer action against them. However, I'm pretty sure most of them will not be willing to take that chance and will test to make sure, at least at intervals.

My suggestion is that you look for the label "Certified Gluten Free" as opposed to "Gluten Free". Certified gluten-free products are held to stricter standards.

Thanks so much for the heads-up about "Certified Gluten Free" labeling, Trents! Hard to find but worth seeking! 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,032
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Moxielu
    Newest Member
    Moxielu
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • kate g
      Are they close to a drug that will help celiacs with cross contamination

      By kate g · Posted

      Ive read articles that there is stage 2 research being conducted for drugs that will limit damage to celiacs through cross contamination- how close are they to this will there be enough funding to create a mainstream drug? 
    • cristiana
      Celiac pain relief

      By cristiana · Posted

      Hi @Karmmacalling I'm very sorry to hear you are feeling so unwell.  Can you tell us exactly what sort of pain you are experiencing and where the pain is?  Is it your lower abdomen, upper abdomen etc?  Do you have any other symptoms? Cristiana
    • trents
      How many people here are aware that there are 9 types of gluten that Celiacs should be aware of?

      By trents · Posted

      The NIH article you link actually supports what I have been trying to explain to you: "Celiac disease (celiac disease) is an autoimmune-mediated enteropathy triggered by dietary gluten in genetically prone individuals. The current treatment for celiac disease is a strict lifelong gluten-free diet. However, in some celiac disease patients following a strict gluten-free diet, the symptoms do not remit. These cases may be refractory celiac disease or due to gluten contamination; however, the lack of response could be related to other dietary ingredients, such as maize, which is one of the most common alternatives to wheat used in the gluten-free diet. In some celiac disease patients, as a rare event, peptides from maize prolamins could induce a celiac-like immune response by similar or alternative pathogenic mechanisms to those used by wheat gluten peptides. This is supported by several shared features between wheat and maize prolamins and by some experimental results. Given that gluten peptides induce an immune response of the intestinal mucosa both in vivo and in vitro, peptides from maize prolamins could also be tested to determine whether they also induce a cellular immune response. Hypothetically, maize prolamins could be harmful for a very limited subgroup of celiac disease patients, especially those that are non-responsive, and if it is confirmed, they should follow, in addition to a gluten-free, a maize-free diet." Notice that those for whom it is suggested to follow a maize-free diet are a "very limited subgroup of celiac disease patients". Please don't try to make your own experience normative for the entire celiac community.  Notice also that the last part of the concluding sentence in the paragraph does not equate a gluten-free diet with a maize-free diet, it actually puts them in juxtaposition to one another. In other words, they are different but for a "limited subgroup of celiac disease patients" they produce the same or a similar reaction. You refer to celiac reactions to cereal grain prolamins as "allergic" reactions and "food sensitivity". For instance, you say, "NIH sees all these grains as in opposition to celiacs, of which I am one and that is science, not any MD with a good memory who overprescribes medications that contain known food allergens in them, of which they have zero knowledge if the patient is in fact allergic to or not, since they failed to do simple 'food sensitivity' testing" and "IF a person wants to get well, they should be the one to determine what grains they are allergic to and what grains they want to leave out, not you. I need to remind you that celiac disease is not an allergy, it is an autoimmune disorder. Neither allergy testing nor food sensitivity testing can be used to diagnose celiac disease. Allergy testing and food sensitivity testing cannot detect the antibodies produced by celiac disease in reaction to gluten ingestion.  You say of me, "You must be one of those who are only gluten intolerant . . ." Gluten intolerance is synonymous with celiac disease. You must be referring to gluten sensitivity or NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). Actually, I have been officially diagnosed with celiac disease both by blood antibody testing and by endoscopy/positive biopsy. Reacting to all cereal grain prolamins does not define celiac disease. If you are intent on teaching the truth, please get it straight first.
    • Bebygirl01
      How many people here are aware that there are 9 types of gluten that Celiacs should be aware of?

      By Bebygirl01 · Posted

      Perhaps you would still like to answer the questions I posed on this topic, because that is all I asked. I am curious to know the answers to those questions, I do not care about the background of Dr. Osborne as I am more aware of the situation than you are, and he is also one of the best known authors out there on Celiac disease. But did you even bother to read the three Research Papers I posted by NIH? You must be one of those who are only gluten intolerant and not yet reacting to all glutens aka grains, but I AM one of those who react to ALL the glutens, and again, that is one of the two questions I originally posted on this matter. NIH sees all these grains as in opposition to celiacs, of which I am one and that is science, not any MD with a good memory who overprescribes medications that contain known food allergens in them, of which they have zero knowledge if the patient is in fact allergic to or not, since they failed to do simple 'food sensitivity' testing. I started with the failed FDA explanation of what Gluten Free is and I stayed sick and got even sicker. It wasn't until I came across NIH's papers and went off all grains that I realized that in fact, I am Celiac and reacting to all the glutens. IF a person wants to get well, they should be the one to determine what grains they are allergic to and what grains they want to leave out, not you. Those who are just getting started with learning about grains etc., can take it easy by just being "grain free' and eating a lot of meat, vegetables, etc. or whole foods as God has intended, without buying so called gluten free garbage out there that is making them sick and the whole reason they are not better. I tried the stupid gluten free garbage and it didn't work, and that will make anyone want to give up, it is better to teach the entire truth and let the patient decide, rather than give them misinformation and lies.
    • Nicola McGuire
      My son newly diagnosed

      By Nicola McGuire · Posted

      Thank you so much I will speak to the doctor for dietician apt . Thank you for your advice Beth much appreciated 
×
×
  • Create New...