Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Negative follow up biopsy but continue to have elevated tTg IgA Antibodies


Acacia Voynar

Recommended Posts

Acacia Voynar Explorer

I am almost 2 years into a strict gluten free diet but my tTg IgA antibody levels continue to be elevated outside of the normal range (they are tested at least every 6 months).  I had a follow up endoscopy in January (1.5 years into diagnosis and gluten-free diet) which showed no inflammation and biopsies were all normal. I was told by the GI Dr that the damage from Celiac had all healed. At time of diagnosis, the GI Dr that performed the endoscopy (a different GI Dr) told me I had severe villi damage. 

My main question is.. if antibodies are elevated due to continued gluten exposure, could biopsies show healed villi and the endoscopy show no inflammation? A coloscopy was also preformed at the same time, with normal results.

I've been all over the place with medical professional during this journal and the many complications I've had from it.. I've seen multiple GI Dr's, primary care physicians, dietitians and an integrative medicine Dr.  No one agrees on elevated IgA levels and what it means for exposure to gluten (some say it could only mean exposure, others say it will take years to come down).  No one can provide me with an answer as to why the levels would be elevated but the biopsies normal.

For my tests, the tTG IgA antibodies standard range is <15.0 U/ml.  Here is the history of my test results:

5/12/23: 23.3

12/29/22: 25.8

11/1/22: 29.3

6/27/22: 54.9

1/3/22: 80.2

8/5/21: 536 **This was what lead to my diagnosis and was before going gluten free**

There's a lot more to my story and a ton of information I can provide, including ongoing abnormal labs and other diagnosis, but I was trying to keep this as short as possible to start.  :) 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



knitty kitty Grand Master

It can take two years or more for antibody levels to normalize.  

Your antibody levels are consistently going down.  

You can try checking your Vitamin D level.  Vitamin D is instrumental in calming the immune system (besides other things).  

You're doing great.

Acacia Voynar Explorer
7 minutes ago, knitty kitty said:

It can take two years or more for antibody levels to normalize.  

Your antibody levels are consistently going down.  

You can try checking your Vitamin D level.  Vitamin D is instrumental in calming the immune system (besides other things).  

You're doing great.

Thank you!  My Vitamin D level was low during those May blood tests and my Dr had me start on a 5,000 IU daily supplement. 

knitty kitty Grand Master

Do you remember the number?  

Mine was severely low, like single digits.  I took Vitamin D3.  (The doctor had prescribed Vitamin D 2, a synthetic form that the body cannot utilize well.)  

I took lots of Vitamin D3.  I ate them like M&M's actually because my body craved them so.  Really weird, yes, but it brought my Vitamin D level up quickly and I began to feel better quickly, too.  

High dose Vitamin D has been used in the past to correct rickets in children.  

DRIVING UP THE DOSE: IMPLICATIONS FOR HIGH-DOSE VITAMIN D THERAPY

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4824637/

Acacia Voynar Explorer
1 minute ago, knitty kitty said:

Do you remember the number?  

Mine was severely low, like single digits.  I took Vitamin D3.  (The doctor had prescribed Vitamin D 2, a synthetic form that the body cannot utilize well.)  

I took lots of Vitamin D3.  I ate them like M&M's actually because my body craved them so.  Really weird, yes, but it brought my Vitamin D level up quickly and I began to feel better quickly, too.  

High dose Vitamin D has been used in the past to correct rickets in children.  

DRIVING UP THE DOSE: IMPLICATIONS FOR HIGH-DOSE VITAMIN D THERAPY

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4824637/

26.6 (normal range for the test was 30-100)

Just now, Acacia Voynar said:

26.6 (normal range for the test was 30-100).  I'm taking the 5,000 IU daily in the form of a D3 supplement (Pure Encapsulations), not a prescription. 

 

knitty kitty Grand Master
(edited)

You'll feel much better when your Vitamin D level gets up into the 80's where it is supposed to be.  At 80's level, Vitamin D can act like a hormone, like it's supposed to.  

Polynesian people who dress and live in traditional ways have Vitamin D levels between 80 and 120 nMol/L.  So that's where we want ours, too.  (But no island life. 😿)

I believe @Wheatwacked took four years to get his Vitamin D level up to 80 nMol/L.  

(Too long to feel better, in my book.)  

Since yours is so low, it won't hurt to take more than 5,000 IU a day.  Try one with each meal.

I take Naturewise 5000 IU.  

Edited by knitty kitty
Add more information
Acacia Voynar Explorer
19 minutes ago, knitty kitty said:

You'll feel much better when your Vitamin D level gets up into the 80's where it is supposed to be.  At 80's level, Vitamin D can act like a hormone, like it's supposed to.  

