Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Any help is appreciated.

Mm123
 Share

Recommended Posts

Mm123 Newbie
Mm123
Posted

Apologies for how long this is, but I’m really confused and conflicted and I would really appreciate any advice. 

About two months ago I went in for a regular doctors appointment and requested general blood work. The last time I was tested was around 10 years ago when my brother was diagnosed with celiac disease. My tests back then were normal. I requested my blood work this time to include testing for celiac, just to check. I had no symptoms and no other reason to believe I would have celiac other than the fact that my brother has it and that I’m supposed to occasionally check to see if I’ve developed it. 

A month later I was called back in and informed that I tested positive for endomysial AB antibodies IgA. I was referred to a gastroenterologist, but after some basic research on the internet and with the knowledge that my brother has it, I came to the decision to start a gluten free diet. I wanted to avoid seeing a gastroenterologist if possible considering that the whole process can be expensive and if my research about my positive test is correct, it seems nearly impossible to test positive for those antibodies and not have celiac disease (please correct me if I’m wrong). 

I’ve been gluten free for about a month now and everything is relatively unchanged, but I’m questioning if I maybe got a little ahead of myself and if I should resume eating gluten. First off, I have no symptoms that I’m aware of. My regular blood test came back completely normal—no deficiencies or anything concerning regarding my nutrition. Second, I was told that my other tests for celiac disease came back normal. My endomysial AB titer is 1:80. My FGliadin IgG is <0.4. My FGliadin IgA is <0.2. My reticulin AB is negative. My tissue transglutaminase IgA is <0.5. Given my test results and my family history, is it safe to assume that I do have celiac disease? 

My reasoning for not wanting to continue my gluten free diet, besides the obvious wanting to eat gluten, is that since I don’t seem to have any symptoms or deficiencies, I would like to avoid potentially causing more problems by being overly cautious. I have IBS and a pretty severe intolerance to garlic and onions. Omitting gluten on top of that is difficult and I’m afraid of becoming intolerant to gluten in case I don’t have celiac disease. I have cut garlic and raw onions out for about two years now and all my severe symptoms (severe stomach cramps and diarrhea) have gone away since then. I came to the conclusion that garlic and raw onions were my trigger after doing the low-FODMAP diet. Is there a possibility that I’m mixing up my IBS symptoms for celiac? And is there a possibility that my IBS symptoms could be resolved by a gluten free diet? I have never had a reaction to gluten and my reactions to garlic and onions are so severe that I’d rather honestly cut out garlic and onions than gluten if given the choice. 

Do I have silent celiac or have I gotten ahead of myself? I have considered continuing to eat gluten and regularly get blood work done to see if I have any deficiencies or symptoms. My brothers symptoms were nutritional deficiencies/malabsorption and sudden weight loss. Obviously, if eating gluten affects my health and increases my risks for diseases I’ll continue my gluten free diet. But what is the severity of complete silent celiac? And if I omit gluten how much does it lower my risks to health problems compared to what risks I may already have genetically? 

I know the most straightforward way to get an answer would be to see a gastroenterologist and to get a biopsy done, but I’d really like to avoid that if possible. Is there anyone who can offer some advice on what I should do? 

Thank you!

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


trents Grand Master
trents
Posted

Welcome to the forum, @Mm123!

First, many celiacs are asymptomatic for many years after the onset of the disease. We call them "silent" celiacs. Second, the endomysial IGA test (aka, "EMA") is a very very reliable indicator for having celiac disease. It is not often run these days, having been largely replaced by the tTG-IGA which is less expensive. But the EMA is probably the most reliable blood antibody test available. Third, I believe there is a strong possibility your IBS is actually misdiagnosed celiac disease. The fact that your other blood values are normal and you have no weight loss may be due to the fact that you are in the earlier stages of celiac disease. Also, it is a misconception that all people with celiac disease will lose weight. Some gain weight because they are eating more to unconsciously trying to compensate for nutritional deficiencies. My suggestion is that you schedule an endoscopy/biopsy and keep eating significant amounts of gluten up to the day of that procedure to ensure its validity. If you do not, you will always be in doubt about whether or not you have celiac disease and will be unable to stick to a gluten free diet. You will find excuses to cheat. That's how the psychology works.

Mm123 Newbie
Mm123
Posted
  • Author

Thank you for your response @trents! I appreciate your insight very much.

Awol cast iron stomach Experienced
Awol cast iron stomach
Posted

Hello. I was misdiagnosed for decades as IBS. As trents said many of us may not fit the "typical" profile, and were missed. My cousin is a gold standard celiac, and they took too long to diagnose her as well. 

I definitely had signs before official diagnosis, but it was often times  dismissed, and/or minimized. 

Having the genetic component with the sibling. I hope you are able to get testing, and an answer. The actual correct diagnosis for me helped give me clarity that my ailments, and symptoms were not IBS or other issues at all. It was amazing how many symptoms gluten caused for me. 

