Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

What does it mean by 'routine phone call from GP' to discuss blood test result in UK?


salsasaki

Recommended Posts

salsasaki Newbie

Hi, I have extremely itchy rashes all over my body which my GP suspected as Dermatitis Herpetiformis and ordered a blood test to confirm it last week. I phoned the surgery this afternoon and the receptionist just said that the results have come back, and I will get a routine phone call from the GP to discuss the result, which the earliest slot is 2 weeks from now. I tried to ask about the result, but the receptionist said that she was unable to tell me, I had to wait for the phone call from the GP to know that.

I'm feeling anxious right now and don't think I can wait 2 weeks to know the result and what should I do next. The burning itch is driving me crazy, and I really want to start eating gluten-free if that will make me feel better. Does anybody have any advice on what should I do now? And about the 'routine phone call' to discuss the result, does that mean that my blood test result is probably not serious/not urgent? I live in Wales, UK.

Any help is very much appreciated, many thanks!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



trents Grand Master

Even after the physician discusses the results with you there is a very good chance he will want to set you up with a GI doc for an endoscopy with biopsy of the small bowel lining to confirm the results of the blood work which is the normal process unless the blood antibody tests are 10x normal levels. So, don't start eating gluten free until all testing is complete, including the endoscopy/biopsy if that will be ordered. Starting a gluten-free diet now would sabotage the results of the biopsy.

Rogol72 Collaborator

If it's suspected Dermatitis Herpetiformis and the itch is that bad, you should be referred to a Dermatologist for a skin biopsy ASAP to either confirm or rule out DH. I have DH and the itch can be terrible. A blood test won't confirm DH, only a skin biopsy will. A positive diagnosis for DH is a positive diagnosis for Coeliac Disease according to the dietitian with the Coeliac Society of Ireland. Dapsone helps to relieve the itching of DH until a gluten free diet takes effect., though it has some side effects and requires monitoring.

Is it possible to see a dermatologist privately without an NHS or GP referral?

https://www.bad.org.uk/pils/dermatitis-herpetiformis-gluten-sensitivity/

Scott Adams Grand Master

Another member here who has DH reported that the very best thing to stop the itching was grinding up a 25mg pill of Benadryl (or perhaps get capsules and just open one) into a little water, then rubbing the solution over the rash or itchy areas. Just be careful about using too much too often, as you can absorb the drug through the skin.

salsasaki Newbie

Hi all, thank you for your replies!

I just went to the surgery this morning to ask for a bit more details about the blood test results, and they said that the TTG-IgA came back normal. They required me to book a phone call with the GP not because of the coeliac test result, but because of the full blood count.

Does this mean that I don't have coeliac and my rashes are not DH? Or should I ask the doctor about doing the skin biopsy?

salsasaki Newbie
13 hours ago, Rogol72 said:

Is it possible to see a dermatologist privately without an NHS or GP referral?

Unfortunately seeing a dermatologist privately seems a bit out of my budget. Do you think I should ask my GP to be referred to the dermatologist?

12 hours ago, Scott Adams said:

Another member here who has DH reported that the very best thing to stop the itching was grinding up a 25mg pill of Benadryl (or perhaps get capsules and just open one) into a little water, then rubbing the solution over the rash or itchy areas. Just be careful about using too much too often, as you can absorb the drug through the skin.

I might try Benadryl as a temporary solution for the itchy before getting the chance to speak to my GP. Thanks very much!

shadycharacter Enthusiast
55 minutes ago, salsasaki said:

Hi all, thank you for your replies!

I just went to the surgery this morning to ask for a bit more details about the blood test results, and they said that the TTG-IgA came back normal. They required me to book a phone call with the GP not because of the coeliac test result, but because of the full blood count.

Does this mean that I don't have coeliac and my rashes are not DH? Or should I ask the doctor about doing the skin biopsy?

I think a skin biopsy for DH looks for a slightly different ttg-iga antibody. There are at least three types. Type 2 is associated with gastro symptoms, type 3 with DH, and type 6 with the brain and nerves. I think you can have DH despite being negative on the ttg-iga blood test.

If it's DH it might help to eat less iodine.

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Rogol72 Collaborator
1 hour ago, salsasaki said:

Does this mean that I don't have coeliac and my rashes are not DH? Or should I ask the doctor about doing the skin biopsy?

