Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Coeliac screen - did I eat enough gluten?

whaleroad
 Share
Go to solution Solved by trents,

Recommended Posts

whaleroad Newbie
whaleroad
Posted

Hello. I've had a coeliac screen blood test and currently awaiting results.

It never occurred to me for a second that coeliac could be responsible for my symptoms but after the GP ordered the test I started to think about it and it might actually make sense.

However, by the time I finally went to the doctor I wasn't eating much as I was so fed up of diarrhoea and abdominal pain. In the weeks preceding the test I had 2 sourdough crumpets* for breakfast and no other gluten at all. Is this enough for a reliable test result?

I'm not convinced it's coeliac at all, I just want to be assured the test result will be as reliable as possible (I know an endoscopy is needed to be sure, but blood test determines next steps).

*You can probably tell from my spelling I'm in the UK so if you're not familiar with crumpets they are like a small thick pancake, like an English muffin but softer and full of holes.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


  • Solution
trents Grand Master
trents
Posted
  • Solution

Welcome to the forum, whaleroad!

It's not clear to me if you ate the two crumpets every morning leading up to the blood draw or just once during that time.

The Mayo Clinic guidelines for a pretest "gluten challenge" is the daily consumption of two slices of wheat bread (or the gluten equivalent) for 6-8 weeks leading up to the day of the blood draw. So, if your were eating two crumpets every morning it may have been sufficient to give accurate testing except . . .

Interestingly enough, we have had a number of reports on this forum over the years (and there is some research to back this I think) to the effect that some celiacs do not experience reactions when consuming sourdough bread. Most of these reports seem to have come from people traveling and eating out in some continental European countries where perhaps a different variety of wheat was used than what is typically used here in the US.

So, yes, you may have sabotaged the test results but maybe not.

whaleroad Newbie
whaleroad
Posted
  • Author
53 minutes ago, trents said:

It's not clear to me if you ate the two crumpets every morning leading up to the blood draw or just once during that time.

Hi. Thanks. Sorry I wasn't clear - I mean for breakfast every morning!

I just checked the ingredients and they seem to contain yeast so I don't think they are true sourdough and are probably full of gluten with just a bit of sourdough added for flavour. 

patty-maguire Contributor
patty-maguire
Posted

Hi Whaleroad. Welcome to the community!

Trents answered your question about having eaten enough gluten, however, I wanted to address your comment about not believing you have celiac disease.

I was there too!  So many people have trouble getting their gp to test them for celiac.  I was the opposite.  After years of mysterious symptoms I was sent for an endoscopy for a different purpose, and the surgeon noticed "inflammation consistent with celiac disease".  When he ordered the celiac blood test I pushed back.  "I don't feel particularly bad when I eat bread or pasta" I said.   I almost didn't go for the test.  

Well, I did go and I'm here on this forum so you can guess where that led. 

I happy you're being tested.  Two crumpets per day is probably enough gluten.  If it's negative and you're not confident of the result, another approach is genetic testing.  Celiac disease is a hereditary autoimmune disease and companies like 23andMe test for the related genes.  These tests don't diagnose celiac disease as about 30% of the population have the gene and only about 3% actually develop the condition, but you can use the test to rule out celiac.  I.e. if you don't have the gene you likely don't have celiac. 

All the best. 

cristiana Veteran
cristiana
Posted

Hello @whaleroad - I'm from the UK, and a fellow crumpet-eater!  (You will be glad to know if you do ever have to go gluten free, Warburtons make some delicious gluten free crumpets, and I actually prefer them to the normal ones!)

I think you need to see what your results are.  It could be that despite your gluten avoidance your results are still positive, and the reason I say this is my TTG test (one of the tests you would have had in the UK for coeliac) was still at a high levels years after I had stopped eating gluten.  This is unusual, but it happens, and if you have had high levels they might take a while to come down, too.

Perhaps when you get your results you might wish to post them here.  We've got some really knowledgeable people on this forum who might be able to advise re: your next steps if you need further help.

