Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Calcium dosage


Elizabeth M Blair
Go to solution Solved by Elizabeth M Blair,

Recommended Posts

Elizabeth M Blair Contributor

In addition to being recently diagnosed with Celiac (July) I had a bone density scan and have been diagnosed with osteoporosis in both knees.  I have been taking 600 units of Calcium per day and my doctor and my GI nutritionist both told me to up that to 1200 a day.  But my sister, who has had a long career working with patients who need rehabilitation, and also shepherded our mother safely through her 20 some years of Celiac disease,  told me that I should take that 1200 in two different doses of 600 each.  Which should I purchase - the 600 or the 1200 unit tablets?  Does it matter?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



knitty kitty Grand Master

Take smaller doses of calcium throughout the day with meals.  

Also supplement with magnesium.  Low magnesium allows calcium to leach out.  Take twice as much calcium as magnesium.

Vitamin D and Vitamin K are important for bone health.  Trace minerals like boron, zinc, iron, copper, manganese and selenium are important, too.

The Impact of Trace Minerals on Bone Metabolism

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30467628/

An update on magnesium and bone health

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33959846/

  • Solution
Elizabeth M Blair Contributor

Thank you Kitty Kitty.  I did not realize calcium should be taken with meals.  I just checked my multi-vitamin bottle to see if it includes magnesium. It does and also Vit K and the B vitamins.  I will look online for more information about when best to take Calcium.  Thank you!

newtonfree Explorer

Knitty kitty is right on the money. Calcium and magnesium are a balancing act and most people get too little of both. Magnesium bisglycinate, sometimes just labeled "glycinate" (same molecule) is much more easily absorbed than the inorganic forms like magnesium oxide and I recommend bisglycinate to nearly everyone, celiac or not.

As KK already said, vitamins D and K (specifically K2) are also essential for proper metabolism of calcium. What we saw when we started giving everyone high doses of calcium without vitamins D and K2 was that they deposited that calcium everywhere but their bones - heart valves, blood vessels, tendons and other soft tissues.

K2 in particular is a relatively recent discovery, and seems to be vital in "directing" calcium away from soft tissues and into bones. When I studied Family Medicine, they didn't even have any recommendations surrounding it. They still barely touch on it in guidelines - Japan and Scandinavia are leading the way and North America is far behind. I'm considered a cutting-edge outlier just for having it on my radar and telling people to make sure they get enough.

Very few people get adequate K2 without supplements because it's often found either in foods uncommon in the western diet (like the incredibly pungent Japanese dish called nattō, or the Eastern european drinkable yogurt called kefir), or in foods that doctors have traditionally told people to eat less of for other health reasons (gouda, blue cheese, chicken liver, egg yolks). Chicken breast is one of the few foods that is 1) common in a Western diet, 2) a source of vitamin K2, and 3) something that isn't out of favour with nutritionists for other reasons!

KK is also correct that taking smaller doses of calcium more frequently (and always with food) is better for absorption. Our bodies are used to digesting snacks and meals, not compacted pellets of minerals. Our gut - especially a celiac one - struggles with the "huge dose of nutrients all at once" approach, which is one of the many reasons you always hear that it's better to get nutrition from food than from pills. But as celiacs especially, pills have their place - but smaller doses taken more frequently and with food is still the ticket.

Also, if you're on prescription medication, speak to your pharmacist before planning your calcium supplementation routine because some pills have to be spaced far apart from any doses of calcium to avoid interactions that could severely impact how much of your medication you absorb.

Elizabeth M Blair Contributor

Thank you, Newton Free.  This was very helpful. I do eat the foods you mention that have Vit K.  Egg yokes, blue cheese, gouda.  I purchased Calcium tablets with Magnesium and zinc yesterday (333 mg) in order to take it at smaller doses, after KK's post.  I do have one more question.  Most of the foods I eat now have iron in them and on the Mayo Clinic site, which I read yesterday, it said do not take calcium with foods that have iron in them.  So what kind of snacks would be good between meals when I take the calcium?  Cheese? which I eat a lot of because I have lost a lot of weight and would like to get most of it back.

 

  • 2 weeks later...
Elizabeth M Blair Contributor
On 10/16/2023 at 6:59 AM, Elizabeth M Blair said:

Thank you, Newton Free.  This was very helpful. I do eat the foods you mention that have Vit K.  Egg yokes, blue cheese, gouda.  I purchased Calcium tablets with Magnesium and zinc yesterday (333 mg) in order to take it at smaller doses, after KK's post.  I do have one more question.  Most of the foods I eat now have iron in them and on the Mayo Clinic site, which I read yesterday, it said do not take calcium with foods that have iron in them.  So what kind of snacks would be good between meals when I take the calcium?  Cheese? which I eat a lot of because I have lost a lot of weight and would like to get most of it back. I did not find an answer to this about not eating foods with iron when taking one of the three calcium tablets per day.   Does anyone suggestions. My other usual snack is almonds and they contain iron.

