Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Food designated as “gluten free” really isn’t

Heather0515
 Share

Recommended Posts

Heather0515 Newbie
Heather0515
Posted

Hi everyone. I am new to this forum. I was diagnosed with celiac two years ago. I am writing today because I have learned something about gluten free labeling that has me concerned. I started using a protein shake  that had the gluten free designation on the front. It also was promoted to me as gluten free because their original was not gluten-free and it was suggested I use the “gluten free” one since I had celiac. Fast forward a few weeks on the shake and my skin breaks out into full blown dermatitis herpetiformis and I had two migraines in a week (neither happen to me unless there’s an exposure to gluten). So after searching through what I was eating I learned that the shake was made in a facility that also processes wheat. How can a product be promoted as safe and “gluten free” if it is not? I also learned that companies  don’t even have to put an allergen warning on the back of their products so products that say “gluten free” could still be processed in a facility that also processed wheat and we don’t even know it by looking at the box/bag. These two things really shook me up because I try so hard to make sure I am not exposed. Any insight or explanation on how we can fight this? Has anyone else had the same issue with labeling?  Is there a place where people are working on fighting this because I’d like to be proactive. Thank you. 
 

Heather

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


trents Grand Master
trents
Posted

Welcome to the forum, Heather!

According to FDA guidelines, food products may use the "gluten free" label as long as the concentration of gluten does not exceed 20ppm. So, according to regulatory standards they can still have very small amounts of gluten and advertise as gluten free. This standard works for the majority of celiacs but there are some who are much more sensitive for whom 20ppm will cause a reaction. 

The other possibility is that some batches of the gluten free product, for whatever reason, did not meet the requirement. They don't test every batch. In fact, my understanding of the FDA regulations is that the companies aren't required to test at all unless challenged to do so by some consumer action against them. However, I'm pretty sure most of them will not be willing to take that chance and will test to make sure, at least at intervals.

My suggestion is that you look for the label "Certified Gluten Free" as opposed to "Gluten Free". Certified gluten-free products are held to stricter standards.

RMJ Mentor
RMJ
Posted

This organization fights for accurate labeling (hope I’m allowed to link her site here).

Gluten Free Watchdog

Heather0515 Newbie
Heather0515
Posted
  • Author
59 minutes ago, trents said:

Welcome to the forum, Heather!

According to FDA guidelines, food products may use the "gluten free" label as long as the concentration of gluten does not exceed 20ppm. So, according to regulatory standards they can still have very small amounts of gluten and advertise as gluten free. This standard works for the majority of celiacs but there are some who are much more sensitive for whom 20ppm will cause a reaction. 

The other possibility is that some batches of the gluten free product, for whatever reason, did not meet the requirement. They don't test every batch. In fact, my understanding of the FDA regulations is that the companies aren't required to test at all unless challenged to do so by some consumer action against them. However, I'm pretty sure most of them will not be willing to take that chance and will test to make sure, at least at intervals.

My suggestion is that you look for the label "Certified Gluten Free" as opposed to "Gluten Free". Certified gluten-free products are held to stricter standards.

Thank you very much for this insight. I am and will be much stricter about what I’m choosing off the shelves! 

20 minutes ago, RMJ said:

This organization fights for accurate labeling (hope I’m allowed to link her site here).

Gluten Free Watchdog

The link worked, thank you! 

PME Explorer
PME
Posted
On 8/24/2022 at 3:27 PM, trents said:

Welcome to the forum, Heather!

According to FDA guidelines, food products may use the "gluten free" label as long as the concentration of gluten does not exceed 20ppm. So, according to regulatory standards they can still have very small amounts of gluten and advertise as gluten free. This standard works for the majority of celiacs but there are some who are much more sensitive for whom 20ppm will cause a reaction. 

The other possibility is that some batches of the gluten free product, for whatever reason, did not meet the requirement. They don't test every batch. In fact, my understanding of the FDA regulations is that the companies aren't required to test at all unless challenged to do so by some consumer action against them. However, I'm pretty sure most of them will not be willing to take that chance and will test to make sure, at least at intervals.

My suggestion is that you look for the label "Certified Gluten Free" as opposed to "Gluten Free". Certified gluten-free products are held to stricter standards.

Thanks so much for the heads-up about "Certified Gluten Free" labeling, Trents! Hard to find but worth seeking! 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      126,137
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    kfkynett
    Newest Member
    kfkynett
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69.2k
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      On the cusp of facing a new life of managing a life with Celiac Disease

      By trents · Posted

      Biopsy results can be negative despite positive serum antibody results for these reasons: 1. Early onset of celiac disease. Inflammation has been happening for long enough to cause damage to the small bowel lining that is observable in the biopsy sample. 2. The damage is in the part of the small bowel lining below the duodenum. The duodenum is the part of the small bowel immediately below the outlet of the stomach. 3. The damage is patchy and was missed by the one doing the biopsy. A thorough biopsy would include several samples taken from different areas of the duodenum. Not all scoping is done this thoroughly, unfortunately. 4. The positive serum antibody results are caused by some other medical problem, food or medication that mimics the inflammatory reaction typical of celiac disease.
    • trents
      Options - 7 year old boy - Helicobacter pylori and serology

