Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Suggestive but not conclusive…now what?

musicalmummy
 Share

Recommended Posts

musicalmummy Apprentice
musicalmummy
Posted

My daughter tests came back to say they are suggestive of coeliac but not conclusive so we need to see the dr and he’ll discuss what we do from there. 

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


cnazrael89 Enthusiast
cnazrael89
Posted

I am in no shape or form an expert, as I am just learning about Celiac as I go by reading on here and other links that are posted. However, in my opinion if your daughter had celiac symptoms, positive blood screening and an EGD/biopsy with results "suggestive of Celiac", I would think it would be safe to say she has Celiac disease? My endoscopy is tomorrow and I can honestly say if the results say in any way "suggestive of Celiac", I am taking that as gold for me as I had both ttg-iga and dgp-igg positive. That is my personal opinion, and it sounds like you will still be having an appointment to discuss your results with your doctor. Honestly, I am going gluten free regardless of the EGD biopsy results simply because I had 2 different positive blood tests that are highly specific to Celiac. Just my two cents for what they are worth. I'm sure you will get some good responses from moderators on here. They have such helpful information to help guide your thinking!

cnazrael89 Enthusiast
cnazrael89
Posted

Also, maybe the results of the biopsy aren't blatantly obvious and the villi aren't too damaged yet because your daughter is young and you got a diagnosis early? Just another thought...

jordan-fre Newbie
jordan-fre
Posted

Imo from my own experience, suggestive should be treated as conclusive. I was given the suggestive diagnosis 13 years ago and just last week got news that my celiac disease is not in control (Marsh 3, active celiac). While I have been gluten-free, I was not diligent about cross-contact. In the back of my mind, this suggestive diagnosis I think gave me some unspoken permission to not be as serious as I should have been. This is just my story and yours may be different, but if I could go back in time, I would really press my doctor to explain how something can be suggestive and what follow up tests I need to make sure I stay in a healthy range. 

trents Grand Master
trents
Posted
11 hours ago, musicalmummy said:

My daughter tests came back to say they are suggestive of coeliac but not conclusive so we need to see the dr and he’ll discuss what we do from there. 

Specifically, what blood tests were suggestive of celiac disease? What is the name of the test or tests that must have been in the positive range and what were the actual numbers, including the reference range for negative vs. positive. Do you have that information and can you post it? Has there also been a biopsy done? You don't mention that in your first post but other responses in this thread indicate a biopsy has been done. Is this covered in another thread?

Scott Adams Grand Master
Scott Adams
Posted

Please share your daughter's test results here if possible. I find this middle "suggestive of celiac disease" diagnosis rather odd, but to me it sounds like a positive diagnosis, and she has celiac disease.

musicalmummy Apprentice
musicalmummy
Posted
  • Author

I’ve attached her initial blood results.

I am unable to attack the notes we got back about the gastroscopy. These were the notes given the day of the procedure not her actual results of course. These are what led to the suggestive but not conclusive..

 

the notes say

”the oesophagus was normal

the stomach was normal

mildly atrophic mucosa was found in the duodenal bulb”

DF257005-6275-4D8A-862D-D9A055C84354.webp

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


trents Grand Master
trents
Posted
(edited)

musicalmummy, try attaching those gastroscopy results in a fresh post. You have a limited time windows where you can edit posts or add attachments. This is to discourage scammers who try to get an innocent looking post approved and then try add malicious material to it.

Did you notice the note suggesting that "first and second degree relatives get screened"? A recent study by the Mayo Clinic found that 44% of first degree relatives of those with confirmed celiac disease also had it when tested, even though most of them probably had no clue.

Edited by trents
musicalmummy Apprentice
musicalmummy
Posted
  • Author
32 minutes ago, trents said:

musicalmummy, try attaching those gastroscopy results in a fresh post. You have a limited time windows where you can edit posts or add attachments. This is to discourage scammers who try to get an innocent looking post approved and then try add malicious material to it.

Did you notice the note suggesting that "first and second degree relatives get screened"? A recent study by the Mayo Clinic found that 44% of first degree relatives of those with confirmed celiac disease also had it when tested, even though most of them probably had no clue.

Still won’t let me, says file too big.

I did see that section. I was screened after her as I was sure I would’ve had it given symptoms but mine are negative. I will also do the rest of the family. 

Scott Adams Grand Master
Scott Adams
Posted

The two blood test results you posted for celiac disease are strongly positive, and it looks like the biopsy results are positive as well, as "mildly atrophic mucosa was found in the duodenal bulb" is the area where damage from celiac disease occurs. 

trents Grand Master
trents
Posted
(edited)
52 minutes ago, musicalmummy said:

Still won’t let me, says file too big.

