Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Negative follow up biopsy but continue to have elevated tTg IgA Antibodies


Acacia Voynar

Recommended Posts

Acacia Voynar Explorer

I am almost 2 years into a strict gluten free diet but my tTg IgA antibody levels continue to be elevated outside of the normal range (they are tested at least every 6 months).  I had a follow up endoscopy in January (1.5 years into diagnosis and gluten-free diet) which showed no inflammation and biopsies were all normal. I was told by the GI Dr that the damage from Celiac had all healed. At time of diagnosis, the GI Dr that performed the endoscopy (a different GI Dr) told me I had severe villi damage. 

My main question is.. if antibodies are elevated due to continued gluten exposure, could biopsies show healed villi and the endoscopy show no inflammation? A coloscopy was also preformed at the same time, with normal results.

I've been all over the place with medical professional during this journal and the many complications I've had from it.. I've seen multiple GI Dr's, primary care physicians, dietitians and an integrative medicine Dr.  No one agrees on elevated IgA levels and what it means for exposure to gluten (some say it could only mean exposure, others say it will take years to come down).  No one can provide me with an answer as to why the levels would be elevated but the biopsies normal.

For my tests, the tTG IgA antibodies standard range is <15.0 U/ml.  Here is the history of my test results:

5/12/23: 23.3

12/29/22: 25.8

11/1/22: 29.3

6/27/22: 54.9

1/3/22: 80.2

8/5/21: 536 **This was what lead to my diagnosis and was before going gluten free**

There's a lot more to my story and a ton of information I can provide, including ongoing abnormal labs and other diagnosis, but I was trying to keep this as short as possible to start.  :) 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



knitty kitty Grand Master

It can take two years or more for antibody levels to normalize.  

Your antibody levels are consistently going down.  

You can try checking your Vitamin D level.  Vitamin D is instrumental in calming the immune system (besides other things).  

You're doing great.

Acacia Voynar Explorer
7 minutes ago, knitty kitty said:

It can take two years or more for antibody levels to normalize.  

Your antibody levels are consistently going down.  

You can try checking your Vitamin D level.  Vitamin D is instrumental in calming the immune system (besides other things).  

You're doing great.

Thank you!  My Vitamin D level was low during those May blood tests and my Dr had me start on a 5,000 IU daily supplement. 

knitty kitty Grand Master

Do you remember the number?  

Mine was severely low, like single digits.  I took Vitamin D3.  (The doctor had prescribed Vitamin D 2, a synthetic form that the body cannot utilize well.)  

I took lots of Vitamin D3.  I ate them like M&M's actually because my body craved them so.  Really weird, yes, but it brought my Vitamin D level up quickly and I began to feel better quickly, too.  

High dose Vitamin D has been used in the past to correct rickets in children.  

DRIVING UP THE DOSE: IMPLICATIONS FOR HIGH-DOSE VITAMIN D THERAPY

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4824637/

Acacia Voynar Explorer
1 minute ago, knitty kitty said:

Do you remember the number?  

Mine was severely low, like single digits.  I took Vitamin D3.  (The doctor had prescribed Vitamin D 2, a synthetic form that the body cannot utilize well.)  

I took lots of Vitamin D3.  I ate them like M&M's actually because my body craved them so.  Really weird, yes, but it brought my Vitamin D level up quickly and I began to feel better quickly, too.  

High dose Vitamin D has been used in the past to correct rickets in children.  

DRIVING UP THE DOSE: IMPLICATIONS FOR HIGH-DOSE VITAMIN D THERAPY

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4824637/

26.6 (normal range for the test was 30-100)

Just now, Acacia Voynar said:

26.6 (normal range for the test was 30-100).  I'm taking the 5,000 IU daily in the form of a D3 supplement (Pure Encapsulations), not a prescription. 

 

knitty kitty Grand Master
(edited)

You'll feel much better when your Vitamin D level gets up into the 80's where it is supposed to be.  At 80's level, Vitamin D can act like a hormone, like it's supposed to.  

Polynesian people who dress and live in traditional ways have Vitamin D levels between 80 and 120 nMol/L.  So that's where we want ours, too.  (But no island life. 😿)

I believe @Wheatwacked took four years to get his Vitamin D level up to 80 nMol/L.  

(Too long to feel better, in my book.)  

Since yours is so low, it won't hurt to take more than 5,000 IU a day.  Try one with each meal.

I take Naturewise 5000 IU.  

Edited by knitty kitty
Add more information
Acacia Voynar Explorer
19 minutes ago, knitty kitty said:

You'll feel much better when your Vitamin D level gets up into the 80's where it is supposed to be.  At 80's level, Vitamin D can act like a hormone, like it's supposed to.  

Polynesian people who dress and live in traditional ways have Vitamin D levels between 80 and 120 nMol/L.  So that's where we want ours, too.  (But no island life. 😿)

I believe @Wheatwacked took four years to get his Vitamin D level up to 80 nMol/L.  

(Too long to feel better, in my book.)  

Since yours is so low, it won't hurt to take more than 5,000 IU a day.  Try one with each meal.

