Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Now What? Input Greatly Appreciated.


Maxipoo

Recommended Posts

Maxipoo Rookie

Noted on the board previously, I have had some digestive and neurological issues. This led to a Celiac panel at the end of March after I had a biopsy showing small intestine damage. I was off of gluten three weeks leading up to it. Three measures were out of range. The gastroenterologist wanted to do one more panel to confirm Celiac Disease. As suggested by the board, I ate plenty of gluten daily. I just received an email that the test results were in (see below for number comparisons). The numbers are lower than before, with only Gliadin Peptide IgG showing high this time. I will try to call the gastroenterologist tomorrow. I am trying to process this all and am a bit discombobulated. Also noted previously, the gastroenterologist was very hesitant to label me with Celiac. I have some anxiety about the call. Thanks to anyone who can provide me with some objective input.

FIRST TEST 3/31

Gliadin Peptide - Ab.IgA / 15 (positive 20+)

Gliadin Peptide - Ab.IgG / 37 (positive 20+)

Tissue Transglutaminase Ab.IgA / 4 (positive 4+)

Tissue Transglutaminase Ab.IgG / 2 (positive 6+)

Endomysium Ab.IgA / 389 (positive 387+)

SECOND TEST 5/11

Gliadin Peptide - Ab.IgA / 13 (positive 20+)

Gliadin Peptide - Ab.IgG / 24 (positive 20+)

Tissue Transglutaminase Ab.IgA / 2 (positive 4+)

Tissue Transglutaminase Ab.IgG / 2 (positive 6+)

Endomysium Ab.IgA / 363 (positive 387+)

 

 

 

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Maxipoo Rookie

Follow up... Gastroenterologist’s office called earlier before I had a chance to proactively call them. The nurse said the doctor asked if I had any gluten since the last test. He assumed I had not and my numbers were normalizing. I told her I had it everyday and figured my numbers would go up and am confused as to why they went down (let her know I accessed them via the lab company when an email notified me the results were in last night). She was surprise I had been consuming gluten and the numbers went down. She said she would notify the doctor. I asked her to please have him call me. Still would love any board input I could get. Thanks.

Scott Adams Grand Master

The gold standard for diagnosing celiac disease is still the biopsy results, so if you had positive results this is a pretty strong indicator that you likely have it. If you had a positive biopsy AND a positive blood test, then it's even more likely, especially given your symptoms. 

In the end, since it seems you are reluctant to have such a diagnosis, probably the only other options would be 1) get a genetic test; 2) try the gluten-free diet for a few months and see if it helps your symptoms.

You could also have non-celiac gluten sensitivity, which ~10x more people have than celiac disease, but there isn't a formal test for this yet.

Maxipoo Rookie
4 hours ago, Scott Adams said:

The gold standard for diagnosing celiac disease is still the biopsy results, so if you had positive results this is a pretty strong indicator that you likely have it. If you had a positive biopsy AND a positive blood test, then it's even more likely, especially given your symptoms. 

In the end, since it seems you are reluctant to have such a diagnosis, probably the only other options would be 1) get a genetic test; 2) try the gluten-free diet for a few months and see if it helps your symptoms.

You could also have non-celiac gluten sensitivity, which ~10x more people have than celiac disease, but there isn't a formal test for this yet.

Thank you so much for the reply. I always appreciate when you post. The dip in numbers certainly threw me off. So, the IgG still positive basically means nothing? The nurse called me back and said the doctor said I definitely do NOT have celiac disease. I asked about the biopsy and what could have made the numbers change. Also asked where to go from here. She sighed and said she would ask him. Have not heard back. Second opinion from a different gastroenterologist? Third test from a lab on my own? Can I just go to PCP and ask for genetic test? I have an appointment with her Monday. 

Scott Adams Grand Master

What were your total IgA Levels? This is always checked to determine the accuracy of the other tests.

I see several high tests, and several positive blood tests here:

FIRST TEST 3/31

  • Gliadin Peptide - Ab.IgA / 15 (positive 20+)
  • Gliadin Peptide - Ab.IgG / 37 (positive 20+)
  • Tissue Transglutaminase Ab.IgA / 4 (positive 4+) - This is a high reading, borderline positive if 4+ is positive - The test is estimated to have a sensitivity of approximately 90%, which means that it correctly identifies 90% of people with celiac disease. It also has a high specificity of around 95%, which means that it correctly identifies 95% of people who do not have celiac disease.
  • Tissue Transglutaminase Ab.IgG / 2 (positive 6+)
  • Endomysium Ab.IgA / 389 (positive 387+) - POSITIVE! highly accurate test for celiac disease, with a sensitivity of approximately 98-100% and a specificity of nearly 100%. The test requires specialized expertise to perform and interpret, and it is more expensive than other blood tests, and is generally used as a last test to confirm celiac disease after a positive tTG-IgA test. The sensitivity of this test is approximately 50-90%. This means that the test may produce a false negative result in some people with celiac disease who do not have elevated levels of IgG antibodies to tissue transglutaminase, and the specificity (its ability to correctly identify people without celiac disease) is approximately 70-90%.

