Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Waiting for results


Di Wallace

Recommended Posts

Di Wallace Rookie

I live in the UK. A Blood test showed TTG 29, positive is 10. I was sent for a biopsy on 11th April. It is now 9 weeks on and have still to receive a result I have rung the Secretary numerous times and keep getting told that the consultant has them. At our previous appointment the consultant said he thought it was very likely I had Coeliac. I just want to know what to do. Am I meant to stop eating gluten. No one has said anything. Have tried GP for help, but they have just said I have to wait. Has anyone else had this frustrating problem?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Scott Adams Grand Master

This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease.  If you doctor said you likely have celiac disease, and you've already done a blood panel and endoscopy, it might make sense for you to start a gluten-free diet to see if you symptoms go away. You may want to let your doctor know that you are doing this just in case, as there could be a small change that they may want to do more testing.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ajt2106 Newbie

Hi Di,

Your experience with the NHS seems to be similar to my own. 

I was called up by my GP following blood tests to tell me I had significantly raised antibodies suggesting coeliac disease. I was told at that point that the waiting list for a gastroscopy was in excess of 2 years so I needed to stop eating gluten immediately. The GP told me she had discussed my blood results with the gastro consultant at the hospital and everyone was in agreement that coeliac is highly likely. 

I went gluten free as instructed and I immediately felt better in myself and noticed all my bloating had gone down, I was going to the toilet less, I was feeling more energetic. It was great after feeling terrible for years! I then got a call several weeks later saying my gastroscopy/biopsy was being outsourced privately and I was to go back to eating gluten for at least 6 weeks before my procedure. Fine. I got my date which was around 8 weeks from that point so it worked out pretty well. 

Fast forward 8 weeks, I have my biopsy and whatnot which picks up that I have gastritis and I should be given a course of PPI medication to reduce the inflammation followed by a review in clinic. I was also told my biopsy results would be ready within 6-8 weeks and to contact the GI dept. if I hadn't heard anything after that period.

I left with a copy of my endoscopy report but no prescription for any medication and no advice given whether I should go back to being gluten free. I'm not familiar with how the NHS works so I assumed I'd get a call from my GP or something to talk me through the next steps. I heard nothing from anyone. 

I was feeling terrible at this point so I decided myself that I was going back to gluten free which again, helped me massively.

I waited for 8 weeks as instructed and I hadn't heard anything about my biopsy results. I hadn't had any prescription for the meds I was supposed to be taking etc. I contacted the consultant's secretary who told me my results were back  but they couldn't be discussed over the phone and that I would have to wait until I was written to. I had chase up the GP (who had received a copy of my report stating I needed medication) asking where my prescription was which I finally got 2 months after I was meant to have it.

Anyway, we're 6 months on from that and I finally had my biopsy results back literally one day ago. They have turned out to be fairly inconclusive anyway.

I received two letters - one which states that I have stomach inflammation but nothing that is a cause for concern and it's to be managed by GP. The letter then goes on with a 'PS' stating that after reviewing my case 'more fully', they realised that I had positive anti-TTG antibodies well within the range that they would expect the biopsy to show coeliac. 

The second letter follows on saying that my biopsy results have been discussed in meetings and that there ARE changes which indicate coeliac. I have to repeat the blood tests again and go back to eating gluten for another 6 week period. The wording they have used is that it's to give them clear idea of whether I have coeliac or not followed by the sentence 'Unfortunately, it is likely you have got coeliac disease.'

So yeah, I'm also super confused as to what is going on. Poor communication and plenty of confusion to go with it. 

I'd say that if you've had your blood tests and gastroscopy, cut out the gluten to see if it makes you feel better. If they aren't prepared to tell you then take matters into your own hands. If they require further testing, then they'll just have to wait whilst you reintroduce gluten back into your diet. Going off what my letter says, they've assumed I was gluten-free anyway because it instructs me to reintroduce it to my diet. Just be prepared for it to take months instead of weeks before you get your biopsy results.

Good luck!

Andy

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Di Wallace Rookie

Thanks for your reply. Sounds like you've had an awful experience. Hope you get sorted eventually. Actually, I finally received my results yesterday, 11 weeks and 3 days after the procedure, which did confirm Coeliac. Honestly though, the Consultant only works at the hospital 1 day a week, the rest is private work. Is it any wonder that we are left climbing the walls. Anyway, thanks for your helpful reply. All the best 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GardeningForHealth Enthusiast

Wow. That wasn't handled well by the doctors. I am not sure why there is such uncertainty and confusion around the endoscopy. Doctors and researchers make such a big deal about getting the endoscopy to confirm the diagnosis, but there seems to be so much uncertainty and gray around the endoscopy.