Polynesian people who dress and live in traditional ways have Vitamin D levels between 80 and 120 nMol/L.  So that's where we want ours, too.  (But no island life. 😿)

I believe @Wheatwacked took four years to get his Vitamin D level up to 80 nMol/L.  

(Too long to feel better, in my book.)  

Since yours is so low, it won't hurt to take more than 5,000 IU a day.  Try one with each meal.

I take Naturewise 5000 IU.  

Okay, thank you so much, I greatly appreciate your feedback! :)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Wheatwacked Veteran

Yes, I started 10,000 IU a day (thats 250 mcg) in early 2015 about 6 months after starting GFD on Thanksgiving 2014. In Sept 2018 (just looked it up) my 25-hydroxy vitamin D test was 44.7 ng/ml. that equals 112 nmol/L. By Aug 2021 it was 86.9 ng/ml (217 nmol/L).

Despite the fearmongering claims of terrible results of too much vitamin D I was inspired by multiple clinical trials of kidney transplant patients being given massive bolus doses of vitamin D in the 1,250,000 IU range with no difference in outcomes compared to patients who got 50,000 IU of D2 weekly.  I understand that only D2 can be given as a prescription, but the bioavailability of D2 is half that of D3.

My mental health began improving after only three or four days. I actually looked at the bottle one morning and said "This stuff is Sunshine in a bottle!" It ended a very long period of depression.   Doctor tests me every 3 months and it stays steady at 80 ng/ml (200 nmol/L). For comparison a study of Israeli lifeguards in August had them between 70 and 90 ng/ml.  that sort of indicates a homeostasis level.  My son an Ocean lifeguard in Florida was told last summer his vitamin D was low (<39 ng/ml or <98 nmol/L). Shows how effective sunscreen and their hats and clothing can block UV.

As my D increased I noticed my response to gluten became less violent.  Starting in 2012 I was on prednisone for fibromyalgia, arthritis, basically could not stand for more than 5 minutes at a time, before finding out I have Celiac, That is all gone now but I need to continue prednisone as a maintenance dose and that may explain why it took me so long to to get to homeostasis and continue to need so much daily to keep it there.  A misdiagnosis with permanent effect.

Then there is this from the Mayo Clinic Proceedings:

     "the Endocrine Society’s practice guidelines on vitamin D state that vitamin D intoxication is usually not observed until serum 25(OH)D levels are more than 150 ng/mL [375 nmol/L] .... The evidence is clear that vitamin D toxicity is one of the rarest medical conditions and is typically due to intentional or inadvertent intake of extremely high doses of vitamin D (usually in the range of >50,000-100,000 IU/d for months to years)."

Acacia Voynar Explorer
13 hours ago, Wheatwacked said:

Yes, I started 10,000 IU a day (thats 250 mcg) in early 2015 about 6 months after starting GFD on Thanksgiving 2014. In Sept 2018 (just looked it up) my 25-hydroxy vitamin D test was 44.7 ng/ml. that equals 112 nmol/L. By Aug 2021 it was 86.9 ng/ml (217 nmol/L).

Despite the fearmongering claims of terrible results of too much vitamin D I was inspired by multiple clinical trials of kidney transplant patients being given massive bolus doses of vitamin D in the 1,250,000 IU range with no difference in outcomes compared to patients who got 50,000 IU of D2 weekly.  I understand that only D2 can be given as a prescription, but the bioavailability of D2 is half that of D3.

My mental health began improving after only three or four days. I actually looked at the bottle one morning and said "This stuff is Sunshine in a bottle!" It ended a very long period of depression.   Doctor tests me every 3 months and it stays steady at 80 ng/ml (200 nmol/L). For comparison a study of Israeli lifeguards in August had them between 70 and 90 ng/ml.  that sort of indicates a homeostasis level.  My son an Ocean lifeguard in Florida was told last summer his vitamin D was low (<39 ng/ml or <98 nmol/L). Shows how effective sunscreen and their hats and clothing can block UV.

As my D increased I noticed my response to gluten became less violent.  Starting in 2012 I was on prednisone for fibromyalgia, arthritis, basically could not stand for more than 5 minutes at a time, before finding out I have Celiac, That is all gone now but I need to continue prednisone as a maintenance dose and that may explain why it took me so long to to get to homeostasis and continue to need so much daily to keep it there.  A misdiagnosis with permanent effect.

