Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Working my way through all the celiac screens - wondering if I can skip the endoscopy for now ...


Scott Mengel

Recommended Posts

Scott Mengel Newbie

Hi.  My daughter was just formally diagnosed with celiac via endoscopy (with serology beforehand).  I started down that journey as well, though have had many fewer symptoms - mostly with "arm pain"/arthalgia? in both arms, issues with cold sores, eczema in adolescence - I think that's it.  I've always been an eater of just about anything.  I'm in good shape for a 60 year old, active, eat well, etc.  I have had just about all of the celiac tests, and am awaiting an appointment with a GI doc next week to go over results and discuss next steps (to include a possible endoscopic biopsy).  My results:

  • HLA-DQ2 (Celiac Panel) - present

  • HLA-DQ8 (Celiac panel) - absent

  • HLA-DQA1*05 (Celiac Panel) - present

  • Immunoglobulin A ... 188

  • TTG (Anti-Tissue Transglutaminase) IgA Quantitative  ... 12.2

  • Deamidated Gliadin Peptide IgA Antibody ... 3.03

  • Deamidated Gliadin Peptide IgG Antibody ... 1.36

  • ENDOMYSIAL ANTIBODIES IGA ... "High degree of non-specific fluorescence observed; results indeterminate"

I am wondering what those of you with much more expertise and experience would advise as far as the endoscopy.  My "gut" right now says that I likely have celiac, that I can go gluten-free without the endoscopy, and that I can re-test some months down the road to ascertain the effects of the gluten-free diet - and perhaps wait on the endoscopy until Medicare kicks in at age 65.  

Thoughts about my results or direction moving forward?  Thanks in advance!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



trents Grand Master
(edited)

You left out information that we need to understand your antibody test results. We need not only the raw scores but the ranges used by the lab to establish what is negative vs. positive. Different labs use different ranges. There is no industry standard. So, we cannot tell if any of your antibody tests were actually positive unless you give us the ranges. All we can say is that you have one, maybe two celiac gene which establishes the you have the potential for developing celiac disease but it does not mean you have it or will develop it. 40% of the population have one or more celiac genes but only about 1% or so actually develop celiac disease. It also takes a triggering stress event of some kind.

I would certainly hold off on going gluten free until you have more confirmation about whether or not you actually have celiac disease. The symptoms you describe are not common celiac symptoms so I would go forward with the endoscopy/biopsy to check for damage to the small bowel villous lining.

Edited by trents
Scott Mengel Newbie

Thanks for the reply.  Here are the ranges provided by the labs:

Immunoglobulin A ... 188   Normal range: 66 - 433 mg/dL

TTG (Anti-Tissue Transglutaminase) IgA Quantitative  ... 12.2.  (Normal range: below <4.0 U/mL)

Deamidated Gliadin Peptide IgA Antibody ... 3.03.  Normal range: 0.00 - 4.99 FLU

Deamidated Gliadin Peptide IgG Antibody ... 1.36. Normal range: 0.00 - 4.99 FLU

trents Grand Master

So, you are mildly positive for the tTG-IGA and you have genetic potential for celiac disease. Being as how your symptoms are not debilitating I would go forward with the biopsy.

If you go gluten free now and decide to go for more testing later you would need to go off the gluten free diet in order to have the testing be valid.

Wheatwacked Veteran
On 1/17/2024 at 10:48 PM, Scott Mengel said:

My daughter was just formally diagnosed with celiac via endoscopy

On 1/17/2024 at 10:48 PM, Scott Mengel said:

Thoughts about my results or direction moving forward? 

Start her gluten free journey with your support by also going gluten free.  

A biopsy would give you a baseline of damage if it is bad enough and they look in the right places.  Joining your daughter would almost make it moot.  There are many cases of postitive serology and negative biopsy and vice versa.  It takes some 10 or more years of being told they are not Celiac before a positive diagnosis.  To don't need a positive diagnosis to yield the positive effect of GFD, but it does help to validate your decision to every one else. Gluten Free Diet is still denounced as simply a fad.

 

On 1/17/2024 at 11:23 PM, trents said:

So, you are mildly positive for the tTG-IGA and you have genetic potential for celiac disease.

kind of like "partly pregnant"

Keep in mind that gluten free processed foods are not fortified.   Vitamin and mineral deficiencies are common in Celiac Disease from the villi damage while consuming gluten; dietary deficiencies while on GFD.

Around 40% of US, Canadian, UK and Ireland adults are low in vitamin D.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,394
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    vita frances
    Newest Member
    vita frances
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.9k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      Hope you're feeling better.   I use a combination of Thiamine, Cobalamine, and Pyridoxine (Vitamins B 1, B12, and B6) for pain relief.  Together these vitamins together have pain killing effects (analgesic).  They are water soluble, so the body can easily excrete any excess.  They are safe to take.   Hope this helps.   Mechanisms of action of vitamin B1 (thiamine), B6 (pyridoxine), and B12 (cobalamin) in pain: a narrative review https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35156556/
    • trents
      I did some research on what exactly is gluten . . . what defines it.  "The term gluten usually refers to the elastic network of a wheat grain's proteins, gliadin and glutenin primarily . . . " "The types of grains that contain gluten include all species of wheat (common wheat, durum, spelt, khorasan, emmer and einkorn), and barley, rye, and some cultivars of oat" (emphasis mine) "The storage proteins in other grains, such as maize (zeins) and rice (rice protein), are sometimes called gluten, but they do not cause harmful effects in people with celiac disease." (emphasis mine) From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gluten What I found most interesting is that some cultivars of oats contain gluten. Could this explain, in part at least, the controversy surrounding oats? I mean, depending on the source, it could indeed sometimes include gluten and cause a celiac reaction.
    • Scott Adams
      Your point about the limitations of current testing is valid, but the idea of "molecular mimicry" with rice and corn glutens is less clear. While corn contains zein, which can trigger reactions in some celiac patients, rice is generally considered safe and lacks proteins structurally similar to gluten. The term "molecular mimicry" is often overused and not well-supported in the context of all grains. While your experience with corn is noteworthy, extending this to all grains, including rice, may not be scientifically justified. Testing and research should indeed improve, but claims about all grains causing similar reactions need more evidence.
    • trents
      I think Scott speaks truth. And I think there is more to this than the prospect of her having celiac disease. If it wasn't this issue, I'm betting it would be another. 
    • Scott Adams
      So one does need a specific inherited gene in order to develop celiac disease, so in some way I suppose anyone with celiac disease could take the negative approach of blaming their parents for getting it, however, it also takes some other environmental trigger, such as a specific virus or other factor, and this part is not necessarily caused by the parents. Around 40% of people have the genes to get celiac disease, but only around 1% actually get it.  In any case, we could all go through life complaining about all sorts of different wrongs supposedly caused by our parents, however, it's probably a lot more healthy for everyone to try to deal with life in a more positive way and instead move forward. For most people it's probably far more important to maintain positive family relationships in life than it is to try to attach blame to family members for getting any disease. 
×
×
  • Create New...