Years ago, my sister had a very very high celiac blood panel which revealed a TTG of like 140, and she did get an endoscopy done, but there was confusion around that. The report that came from that did not clearly state the result, and her subsequent doctors were confused what to make of this report.

It really puts me off to the idea of getting one done. I would expect a concrete report from such a procedure which eliminates any uncertainties.

The endoscopy is supposed to reveal a result of how damaged your villi is, and rank the level of damage by Marsh 0, Marsh 1, Marsh 2, or Marsh 3. Why isn't this discussed on the reports?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      125,798
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    TriciaE
    Newest Member
    TriciaE
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.8k
    • Total Posts
      68.9k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Hydrolyzed wheat is wheat protein that has been broken down into smaller components through a chemical or enzymatic process called hydrolysis. This ingredient can be found in various products, including cosmetics, personal care items, and some food products. For people with celiac disease, hydrolyzed wheat is generally not safe to consume because it still contains gluten proteins, even in its broken-down form. Though hydrolysis reduces the size of these proteins, it doesn’t fully remove the components that trigger an autoimmune response in people with celiac disease. In food products, hydrolyzed wheat protein still poses a risk and should be avoided. With regard to the McDonald's French fries, the total amount of hydrolyzed wheat in the flavoring is small, and the amount that ends up in an order of fries is even smaller, and likely below 20ppm. McDonald’s states that the fries are gluten-free by ingredient and free from cross-contact with gluten-containing foods in their dedicated fryers. Third-party tests and statements by McDonald's confirm gluten levels are below the FDA threshold for gluten-free labeling (20 parts per million or less). So, while McDonald’s USA fries are widely accepted as gluten-free based on testing and labeling, some people with celiac disease still approach them cautiously due to the past concerns and individual sensitivities.
    • trents
      Here is an excerpt from this article: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC82695:   Studies have shown that various peptidases of fungal, plant, animal, or bacterial origin are able to hydrolyze gluten into harmless peptides. According to SDS‐PAGE pattern, proteolytic enzymes hydrolyze gliadins (Heredia‐Sandoval et al., 2016; Scherf et al., 2018; Socha et al., 2019; Wei et al., 2018, 2020). Bacterial peptidase (Krishnareddy & Green, 2017), fungal peptidase (Koning et al., 2005), and prolyl endopeptidases (PEPs) (Amador et al., 2019; Janssen et al., 2015; Kerpes et al., 2016; Mamo & Assefa, 2018) thoroughly degrade gliadin fractions to decrease gluten concentration and influence celiac disease. Aspergillus niger derived PEP (AN‐PEP) were assessed in clinical cases for their impact on modifying immune responses to gluten in celiac patients (Lähdeaho et al., 2014). Guerdrum and Bamforth (2012) reported that PEP addition in brewing technology decreased the prolamin and all of the identified immunopathogenic gluten epitopes in beer production (Akeroyd et al., 2016). On the contrary, many of the recent investigations which employed enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), mass spectrometry, and Western blot analysis reported that PEP did not thoroughly destroy the whole gluten proteins (Allred et al., 2017; Colgrave et al., 2017; Fiedler et al., 2018; Panda et al., 2015), which indicates that beers treated with PEP are not safe for celiac disease patients. Anecdotally, this excerpt supports what we hear from the celiac community on this forum with regard to "gluten free" hydrolyzed wheat products and that is that some still react to them while many don't.
    • Scott Adams
      There aren't good studies that have been done on celiac disease remission, and I'm going from a distant memory of an older post here, but the longest remission that Dr. Stefano Guandalini from the University of Chicago Celiac Disease Center has witnessed was ~10 years, then the symptoms of celiac disease and the damage came back. The real issue though, is that you still could increase your risk of various related diseases and disorders by eating gluten, but again, celiac disease remission has not been studies enough to know what health risks you might face.
    • trents
      Scott, could you elaborate on hydrolyzed wheat? Does that remove or deactivate the gluten protein?
    • Scott Adams
      McDonald's has a gluten-free bun, are you in Europe? They don't have that in the USA but I hope they are coming here soon. In the USA the fries are not considered gluten-free, even if they are made in a dedicated fryer, but many celiacs, including myself, have been eating them for years without issues. In Europe they don't have the same hydrolyzed wheat as an ingredient in their beef flavoring, like they do here in the USA. This is a controversial topic that I wanted to mention with you, but you can check the ingredients on the McDonald's website, as they can vary from country to country.
×
×
  • Create New...