Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

TTG-IGG


GUY1

Recommended Posts

GUY1 Rookie

It would be yes but I don’t want to go back on gluten.At least for the time being.I guess it means that something was bothering me and it has been removed.Also from what I understand igg ttg is related mostly to  gluten than other foods


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



trents Grand Master
10 minutes ago, GUY1 said:

It would be yes but I don’t want to go back on gluten.At least for the time being.I guess it means that something was bothering me and it has been removed.Also from what I understand igg ttg is related mostly to  gluten than other foods

That would be my guess. But since the AIP is a shotgun approach you can't be sure.

trents Grand Master

This is probably a repeat post but nonetheless: 

tTG-IgG (tissue transglutaminase IgG) Blood Test for Celiac Disease

This test measures the levels of antibodies to tissue transglutaminase, but it specifically measures IgG antibodies rather than IgA antibodies which are produced in people who eat gluten and have celiac disease. It is not as sensitive or specific as the tTG-IgA test, but it may be useful in cases where a person has an IgA deficiency, which can occur in approximately 2-3% of people with celiac disease. In these cases, the tTG-IgG test may be positive while the tTG-IgA test is negative. However, the tTG-IgG test is not recommended as a first-line screening test for celiac disease.

The sensitivity of the tTG-IgG blood test is generally high, ranging from 85% to 98%. This means that the test can accurately detect celiac disease in a significant percentage of people who have the condition.

The specificity of the tTG-IgG blood test is also high, typically around 90% to 98%. This indicates that the test can effectively rule out celiac disease in individuals who do not have the condition.

From: 

 

GUY1 Rookie

I have read this before.not sure though that the last 2 paragraphs are referred to individuals with total iga deficiency or not:

 

The sensitivity of the tTG-IgG blood test is generally high, ranging from 85% to 98%. This means that the test can accurately detect celiac disease in a significant percentage of people who have the condition.

The specificity of the tTG-IgG blood test is also high, typically around 90% to 98%. This indicates that the test can effectively rule out celiac disease in individuals who do not have the condition.”

 

 

what do you think Trent’s?

trents Grand Master

Whether or not someone is IGA deficient should have no impact on the IGG test. It's simply saying that although the tTG-IGA is the better test under normal circumstances (people with normal total IGA levels) for IGA deficient people the tTG-IGG is better.

GUY1 Rookie

👍that’s what o thought.

So according to this article 85%-98% of people with positive ttg igg have celiac.I find that to be a pretty high percentage to be ignored if one has a positive test like that.Yet the doctors I have been to claim that probability is low or non existent for celiac with just ttg igg positive.

 

don’t know what to think anymore.

 

tahnks for the help again!

trents Grand Master

Now that I read it again and think about it, it all depends on what is meant by ("people who don't have this condition") Is that referring to celiac disease or low total IGA? And note the words "This indicates that the test can effectively rule out celiac disease in individuals who do not have the condition.”

So, I'm guessing "this condition" refers to celiac disease, i.e., a negative test result for the ttg-igg can be trusted.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



knitty kitty Grand Master
12 hours ago, GUY1 said:

Hello All,

just an update....and a question.

If you scroll up to the original post my initial question was about a TTG IGG positive result with everything else within the normal range.

Update: After 2 1/2 months on a strict gluten free diet(actually went on the AIP diet) I re-tested for the TTG IGG and it came back within normal levels.3.8 u/ml.(ranges:0-5=negative, 6-9 weak positive, >9 positive).

Original test was 9 u/ml.

 

Question: I know that no one can give a definitive answer but does the reduction of antibodies (even if it is ttg igg) mean anything?also if there is a GI that reads this please chime in!:)

Reminding you that my genetic testing came back only one half positive.But also positive for DQ 7.5!

 

 

Thanks again All for your immense help!

 

I've found some interesting studies that might help you....

High Frequency of Haplotype HLA-DQ7 in Celiac Disease Patients from South Italy: Retrospective Evaluation of 5,535 Subjects at Risk of Celiac Disease

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4580462/

And...

Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Anti-Tissue Transglutaminase Antibodies Used as Markers for IgA-Deficient Celiac Disease Patients

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC549312/

And...

Evaluating Responses to Gluten Challenge: A Randomized, Double-Blind, 2-Dose Gluten Challenge Trial

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7878429/

trents Grand Master
(edited)

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC549312/

So, kk, is this saying that the tTG-IGG is less accurate as a predictor of celiac disease in IGA sufficient patients than it is in IGA deficient patients? This is our question since the OP is not IGA deficient, had negative tTG-IGA but positive tTG-IGG.