I take Naturewise 5000 IU.  

Okay, thank you so much, I greatly appreciate your feedback! :)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Wheatwacked Veteran

Yes, I started 10,000 IU a day (thats 250 mcg) in early 2015 about 6 months after starting GFD on Thanksgiving 2014. In Sept 2018 (just looked it up) my 25-hydroxy vitamin D test was 44.7 ng/ml. that equals 112 nmol/L. By Aug 2021 it was 86.9 ng/ml (217 nmol/L).

Despite the fearmongering claims of terrible results of too much vitamin D I was inspired by multiple clinical trials of kidney transplant patients being given massive bolus doses of vitamin D in the 1,250,000 IU range with no difference in outcomes compared to patients who got 50,000 IU of D2 weekly.  I understand that only D2 can be given as a prescription, but the bioavailability of D2 is half that of D3.

My mental health began improving after only three or four days. I actually looked at the bottle one morning and said "This stuff is Sunshine in a bottle!" It ended a very long period of depression.   Doctor tests me every 3 months and it stays steady at 80 ng/ml (200 nmol/L). For comparison a study of Israeli lifeguards in August had them between 70 and 90 ng/ml.  that sort of indicates a homeostasis level.  My son an Ocean lifeguard in Florida was told last summer his vitamin D was low (<39 ng/ml or <98 nmol/L). Shows how effective sunscreen and their hats and clothing can block UV.

As my D increased I noticed my response to gluten became less violent.  Starting in 2012 I was on prednisone for fibromyalgia, arthritis, basically could not stand for more than 5 minutes at a time, before finding out I have Celiac, That is all gone now but I need to continue prednisone as a maintenance dose and that may explain why it took me so long to to get to homeostasis and continue to need so much daily to keep it there.  A misdiagnosis with permanent effect.

Then there is this from the Mayo Clinic Proceedings:

     "the Endocrine Society’s practice guidelines on vitamin D state that vitamin D intoxication is usually not observed until serum 25(OH)D levels are more than 150 ng/mL [375 nmol/L] .... The evidence is clear that vitamin D toxicity is one of the rarest medical conditions and is typically due to intentional or inadvertent intake of extremely high doses of vitamin D (usually in the range of >50,000-100,000 IU/d for months to years)."

Acacia Voynar Explorer
13 hours ago, Wheatwacked said:

Yes, I started 10,000 IU a day (thats 250 mcg) in early 2015 about 6 months after starting GFD on Thanksgiving 2014. In Sept 2018 (just looked it up) my 25-hydroxy vitamin D test was 44.7 ng/ml. that equals 112 nmol/L. By Aug 2021 it was 86.9 ng/ml (217 nmol/L).

Despite the fearmongering claims of terrible results of too much vitamin D I was inspired by multiple clinical trials of kidney transplant patients being given massive bolus doses of vitamin D in the 1,250,000 IU range with no difference in outcomes compared to patients who got 50,000 IU of D2 weekly.  I understand that only D2 can be given as a prescription, but the bioavailability of D2 is half that of D3.

My mental health began improving after only three or four days. I actually looked at the bottle one morning and said "This stuff is Sunshine in a bottle!" It ended a very long period of depression.   Doctor tests me every 3 months and it stays steady at 80 ng/ml (200 nmol/L). For comparison a study of Israeli lifeguards in August had them between 70 and 90 ng/ml.  that sort of indicates a homeostasis level.  My son an Ocean lifeguard in Florida was told last summer his vitamin D was low (<39 ng/ml or <98 nmol/L). Shows how effective sunscreen and their hats and clothing can block UV.

As my D increased I noticed my response to gluten became less violent.  Starting in 2012 I was on prednisone for fibromyalgia, arthritis, basically could not stand for more than 5 minutes at a time, before finding out I have Celiac, That is all gone now but I need to continue prednisone as a maintenance dose and that may explain why it took me so long to to get to homeostasis and continue to need so much daily to keep it there.  A misdiagnosis with permanent effect.

Then there is this from the Mayo Clinic Proceedings:

     "the Endocrine Society’s practice guidelines on vitamin D state that vitamin D intoxication is usually not observed until serum 25(OH)D levels are more than 150 ng/mL [375 nmol/L] .... The evidence is clear that vitamin D toxicity is one of the rarest medical conditions and is typically due to intentional or inadvertent intake of extremely high doses of vitamin D (usually in the range of >50,000-100,000 IU/d for months to years)."

Thank you, I appreciate all that information! 