Cristiana

whaleroad Newbie
whaleroad
Posted
  • Author
3 minutes ago, patty-maguire said:

Celiac disease is a hereditary autoimmune disease and companies like 23andMe test for the related genes. 

Hi. This is all really interesting information, thank you. I have axial spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis so I'm already in the autoimmune disease camp. My sister has Hashimoto's. My first thought was IBD, e.g. Crohn's disease, as it's strongly linked to the type of arthritis I have, but it just doesn't quite fit. My usual IBS remedies aren't working (I was diagnosed with IBS 25+ years ago but these symptoms are new/different). My biggest fear honestly is that they can't find the cause! 

whaleroad Newbie
whaleroad
Posted
  • Author
4 minutes ago, cristiana said:

Hello @whaleroad - I'm from the UK, and a fellow crumpet-eater!  (You will be glad to know if you do ever have to go gluten free, Warburtons make some delicious gluten free crumpets, and I actually prefer them to the normal ones!)

Thank you, I will do. I actually tried Warburtons gluten-free crumpets several years ago - I had just been diagnosed with inflammatory arthritis and tried a gluten-free diet for a while out of desperation for anything that might help. I can't really remember the outcome, I just found it too difficult to stick to a gluten-free diet so it didn't last long 😐. As you probably know, NHS lab results can take weeks to come back at the moment. I wish I could just switch off and not think about it but that's not in my nature!

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


patty-maguire Contributor
patty-maguire
Posted
(edited)
37 minutes ago, whaleroad said:

I'm already in the autoimmune disease camp. My sister has Hashimoto's.

Autoimmune diseases tend to travel together as you may already know.  The fact that you and your sister already have autoimmune conditions may increase the likelihood that you have celiac.  There is documented correlation between celiac and Hashimoto's.  Anecdotally I've heard quite a few people with celiac say they also have rheumatoid arthritis though I've not heard specifically of spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis correlating with celiac.  A quick google search brought this up: https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/323156

Edited by patty-maguire
whaleroad Newbie
whaleroad
Posted
  • Author
38 minutes ago, patty-maguire said:

Autoimmune diseases tend to travel together as you may already know.  The fact that you and your sister already have autoimmune conditions may increase the likelihood that you have celiac.  There is documented correlation between celiac and Hashimoto's.  Anecdotally I've heard quite a few people with celiac say they also have rheumatoid arthritis though I've not heard specifically of spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis correlating with celiac.  A quick google search brought this up: https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/323156

Oh that's very interesting, thank you!

whaleroad Newbie
whaleroad
Posted
  • Author

Just to update anyone who is curious, my coeliac screen blood test was negative. I've been trying to eliminate certain things and although it's too early to say, I definitely think gluten is at least one of the culprits. The pain after eating continues, the diarrhoea has settled down, I've now also got nausea/sickness as a new symptom. I'm going to just go gluten-free and see what happens. Thanks for all your help while I was awaiting my results. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,038
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Shadowseeker
    Newest Member
    Shadowseeker
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • kate g
      Are they close to a drug that will help celiacs with cross contamination

      By kate g · Posted

      Ive read articles that there is stage 2 research being conducted for drugs that will limit damage to celiacs through cross contamination- how close are they to this will there be enough funding to create a mainstream drug? 
    • cristiana
      Celiac pain relief

      By cristiana · Posted

      Hi @Karmmacalling I'm very sorry to hear you are feeling so unwell.  Can you tell us exactly what sort of pain you are experiencing and where the pain is?  Is it your lower abdomen, upper abdomen etc?  Do you have any other symptoms? Cristiana
    • trents
      How many people here are aware that there are 9 types of gluten that Celiacs should be aware of?

