Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Positive Blood Test, Negative Biopsy


Jen2114

Recommended Posts

Jen2114 Newbie

Hi everyone—

 

I have been having lots of GI symptoms recently so my doctor ordered a celiac blood panel. Most of it came up positive. Earlier this week I went in for an upper Endoscopy and my biopsies only came back with a Marsh score of 1. 
 

Has anyone had experience with this? Going today to have the genetic blood work done. 
 

These are the blood work results:

t-Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA- 14 , (scale 0-3)

t-Transglutaminase (tTG) IgG- 4 (scale 0-5)

Endomysial antibody- positive

Deamidated Gliadin Abs, IgA- 57 (scale 0-19)

Deamidated Gliadin Abs, IgG- 39 (scale 0-19)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



trents Grand Master

Not much damage to the villi yet. Must have caught it early. It is normal for some celiac tests to be negative when others are positive. Some are more specific and/or more sensitive than others. The tTG-IGA and Endomysial antibody tests are very specific for celiac disease and the tTG-IGA is also very sensitive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Emma84 Explorer
On 5/12/2023 at 12:37 PM, Jen2114 said:

Hi everyone—

 

I have been having lots of GI symptoms recently so my doctor ordered a celiac blood panel. Most of it came up positive. Earlier this week I went in for an upper Endoscopy and my biopsies only came back with a Marsh score of 1. 
 

Has anyone had experience with this? Going today to have the genetic blood work done. 
 

These are the blood work results:

t-Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA- 14 , (scale 0-3)

t-Transglutaminase (tTG) IgG- 4 (scale 0-5)

Endomysial antibody- positive

Deamidated Gliadin Abs, IgA- 57 (scale 0-19)

Deamidated Gliadin Abs, IgG- 39 (scale 0-19)

 

Is a marsh score of 1 considered negative? I thought any damage indicated positive for celiac 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jen2114 Newbie
5 minutes ago, Emma84 said:

Is a marsh score of 1 considered negative? I thought any damage indicated positive for celiac 

From what my GI told me, 2 and up with a positive blood test indicates a Celiac diagnosis. Since mine was a 1 she said she wouldn’t diagnose me with it yet unless the genetic blood test came out positive.

 

So confusing to me because I thought the same!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Emma84 Explorer
28 minutes ago, Jen2114 said:

From what my GI told me, 2 and up with a positive blood test indicates a Celiac diagnosis. Since mine was a 1 she said she wouldn’t diagnose me with it yet unless the genetic blood test came out positive.

 

So confusing to me because I thought the same!

Didn’t you have elevated antibodies ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jen2114 Newbie
25 minutes ago, Emma84 said:

Didn’t you have elevated antibodies ? 

Yes! Antibodies were positive and almost the whole celiac panel was very high.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Emma84 Explorer
27 minutes ago, Jen2114 said:

Yes! Antibodies were positive and almost the whole celiac panel was very high.

I’m am not a doctor but I think that’s pretty indicative of celiac. Your marsh scale may have only been 1 because it’s a new development. How long have you had symptoms for? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Tara V Newbie

Hello,

I am hoping someone can help shed some light for me. I am a 51 year woman who a little over 2 years had a weak positive TTG of 4 (normal <4) negative EMA. I have no symptoms but was tested because I have reactive hypoglycemia and my doctor thought maybe a malabsorption problem. After the positive serology I had a endoscopy and biopsy showed mild IEL’s but no villous atrophy. My doctor then send me for genetic testing and I do carry DQ2 and repeated the TTG which was then negative and I was told no celiac. More than 2 years have passed and my GI wanted to repeat endoscopy which again showed IELs but again no villous atrophy. Repeated the TTG again and now it’s weak positive again at 5 and repeat EMA still negative. I have been eating gluten the entire time. So my question is can you have celiac for years and never develop villous atrophy? And remain weak positive ttg on and off? My only other health issue is a increased bone specific alkaline phos for the last 5 years but whole body bone scan was negative and dexa scan showed mild osteopenia which is not unusual for my age group. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
trents Grand Master

Welcome to the forum, Tara V!

In answer to your question, we do have reports on this forum from those who have positive celiac antibody scores (and not just borderline) but no villous atrophy. Frequently, we are exposed to things like this on the forum that defy our little boxes and check off lists. IMO, we are learning that gluten disorders have a larger variety of expression than we used to think. We have known for a long time, for instance, that there is an epidermal expression of gluten intolerance called dermatitis herpetiformis and most of those folks also have villi damage. But a small percentage of them don't.