SECOND TEST 5/11

  • Gliadin Peptide - Ab.IgA / 13 (positive 20+)
  • Gliadin Peptide - Ab.IgG / 24 (positive 20+) - Some studies have suggested that the Gliadin Peptide Antibody IgG test has a relatively high false positive rate, meaning that it may produce positive results in people who do not actually have celiac disease or gluten sensitivity. Additionally, the test may miss cases of celiac disease, particularly in people who have mild or atypical symptoms. Overall, the Gliadin Peptide Antibody IgG test may be useful as a screening tool for celiac disease or gluten sensitivity, but a positive result would generally need to be confirmed with additional testing, such as the DPG test or a biopsy of the small intestine.
  • Tissue Transglutaminase Ab.IgA / 2 (positive 4+)
  • Tissue Transglutaminase Ab.IgG / 2 (positive 6+)
  • Endomysium Ab.IgA / 363 (positive 387+) - This is a high reading, and borderline positive if 387+ is positive

With these results, plus a biopsy showing small intestinal damage (exactly what did the results say?), it seems highly unlikely that you do not have celiac disease, and I have no idea why your doctors would tell you otherwise.

 

 

PS - Were you told to eat a minimum of 2 slices of wheat bread per day for 6-8 weeks before these blood panels? That is the standard protocol, and if you were eating less than that leading up to these tests it will affect the results.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,247
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Jbamf8791
    Newest Member
    Jbamf8791
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Zuma888
      Thanks @Scott Adams! I guess my question now is: do the celiacs who can get away with regular contamination without villi damage as you mentioned have to be strict about cross-contamination ? 
    • Zuma888
      Thank you very much @knitty kitty! I'm glad you brought up the point about histamine. I have been taking an antihistamine after meals where I don't feel so good and never knew why it helped so much. At first I thought I might have a food allergy, but I recently did a food allergy test and I actually have ZERO food allergies. Regarding your last point about the stages of grief, are you saying it's likely that I have celiac? I have Hashimoto's BTW and I know for sure that gluten causes an autoimmune response to my thyroid as my anti-TPO and anti-Tg go up and my throat feels swollen. Could the symptoms be due to that autoimmune response?
    • knitty kitty
      @Zuma888, The antibodies produced in response to gluten are made in the intestines.  When the body is provoked sufficiently, the antibodies overflow out of the intestines and into the blood stream.  Once in the blood stream, the antibodies can be measured with tTg IgA tests.  Three grams of gluten per day for two weeks minimum is enough gluten to make you feel the symptoms of having been glutened, but the antibodies are not in sufficient quantity to be measured in the blood. Ten grams of gluten per day for a minimum of two weeks is required to get the anti gluten antibodies at a high enough level in the blood stream to be measured by tTg IgA tests. So, no, occasional cross contamination or (heaven forbid) intentional cheat days will not be sufficient for tTg IgA testing.  You will still be making antibodies which will still be causing inflammation and damage to the intestines and body.  Histamine is released as part of the immune response to gluten.  High histamine levels lead to food sensitivities, brain fog, and body aches.   The damage done to the gastrointestinal tract affects the absorption of essential vitamins and minerals.  Malabsorption of fats can cause changes in stools.  Insufficient absorption of vitamins and minerals can cause damage to other organs like the thyroid if it can't get enough Selenium, iodine, iron, zinc, and Thiamine.  Brain fog and fatigue can be caused by low Thiamine and other B Complex vitamins.  Vitamin D is needed to regulate the immune system.  One gene is all that's needed to develop Celiac disease.  I know a Celiac diagnosis is a change that can be difficult to get your head around.  Many people go through the five stages of grief.  One stage is "bargaining".  Sounds like you're stuck there.  Every little cheat counts to your detriment.  But sticking to a gluten free diet, makes every meal a success.   Read the comments below the article... Best wishes!  Keep us posted on your progress!
    • Scott Adams
      No, I would not say this at all. If you were diagnosed with celiac disease and were gluten-free for a while, you could have gone into remission. Everyone's body is different, and some celiacs may be able to get regular contamination and not end up with damaged villi and positive antibody tests, while others who ingest tiny amounts will relapse and have full blown symptoms and flattened villi.  Only a full gluten challenge would reveal where you are at this point. Here is more info about how to do a gluten challenge for a celiac disease blood panel, or for an endoscopy: and this recent study recommends 4-6 slices of wheat bread per day:    
    • Scott Adams
      The most common nutrient deficiencies associated with celiac disease that may lead to testing for the condition include iron, vitamin D, folate (vitamin B9), vitamin B12, calcium, zinc, and magnesium.  Unfortunately many doctors, including my own doctor at the time, don't do extensive follow up testing for a broad range of nutrient deficiencies, nor recommend that those just diagnosed with celiac disease take a broad spectrum vitamin/mineral supplement, which would greatly benefit most, if not all, newly diagnosed celiacs.      
×
×
  • Create New...