Then there is this from the Mayo Clinic Proceedings:

     "the Endocrine Society’s practice guidelines on vitamin D state that vitamin D intoxication is usually not observed until serum 25(OH)D levels are more than 150 ng/mL [375 nmol/L] .... The evidence is clear that vitamin D toxicity is one of the rarest medical conditions and is typically due to intentional or inadvertent intake of extremely high doses of vitamin D (usually in the range of >50,000-100,000 IU/d for months to years)."

Thank you, I appreciate all that information! 

Rogol72 Community Regular

I agree with @Wheatwacked , when my Vitamin D levels drop, my celiac disease and DH is more reactive to CC and trace amounts of gluten. Low levels will alter mood and bones begin to ache. It's a critical nutrient for immune system modulation. Some people have genetic polymorphisms of Vitamin D and do not convert D3 to the active form very well. I take 4000iu at present to boost levels since I live in a northern climate. My levels need to be in the 80+ng/mL  or 150+ nmol/L range to feel well.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to ainsleydale1700's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Confused about HLA-DQ Celiac gene test result

    2. - Scott Adams replied to ainsleydale1700's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Confused about HLA-DQ Celiac gene test result

    3. - Aretaeus Cappadocia replied to Thoughtidjoin's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      4

      Dried Chickpeas

    4. - ainsleydale1700 posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Confused about HLA-DQ Celiac gene test result

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,434
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    LexiBusch
    Newest Member
    LexiBusch
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the celiac.com community, @ainsleydale1700! First, it is very unlikely, given your genetic results, that you have celiac disease. But it is not a slam dunk. Second, there are some other reasons besides having celiac disease that your blood antibody testing was positive. There are some diseases, some medications and even (for some people) some foods (dairy, the protein "casein") that can cause elevated celiac blood antibody test scores. Usually, the other causes don't produce marginally high test scores and not super high ones. Having said that, by far, the most common reason for elevated tTG-IGA celiac antibody test scores (this is the most common test ordered by doctors when checking for celiac disease) is celiac disease itself. Please post back and list all celiac blood antibody tests that were done with their scores and with their reference ranges. Without the reference ranges for negative vs. positive we can't tell much because they vary from lab to lab. Third, and this is an terrible bum steer by your doc, for the biopsy results to be valid, you need to have been eating generous amounts of gluten up to the day of the procedure for several weeks.  Having said all that, it sounds most likely that you have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity) as opposed to celiac disease. The two share many common symptoms but NCGS is not autoimmune in nature and doesn't damage the lining of the small bowel. What symptoms do you have? Do you have any blood work that is out of norm like iron deficiency that would suggest celiac disease?
    • ainsleydale1700
    • Scott Adams
      HLA testing can definitely be confusing. Classic celiac disease risk is most strongly associated with having the full HLA-DQ2 or HLA-DQ8 heterodimer, which requires specific DQA1 and DQB1 genes working together. Your report shows you are negative for the common DQ2 and DQ8 combinations, but positive for DQB102, which is one component of the DQ2 pair. On its own, DQB102 does not usually form the full DQ2 molecule most strongly linked to celiac disease, which is likely why your doctor said you do not carry the typical “celiac genes.” However, genetics are only part of the picture. A negative gene test makes celiac disease much less likely, but not absolutely impossible in rare cases. More importantly, both antibody testing and biopsy are only reliable when someone is actively eating gluten; being gluten-free for four years before testing can cause both bloodwork and intestinal biopsy to appear falsely negative. Given your positive antibodies and ongoing symptoms, it may be reasonable to seek clarification from a gastroenterologist experienced in celiac disease about whether proper gluten exposure was done before testing and whether additional evaluation is needed.
    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      I agree with your post and have had similar experiences. I'm commenting to add the suggestion of also using nutritional yeast as a supplement. It's a rich source of B vitamins and other nutrients, and some brands are further supplemented with additional B12. I sprinkle a modest amount in a variety of savory recipes.
    • ainsleydale1700
      Hi, could someone help me understand the result of my gene test? DQ2 (DQA1 0501/0505,DQB1 02XX): Negative DQ8 (DQA1 03XX,DQB1 0302): Negative The patient is positive for DQB1*02, one half of the DQ2 heterodimer.  The doctor said I don't have Celiac genes.  I asked him to clarify about my positive DQB1*02, and he said it's a gene unrelated to Celiac.  I have all the symptoms and my bloodwork is positive for antibodies, despite being on a gluten-free diet for the past 4 years.  He also did a biopsy but told me to continue a gluten-free diet and not eat gluten before the biopsy.  Based on the gene test and biopsy (which came back negative) he ruled out Celiac, leaving me very confused.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.