Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Trying to figure out my probability of having celiac disease


Lredd

Recommended Posts

Lredd Rookie

I recently got celiac blood tests completed due to a bunch of symptoms I was having. Some came back positive, some negative.

 

Total IgA was low

ttg, IgA and dgp, IgA were Negative

ttg, IgG and dgp, IgG were positive

 

I’m getting an endoscopy, but was curious if signs are pointing to celiac. Just curious if anyone else had a similar diagnostic process. If I get a negative biopsy, does that just mean I have NCGS? I don’t have anyone in my family who has been diagnosed celiac, but a whole slew of digestive issues. 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



trents Grand Master

Welcome to the forum, Lredd!

The igG tests are not as specific for celiac disease as are the igA tests. Yes, if your biopsy is negative I would be looking at NCGS. Keep in mind that some gluten disorder experts believe that NCGS can be a precursor to celiac disease. What are your symptoms? Are any CBC labs, like hemoglobin/hematocrit, or vitamain B12 and D3 out of whack? Lab values that would suggest malabsorption?

Scott Adams Grand Master

This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.

 

 

Lredd Rookie
23 minutes ago, trents said:

Welcome to the forum, Lredd!

The igG tests are not as specific for celiac disease as are the igA tests. Yes, if your biopsy is negative I would be looking at NCGS. Keep in mind that some gluten disorder experts believe that NCGS can be a precursor to celiac disease. What are your symptoms? Are any CBC labs, like hemoglobin/hematocrit, or vitamain B12 and D3 out of whack? Lab values that would suggest malabsorption?

The reason why I went down this path was actually due to low vitamin D. I got tested and was deficient. I went on a megadose for 12 weeks and retested it and it actually went down. My major symptom has been awful fatigue, but also constant diarrhea, and a pain in my left abdomen that comes and goes and feels like a side stitch or sometimes more stabbing. This has all gotten slowly worse over the last two years since I gave birth to my first child. 

trents Grand Master

Low D3 is probably rampant in the USA population as a whole and the level deemed "normal" when you get serum tested for it is likely well below optimum. Yet, if you were megadosing with it for three months and levels went down, that certainly raises the question of are you absorbing nutrients properly.

Wheatwacked Veteran
(edited)
11 hours ago, Lredd said:

My major symptom has been awful fatigue, but also constant diarrhea, and a pain in my left abdomen that comes and goes and feels like a side stitch

That might be Choline deficiency. Major food source is liver, eggs, steak. It is the major salt in bile.  Deficiency can cause poor digestion of fats. Yellow and green stinky diarrhea with floaters.  Not enough Choline can cause Non Alchohol Fatty Liver, something well proven, yet essentially ignored in the US.

For energy try increasing B vitamins.  Celiac Disease is a disease of malabsorption. Your D level resistance points to that.  B vitamins make energy.  Folic Acid is the only B vitamin with a safe upper limit set at 1000 mcg because it has been linked increased cancer risk.  Folate from food is unlimited. At 500 mg a day of B1, B3, B5, Choline and Taurine; and 1000 mcg of B12. you should feel the difference in a few days.

11 hours ago, Lredd said:

I went on a megadose for 12 weeks and retested it and it actually went down.

     Depends on the definition of mega dose.  Doctors often prescribe 50000 IU Vitamin D2 a week.  D2 is only one half bioavailable as D3; they cannot prescribe D3.  I take 10,000 IU daily since 2015.  I don't know what it was then but I was in very bad shape.  I kept increasing, started at 1000 iu a day.  At 8000 a day still no noticible effect. Finally after 3 days at 10,000 I felt it  kick in. Sunshine in a bottle. No missing it.  In 2019 I paid the doctor to test it (he saw no reason) and I was still only at 47 ng/ml.  Currently steady at 80 ng/ml.  Once, I stopped taking it 3 weeks before the test (new doctor tests me quarterly with the other labs) It dropped to 72 ng/ml.  ParaThyroid Hormone is normal. 

     "Ekwaru et al recently reported on more than 17,000 healthy adult volunteers participating in a preventative health program and taking varying doses of vitamin D up to 20,000 IU/d. These patients did not demonstrate any toxicity, and the blood level of 25(OH)D in those taking even 20,000 IU/d was less than 100 ng/mL."

Also, just being human gives you a 44% chance of having one or more of the genes identified with Celiac Disease.  It's a matter of time and nutrition.  It appears you are already there.  Vitamin D helps keep them subdued.

