Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Weak Positive/Negative

Hallowbean
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hallowbean Newbie
Hallowbean
Posted

Hi all! I’m brand new here and brand new to learning about celiac. 
 

I’ve had tum issues for a number of years, but they amplified after my first pregnancy (5 years) and then after my second pregnancy (2 years ago) my health really took a hit. Diarrhea, constipation, bloating, canker sores, headaches, joint pain, the works. 
 

My GP decided to do two celiac tests. The TTG and the deamidated giladin IgA/IgG. My TTG came back at 3 and anything below 4 is considered normal. My IgA came back at 21 and anything from 20-30 is considered weak positive. My IgG came back at 11 which is considered negative. All signs point to no celiac disease? Of course my doctor probably won’t comment for the weekend now and I’m gonna be left wondering, but would could elevate the IgA? I’ve tried researching and researching to no avail. 

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


trents Grand Master
trents
Posted

Which IGA measure do you refer to that has the score of 21? There is more than one IGA test that can be run when checking for celiac disease. Can you repost the results exactly as they appear on the report, along with ranges? Here is a primer that outlines the tests that can be run when checking for celiac disease: 

Was there a result for Total Serum IGA? The tTG-IGA is the most common test ordered by physicians. There is also an EMA test which is the most specific for celiac disease. And then there are DGP and IGG tests as well. It is also possible that you have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity) which shares many of the same symptoms with celiac disease and also requires a lifelong commitment to gluten free eating. There is no test for NCGS. Celiac disease must first be ruled out. NCGS is 10x more common than celiac disease.

Hallowbean Newbie
Hallowbean
Posted
  • Author

 

TISSUE TRANSGLUTAMINASE ANTIBODY, IGA

View trends

Normal range: 0 - 3 U/mL

My level: 3 

 

 

Deamidated Gliadin Peptide Ab, IgA

View trends

Normal range: 0 - 19 Units
 

My level: 21 

 

Deamidated Gliadin Peptide Ab, IgG

View trends

Normal range: 0 - 19 Units
 

My level: 11

trents Grand Master
trents
Posted

So, you've had:

tTG-IGA - normal

DGP-IGA - weak positive

DGP-IGg - negative

I would suggest you ask your physician to order a total IGA test. If total IGA is low, it can push individual IGA scores down toward negative.

The next round of diagnostic work would be an endoscopy with biopsy of the small bowel villous lining. Typically, celiac disease inflammation "blunts" the villi that line the small bowel. This does not happen with NCGS. Has your physician talked to you about getting an endoscopy/biopsy done?

Hallowbean Newbie
Hallowbean
Posted
  • Author

I have not! I just got these results back and like I said, he hasn’t commented on the DGP results yet, but he did see the tTG-IgA and told me everything looks normal. I don’t think he’ll reply until Monday now. 

trents Grand Master
trents
Posted

The weak positive DGP could mean celiac disease but there are other possible causes. It is so close to normal that if you were retested it might be negative on any given day. Nonetheless, I would as for a total IGA test to be ordered.

Scott Adams Grand Master
Scott Adams
Posted

I would still view ISSUE TRANSGLUTAMINASE ANTIBODY, IGA at 3 as another weak positive if the scale is positive is over 3. Normal people would not score a 3, and that combined with a positive DGP tells me that you are definitely having an issue with gluten. 

Were you eating at least 2 slices of wheat bread daily before the blood tests? You should have been. If not, your levels would likely have been higher. Many doctors do not follow the protocol and inform their patients to eat lots of gluten in the weeks leading up to the tests.

And I agree 100% with @trents that there should have been a total IGA test included in your screening.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Hallowbean Newbie
Hallowbean
Posted
  • Author

I actually don’t think I ate any gluten that day. My appt wasn’t until 3:30 pm, didn’t get my blood drawn until 4:30 and I had been running around all day long and didn’t eat much of anything that day. I was actually wondering if that had anything to do with my results or not. Over the weekend I had a sandwich with rye bread and I was not okay after that lol. My doctor did get back to me though and wants to follow through with some other stool sample tests and then possibly do more gluten related testing after that. 

trents Grand Master
trents
Posted
8 minutes ago, Hallowbean said:

I actually don’t think I ate any gluten that day. My appt wasn’t until 3:30 pm, didn’t get my blood drawn until 4:30 and I had been running around all day long and didn’t eat much of anything that day. I was actually wondering if that had anything to do with my results or not. Over the weekend I had a sandwich with rye bread and I was not okay after that lol. My doctor did get back to me though and wants to follow through with some other stool sample tests and then possibly do more gluten related testing after that. 

Missing one day of gluten would not materially affect the test results. The tests aren't measuring serum gluten levels but antibodies produced by inflammation to the small bowel villous lining produced by gluten consumption over weeks/months for those with celiac disease.

Hallowbean Newbie
Hallowbean
Posted
  • Author

Good to know, thanks! 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,733
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Debbeighe
    Newest Member
    Debbeighe
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.4k
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • cristiana
      My Adult daughter is blaming me for her "possible" Celiac disease.

      By cristiana · Posted

      You are most welcome, Marie.  Thank you for getting in touch, because this sort of post will be seen by other parents who find themselves in this position, I am sure there are many.   And as I say, in the long run, I am sure your daughter will be sorry for what she said.  I remember having a go at my dear Mum when I was in my twenties about something and then apologising, saying, "I don't know how you put up with me."  I can't remember her exact words but it was something along the lines of, "I used to say things like to my Mum.  Now it's my turn [to be on the receiving end]!"    😂  Although it isn't very nice to be on the receiving end, it is good your daughter feels safe to say these things to you. We look forward to hearing from you again in due course.  
    • Wheatwacked
      Not sure if this is Celiac or just a gluten-free intolerance

      By Wheatwacked · Posted

      Are You Confused About Your Celiac Disease Lab Results? Some people test negative but have a positive biopsy, others test positive but negative biopsy.  This is why it can take years and misdiagnosis of other diseases that Celiac Disease can mimic. The above link is a good read with real life examples. Something I find interesting is that in 1980 or so a new diagnosis was created, Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity, only 10 years after Norman Borlaug won the Nobel Peace Prize for creating our modern wheat and the Green Revolution.    
    • trents
      Trader Joe's strikes again

      By trents · Posted

      @Steve-n-Portland, there is a difference in the requirements to use the label "Gluten Free" and the label "Certified Gluten Free". "Gluten Free" is governed by FDA regulations and has a ceiling of 20 ppm. "Certified Gluten Free" is a labeling convention used by the GFCO, an independent international third party certifying group that uses 10 ppm as its standard.
    • trents
      Trader Joe's strikes again

      By trents · Posted

      We have had numerous reports from forum participants experiencing gluten reactions from Trader Joe "gluten-free" products. It seems it's not a good place for the celiac/gluten sensitive community to shop.
    • Steve-n-Portland
      Trader Joe's strikes again

      By Steve-n-Portland · Posted

      Also, a class action lawsuit was launched in 2024 against Trader Joe's re: their " gluten free" everything bagels. They tested at 269ppm. (Personally, I am not sure they will win. The FDA says that the *ingredients* have to be less than 20ppm for a company to label something "gluten-free."  In order to be certified as gluten-free by the GFCO, the *final product* needs to be less than 20ppm. That said, the lawsuit is arguing that most people read that label and assume the final product is safe for people with celiac. Thus, many people were made sick. And being sick can have costly consequences in regard to work or school, depending when one becomes ill.)
×
×
  • Create New...