Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Having Biopsy


erin24

Recommended Posts

erin24 Explorer

My blood tests are negative and my GI said he will do a biopsy if I wanted him to. I said yes. I have been gluten-free for 3 weeks. I have 2 weeks until the endoscopy. So, will it even come back positive or negative since I have been gluten-free for 3 weeks?

Also, I asked the nurse (who admitted she didn't know much about Celiac) if I needed to go back on gluten for the next 2 weeks since I have been gluten-free for the past 3 weeks she said "If you have Celiac, you have it, no matter if you have been gluten-free, so it is my choice whether to eat gluten or not"!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ok, I am no a doctor but isn't that completely wrong? If I have been gluten-free for 3 weeks and my intestines heal then it will show up as no damage and therefore negative on the endo, right?

I mean seriously, am I wasting my time here dealing with these drs and doing this endoscopy? Basically, how I feel is that this guy probably doesn't even know what to look for when he does the endoscopy.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



RoseNNJ Apprentice

I had my Biopsy and getting the reults on Thursday. I was told to eat Gluten 7-10 days before the test. Which totaly sucked! I don't know if that was long enough. He sent me for the Celiac Panel being 3 weeks gluten-free, and it was Negative.

dlp252 Apprentice

I don't know if it's a complete waste of time, but it definitely might not show anything. My doctor ran a celiac blood panel even though I've been gluten-free for 4 months...he agreed that it probably wouldn't show anything, but said we could run it to have some baseline numbers for reference down the road.

I was scheduled for a colonoscopy (the reason I was seeing him in the first place), and he wanted to do an endoscopy as well (at the same time)...in my case it was to check for damage from GERD, but he said while he was in there he would do a biopsy to check for celiac damage...again more of a baseline, than actually expecting to find much I think.

In the end I don't know what benefit the baseline numbers might provide other than to see at some point down the road how things are progressing or worsening for me. And, I'm not sure if we weren't doing the endoscopy anyway if I would have opted for that just to check for damage after having been gluten-free so long.

plantime Contributor

Whether or not damage will show will depend on how severe it was to begin with. I don't think 3 weeks is long enough for bad damage to be reversed, but it will depend on how bad it was. You can eat gluten for next two weeks, just in case, then go gluten-free after the testing. It is usually not recommended to be gluten-free before testing, to avoid false negatives as much as possible.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,389
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Shavon
    Newest Member
    Shavon
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.9k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      If you have been eating the gluten equivalent of 4-6 slices of wheat bread daily for say, 4 weeks, I think a repeat blood test would be valid.
    • englishbunny
      it did include Total Immunoglobin A which was 135, and said to be in normal range. when i did the blood test in January I would say I was on a "light' gluten diet, but def not gluten free.  I didn't have any clue about the celiac thing then.  Since then I have been eating a tonne of gluten for the purpose of the endoscopy....so I'm debating just getting my blood test redone right away to see if it has changed so I'm not waiting another month...
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @englishbunny! Did your celiac panel include a test for "Total IGA"? That is a test for IGA deficiency. If you are IGA deficient, other IGA test resultls will likely be falsely low. Were you by any chance already practicing a reduced gluten free diet when the blood draw was done?
    • englishbunny
      I'm upset & confused and really need help finding a new gastro who specializes in celiac in California.  Also will welcome any insights on my results. I tested with an isolated positive for deamidated IGA a few months ago (it was 124.3, all other values on celiac panel <1.0), I also have low ferritin and Hashimotos. Mild gastro symptoms which don't seem to get significantly worse with gluten but I can't really tell... my main issues being extreme fatigue and joint pain. The celiac panel was done by my endocrinologist to try and get to the bottom of my fatigue and I was shocked to have a positive result. Just got negative biposy result from endoscopy. Doctor only took two biopsies from small intestine (from an area that appeared red), and both are normal. Problem is his Physician's Assistant can't give me an answer whether I have celiac or not, or what possible reason I might have for having positive antibodies if I don't have it. She wants me to retest bloods in a month and says in the meantime to either "eat gluten or not, it's up to you, but your bloodwork won't be accurate if you don't" I asked if it could be I have early stage celiac so the damage is patchy and missed by only having two samples taken, and she said doctor would've seen damaged areas when performing endoscopy (?) and that it's a good sign if my whole intestine isn't damaged all over, so even if there is spotty damage I am fine.  This doesn't exactly seem satisfactory, and seems to be contrary to so much of the reading and research I have done. I haven't seen the doctor except at my endoscopy, and he was pretty arrogant and didn't take much time to talk. I can't see him or even talk to him for another month. I'm really confused about what I should do. I don't want to just "wait and see" if I have celiac and do real damage in the meantime. Because I know celiac is more that just 'not eating bread' and if I am going to make such a huge lifestyle adjustment I need an actual diagnosis. So in summary I want to find another doctor in CA, preferably Los Angeles but I don't care at this stage if they can do telehealth! I just need some real answers from someone who doesn't talk in riddles. So recommendations would be highly welcomed. I have Blue Shield CA insurance, loads of gastros in LA don’t take insurance at all 😣
    • trents
      Okay, Lori, we can agree on the term "gluten-like". My concern here is that you and other celiacs who do experience celiac reactions to other grains besides wheat, barley and rye are trying to make this normative for the whole celiac community when it isn't. And using the term "gluten" to refer to these other grain proteins is going to be confusing to new celiacs trying to figure out what grains they actually do need to avoid and which they don't. Your experience is not normative so please don't proselytize as if it were.
×
×
  • Create New...