Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Negative Blood Test...but I Dunno...

elye

Recommended Posts

elye Community Regular
elye
Posted

Upon my urging, my dad had the blood work done for celiac. I have suspected since my diagnosis that he also has it, as he's always had some of the classic symptoms. I haven't talked to him yet about this, but he called last night to tell us that the test was negative. Now, I've been hearing that false negatives are possible. Can someone explain this a little for me? If there are no antibodies in the blood, doesn't that mean there is no autoimmune response? Is it something else they are looking for? I want to know exactly how celiac can be missed through the blood test (and I am assuming he got the cadillac test--the glutaminase(?) I believe it is called). Maybe someone can also remind me of the name of that test that is the most thorough. I need this info before I talk to my dad and say, "Actually, a negative result may mean nothing. And here's why..."

Thanks, guys!

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Guest nini
Guest nini
Posted

Anti-Gliadin (AGA) IgA

Anti-Gliadin (AGA) IgG

Anti-Endomysial (EMA) IgA

Anti-Tissue Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA

Total Serum IgA

Here is the complete panel that should have been run, so if they did not do ALL of these in the panel, the results can be less accurate.

Many Celiacs are also IgA deficient and therefore show up as negative on the tests...

Also, if he hasn't been able to eat, or has been on a gluten-free diet or low gluten diet for a while, the results can be skewed as well.

Another way you can have a false negative is if the lab reading the results isn't familiar with Celiac and reads the results incorrectly, Also, many Dr's will say that a borderline or low positive result is negative when in fact it is really positive.

These are the only reasons I can think of at the moment. The dietary response is the most valid indicator in my opinion. It never hurts to try the diet and see if symptoms improve because positive dietary response is the best indicator of a problem with gluten.

elye Community Regular
elye
Posted
  • Author

Thanks so much, Nini...excellent info. I'm copying it off to go over with the family, as there may be more questionable "negatives" when others eventually get tested.

hungryforlife Apprentice
hungryforlife
Posted

Hi Elye

I also wanted to throw in here that my brother was diagnosed with celiac disease through biopsy, but his bloodwork was negative. His body didnt make any AGA IgG/IgA antibodies. It is very possible.

Good luck to your dad. I agree with Nini.. If he has a positive dietary response then why go back?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,387
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Tim Semas
    Newest Member
    Tim Semas
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.9k
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Negative biopsy and seeking doctor recs in Los Angeles

      By trents · Posted

      If you have been eating the gluten equivalent of 4-6 slices of wheat bread daily for say, 4 weeks, I think a repeat blood test would be valid.
    • englishbunny
      Negative biopsy and seeking doctor recs in Los Angeles

      By englishbunny · Posted

      it did include Total Immunoglobin A which was 135, and said to be in normal range. when i did the blood test in January I would say I was on a "light' gluten diet, but def not gluten free.  I didn't have any clue about the celiac thing then.  Since then I have been eating a tonne of gluten for the purpose of the endoscopy....so I'm debating just getting my blood test redone right away to see if it has changed so I'm not waiting another month...
    • trents
      Negative biopsy and seeking doctor recs in Los Angeles

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the forum, @englishbunny! Did your celiac panel include a test for "Total IGA"? That is a test for IGA deficiency. If you are IGA deficient, other IGA test resultls will likely be falsely low. Were you by any chance already practicing a reduced gluten free diet when the blood draw was done?
    • englishbunny
      Negative biopsy and seeking doctor recs in Los Angeles

      By englishbunny · Posted

      I'm upset & confused and really need help finding a new gastro who specializes in celiac in California.  Also will welcome any insights on my results. I tested with an isolated positive for deamidated IGA a few months ago (it was 124.3, all other values on celiac panel <1.0), I also have low ferritin and Hashimotos. Mild gastro symptoms which don't seem to get significantly worse with gluten but I can't really tell... my main issues being extreme fatigue and joint pain. The celiac panel was done by my endocrinologist to try and get to the bottom of my fatigue and I was shocked to have a positive result. Just got negative biposy result from endoscopy. Doctor only took two biopsies from small intestine (from an area that appeared red), and both are normal. Problem is his Physician's Assistant can't give me an answer whether I have celiac or not, or what possible reason I might have for having positive antibodies if I don't have it. She wants me to retest bloods in a month and says in the meantime to either "eat gluten or not, it's up to you, but your bloodwork won't be accurate if you don't" I asked if it could be I have early stage celiac so the damage is patchy and missed by only having two samples taken, and she said doctor would've seen damaged areas when performing endoscopy (?) and that it's a good sign if my whole intestine isn't damaged all over, so even if there is spotty damage I am fine.  This doesn't exactly seem satisfactory, and seems to be contrary to so much of the reading and research I have done. I haven't seen the doctor except at my endoscopy, and he was pretty arrogant and didn't take much time to talk. I can't see him or even talk to him for another month. I'm really confused about what I should do. I don't want to just "wait and see" if I have celiac and do real damage in the meantime. Because I know celiac is more that just 'not eating bread' and if I am going to make such a huge lifestyle adjustment I need an actual diagnosis. So in summary I want to find another doctor in CA, preferably Los Angeles but I don't care at this stage if they can do telehealth! I just need some real answers from someone who doesn't talk in riddles. So recommendations would be highly welcomed. I have Blue Shield CA insurance, loads of gastros in LA don’t take insurance at all 😣
    • trents
      Oats gluten free?

      By trents · Posted

      Okay, Lori, we can agree on the term "gluten-like". My concern here is that you and other celiacs who do experience celiac reactions to other grains besides wheat, barley and rye are trying to make this normative for the whole celiac community when it isn't. And using the term "gluten" to refer to these other grain proteins is going to be confusing to new celiacs trying to figure out what grains they actually do need to avoid and which they don't. Your experience is not normative so please don't proselytize as if it were.
×
×
  • Create New...