      By trents · Posted

      The NIH article you link actually supports what I have been trying to explain to you: "Celiac disease (celiac disease) is an autoimmune-mediated enteropathy triggered by dietary gluten in genetically prone individuals. The current treatment for celiac disease is a strict lifelong gluten-free diet. However, in some celiac disease patients following a strict gluten-free diet, the symptoms do not remit. These cases may be refractory celiac disease or due to gluten contamination; however, the lack of response could be related to other dietary ingredients, such as maize, which is one of the most common alternatives to wheat used in the gluten-free diet. In some celiac disease patients, as a rare event, peptides from maize prolamins could induce a celiac-like immune response by similar or alternative pathogenic mechanisms to those used by wheat gluten peptides. This is supported by several shared features between wheat and maize prolamins and by some experimental results. Given that gluten peptides induce an immune response of the intestinal mucosa both in vivo and in vitro, peptides from maize prolamins could also be tested to determine whether they also induce a cellular immune response. Hypothetically, maize prolamins could be harmful for a very limited subgroup of celiac disease patients, especially those that are non-responsive, and if it is confirmed, they should follow, in addition to a gluten-free, a maize-free diet." Notice that those for whom it is suggested to follow a maize-free diet are a "very limited subgroup of celiac disease patients". Please don't try to make your own experience normative for the entire celiac community.  Notice also that the last part of the concluding sentence in the paragraph does not equate a gluten-free diet with a maize-free diet, it actually puts them in juxtaposition to one another. In other words, they are different but for a "limited subgroup of celiac disease patients" they produce the same or a similar reaction. You refer to celiac reactions to cereal grain prolamins as "allergic" reactions and "food sensitivity". For instance, you say, "NIH sees all these grains as in opposition to celiacs, of which I am one and that is science, not any MD with a good memory who overprescribes medications that contain known food allergens in them, of which they have zero knowledge if the patient is in fact allergic to or not, since they failed to do simple 'food sensitivity' testing" and "IF a person wants to get well, they should be the one to determine what grains they are allergic to and what grains they want to leave out, not you. I need to remind you that celiac disease is not an allergy, it is an autoimmune disorder. Neither allergy testing nor food sensitivity testing can be used to diagnose celiac disease. Allergy testing and food sensitivity testing cannot detect the antibodies produced by celiac disease in reaction to gluten ingestion.  You say of me, "You must be one of those who are only gluten intolerant . . ." Gluten intolerance is synonymous with celiac disease. You must be referring to gluten sensitivity or NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). Actually, I have been officially diagnosed with celiac disease both by blood antibody testing and by endoscopy/positive biopsy. Reacting to all cereal grain prolamins does not define celiac disease. If you are intent on teaching the truth, please get it straight first.
    • Bebygirl01
      How many people here are aware that there are 9 types of gluten that Celiacs should be aware of?

      By Bebygirl01 · Posted

      Perhaps you would still like to answer the questions I posed on this topic, because that is all I asked. I am curious to know the answers to those questions, I do not care about the background of Dr. Osborne as I am more aware of the situation than you are, and he is also one of the best known authors out there on Celiac disease. But did you even bother to read the three Research Papers I posted by NIH? You must be one of those who are only gluten intolerant and not yet reacting to all glutens aka grains, but I AM one of those who react to ALL the glutens, and again, that is one of the two questions I originally posted on this matter. NIH sees all these grains as in opposition to celiacs, of which I am one and that is science, not any MD with a good memory who overprescribes medications that contain known food allergens in them, of which they have zero knowledge if the patient is in fact allergic to or not, since they failed to do simple 'food sensitivity' testing. I started with the failed FDA explanation of what Gluten Free is and I stayed sick and got even sicker. It wasn't until I came across NIH's papers and went off all grains that I realized that in fact, I am Celiac and reacting to all the glutens. IF a person wants to get well, they should be the one to determine what grains they are allergic to and what grains they want to leave out, not you. Those who are just getting started with learning about grains etc., can take it easy by just being "grain free' and eating a lot of meat, vegetables, etc. or whole foods as God has intended, without buying so called gluten free garbage out there that is making them sick and the whole reason they are not better. I tried the stupid gluten free garbage and it didn't work, and that will make anyone want to give up, it is better to teach the entire truth and let the patient decide, rather than give them misinformation and lies.
    • Nicola McGuire
      My son newly diagnosed

      By Nicola McGuire · Posted

      Thank you so much I will speak to the doctor for dietician apt . Thank you for your advice Beth much appreciated 
×
×
  • Create New...