Rogol72 Collaborator

I agree with @Wheatwacked , when my Vitamin D levels drop, my celiac disease and DH is more reactive to CC and trace amounts of gluten. Low levels will alter mood and bones begin to ache. It's a critical nutrient for immune system modulation. Some people have genetic polymorphisms of Vitamin D and do not convert D3 to the active form very well. I take 4000iu at present to boost levels since I live in a northern climate. My levels need to be in the 80+ng/mL  or 150+ nmol/L range to feel well.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      126,059
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Lynda Huber Davis
    Newest Member
    Lynda Huber Davis
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69.1k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
      Soy has been on our safe list for nearly 30 years, it is gluten-free. Most soy sauces do include wheat, and should be avoided. The following two lists are very helpful for anyone who is gluten sensitive and needs to avoid gluten when shopping. It's very important to learn to read labels and understand sources of hidden gluten, and to know some general information about product labelling--for example in the USA if wheat is a possible allergen it must be declared on a product's ingredient label like this: Allergens: Wheat.       In general if you see "gluten-free" on a label in the USA, Canada, Europe, Australia, etc., it does mean that the food is safe for those with celiac disease, and it does NOT mean that there is 19ppm gluten in it, as some people might lead you to believe. Whenever a company detects gluten in the 5-19ppm (most tests can't accurately go below this level) in foods which they have labelled gluten-free, especially a USA-based company (lawsuits in the USA are far more common and easier to win in such cases), they will immediately seek to find and eliminate the source of the gluten contamination. There is a very common myth or misconception that companies don't care at all if their products test between 5-19ppm, but they definitely do because a product recall could be just around the corner should they hit the 20ppm or higher level. Many people, including myself, now have home test kits like Nima, and companies are definitely aware of this.  
    • trents
      Kathleen, I am not sure I agree with you that your son is asymptomatic with regard to his celiac disease. The horrible stomach pains you describe in your first post could be celiac symptoms as easily as they could be H. Pylori or viral infection symptoms. Yes, the social impact of having celiac disease is perhaps the most difficult dimension of the disorder to deal with. It requires thinking ahead and providing safe substitutes for snacks and party foods so that your son doesn't feel left out and singled out or different. Some of those feeling are unavoidable but they can be minimized. Dining at eateries is a huge challenge to celiacs as even when you order gluten free menu items they are often heavily cross contaminated back in the kitchen from being cooked together with wheat things or handled with the same utensils. You need to be bold in asking a lot of questions and requesting that your son's food be cooked in separate pots and pans. It's awkward at first but you get used to it. Speaking of CC (Cross Contamination), how careful you have to be with this will depend on the sensitivity level to gluten your son will demonstrate. This can be a challenge to get a handle on for those celiacs who are of the "silent" type. By "silent" is meant they are largely asymptomatic. It is common for sensitivity levels to increase over time when gluten is withdrawn from the diet as whatever tolerance we may have had to gluten when we were being exposed to it constantly may disappear. Whether or not that proves to be the case, it would be important for you to have his antibody levels checked at regular intervals (say every six months to a year) to check for compliance with the gluten free diet. And I would not worry about him touching wheat food products. It is highly unlikely that any significant exposure will occur transdermally. That would only be an issue for the most extremely sensitive subset of celiacs. Of course, you wouldn't want him getting wheat flour on his hands and then putting fingers in his mouth.  At school, you will need to pack his lunches and also have conversations with the school dietary staff to ensure his safety.  I know this all seems overwhelming right now but you are not the only parents who are having to go through this kind of thing. Celiac disease is not uncommon and thankfully there is much more public awareness about it than there was a generation ago. It can be done. It's the kind of thing that requires parents to be willing to find that extra gear of assertiveness in order to keep their child safe and to guard his/her psyche as much as possible. Count your blessings. It could be worse. He doesn't have cancer. This might be helpful in getting off to a good start with eating gluten free. Some of it may be overkill depending on how sensitive to minute levels of gluten your son is:  
    • trents
      Staci, take note of the forms of magnesium and zinc I recommended. With some of the vitamins and minerals, the formulation can be very important in how well they are absorbed. Many of the vitamin and mineral products on supermarket shelves are in a form that maximizes shelf life rather than bioavailability which, in your case, would seem to be a critical issue. And with magnesium, if you use the typical over the counter form (magnesium oxide) you may find it has a definite laxative effect (think, "milk of magnesia") simply because it isn't well absorbed and draws water into the colon. Spend some extra money and get quality vitamin and mineral products and research the issue of bioavailability. There are forum members who are knowledgeable in this area who may have recommendations. Do you have Costco stores where you live? Is Amazon available to you?
    • Kathleen JJ
      And yes, of course it's better to know and we will adjust.  It's just, he's 7 and in our house we can control what he gets. But he plays soccer 3 times a week and in the changing room the boys share candies. I can and will tell him not to accept them any more, but "mistakes" will be made.   I'm really burdened by the potential social impact for him. He so loves to go to a restaurant as a family - I'll guess that's finished. Going to birthday parties at another kids house? I am reading about Coeliacs and apparently the fact that something as much as TOUCHED something with wheat is enough, even if he doesn't feel the symptoms - how can we control that bar from keeping him locked up?    And the worst worry of all: how do you tell a little boy to do all of this to not have symptoms that he does not have. If he'd been having horrible diarrhea or feeling really tired, we could tell him 'see, you feel so much better now, that kind of food was just not good for your body', but now, what will our argument be? For clarity: of course we will put him on the diet, I am not saying I don't believe in the necessity of that, it is just that it will be quite a stretch to 'sell' it to him 😞
×
×
  • Create New...