Edited by Wheatwacked
Lredd Rookie

@Wheatwacked - this is all so interesting. I was only tested for vitamin d and ferritin because of the fatigue months ago (this is before I went to a gastro specialist). Ferritin was low, but still in range and the vitamin d was 15 (30 was the lowest in range point). I did the weekly 50,000 of d2 and retested and it was 13. After the biopsy in a few weeks, I’m definitely going to push to get other vitamins checked out to get a baseline. 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Wheatwacked Veteran

Most of the tests for vitamins and minerals don't really reflect cellular status.  For example, 98% of the potassium in our bodies is intracellular.

"Potassium (K+) is the major intracellular cation, with 98% of the total pool being located in the cells at a concentration of 140-150 mmol/l, and only 2% in the extracellular fluid, where it ranges between 3.5 and 5 mmol/l."

There is more potassium in the ribs, ileac crests and scapulas than there is calcium.  Ferritin could be low because an autoimmune response (think low D) interferes with the production of Intrinsic Factor which we need to absorb B12 and B12 works with Folate to recycle homocysteine back to methionine.  Homocysteine is a product of protein metabolism and high levels (over 18) is considered an independent indicator of cardiovascular inflammation.  Dealing with homocysteine is so important there are three separate pathways. 1)B12 and Folate; 2) Choline: and 3) B6. If one is deficient the others pick up the slack.  Increasing intake of those will reduce your inflammation as well as that omega 3 supplement processed from the green lipped mussels found in the pristene waters of New Zealand.  But significantly CHEAPER, and homocysteine is only one of the functions of those four essential nutrients.  "Essential nutrients"  means that we must get it from external sources.  There are around 40 essential nutrients and twenty of them are absorbed in the small intestine where Celiac Disease damage causes malabsorption.  Vitamin D is one of them so you need large amounts of dietary intake to overcome that.  Sunshine, enough to tan but not burn may be the answer.  In the US there are one million patients with skin cancer, common belief is that it is caused by too much UV light.  There are 51 million suffering autoimmune diseases, including osteoporosis, from low D.  Conumdrom?  At the same time, the intake of iodine in the US has dropped since 1970 to half of what it was and the incidence of cancer has doubled.  As has the prescribing of thyroxine.  Thyroxin,  synthetic hormone has the iodine we no longer get in our food.   Iodine is a major hitman for the immune system to kill off sick and old and defective cells to make room for fresh healing growth.

So my personal conclusion is: Low D + Low Iodine = More autoimmune diseases and cancer.

By the way there is not an "autoimmune system".  It is an out of control immune system attacking our own cells because we don't have enough D to control the immune system.  That 30 ng/ml number is only enough to prevent bowed thighs from rickets ignoring all other functions.  Thank the UK Royal College of Physicians in the 1950's for putting a vitual worldwide clamp on vitamimin D due to an epidemic of infant deaths from a manufacturing error in baby formula.

 

knitty kitty Grand Master
On 7/15/2023 at 12:39 PM, Lredd said:

The reason why I went down this path was actually due to low vitamin D. I got tested and was deficient. I went on a megadose for 12 weeks and retested it and it actually went down. My major symptom has been awful fatigue, but also constant diarrhea, and a pain in my left abdomen that comes and goes and feels like a side stitch or sometimes more stabbing. This has all gotten slowly worse over the last two years since I gave birth to my first child. 

Vitamin D 2 is synthetic Vitamin D.  It is not easily assimilated and utilized by the body.  Vitamin D 3 is much better absorbed and used.  It's important to correct vitamin and mineral deficiencies as soon as possible so no lasting damage will occur.  Your pregnancy may have also depleted your other vitamin and mineral stores as well.

Fatigue, diarrhea and abdominal pain are symptoms of Gastrointestinal Beriberi caused by Thiamine Vitamin B 1 deficiency.  Pregnancy can deplete the mother's stores of nutrients and give them to the baby.  

Doctors are not well educated in nutritional deficiencies.  They fail to attribute symptoms to vitamin and mineral deficiencies.  But in Celiac Disease, the villi in the small intestine are damaged and can no longer absorb nutrients, so vitamin and mineral deficiencies are common in newly diagnosed Celiacs.  Checking for nutritional deficiencies is part of proper follow up care. Blood tests for vitamin deficiencies are not very accurate.  You can have normal blood levels, but still have deficiencies before blood levels reflect a deficiency.  Discuss with your doctor the benefits of taking a B Complex and additional Thiamine (Benfotiamine).

