Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Help with antibody questions


TriticumToxicum

Recommended Posts

TriticumToxicum Newbie

Hello everyone!

I have been tested for celiac in 2014/2015 and was all negative in biopsy and blood test. I am positive for DQ8 and DQ7, so my doctor told me to come back for retesting if I feel like something is up.

I have had some really stressful weeks and things escalated, so I wanted to go back on a gluten-free diet ASAP. I went to a different doctor this time and asked for testing an she unfortunately only got two things tested:

Gliadin IgA 16 EliA/ml (normal <7)

Gliadin IgG <1 EliA/ml (normal <7)

What do I make of this? I am going back Thursday to ask for the ttg-test and to ask if this is the "old" gliadin-test or the deaminated Gliadin. Does anyone know if the unit EliA/ml mean it is the deaminated test? As far as I know, the EliA points at ELISA and I am not sure if there is an ELISA for the old version, since it isn't used anymore. 

Thankful for any explanations and comments! :)

 

 

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



TriticumToxicum Newbie

Forgot to add:

the reason for testing in 2014/2015 was that I felt awesome on 3-month-gluten-free diet. I did go back on gluten prior to blood tests and biopsy, but I am not sure for how long. I think it was 10-12 weeks. 

My blood results in 2015 were as follows:

ttg IgA Celikey 0,3 U/ml (normal <7)

ttg IgG <0,6 U/ml (normal <7)

DGP IgA 1,6 U/ml (normal <7)

DGP IgG <0,4 U/ml (normal <7)

Scott Adams Grand Master

It looks like you have one blood test positive for celiac disease, and more about that is here:

"IgG anti-gliadin antibodies are more sensitive but are less specific markers for disease compared with IgA class antibodies. IgA anti-gliadin antibodies are less sensitive but are more specific. In clinical trials, the IgA antibodies have a specificity of 97% but the sensitivity is only 71%. That means that, if a patient is IgA positive, there is a 97% probability that they have celiac disease. "

 The normal protocol for celiac disease blood tests is for you to eat the equivalent of 2 slices of wheat bread per day for 6-8 weeks before the tests, and 2 weeks before a biopsy.

Since you already have a positive blood test, and you report feeling much better on a gluten-free diet, perhaps you should just go gluten-free? Of course discuss this with your doctor, but it sounds like that might be the outcome no matter what the tests indicate.

TriticumToxicum Newbie

Thank you so much for your reply! The text you linked here is really informative! 

You're right, I think I will definitely go gluten-free (at least for a while), but I would like to know for sure, because 1. I already am fructose intolerant and it has been a constant battle with some relatives, who think I just need to be special and constantly feel the need to comment on my eating habits (I really don't know why it even matters to them if I eat fruit cake or not, but ok), so it would be much easier to have a rock-solid diagnosis if I need to also cut out gluten. And 2. it would be much easier to not have to be so strict and careful with trace amounts since there is 4 people in my house and I am not sure if it's possible to ban gluten from the house for everyone.

I will ask for the ttg-test tomorrow and go from there. Although, if it is true that a positive IgA is 97% specific for celiac, then I should probably get used to the idea of being a celiac?! 

TriticumToxicum Newbie

I am posting an update for anyone who stumbles into this thread with a similar question:

I spoke with my doctor today and the positive test I have is deaminated Gliadin-Antibodies, so that makes the test a lot more specific.

They think I have celiac disease, but the IgG is negative, because I might just beginning to react to gluten. I am supposed to eat gluten-free from now on and they want to test me again in 6 months to see if all the antibodies are down. They don't want to test the ttg-antibodies, because those might also still be negative.

I would have liked to at least see ttg IgA to be a little more sure about the diagnosis, but oh well. 🤷🏼‍♀️

I have an appointment with a specialist two weeks from today, so maybe they will help me with that.

Scott Adams Grand Master

Thanks for the update! This article will be helpful:

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      126,138
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    kfkynett
    Newest Member
    kfkynett
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69.2k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • sh00148
      Thank you. That’s all really helpful. I think it must have been something she ate as the poo colour has settled now.    Starting to see improvements in her tummy, slowly but surely!
    • Yaya
      I take all vitamins and supplements.  My cardiologist has me taking B12 5,000 once per weeks.  He gives me complete blood work every 6 months.  He's still building my D levels which is now in 60s.  He wants them in low 80s.  I take 5,000 IU's daily.  With this dosage I've gone from 42 to 65 over a period of about 5 years.  It builds very slowly.   As far as iron, I take a double dose of gentle iron with C on an empty stomach on alternate nights.  Yes, iron is a component for many of us with RLS, but mostly "brain iron" that in some people may require iron transfusions.   
    • trents
      The positive DGP-IGA indicates the possibility of celiac disease. It is typical for someone who does have celiac disease to have some antibody tests be negative and others positive. This is not unique to celiac disease diagnosis. It is why doctors typically run many tests when seeking diagnosis of a suspected disease.  The DGP-IgA test is considered to have high sensitivity and specificity. In general, the DGP-IgA test has been reported to have a sensitivity ranging from 75% to 95% and a specificity ranging from 90% to 100%. Overall, the DGP tests, including DGP-IgA and DGP-IgG, exhibit a sensitivity of approximately 85-95% and a specificity of about 95-98%. The above paragraph is taken from this article which gives an overview of the various tests that can be run for celiac disease and their reliability: What symptoms are you experiencing?
    • trents
      Check Costco's store brand.
    • trents
      Yes, get serum antibody testing done for celiac disease. You could also have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). NCGS shares many of the same symptoms of celiac disease but does not damage the lining of the small bowel as does celiac disease. There is no test for it. A diagnosis for NCGS depends on first ruling out celiac disease. It is 10x more common than celiac disease. Some experts feel it can be a precursor to the development of celiac disease. Eliminating gluten from your life is the antidote for both.
×
×
  • Create New...