Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Weak positive


lorishaw
Go to solution Solved by trents,

Recommended Posts

lorishaw Newbie

Hi all! I  am new here. Recently I had a celiac blood panel done. Everything was normal except for two things. My tgg-iga was a weak positive (I had a 4.6 where <4.0 is negative) and my Immunoglobulin A (IgA), S was low (I had 60 where 61-356 is normal). With these results I thought I was surely negative. The GI said that these results are indicative of celiacs. I have an endoscopy Monday. Does anyone else have experience with this? Is a weak positive truly a positive? Could it just be a fluke? Thank you!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



  • Solution
trents Grand Master

Welcome to the forum, @lorishaw!

One factor you are likely not aware of is that your low Immunoglobulin A (IgA) (what we typically refer to as "total IGA") would cause the TTG-IGA test score to be artificially low. Low total IGA (or IGA deficiency) suppresses individual IGA test scores. It is not itself an antibody test for celiac disease but if it is low it will influence those that are. In other words, if your Immunoglobulin A (IGA) were within normal range your TTG-IGA score would likely have been more strongly positive. There are a number of antibody tests that can be run when diagnosing celiac disease and it is important to realize that it only takes one of them being positive in order to point to celiac disease. The TTG-IGA is the most popular test run by physicians and often the only one. Kudos to your doc for doing a more complete celiac panel. 

Celiac disease causes inflammation to the villous lining of the small bowel when gluten is consumed which eventually and over time damages the lining and inhibits nutrient absorption. The antibody tests are designed to detect the inflammation markers that show up in the blood. The endoscopy/biopsy is designed to visually (and microscopically) examine the damage to the villous lining and is used to confirm the results of a positive antibody test. Generous amounts of gluten should be consumed daily until both kinds of testing are complete. Beginning a gluten free diet weeks or months ahead of testing will sabotage the test results.

Scott Adams Grand Master

This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. 

 

 

lorishaw Newbie
15 minutes ago, trents said:

Welcome to the forum, @lorishaw!

One factor you are likely not aware of is that your low Immunoglobulin A (IgA) (what we typically refer to as "total IGA") would cause the TTG-IGA test score to be artificially low. Low total IGA (or IGA deficiency) suppresses individual IGA test scores. It is not itself an antibody test for celiac disease but if it is low it will influence those that are. In other words, if your Immunoglobulin A (IGA) were within normal range your TTG-IGA score would likely have been more strongly positive. There are a number of antibody tests that can be run when diagnosing celiac disease and it is important to realize that it only takes one of them being positive in order to point to celiac disease. The TTG-IGA is the most popular test run by physicians and often the only one. Kudos to your doc for doing a more complete celiac panel. 

Celiac disease causes inflammation to the villous lining of the small bowel when gluten is consumed which eventually and over time damages the lining and inhibits nutrient absorption. The antibody tests are designed to detect the inflammation markers that show up in the blood. The endoscopy/biopsy is designed to visually (and microscopically) examine the damage to the villous lining and is used to confirm the results of a positive antibody test. Generous amounts of gluten should be consumed daily until both kinds of testing are complete. Beginning a gluten free diet weeks or months ahead of testing will sabotage the test results.

Thank you so much! This is actually really helpful. I was feeling as if maybe I was making it up in my head a little bit. I’m kind of a nervous Nancy so the sudden potential for something I have not considered is throwing me through a loop. I appreciate your response!

lorishaw Newbie
15 minutes ago, Scott Adams said:

This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. 

 

 

It is! Thank you! I guess I’m still confused about why a weak positive is labeled as such. Does that mean it is less likely it is celiacs?

trents Grand Master

Lori, I suppose it is true that a weak positive antibody test score makes it less certain that it could be celiac disease and more likely something else. But because you are IGA deficient, the water is a little muddied in that regard. You will likely have some more definitive answers soon after your procedure on Monday, probably within a week or two. But let me ask you. What symptoms do you have? What prompted this testing for celiac disease in the first place?

Scott Adams Grand Master

In all honesty that designation is fairly recent, and very confusing--what I really think it means is that for patients OR doctors who really don't like the concept of a lifelong gluten-free diet it provides a way for either to "copout" on making an official diagnosis.

There isn't for example, a "strong-negative" designation, where you might score 19/20, for example, and you may actually have detected celiac disease early, before you have villi damage. I can't think of any reason for this designation, as there is no mild form of celiac disease. I suppose one possible reason for it might be that you could be catching the disease early, before serious villi damage, which is a good thing, however, this designation is being abused, which can be seen over and over in threads on this board. Many patients and doctors think they don't have it when they hear "weak positive."


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



lorishaw Newbie
1 hour ago, trents said:

Lori, I suppose it is true that a weak positive antibody test score makes it less certain that it could be celiac disease and more likely something else. But because you are IGA deficient, the water is a little muddied in that regard. You will likely have some more definitive answers soon after your procedure on Monday, probably within a week or two. But let me ask you. What symptoms do you have? What prompted this testing for celiac disease in the first place?