      By trents · Posted

      I am not a cigarette smoker and the only time I ever tried to smoke a cigarette was when I was 13 years old and it made me nauseous. I'm sure if I were to have kept at it, I would have developed a tolerance to nicotine such that it would no longer have made me nauseous. But I also imagine that if I quit for a good amount of time and went back to it I would be made nauseous at first again until I built up a tolerance to it. I could site many examples of toxic things we could put into our bodies in small doses at first and build up a tolerance to them but lose it again after quitting them. That's how gluten can work for the celiac. When we force our bodies to deal with it by consuming it every day, the body does the best it can to handle it and sort of gets by, even though it may be doing long term damage. But if we quit and remain off for a good period of time, we lose that tolerance. Yes, for the celiac, gluten ingestion causes the immune system to mount an attack in the lining of the small bowel. By definition, that is celiac disease. But we now know that in addition to damaging the small bowel lining, gluten can also cause inflammatory reactions in other organ systems such as the liver. About 20% of celiacs have elevated liver enzymes. So, the effects of gluten ingestion for the celiac can by somewhat system in some cases. Another example is headaches. Migraine rates are higher for the celiac population than for the general population.  Small amounts of gluten ingestion would likely cause less inflammation than larger amounts. The absence of a discernable reaction after gluten ingestion does not necessarily equate to no inflammation. This factoid can make it more challenging for "silent" celiacs to get a handle on cross contamination. It takes weeks of consistent gluten consumption for antibody levels to build up to detectable levels in the blood. Occasional accidents and missteps are not likely to be reflected in serum antibody testing. After beginning the gluten free diet, antibody levels begin to drop but it can take weeks or months to return to normal (negative) levels. For adults, it can take two years or more for complete healing of the small bowel lining but for children and young people it can be much shorter. Follow-up testing, either serum antibody or endoscopy/biopsy can gauge healing progress and can also shed light on the success and consistency of eliminating gluten from the diet. 
    • knitty kitty
      Muscle Twitching

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      Hello, I'd have been here sooner, but I got tangled up in yarn... Restless leg syndrome (RLS) I've had. It's often associated with iron deficiency and B12 deficiency, but can also show up with any deficiencies in Vitamin C, copper, Vitamin D, and Thiamine, Pyridoxine, and magnesium.  B12, Thiamine, and Pyridoxine will also help with peripheral neuropathy, that burning sensation.   (See... https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9804944/ ) Long Covid can be the result of nutritional deficiencies, as well.  Zinc, Selenium, Vitamin D, B12, Thiamine, Riboflavin, Pyridoxine, Niacin, and Choline.  (See... https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10015545/  and https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36587225/ ) I agree with @Wheatwacked to get Vitamin D level higher, 80 ng/ml.  Taking high doses of Vitamin D to correct a deficiency has been found to be beneficial.  I took Vitamin D3 supplements throughout the day when I had a severe deficiency.  It got my level up quickly and I started feeling much better.   (See... https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28167237/ , https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4824637/) Vitamin D is a fat soluble vitamin.  Fats can be difficult to digest and absorb, so most of the newly diagnosed can be low in the four fat soluble vitamins (A,D,E,K).  A deficiency in Vitamin A can cause dry eyes.  Omega Threes and Evening Primrose Oil help with dry eyes, too.  (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10363387/) Blood tests are not accurate measurements of vitamin levels.  Blood tests will reflect any supplements being taken.  Blood tests do not measure how much of a vitamin is stored inside cells.  Supplementing with all eight essential B vitamins for several months will boost your ability to absorb the needed nutrients. A deficiency in Cobalamine, B12, can be aggravated by anesthesia.  Cobalt in Cobalamine binds irrevocably, irreversibly with the Nitrogen in anesthesia, rendering B12 useless.  Supplementing with B12 after exposure to anesthesia is beneficial.  (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8250714/) Pyridoxine B6 and Riboflavin B2 as well as B12 are needed to lower histamine levels (produced during the inflammation process that occurs in Celiac Disease). This can help relieve the sinus pressure.  Riboflavin B2 and Thiamine B1 are helpful with headaches.   We need more Thiamine when we are emotionally stressed, physically ill, and physically active.  Benfotiamine, a form of Thiamine, has been shown to promote intestinal healing.  Thiamine is helpful in relieving anxiety.   (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10682628/  , https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8451766/ ) Celiac Disease causes malabsorption of vitamins and minerals.  It is rare to have a single vitamin deficiency.  Malabsorption in celiac disease affects all the nutrients we need.  Some vitamins just run out sooner than others because they can't be stored or we have a metabolic need for more.  (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10106602/ ) Hope this helps!
    • Jtestani
      Help with results please. As I have a appt after the New Year.

      By Jtestani · Posted

      My question is .. my test results Ttg (IgA 1.7 u/ml & IgG 3:3 u/ml)  both negative & DGP IGG 7.1025 negative but DGP IGA postive at 36.2007 U/ML.  Am I showing a negative test result?  any insight helps as I have to wait till new year for next Doctor’s appt.  Thanks 
    • StaciField
      My bone structure is disintegrating and I’m having to have my teeth removed

      By StaciField · Posted

      There’s a Cosco in Auckland in New Zealand. It’s a bit away from where I live but it’s worth the travel for me. Very appreciative of your advice.
×
×
  • Create New...