 

newtonfree Explorer
On 10/16/2023 at 7:59 AM, Elizabeth M Blair said:

Thank you, Newton Free.  This was very helpful. I do eat the foods you mention that have Vit K.  Egg yokes, blue cheese, gouda.  I purchased Calcium tablets with Magnesium and zinc yesterday (333 mg) in order to take it at smaller doses, after KK's post.  I do have one more question.  Most of the foods I eat now have iron in them and on the Mayo Clinic site, which I read yesterday, it said do not take calcium with foods that have iron in them.  So what kind of snacks would be good between meals when I take the calcium?  Cheese? which I eat a lot of because I have lost a lot of weight and would like to get most of it back.

 

Happy to help.

The reason they say not to take calcium together with iron is that calcium inhibits iron absorption. So it's not specifically dangerous to take the calcium with food containing iron, as long as you understand that the iron in that food will not be properly absorbed. So, if you were relying on that food to meet your daily iron requirement, you'd now be falling short of it.

If you consider the food you took with the calcium to be iron-free in terms of meeting your daily requirement, it doesn't matter that it contains iron. But it is true that it is a "waste" of an iron-containing food, since so many people struggle to meet their iron requirements.

Personally, I take ferrous bisglycinate (often sold as "mild" or "gentle" iron since it doesn't cause the same nausea or constipation as most other pill forms of iron) and just space it apart from any big doses of calcium. But I'm also very early on into my celiac journey, just a few months in to my GFD, and am more heavily reliant on supplements because of what bad shape my gut is in. If your diet is rich in iron and your levels are good on bloodwork, just try to space the calcium a couple of hours apart from the most iron-rich foods you eat in order to preserve their nutritional value.