There is also a gluten disorder known as NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity) which shares many of the same symptoms as celiac disease but does not blunt the villi. Yet, it can cause other serious health issues such as ataxia. Some experts feel that NCGS can be a precursor to celiac disease.

Now, having said all that, we don't even know if gluten itself poses any issues for you. But, have you considered MCAS (Mast Cell Activation Syndrome)\histamine intolerance and SIBO (Small Intestine Bacterial Overgrowth)? I urge you to do some research into these.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tara V Newbie
6 minutes ago, trents said:

Welcome to the forum, Tara V!

In answer to your question, we do have reports on this forum from those who have positive celiac antibody scores (and not just borderline) but no villous atrophy. Frequently, we are exposed to things like this on the forum that defy our little boxes and check off lists. IMO, we are learning that gluten disorders have a larger variety of expression than we used to think. We have known for a long time, for instance, that there is an epidermal expression of gluten intolerance called dermatitis herpetiformis and most of those folks also have villi damage. But a small percentage of them don't.

There is also a gluten disorder known as NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity) which shares many of the same symptoms as celiac disease but does not blunt the villi. Yet, it can cause other serious health issues such as ataxia. Some experts feel that NCGS can be a precursor to celiac disease.

Now, having said all that, we don't even know if gluten itself poses any issues for you. But, have you considered MCAS (Mast Cell Activation Syndrome)\histamine intolerance and SIBO (Small Intestine Bacterial Overgrowth)? I urge you to do some research into these.

Thank you for your reply. I will definitely look into these. Would any of these cause a weak positive TTG?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
trents Grand Master
12 minutes ago, Tara V said:

Thank you for your reply. I will definitely look into these. Would any of these cause a weak positive TTG?

I don't think so but these other two conditions I mention are not infrequently found in the celiac community. But I wonder if you have "celiac light" (my invented term) such that your body is compensating so far for the damage that the inflammation usually causes in celiac disease. Just for your information, we often get reports of young children with significantly elevated antibody scores with no villi damage. Their bodies are so resilient.

But one question. Did the physician order a total IGA test to check for generally low immune system IGA levels? If total IGA is low it will suppress individual IGA test scores such as the tTG-IGA and give false negatives sometimes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tara V Newbie

Yes and my total IGA is normal

Link to comment
Share on other sites
trents Grand Master

One option to consider is to commit to eating gluten free for say, 6 months and then have your tTG-IGA rechecked. If it is within normal range that would suggests you are indeed having a light reaction to gluten.

We know there are certain medical conditions besides celiac (e.g. Crohn's and some parasitic infections), some foods (e.g., the dairy protein, casein) and some medications (e.g., NSAIDS and a certain blood pressure med) that can cause villi blunting but I hesitate to say that this would translate necessarily into elevated tTG-IGA antibodies.

In your celaic diagnostic bloodwork, were any DGP and IGG antibodies run? https://celiac.org/about-celiac-disease/screening-and-diagnosis/screening/

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tara V Newbie
1 minute ago, trents said:

One option to consider is to commit to eating gluten free for say, 6 months and then have your tTG-IGA rechecked. If it is within normal range that would suggests you are indeed having a light reaction to gluten.

We know there are certain medical conditions besides celiac (e.g. Crohn's and some parasitic infections), some foods (e.g., the dairy protein, casein) and some medications (e.g., NSAIDS and a certain blood pressure med) that can cause villi blunting but I hesitate to say that this would translate necessarily into elevated tTG-IGA antibodies.

