Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Help with test results

Johariellis
 Share

Recommended Posts

Johariellis Rookie
Johariellis
Posted

I am sooo confused by these test results. My tissue transglutaminase IG-A came back 236.17 but the ranges listed are 84.50-499. Ive seen people with an IG-A of 102 that is positive for celiac. I don’t know if they are running any additional panels. Any interpretations please? 

 

 

 

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Johariellis Rookie
Johariellis
Posted
  • Author
6 minutes ago, Johariellis said:

I am sooo confused by these test results. My tissue transglutaminase IG-A came back 236.17 but the ranges listed are 84.50-499. Ive seen people with an IG-A of 102 that is positive for celiac. I don’t know if they are running any additional panels. Any interpretations please? 

 

 

 

Test results are in mg/dL

Scott Adams Grand Master
Scott Adams
Posted

From what you've just posted I don't have enough info to be sure how to interpret your results. Normally 236 tTG would be high on most scales I've seen, but your results should say something like <100 normal....any change  you can post an image of the results? Alternatively you should also ask your doctor of course.

RMJ Mentor
RMJ
Posted
On 1/31/2023 at 9:52 AM, Johariellis said:

Test results are in mg/dL

I think 236.17 is a total IgA result, not a tissue transglutaminase IgA result.  84.5-499 is a reasonable range for total IgA.  Tissue transglutaminase IgA results do not have weight per volume (milligrams per deciliter i.e. mg/dL) units.  There was another forum member recently whose results were laid out in a very confusing manner on the printout and it was difficult for her to tell which was which.  Perhaps you could post a photo of your results?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      125,878
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    DJWI
    Newest Member
    DJWI
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69k
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      9 year old- questionable results

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the forum, @ABP! We can't comment on the test numbers you give as you didn't include the range for negative. Different labs use different units and different ranges. There are no industry standards for this so we need more information. If your daughter doesn't have celiac disease she still could have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity) which some experts believe can be a precursor to celiac disease and is 10x more common than celiac disease. However, there is no test for it yet but it does share many of the same symptoms with celiac disease. Both require complete abstinence from gluten.  It is seldom the case during testing where all tests are positive, even for those who do have celiac disease. This is no different than when diagnosing other medical conditions and that is why it is typical to run numbers of tests that come at things from different angles when seeking to arrive at a diagnosis. It seems like you are at the point, since you have had both blood antibody testing and endoscopy/biopsy done, that you need to trial the gluten free diet. If her symptoms improve then you know all you need to know, whatever you label you want to give it. But given that apparently at least one celiac antibody blood test is positive and she has classic celiac symptoms such as slow growth, constipation and bloating, my money would be on celiac disease as opposed to NCGS.
    • ABP
      9 year old- questionable results

      By ABP · Posted

      My nine-year-old daughter has suffered with severe constipation and bloating for years as well as frequent mouth sores, and keratosis Polaris on her arms. She also has recently decreased on her growth curve her % going down gradually.  After seeing a gastroenterologist, her IgG GLIADIN (DEAMIDATED) AB (IGG) was 22.4 while her IGA was normal. Her TISSUE TRANSGLUTAMINASE AB, IGA was 11.9.  Most recently her genetic test for celiac was positive.  After an endoscopy her tissue showed inflammation of the tissue as well as , increased intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) but there was no blunting of the change in the villi.    It seems that every result that we get one out of two things positive rather than all leading to an inconclusive diagnosis. While we do have another appointment with the doctor to go over the results. I'm curious based on this information what others think.    I would hate to have her eliminate gluten if not necessary- but also don't want to not remove if it is necessary.    Signed Confused and Concerned Mama
    • Scott Adams
      Gluten Free ADHD medications

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I guess using "GF" instead of "PL" would have been too easy! 😉
    • trents
      Help with blood test result

      By trents · Posted

      I was wrong, however, about there being no particular health concerns associated with high total IGA: https://www.inspire.com/resources/chronic-disease/understanding-high-iga-levels-causes-impacts/ So maybe the physician's "borderline" remark is relevant to that.
    • trents
      Help with blood test result

      By trents · Posted

      Sometimes that is the case but what is curious to me is the remark by your physician about being "borderline". I assume he was referring to the total IGA score but it just seems like an irrelevant remark when it is on the high side rather than being deficient.
×
×
  • Create New...