Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

5 year old son's results...still confused!


Mel43

Recommended Posts

Mel43 Newbie

Hello! My son has a history of GERD since birth, and was on alimentum formula, was dairy free, and things just didn't really resolve...we were just managing.

Fast forwarding to now...he just had testing done and his DGP IgA was 40.5. Does this usually mean celiacs? 

Back in February he was diagnosed with duodenitis, and the TtG IgA was negative. He was doing a bit better with medication initially, but then this summer got worse. Then at the end of the summer he had rectal bleeding, which has been an isolated incident. 

I know I need to wait on the doctor, but I'm just trying to grasp the possibilities at this point. Thanks for any insights or thoughts!!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Mel43 Newbie

Oh, he also had high fecal calprotectin...it was 135.

trents Grand Master

Welcome to the forum, Mel43.

Can you provide the negative vs. positive range for the DGP-IGA? There is no industry standard and each lab uses their own ranges.

The tTG-IGA test can generate a false negative if total IGA is low. I would ask your physician to run this test. It is often omitted but especially for children it should be run along with tTG-IGA. With children, we often see elevated DGP-IGA even though the tTG-IGA is negative in cases where the child actually does have celiac disease.

It is important that your son not cut back on gluten consumption until all testing for celiac disease is complete, including an endoscopy with biopsy should your physician decide to order that or to refer your son to a GI doc for such.

Mel43 Newbie

Than

14 hours ago, trents said:

Welcome to the forum, Mel43.

Can you provide the negative vs. positive range for the DGP-IGA? There is no industry standard and each lab uses their own ranges.

The tTG-IGA test can generate a false negative if total IGA is low. I would ask your physician to run this test. It is often omitted but especially for children it should be run along with tTG-IGA. With children, we often see elevated DGP-IGA even though the tTG-IGA is negative in cases where the child actually does have celiac disease.

It is important that your son not cut back on gluten consumption until all testing for celiac disease is complete, including an endoscopy with biopsy should your physician decide to order that or to refer your son to a GI doc for such.

Thank you! For the DPG-IGA it lists 0-13.9 as being normal. Max's was 40.5.  His DPG-IGG was 6, with normal being 0-14.9.

His TTG-IGA was <0.5, with normal also being 0-14.9.

Wheatwacked Veteran
2 hours ago, Mel43 said:

My son has a history of GERD since birth, and was on alimentum formula, was dairy free, and things just didn't really resolve...we were just managing.

When my son was diagnosed with Celiac Disease as soon as he was weaned he was put on Nutramigen.  That was back in 1976 and it is still the best.  Improvement was immediate and he grew up fine and strong. It is the only hypoallergenic baby formula with 100% of all the essential nutrients.  They make a version for toddlers.

trents Grand Master
(edited)

Let me reiterate that Max should not reduce his gluten intake (wheat, barley and rye) until all testing for celiac disease is done. Withdrawal of gluten before testing will compromise the test results as it will allow inflammation of the small bowel lining to subside (if Max in fact has celiac disease) and antibodies will therefore cease to be produced.

Also, his DGP-IGA is strongly positive. This is often a more reliable indicator of celiac disease in young children than is the tTG-IGA.

Edited by trents
Scott Adams Grand Master

This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. The next step might be an endoscopy to confirm a celiac disease diagnosis, and if that ends up being negative you may still want to try out a gluten-free diet to see if his symptoms improve.  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.

 

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



  • 3 weeks later...
Mel43 Newbie
On 10/17/2023 at 12:53 PM, Scott Adams said:

This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. The next step might be an endoscopy to confirm a celiac disease diagnosis, and if that ends up being negative you may still want to try out a gluten-free diet to see if his symptoms improve.  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.

 

 

Thank you all so much for the information! We did the genetic testing, and I'm waiting for the doctor to respond. I'm not sure what this means...his results for DQ2/DQX says value III, high. I'm so lost!

trents Grand Master

DQ2 is one of the genes that have been proven to be connected to the potential to develop celiac disease. People with the DQ2 who do develop celiac disease tend to be in the most sensitive, severe reaction to gluten group. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,543
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    cathy sh
    Newest Member
    cathy sh
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      71k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • cristiana
      Hi @Michael McDonald and welcome to the forum. Everyone's experience varies, and I think what you are experiencing is normal, having read a lot of different accounts over the years.  Of course, there is always just a slight chance that gluten might still be getting in somewhere, or that your symptoms might also be down to a gastric virus or food poisoning too, it sometimes is difficult to be sure which is which! But from my own experience, my own reactions have changed over time. Now I react differently to a significant glutening (vomiting, chills, palpitations) and the effects are about 2-3 hours after the glutening.  Sorry for TMI but I think the gluten doesn't hang around in my system as long because I throw up. Before found it took me maybe over a week to feel a lot better.  Although I felt nauseous I wasn't actually sick, so I guess more time for the gluten to hang around in my system.  I would experience chills, dizziness and diarrhea immediately.  Then, bouts of feeling unwell again for perhaps the initial week.  As well as oten feeling just plain weird and out of things.  The thing other thing would be developing a gastritis like sore stomach which could go on for two weeks or more, in the ensuing days.  I would never recommend popping a PPI long-term (unless medically advised, of course,), but time has taught me that a short dose of omeprazole 20mg for maybe 2 -3 days post glutening  helps nip this gastritis pain in the bud.  I take it first thing in the morning, with a glass of water. Cristiana  
    • trents
    • Michael McDonald
      It’s been 3 days so far. I think I might be on the mend, but every time I think that, I go on rewind.  Thanks for your reply, I appreciate it.    
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Michael McDonald! That's going to be a hard question to answer because of individual differences. I would think in most cases a few days to a couple of weeks to completely return to normal. How long are you into it now?
    • Michael McDonald
      How long should it take to recover after a significant cross contamination situation?
×
×
  • Create New...