Edited by trents
GUY1 Rookie

Hello,

 

I have read these articles.that is why I mentioned the DQ 7,because I had seen this research in southern Italy.

As far as ttg igg goes the sensitivity is to know if you have the disease and specificity to rule it out.

 

it all is a bit perplexing but again I think gluten-free diet is the way to go when in doubt.

I ve found only very few to have confirmed celiac disease only with the ttg igg positive and no iga deficiency.

again if there is anyone out there please chime in

knitty kitty Grand Master

@GUY1,

Have you taken immunosuppressive drugs?  Steroids?  PPI's?

GUY1 Rookie

Sorry just saw this reply for some reason!

No haven’t taken these medications.I am assuming you re asking because they can alter blood tests,correct?

knitty kitty Grand Master

Yes, immunosuppressive drugs can skew blood tests, as can conditions like diabetes and anemia.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      125,881
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    tina.walstad
    Newest Member
    tina.walstad
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • gregoryC
      Just finished my second celebrity cruise. My first was on one of their oldest ships, it was awesome! Now we have sailed on the edge class. Wow! Not only do they have so many gluten-free options but the selection is mind blowing! Any given day you will have between 5 to 7 different gluten-free cakes to try. Yes that is right, one day at the coffee shop I had to choose between 5 gluten-free cakes not including the several puddings on display. So they gave me a small piece of each. 2 were great, 2 were just good, and 1 I did not enjoy. But never have I had the tough decision of which cake to eat?  These selections are from their normal options available for all guest. In the main dining room they always surprised me with some awesome desserts.  In my opinion the best pizza was on the Millennium class and best buffet on the Edge class. Although these two ship vary in size they are both consistent and serving high quality food from the main dinning room. The edge class gives you 4 “main” dining rooms (all included). I was unsure how this would work with my gluten-free diet? It worked great! I was able to order or see the next night’s menu for each of the four dinning venues finding that very little to no modifications needed to be made due to their extensive gluten free options.  The Millennium and Edge class ships provide the best gluten-free options from any of the cruise lines I have sailed with. You will find a larger selection and options on the edge class ships, however you will not be disappointed with the smaller Millennium class. Which is still my favorite cruise ship to date.   
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @ABP! We can't comment on the test numbers you give as you didn't include the range for negative. Different labs use different units and different ranges. There are no industry standards for this so we need more information. If your daughter doesn't have celiac disease she still could have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity) which some experts believe can be a precursor to celiac disease and is 10x more common than celiac disease. However, there is no test for it yet but it does share many of the same symptoms with celiac disease. Both require complete abstinence from gluten.  It is seldom the case during testing where all tests are positive, even for those who do have celiac disease. This is no different than when diagnosing other medical conditions and that is why it is typical to run numbers of tests that come at things from different angles when seeking to arrive at a diagnosis. It seems like you are at the point, since you have had both blood antibody testing and endoscopy/biopsy done, that you need to trial the gluten free diet. If her symptoms improve then you know all you need to know, whatever you label you want to give it. But given that apparently at least one celiac antibody blood test is positive and she has classic celiac symptoms such as slow growth, constipation and bloating, my money would be on celiac disease as opposed to NCGS.
    • ABP
      My nine-year-old daughter has suffered with severe constipation and bloating for years as well as frequent mouth sores, and keratosis Polaris on her arms. She also has recently decreased on her growth curve her % going down gradually.  After seeing a gastroenterologist, her IgG GLIADIN (DEAMIDATED) AB (IGG) was 22.4 while her IGA was normal. Her TISSUE TRANSGLUTAMINASE AB, IGA was 11.9.  Most recently her genetic test for celiac was positive.  After an endoscopy her tissue showed inflammation of the tissue as well as , increased intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) but there was no blunting of the change in the villi.    It seems that every result that we get one out of two things positive rather than all leading to an inconclusive diagnosis. While we do have another appointment with the doctor to go over the results. I'm curious based on this information what others think.    I would hate to have her eliminate gluten if not necessary- but also don't want to not remove if it is necessary.    Signed Confused and Concerned Mama
    • Scott Adams
      I guess using "GF" instead of "PL" would have been too easy! 😉
    • trents
      I was wrong, however, about there being no particular health concerns associated with high total IGA: https://www.inspire.com/resources/chronic-disease/understanding-high-iga-levels-causes-impacts/ So maybe the physician's "borderline" remark is relevant to that.
×
×
  • Create New...