I did see that section. I was screened after her as I was sure I would’ve had it given symptoms but mine are negative. I will also do the rest of the family. 

There are freeware apps that will remove pixels from pictures to reduce the data size of the file without dinging quality much. Irfanview is one I'm familiar with.

Edited by trents
RMJ Mentor
RMJ
Posted

Was the “suggestive of coeliac” from visual observation of her duodenum?  Or the pathology results from the biopsy? Was it written by a different doctor than the one who ordered the blood tests? It may just be “doctor speak” from someone who just has partial information.

My guess is that when her gastroenterologist puts together the blood results and endoscopy results she will have a conclusive diagnosis of celiac disease. 

musicalmummy Apprentice
musicalmummy
Posted
  • Author
1 minute ago, RMJ said:

Was the “suggestive of coeliac” from visual observation of her duodenum?  Or the pathology results from the biopsy? Was it written by a different doctor than the one who ordered the blood tests? It may just be “doctor speak” from someone who just has partial information.

My guess is that when her gastroenterologist puts together the blood results and endoscopy results she will have a conclusive diagnosis of celiac disease. 

It was the result from the biopsy and the gastroenterologist admin passed  on the message by phone call to us. The gastro also has her blood results 

RMJ Mentor
RMJ
Posted

In that case, it sounds like the sort of thing a pathologist would say in a biopsy report. My biopsy report included other disorders that could cause the change in villi that was seen, even though the pathologist was aware of and mentioned the blood test results. 

Please let us know what the gastro says when you see him/her!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,232
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Cool river
    Newest Member
    Cool river
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70k
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • ellyelly
      Biopsy results - second opinion?

      By ellyelly · Posted

      Hi all, Such valuable insights shared here - I am so grateful to be able to read along! Thank you all for sharing your wisdom.  I (37yo female) have recently had an endoscopy to screen for celiac given a strong family history and extremely low Ferritin for the past 7 years (not responsive to oral supplements). I am awaiting celiac blood panel results (completed post-endoscopy to provide another piece of the puzzle, I think was just an accidental oversight not doing earlier).  The endoscopy results are as follows: Gastroscopy:  Stomach: Mild gastritis and one 4mm benign appearing inflammatory polyp in the body.  Duodenum: Largely normal but few shallow erosions seen in the duodenal bulb. Microscopy:  1. Sections show specialised and non-specialised gastric mucosa with increased numbers of chronic inflammatory cells within the lamina propria including occasional clusters of plasma cells amounting to mild chronic inflammation. No active inflammation, intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia or malignancy is seen. Immunostains for Helicobacter organisms are negative. 2. Sections show small bowel mucosa with normal villous architecture. A mild non-specific intra-epithelial lymphocytosis is noted at the villous tips of uncertain clinical significance. The lamina propria contains a normal population of chronic inflammatory cells. No granulomas or parasites are seen. There is no dysplasia or malignancy. Conclusion 1. Gastric: Mild chronic inflammation 2. Duodemum: Mild non-specific intraepithelial lymphocytosis with preserved villous architecture.  The GI specialist, assuming blood tests come back normal, feels it is unlikely that it is celiac given the normal villous architecture. Suggested continuing on as usual and monitoring for symptoms etc, screening with blood test if required in the future.  Worth a second opinion or does this seem accurate? Anything else I should be considering? I feel a little lost as to how to best proceed! Thanks again.  
    • knitty kitty
      New Guy Here...

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      @TerryinCO, Are you taking a B Complex in addition to your B12?  B 12 needs the other B vitamins to function correctly.  Celiac disease and the damage to the intestines makes absorbing vitamins and minerals difficult.  Talk to your doctor and nutritionist about supplementing while you're healing.   Are you on any medication for your Gerd?  Here is often caused by too little production of digestive juices.  Supplementing with a B Complex will help.  
    • trsprecker
      OTC pain reliever that are gluten-free and corn free??

      By trsprecker · Posted

      I definitely try to get those in my diet.  There is most likely a genetic component to the issues.  Thank you so much for the advice!!
    • knitty kitty
      OTC pain reliever that are gluten-free and corn free??

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      Bless your heart!  That does make for a bumpy journey!  The Takeda ALINAMIN EX Plus really works well for pain relief.  I was surprised at how well it works.  I can't recommend it enough.  I can't tolerate aspirin nor nsaids.   Are you getting enough Omega Threes in your diet?  Healthy fats like olive oil help keep our discs and joints healthy and fluid. 
    • trsprecker
      OTC pain reliever that are gluten-free and corn free??

      By trsprecker · Posted

      Thank you!  I will have to look into that.  I have Anklosing Spondylitis, bulging and dehydrated discs so pain is a big part of my life. 
×
×
  • Create New...