Here's some interesting articles...

Thiamine deficiency in pregnancy and lactation: implications and present perspectives

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10158844/

And...

Thiamine deficiency disorders: a clinical perspective

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8451766/

And...

Clinical profile of patients presenting with thiamine-responsive upper-gastrointestinal upset: A pointer toward gastric beriberi

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35810577/

And...

https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/Thiamin-HealthProfessional/

Hope this helps!  Keep us posted on your progress!

Nikhil12 Newbie

The diagnostic process for celiac disease can vary from person to person. In your case, the low Total IgA level might affect the accuracy of the IgA-based celiac tests, but the positive results for IgG-based tests suggest a possibility of celiac disease. The endoscopy will provide more definitive information. If the biopsy is negative for celiac disease, it could indicate non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) or other conditions. Family history isn't always a reliable indicator. It's important to discuss the results and your symptoms with a healthcare professional for a comprehensive evaluation and proper diagnosis.

Lredd Rookie
15 minutes ago, Nikhil12 said:

The diagnostic process for celiac disease can vary from person to person. In your case, the low Total IgA level might affect the accuracy of the IgA-based celiac tests, but the positive results for IgG-based tests suggest a possibility of celiac disease. The endoscopy will provide more definitive information. If the biopsy is negative for celiac disease, it could indicate non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) or other conditions. Family history isn't always a reliable indicator. It's important to discuss the results and your symptoms with a healthcare professional for a comprehensive evaluation and proper diagnosis.

Thanks @Nikhil12 - That is what I am learning. I think I'm just getting a bit anxious and wanting to know a definitive answer. I have my endoscopy next week so should have some answers soon (hopefully). It's just super tough sitting in limbo when you've been experiencing a bunch of symptoms. I know a lot of people on here probably feel the same. 

Wheatwacked Veteran

While finding Marsh 3 damage to the villi in an endoscopy is the Gold Standard of diagnosing Celiac Disease, not finding it doesn't mean not Celiac, it means they did not see damage. 

 

Lredd Rookie

Update: I just had my endoscopy and the duodenum looked normal visually. Going to wait on pathology, but I’m assuming it isn’t celiac based on the initial findings. I’ll update after I get the pathology. 

Scott Adams Grand Master

Best to wait because most damage would not visual, unless the damage was pretty bad. 

In any case, given your positive blood test results, to me it looks like your body is mounting an autoimmune reaction to gluten. Even if your biopsy ends up negative, you still may want to consider a gluten-free diet. As mentioned earlier, you may be in the NCGS area now, and later that could turn into full blown celiac disease, which you should avoid if possible.

trents Grand Master
4 hours ago, Lredd said:

Update: I just had my endoscopy and the duodenum looked normal visually. Going to wait on pathology, but I’m assuming it isn’t celiac based on the initial findings. I’ll update after I get the pathology. 

Do you know how many samples were taken during the biopsy and from where. The recommendation of this community is at least four samples be taken from the duodenum and the duodenum bulb. Many GI docs doing the scoping may not be that thorough. Damage can be patchy.

Lredd Rookie

Thanks, y’all! Appreciate context for all of this since I’m still so new to it.

My GI said she followed protocol and did two passes through the duodenum and took multiple biopsies from different parts because things can be patchy. In addition, she took a biopsy of my stomach just because of the inflammation. 

Wheatwacked Veteran
On 7/18/2023 at 9:38 AM, Lredd said:

wanting to know a definitive answer

You may not get a "definative" answer from a medical point of view.  I hope you do, but it seems like your body is telling you.  Our bodies don't read the medical and insurance company protocols, and gluten addiction is a powerful thing.  When you think about giving up gluten can you just walk away, like giving up lettuce?  Don't ignore those positive blood tests, even mildly positive.  Do a year gluten free and reevaluate.  It is the only way to tell.

  • 1 month later...
Lredd Rookie

update: it’s be a lot of follow-up testing and doctor appts. My EGD results showed nothing- all clear. My GI was still confused why my bloodwork was positive though and suggested I do good allergy testing. That was all clear. Then we decided to do gene testing more as a way of eliminating celiac fully. It looks like I’m negative for DQ2 and DQ8 but positive for HLA DQ alleles. The results say I have less than a 1% chance and the genetic risk is extremely low.

I have been gluten free for 4.5 weeks and the biggest thing I’ve noticed is less diarrhea and stomach pains. 