If he suspects DH, then I don't see why you haven't been referred to a Dermatologist for a skin biopsy to confirm or rule out DH. It could be some other skin condition similar to DH. As shadycharacter said, you can have a negative blood test for Coeliac Disease and a positive skin biopsy for DH as they're two different antibodies.

salsasaki Newbie

I see... I will ask the GP about a skin biopsy and the possibility of having DH with a negative blood test then. Thank you very much!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,029
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    ChrisJ25
    Newest Member
    ChrisJ25
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • cristiana
      Hi @Karmmacalling I'm very sorry to hear you are feeling so unwell.  Can you tell us exactly what sort of pain you are experiencing and where the pain is?  Is it your lower abdomen, upper abdomen etc?  Do you have any other symptoms? Cristiana
    • trents
      The NIH article you link actually supports what I have been trying to explain to you: "Celiac disease (celiac disease) is an autoimmune-mediated enteropathy triggered by dietary gluten in genetically prone individuals. The current treatment for celiac disease is a strict lifelong gluten-free diet. However, in some celiac disease patients following a strict gluten-free diet, the symptoms do not remit. These cases may be refractory celiac disease or due to gluten contamination; however, the lack of response could be related to other dietary ingredients, such as maize, which is one of the most common alternatives to wheat used in the gluten-free diet. In some celiac disease patients, as a rare event, peptides from maize prolamins could induce a celiac-like immune response by similar or alternative pathogenic mechanisms to those used by wheat gluten peptides. This is supported by several shared features between wheat and maize prolamins and by some experimental results. Given that gluten peptides induce an immune response of the intestinal mucosa both in vivo and in vitro, peptides from maize prolamins could also be tested to determine whether they also induce a cellular immune response. Hypothetically, maize prolamins could be harmful for a very limited subgroup of celiac disease patients, especially those that are non-responsive, and if it is confirmed, they should follow, in addition to a gluten-free, a maize-free diet." Notice that those for whom it is suggested to follow a maize-free diet are a "very limited subgroup of celiac disease patients". Please don't try to make your own experience normative for the entire celiac community.  Notice also that the last part of the concluding sentence in the paragraph does not equate a gluten-free diet with a maize-free diet, it actually puts them in juxtaposition to one another. In other words, they are different but for a "limited subgroup of celiac disease patients" they produce the same or a similar reaction. You refer to celiac reactions to cereal grain prolamins as "allergic" reactions and "food sensitivity". For instance, you say, "NIH sees all these grains as in opposition to celiacs, of which I am one and that is science, not any MD with a good memory who overprescribes medications that contain known food allergens in them, of which they have zero knowledge if the patient is in fact allergic to or not, since they failed to do simple 'food sensitivity' testing" and "IF a person wants to get well, they should be the one to determine what grains they are allergic to and what grains they want to leave out, not you. I need to remind you that celiac disease is not an allergy, it is an autoimmune disorder. Neither allergy testing nor food sensitivity testing can be used to diagnose celiac disease. Allergy testing and food sensitivity testing cannot detect the antibodies produced by celiac disease in reaction to gluten ingestion.  You say of me, "You must be one of those who are only gluten intolerant . . ." Gluten intolerance is synonymous with celiac disease. You must be referring to gluten sensitivity or NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). Actually, I have been officially diagnosed with celiac disease both by blood antibody testing and by endoscopy/positive biopsy. Reacting to all cereal grain prolamins does not define celiac disease. If you are intent on teaching the truth, please get it straight first.
    • Bebygirl01
      Perhaps you would still like to answer the questions I posed on this topic, because that is all I asked. I am curious to know the answers to those questions, I do not care about the background of Dr. Osborne as I am more aware of the situation than you are, and he is also one of the best known authors out there on Celiac disease. But did you even bother to read the three Research Papers I posted by NIH? You must be one of those who are only gluten intolerant and not yet reacting to all glutens aka grains, but I AM one of those who react to ALL the glutens, and again, that is one of the two questions I originally posted on this matter. NIH sees all these grains as in opposition to celiacs, of which I am one and that is science, not any MD with a good memory who overprescribes medications that contain known food allergens in them, of which they have zero knowledge if the patient is in fact allergic to or not, since they failed to do simple 'food sensitivity' testing. I started with the failed FDA explanation of what Gluten Free is and I stayed sick and got even sicker. It wasn't until I came across NIH's papers and went off all grains that I realized that in fact, I am Celiac and reacting to all the glutens. IF a person wants to get well, they should be the one to determine what grains they are allergic to and what grains they want to leave out, not you. Those who are just getting started with learning about grains etc., can take it easy by just being "grain free' and eating a lot of meat, vegetables, etc. or whole foods as God has intended, without buying so called gluten free garbage out there that is making them sick and the whole reason they are not better. I tried the stupid gluten free garbage and it didn't work, and that will make anyone want to give up, it is better to teach the entire truth and let the patient decide, rather than give them misinformation and lies.
    • Nicola McGuire
      Thank you so much I will speak to the doctor for dietician apt . Thank you for your advice Beth much appreciated 
    • Scott Adams
      Oh no, I'm sorry to hear about the accidental gluten! This article, and the comments below it, may be helpful:    
×
×
  • Create New...