Best wishes 

 

Mm123 Newbie
Mm123
Posted
  • Author

@Awol cast iron stomach thank you for your response. Honestly, being diagnosed with celiac makes me question how accurate my IBS diagnosis was, however, I would be surprised if it was actually celiac considering how severe and immediate my reactions were to garlic specifically. Meals that I ate in the past that contained garlic and no gluten still gave me reactions, so I have a feeling it’s both celiac and IBS. I appreciate your insight though and I will definitely keep an eye on my IBS symptoms now that I’m gluten free. Hopefully, one day I can consume garlic and raw onions again…that would make this gluten free journey a whole lot easier. 

trents Grand Master
trents
Posted

IBS is more common in the celiac population and visa versa. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,024
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Emilyallene
    Newest Member
    Emilyallene
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • cristiana
      Celiac pain relief

      By cristiana · Posted

      Hi @Karmmacalling I'm very sorry to hear you are feeling so unwell.  Can you tell us exactly what sort of pain you are experiencing and where the pain is?  Is it your lower abdomen, upper abdomen etc?  Do you have any other symptoms? Cristiana
    • trents
      How many people here are aware that there are 9 types of gluten that Celiacs should be aware of?

      By trents · Posted

      The NIH article you link actually supports what I have been trying to explain to you: "Celiac disease (celiac disease) is an autoimmune-mediated enteropathy triggered by dietary gluten in genetically prone individuals. The current treatment for celiac disease is a strict lifelong gluten-free diet. However, in some celiac disease patients following a strict gluten-free diet, the symptoms do not remit. These cases may be refractory celiac disease or due to gluten contamination; however, the lack of response could be related to other dietary ingredients, such as maize, which is one of the most common alternatives to wheat used in the gluten-free diet. In some celiac disease patients, as a rare event, peptides from maize prolamins could induce a celiac-like immune response by similar or alternative pathogenic mechanisms to those used by wheat gluten peptides. This is supported by several shared features between wheat and maize prolamins and by some experimental results. Given that gluten peptides induce an immune response of the intestinal mucosa both in vivo and in vitro, peptides from maize prolamins could also be tested to determine whether they also induce a cellular immune response. Hypothetically, maize prolamins could be harmful for a very limited subgroup of celiac disease patients, especially those that are non-responsive, and if it is confirmed, they should follow, in addition to a gluten-free, a maize-free diet." Notice that those for whom it is suggested to follow a maize-free diet are a "very limited subgroup of celiac disease patients". Please don't try to make your own experience normative for the entire celiac community.  Notice also that the last part of the concluding sentence in the paragraph does not equate a gluten-free diet with a maize-free diet, it actually puts them in juxtaposition to one another. In other words, they are different but for a "limited subgroup of celiac disease patients" they produce the same or a similar reaction. You refer to celiac reactions to cereal grain prolamins as "allergic" reactions and "food sensitivity". For instance, you say, "NIH sees all these grains as in opposition to celiacs, of which I am one and that is science, not any MD with a good memory who overprescribes medications that contain known food allergens in them, of which they have zero knowledge if the patient is in fact allergic to or not, since they failed to do simple 'food sensitivity' testing" and "IF a person wants to get well, they should be the one to determine what grains they are allergic to and what grains they want to leave out, not you. I need to remind you that celiac disease is not an allergy, it is an autoimmune disorder. Neither allergy testing nor food sensitivity testing can be used to diagnose celiac disease. Allergy testing and food sensitivity testing cannot detect the antibodies produced by celiac disease in reaction to gluten ingestion.  You say of me, "You must be one of those who are only gluten intolerant . . ." Gluten intolerance is synonymous with celiac disease. You must be referring to gluten sensitivity or NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). Actually, I have been officially diagnosed with celiac disease both by blood antibody testing and by endoscopy/positive biopsy. Reacting to all cereal grain prolamins does not define celiac disease. If you are intent on teaching the truth, please get it straight first.
    • Bebygirl01
      How many people here are aware that there are 9 types of gluten that Celiacs should be aware of?

      By Bebygirl01 · Posted

      Perhaps you would still like to answer the questions I posed on this topic, because that is all I asked. I am curious to know the answers to those questions, I do not care about the background of Dr. Osborne as I am more aware of the situation than you are, and he is also one of the best known authors out there on Celiac disease. But did you even bother to read the three Research Papers I posted by NIH? You must be one of those who are only gluten intolerant and not yet reacting to all glutens aka grains, but I AM one of those who react to ALL the glutens, and again, that is one of the two questions I originally posted on this matter. NIH sees all these grains as in opposition to celiacs, of which I am one and that is science, not any MD with a good memory who overprescribes medications that contain known food allergens in them, of which they have zero knowledge if the patient is in fact allergic to or not, since they failed to do simple 'food sensitivity' testing. I started with the failed FDA explanation of what Gluten Free is and I stayed sick and got even sicker. It wasn't until I came across NIH's papers and went off all grains that I realized that in fact, I am Celiac and reacting to all the glutens. IF a person wants to get well, they should be the one to determine what grains they are allergic to and what grains they want to leave out, not you. Those who are just getting started with learning about grains etc., can take it easy by just being "grain free' and eating a lot of meat, vegetables, etc. or whole foods as God has intended, without buying so called gluten free garbage out there that is making them sick and the whole reason they are not better. I tried the stupid gluten free garbage and it didn't work, and that will make anyone want to give up, it is better to teach the entire truth and let the patient decide, rather than give them misinformation and lies.
    • Nicola McGuire
      My son newly diagnosed

      By Nicola McGuire · Posted

      Thank you so much I will speak to the doctor for dietician apt . Thank you for your advice Beth much appreciated 
    • Scott Adams
      Celiac pain relief

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Oh no, I'm sorry to hear about the accidental gluten! This article, and the comments below it, may be helpful:    
×
×
  • Create New...