In your celaic diagnostic bloodwork, were any DGP and IGG antibodies run? https://celiac.org/about-celiac-disease/screening-and-diagnosis/screening/

I would agree with you except my levels of TTG go to normal about every other time I have them checked every few months. All other antibodies DGP and IGG have been negative. So confusing. And that’s the thing there is no villi blunting at all. Only mild IEL’s. I definitely could go gluten free for 6 months but I don’t know if that would give me any answers since I don’t feel sick, there’s nothing to compare it to. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
trents Grand Master

"A raised IEL count with normal villous architecture is not uncommon. Six of the 14 patients may have had latent coeliac disease. The cause in at least half of cases is not obvious at present. The finding of a raised IEL count with normal villous architecture is of sufficient clinical importance to be highlighted in routine duodenal biopsy reports." https://jcp.bmj.com/content/55/6/424

Microscopic colitis? https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10620-012-2315-0

I just get the feeling you are on the cusp of developing celiac disease. Many celaics are "silent". That is, they have no significant symptoms until the disease is in advanced stages. By then irreversible damage may have been done to body systems. I was a silent celiac.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      125,810
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Niki111084
    Newest Member
    Niki111084
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.8k
    • Total Posts
      69k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • RMJ
      It will not undo all of the healing.  If it did, diagnosis of celiac disease would be much easier!  To have enough damage to see on an endoscopy requires several weeks of gluten ingestion. 
    • Jean Shifrin
      HI, I am new to this and am still in 'repair' mode, which I know will take time. But I'm wondering if anyone knows what happens if you ingest gluten after you have made a lot of progress in repairing your villi. Does anyone know if you just have a short-term issue? Or does an accidental ingestion of gluten derail all the work you've done and set you back to square one? Thanks.
    • Scott Adams
      Hydrolyzed wheat is wheat protein that has been broken down into smaller components through a chemical or enzymatic process called hydrolysis. This ingredient can be found in various products, including cosmetics, personal care items, and some food products. For people with celiac disease, hydrolyzed wheat is generally not safe to consume because it still contains gluten proteins, even in its broken-down form. Though hydrolysis reduces the size of these proteins, it doesn’t fully remove the components that trigger an autoimmune response in people with celiac disease. In food products, hydrolyzed wheat protein still poses a risk and should be avoided. With regard to the McDonald's French fries, the total amount of hydrolyzed wheat in the flavoring is small, and the amount that ends up in an order of fries is even smaller, and likely below 20ppm. McDonald’s states that the fries are gluten-free by ingredient and free from cross-contact with gluten-containing foods in their dedicated fryers. Third-party tests and statements by McDonald's confirm gluten levels are below the FDA threshold for gluten-free labeling (20 parts per million or less). So, while McDonald’s USA fries may be gluten-free based on testing, some people with celiac disease still approach them cautiously due to the past concerns and individual sensitivities.
    • trents
      Here is an excerpt from this article: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC82695:   Studies have shown that various peptidases of fungal, plant, animal, or bacterial origin are able to hydrolyze gluten into harmless peptides. According to SDS‐PAGE pattern, proteolytic enzymes hydrolyze gliadins (Heredia‐Sandoval et al., 2016; Scherf et al., 2018; Socha et al., 2019; Wei et al., 2018, 2020). Bacterial peptidase (Krishnareddy & Green, 2017), fungal peptidase (Koning et al., 2005), and prolyl endopeptidases (PEPs) (Amador et al., 2019; Janssen et al., 2015; Kerpes et al., 2016; Mamo & Assefa, 2018) thoroughly degrade gliadin fractions to decrease gluten concentration and influence celiac disease. Aspergillus niger derived PEP (AN‐PEP) were assessed in clinical cases for their impact on modifying immune responses to gluten in celiac patients (Lähdeaho et al., 2014). Guerdrum and Bamforth (2012) reported that PEP addition in brewing technology decreased the prolamin and all of the identified immunopathogenic gluten epitopes in beer production (Akeroyd et al., 2016). On the contrary, many of the recent investigations which employed enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), mass spectrometry, and Western blot analysis reported that PEP did not thoroughly destroy the whole gluten proteins (Allred et al., 2017; Colgrave et al., 2017; Fiedler et al., 2018; Panda et al., 2015), which indicates that beers treated with PEP are not safe for celiac disease patients. Anecdotally, this excerpt supports what we hear from the celiac community on this forum with regard to "gluten free" hydrolyzed wheat products and that is that some still react to them while many don't.
    • Scott Adams
      There aren't good studies that have been done on celiac disease remission, and I'm going from a distant memory of an older post here, but the longest remission that Dr. Stefano Guandalini from the University of Chicago Celiac Disease Center has witnessed was ~10 years, then the symptoms of celiac disease and the damage came back. The real issue though, is that you still could increase your risk of various related diseases and disorders by eating gluten, but again, celiac disease remission has not been studies enough to know what health risks you might face.
×
×
  • Create New...