I would be okay to accept a ncgs diagnosis if a doctor could tell me why my bloodwork was positive.

 

Just feeling pretty confused. Anyone else face similar results and went down another path/diagnosis?

Scott Adams Grand Master

We've had a lot of people on the forum who had a positive blood test and negative biopsy, or vice versa, but they improved on a gluten-free diet. In this case it is probably best to stick with the diet, especially if you have the genetic makeup and one positive test, AND your symptoms improve on a gluten-free diet.

trents Grand Master

Eating  truly gluten free is harder than most people imagine. It's easy to adopt a lower gluten diet where major sources are eliminated. It's much harder to avoid hidden sources of gluten and CC (cross contamination). Perhaps this will help you get off on a fast track:

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      126,083
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    janmary
    Newest Member
    janmary
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69.2k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Wheatwacked
      Could be the Ozampic is masking your expected symptoms.  Like an analgesic masks pain.  Qzampic slows digestion to lower the rate glucose enters the intestine to slow its effect on glucose level.  It seems it might also slow down the gluten entry into the intestine, reducing its trigger level for the antibodies.  Ultimately the damage from gluten is the same, just not as fast so the pain is less.  Sourdough bread has less gluten.  Ozampic siows its entry.
    • Wheatwacked
      You can sell it better if the whole family does gluten free.  If he does have Celiac Diease, it is genetic so either you, your spouse, or both have a 40% chance of also having Celiac.  There are over 200 non classic symptoms also caused by celiac disease not often considered by doctors. Joint pain, muscle pain, muscle cramps, osteoporosis, and allergies for starters.  
    • Wheatwacked
      Hello @MHavoc, thank you for your question and welcome to the clinic. First, has the contstipation abated with the GFD? If your are pursuing further diagnostics you must continue to eat gluten. Each lab has their own reference range for their test, but they indicate an H for high.  Typically anything above 11 is considered positive. Mild chronic inflammation (gastritis) can interfere with intrinsic factor for B12 leading to low B12 causing low MCHC (anemia). So what is causing your gastritis?  A high tTG IgA level generally indicates potential gastrointestinal problems most commonly associated with celiac disease.  Although the biopsy is the Gold Standard for diagnosis, not finding damage in the biopsy does not rule out Celiac Disease. It means they did not find damage where they looked.  The small intestine is over 20 feet long. Many here have been blood positive and biopsy negative, it just delays the diagnosis until you have enough damage to find and fit their diagnostic profile. The Ttg-iga is not only sensitive (90%) but highly specific (98%) and won’t show positive until the damage is severe.  It is estimated that 40% of first degree relatives of diagnosed Celiacs have undiagnosed Celiac Disease, so your sister is a big risk factor in whether you have it. Are You Confused About Your Celiac Disease Lab Results?  This article explains it better and is quite readable. Celiac Disease can cause deficient vitamin D.  Low vitamin D compromises the immune system.  Any other symptoms? liver enzymes?  Recent cold or flue? Celiac Disease and the malabsorption it causes through vitamin and mineral deficiencies can elicit symptoms not usually associated with Celiac Disease. Case in point maybe your gastritis and anemia.  
    • MHavoc
      As with most of the people that come here, I have questions and need perspective/info from this wonderful community.  Some background, started having severe constipation that would not abate even with softners (not really fun to talk about), so I was able to finally get in to see my primary and she scheduled some blood work.  One of things she wanted to test for is Celiac Disease due to my sister having celiac disease since a young child. Here are my test results: MCHC = 31.4 so considered slightly low TISSUE TRANSGLUTAMINASE AB, IGA = 78.8 H So with that result, I was scheduled for an endoscope for confirmation of celiac disease, but I am very confused with the results: Diagnosis 1. Duodenum, biopsy: -No pathologic alteration. 2. Stomach, biopsy: -Mild chronic inflammation with reactive epithelial change -H. pylori not identified on immunostained section. -No intestinal metaplasia or dysplasia I am now scheduled to meet with a GI Specialist from the Celiac team, but that won't be until after the New Year.  I would appreciate thoughts about the biopsy report to understand whether it confirms the celiac disease as was indicated by the blood test results. I have been gluten free for two weeks and it is a very difficult adjustment for me as an older 50+ person.
    • Vozzyv
      Anyone else have intermittent left ear ringing and outer right ear pain? Both seem to happen in the evenings. 
×
×
  • Create New...