It's all a balancing act.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,916
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    TrevorT
    Newest Member
    TrevorT
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      I agree. Doesn't look like you have celiac disease. Your elevated DGP-IGG must be due to something else. And it was within normal at that after your gluten challenge so it is erratic and doesn't seem to be tied to gluten consumption.
    • Jack Common
      Hello! I want to share my situation. I had symptoms like some food intolerance, diarrhea, bloating, belching one year ago. I thought I could have celiac disease so I did the blood tests. The results were ambiguous for me so I saw the doctor and he said I needed to do tests to check whether I had any parasites as well. It turned out I had giardiasis. After treating it my symptoms didn't disappear immediately. And I decided to start a gluten free diet despite my doctor said I didn't have it. After some time symptoms disappeared but that time it wasn't unclear whether I'd had them because of eliminating gluten or that parasite. The symptoms for both are very similar. Giardiasis also damages the small intestine. The only way to check this was to start eating bread again as I thought. Now about my results.   These are my first test results (almost a year ago) when I had symptoms: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgA antibody - 0.5 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 3.0 is normal) The Tissue Transglutaminase IgG antibody - 6.6 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 3.0 is normal) Immunoglobulin A - 1.91 g/l (for the lab I did the tests 0.7 to 4 g/l is normal) IgA Endomysial antibody (EMA) - < 1:10 titer (for the lab I did the tests < 1:10 titer is normal) IgG Endomysial antibody (EMA) - < 1:10 titer (for the lab I did the tests < 1:10 titer is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgA - 0.3 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 6.0 is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 46.1 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 6.0 is normal)   Then I didn't eat gluten for six months. Symptoms disappeared. And I started a gluten challenge. Before the challenge I did some tests. My results: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgG antibody - 0.5 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 28 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)   During the challenge I ate 6 slices of wheat bread. After the challenge my results are: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgA antibody - 2.0 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) The Tissue Transglutaminase IgG antibody - 2.0 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) Immunoglobulin A - 1.31 g/l (for the lab I did the tests 0.7 to 4 g/l is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgA - 2.0 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 2.13 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)   To be sure I continued consuming gluten. I ate a lot each day. Two months after I did the tests again. My results I got today are: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgA antibody - 0.7 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) Immunoglobulin A - 1.62 g/l (for the lab I did the tests 0.7 to 4 g/l is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 25.6 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)   Nowadays I didn't have any symptoms except tiredness but I think it's just work. I think it was this parasite because two years ago, for example, and before I didn't have these symptoms and I always ate gluten food. But I'm still not sure especially because the Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG results are sometimes high. What do you think? @Scott Adams
    • Jack Common
      My old results (almost a year ago) are: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgA antibody - 0.5 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 3.0 is normal) The Tissue Transglutaminase IgG antibody - 6.6 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 3.0 is normal) Immunoglobulin A - 1.91 g/l (for the lab I did the tests 0.7 to 4 g/l is normal) IgA Endomysial antibody (EMA) - < 1:10 titer (for the lab I did the tests < 1:10 titer is normal) IgG Endomysial antibody (EMA) - < 1:10 titer (for the lab I did the tests < 1:10 titer is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgA - 0.3 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 6.0 is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 46.1 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 6.0 is normal)   Then I didn't eat gluten for six months and after I started a gluten challenge. Before the challenge I did some tests. My results: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgG antibody - 0.5 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 28 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)   During the challenge I ate 6 slices of wheat bread. After the challenge my results are: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgA antibody - 2.0 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) The Tissue Transglutaminase IgG antibody - 2.0 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) Immunoglobulin A - 1.31 g/l (for the lab I did the tests 0.7 to 4 g/l is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgA - 2.0 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 2.13 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)   To be sure I continued consuming gluten. I ate a lot each day. Two months after I did the tests again. My results I got today are: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgA antibody - 0.7 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) Immunoglobulin A - 1.62 g/l (for the lab I did the tests 0.7 to 4 g/l is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 25.6 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)   I didn't have any symptoms now except tiredness but I think it's just work. I'm not IgA deficient as you can see so I don't need to do this Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG test. But I do because it's sometimes not in the normal range. What do you think this time? I think I don't have celiac disease. But this test... 
    • Wheatwacked
      @plumbago, I found a good PDF on cholesterol:  Unlocking the mysteries of VLDL: exploring its production, intracellular trafficking, and metabolism as therapeutic targets I just started it, but it may have answers for us, with whacky cholesterol.  The pharmaceuticals don't seem to be interested in anything but statins.   "The nicotine in tobacco causes a decrease in the HDL cholesterol level. " Maybe you should start smoking? 🤪 I have high LDL and low HDL.  It is genetic mutations in the LDLR, APOB, PCSK9, or LDLRAP1 genes. My whole family is on statins for Familial Hyperliperdemia except me.  December I had ultrasound and cat scan for Carotid Artery blockage and both sides are above 85% blockage.  I started on Atorvastatin and that made me weaker than ever, even with CoQ10.  I asked for and got prescription for 2000 mg/day Nicotinic Acid B3 and in the 3 weeks my numbers changed. I am feeling realy good lately.  Stronger and more flexible.  Sleeping better.  Getting roto router (TCar) as soon as I get clearance from a cardiologist.  I expect that by my next blood panels in April to be even better. I am beginning to believe that like vitamin D where the RDA only accounts for preventing Rickets, the RDA for B3 is way underestimated.   From Oct 22 to Jan 17: A1c from 13.5 to 10.2 eGFR from 55 to 79 Triglyeride from 458 to 362 Total cholesterol from 245 to 264 HDL from 27 to 44 VLDL from 84 to 68 LDL from 134 to 154
    • plumbago
      I have taken thiamine on and off (just not at this exact moment), and I’m not sure it's made any difference. Yes, I almost always “fast” (12 hours NPO) for blood tests, as do a great many other Americans, so I tend to think that’s not it. All I can say is that the mystery continues. I could do some speculating here…well, heck, let me go ahead and speculate now: The lab ranges we all see on our reports are more or less the averages of Americans who have had those blood tests. Now, it’s up to you and me whether or not to think of the average American as healthy. I can make arguments both ways, more often than not, on the negative. My point here is that maybe the current range of HDL is somewhat skewed (ie, low), and maybe just maybe my super high (plus 100s) HDL results are not something to worry about; the range just needs updating. Why do I say this? Because pre-celiac disease diagnosis, my HDL values were in the normal range, but post celiac disease diagnosis, my HDL levels are way above average. See where I’m going? My trusty guidebook on celiac disease, Recognizing Celiac Disease by Cleo Libonati, RN, BSN, says that HDL increases after being on the gluten free diet. Or can increase, I guess. Then again, it could be something else. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ In thinking of going to a cardiologist, I sort of fear that he/she will be dismissive of a link to celiac disease, treated celiac disease, and would not therefore be considering all possibilities. @trents I'm sorry you've been diligently working on your numbers to no effect. That must be frustrating. LDL is a world that is far better understood than HDL, so for you there's maybe less "mystery." Familial hypercholesterolemia is for sure something that can be tested. Outside of that, you're right, genetics can determine a general pattern.
×
×
  • Create New...