Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

2.5 years old 1,5 yearof testing accurate blood tests and symptoms


Papafma

Recommended Posts

Papafma Apprentice

Hi everyone,

you may have read my previous post .My 2.5 years old son was diagnosed with milk protein allergy when he was 3 months.He had silent reflux.Currently he was diagnosed with peanut and soja allergy.When he was 1 years old his blood tests showed elevated liver enzymes.We repeated the tests 4-5 times and were still elevated.Also his lipase.He never had well shaped poop but always mussy and he has steatorrhea( fatty stools)He is growing normal,he eats well( actually i think he is always hungry) He was tested negative for infections,autoimmune diseases,metabolic disorders,cystic fibrosis.

He tested him for celiac

Anti-transglutaminase iga and Anti-gliadine IgG-came back negative.
first ultrasound showed fatty liver second ultrasound normal.

today we had an appointment with an gastroenterologist specialised to liver diseases and we did some genetic tests(including celiac)He is sure that he doesn’t have celiac because of negative serum tests!!!!I ve asked him how accurate the tests are( its not even the full panel) and he told me there is no way its celiac. I don’t know why but my instinct says it is celiac…maybe because i hope it is celiac and not something more serious 

  • Papafma changed the title to 2.5 years old 1,5 yearof testing accurate blood tests and symptoms

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Scott Adams Grand Master

Did they do DGP-IgA and DGP-IgG (Deamidated Gliadin Peptide) Blood Tests for celiac disease? These tests should always be done in a celiac disease blood panel in children because their immune systems are not fully developed, and other tests may not be accurate.

This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.

Celiac disease does indeed cause liver issues in some people, and you are correct to eliminate this possibility. This section of Celiac.com includes articles about liver issues and celiac disease:
https://www.celiac.com/celiac-disease/celiac-disease-amp-related-diseases-and-disorders/liver-disease-and-celiac-disease/

Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS. I've not seen any studies on NCGS causing liver issues, but if you can't get further testing for celiac disease it certainly would not hurt to try a gluten-free diet for a few months and then have the liver enzymes re-checked.  

 

Papafma Apprentice

Thank you for all information.They only tested him forAnti-transglutaminase iga and Anti-gliadine IgG-came back negative.

i really don’t understand how is possible in 2023 after 1.5 of testing that they are not able to give us an answer.
once we finish with the tests i will try him a gluten free diet.For now I don’t want as i dont know if they are going to run an endoscopy.My son consumes gluten but not daily.

How they can be sure its not celiac without do all necessary testing…

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      126,199
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    johnkelley.kj
    Newest Member
    johnkelley.kj
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69.2k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Because you have significantly reduced your gluten intake over a considerable amount of time, it is likely that you will test negative on the antibody tests. However, if the $112 for the Quest test is not a burden, it wouldn't hurt to try. It tests for total IGA (to ascertain if you are IGA deficient) and tTG-IGA. If total IGA is deficient, it can result in false negatives in other IGA tests. The tTG-IGA is the single most popular test ordered by physicians. The Quest test is not a complete celiac panel by any means (refer to the linked article above) but it might be a good place to start. Personally, I think you know enough to conclude that you need to get serious about avoiding gluten, whether you have celiac disease or NCGS. Human nature being what it is, however, many people seem to need an official diagnosis of celiac disease in order to stay on the bandwagon. Otherwise, they seem to rationalize cheating on the gluten-free diet. And there is this misconception out there that NCGS is inconvenient and uncomfortable but not harmful so it's okay to cheat. The more we learn about gluten-related disorders the more they seem to not fit into our neat little black and white categories. By the way, celiac disease is not a food allergy. It is classified as an autoimmune disorder.
    • More2Learn
      These responses are all extremely helpful, ty.  Really good reminder about omega 6.  I also know I'm low in zinc; I took the zinc test where I drank it on a spoon and couldn't taste it.  To that end, I try to eat a lot of oysters.  I do think it would be a good idea to get the blood test.  Two questions: 1-  Is there any reason you wouldn't recommend that I just buy and take a test like this as a first step? 2- I've been somewhat gluten free since ~Jan 2023 (technically organic, gluten free, soy free, light on dairy).  I eat a lot of meat, vegetables, rice -- a common breakfast for me is three eggs and a sausage link, and I can't remember the last time I had a sandwich or bread.  However, because in my mind I didn't think I had an allergy, and I more was doing gluten free to avoid artificially iron-enriched foods, I do make exceptions.  I'll eat breaded calamari.  When my Dad visits, I split mozzarella sticks with him because he loves them so much.  I'll eat the "gluten sensitive" items at a restaurant and if they asked, "is cross contamination ok?",  I always said yes.  Based on that, since I never probably fully eliminated gluten, but it was significantly reduced... is that good enough to take the blood test?  Because the pain in my side gets SO bad (really sometimes I can't function, and I absolutely thought I was dying), I am hesitant to do the gluten challenge.  Would it make sense to take the test, and if it's negative, then consider doing the challenge and seeing if I can deal with eating the bread every day? Thanks again!
    • Yaya
      For me, with osteoporosis, Celiac and more than 1 heart condition, the slower, safer route is preferable.  I'm on 5 meds per day.  Too much of anything can disturb absorption of this or that. Have a Happy Thanksgiving.  I'm gone for a few days.  
    • Wheatwacked
      It took me 2015 to 2021 at 10,000 IU a day to get to 80 ng/ml. In 2019 I was still only 47 ng/ml The highest it has reached is 93.  Tested every 3 months.     While a one time massive dose can be used to quickly raise vitamin D levels, its effects only last three months.  Because vitamin D is stored in fat, an obese person would require more to raise blood level.     Effect of High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation on Volumetric Bone Density and Bone Strength   The point of higher vitamin D is for the mental health and immune system requirements.  Also this study included supplementing calcium.  "Research suggests that women with low levels of vitamin D have a higher risk of breast cancer. Vitamin D may play a role in controlling normal breast cell growth and may be able to stop breast cancer cells from growing." This information is provided by Breastcancer.org. https://www.breastcancer.org/risk/risk-factors/low-vitamin-d-levels Higher vitamin D levels have been consistently associated with reduced risks of colorectal cancer https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/diet/vitamin-d-fact-sheet  
    • RMJ
      You can search here for certified gluten free olive oil GFCO productfinder
×
×
  • Create New...