I’ve always had what I call ‘Tummy troubles’. But more specifically gas, bloating, issues in the bathroom, stomach aches, etc. The celiac panel was actually run by my GP as a way to better prepare me for my GI visit. We were not exactly suspecting celiacs, more so looking to cross it off the list and move towards a different diagnosis (we had though IBS). Which is why I’m so suprised after meeting with the GI. I guess, after reading much in this thread, I  am very thankful for my doctors to have taken the time to do a full celiac panel and ordered the endoscopy. It seems that many doctors do not take such steps.

lorishaw Newbie
1 hour ago, Scott Adams said:

In all honesty that designation is fairly recent, and very confusing--what I really think it means is that for patients OR doctors who really don't like the concept of a lifelong gluten-free diet it provides a way for either to "copout" on making an official diagnosis.

There isn't for example, a "strong-negative" designation, where you might score 19/20, for example, and you may actually have detected celiac disease early, before you have villi damage. I can't think of any reason for this designation, as there is no mild form of celiac disease. I suppose one possible reason for it might be that you could be catching the disease early, before serious villi damage, which is a good thing, however, this designation is being abused, which can be seen over and over in threads on this board. Many patients and doctors think they don't have it when they hear "weak positive."

When you put it into the perspective of a strong/weak negative, that does make the ‘weak positive’ sound odd. I have scoured the internet and have been unable to find a statistic that will tell me who often a weak positive is a confirms case of celiacs after biopsy. I just assumed, as you have noted here, that I was likely fine. Interesting enough I had elevated liver enzymes in my blood work as well. My GP found it strange, but there was no indication why this would be. Upon further research, I have found that elevated liver enzymes can be correlated to celiacs. Very crazy. I’m nervous to see what the biopsy says.

trents Grand Master

Lori, elevated liver enzymes was what led eventually to my celiac diagnosis. This is experienced in about 20% of those with celiac disease but most general medicine doctors would not know that. It is not a "classic" celiac disease symptom and most GPs are not trained beyond an awareness of the classic GI symptoms along with maybe anemia and osteoporosis. There are over 200 symptoms and associated diseases that have now been associated with celiac disease but there is still a lot of ignorance in the medical community at large with regard to all this. That's what makes an online community like this one with a special focus so valuable.

Scott Adams Grand Master

There is definitely a connection between celiac disease and liver issues, and we have a category of research summaries on this topic:
https://www.celiac.com/celiac-disease/celiac-disease-amp-related-diseases-and-disorders/liver-disease-and-celiac-disease/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,983
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Kari Shover
    Newest Member
    Kari Shover
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • WildFlower1
      Thank you for your help, I am currently in the middle of the gluten challenge. A bit over 6 weeks in. At 4 weeks I got the celiac blood tests and that is when they were negative. So to rule out the false negative, since I’m in the middle of the gluten challenge right now and will never do this again, I wanted to continue consuming gluten to the point to make sure the blood tests are not a false negative - which I did not receive a firm answer for how many weeks total.    My issue is, with these blood tests the doctors say “you are not celiac” and rule it out completely as a potential cause of my issues, when the symptoms scream of it. I want to rule out this 30 year mystery for my own health since I’m in the middle of it right now. Thank you!
    • trents
      I am a male and had developed osteopenia by age 50 which is when I finally got dx with celiac disease. I am sure I had it for at least 13 years before that because it was then I developed idiopathic elevated liver enzymes. I now have a little scoliosis and pronounced kyphosis (upper spine curvature).  All of your symptoms scream of celiac disease, even if the testing you have had done does not. You may be an atypical celiac, meaning the disease is not manifesting itself in your gut but is attacking other body systems. There is such a thing as sero negative celiac disease. But you still have not given me a satisfactory answer to my question of why do you need a differential dx between celiac disease and NCGS when either one would call for complete abstinence from gluten, which you have already been practicing except for short periods when you were undergoing a gluten challenge. Why do you want to put a toxic substance into your body for weeks when, even if it did produce a positive test result for celiac disease, neither you or your doctors would do anything different? Regardless of what doctors are recommending to you, it is your body it is affecting not theirs and they don't seem to have given you any good justification for starting another gluten challenge. Where you live, are doctors kings or something?
    • WildFlower1
      Sorry to put it clearly, at 15, infertility started (tried to word it nicely) meaning menstruation stopped. Which is in correlation to celiac I mean. Thank you. 
    • WildFlower1
      Thank you for the reply! Doctors over the years have tested me for everything under the sun and tests are normal, except the decreasing bone density, high FSH (in regards to infertility), lower iron, and all the other celiac symptoms I experience. When I was 15 the infertility started (my whole life growing up I always ate gluten, and always had severe stomach problems, I’m an adult now and I still remember the stomach pain as a child) and then from here, they couldn’t figure out why. At the same time I was having all these celiac symptoms but nobody ever put two and two together.   Eventually in adulthood I went off gluten and dairy and felt better. Later in life, the topic was brought up by doctors, but they could never actually test for celiac because I was off gluten for years.   Just recently multiple doctors brought it up again, and said I should rule it out. So the ruling out of celiac, which is direct correlation with these symptoms, infertility at a younge age, on the edge and getting into osteopenia, etc. etc. is the concern. I was off of dairy for the same time as gluten because it made me sick. I did not surely have adequate calcium/D intake as well over these years.   The matter of concern is to once and for all get celiac ruled out for my own health, a gastro doctor recommended I get it done and other doctors to confirm yes or no to officially rule it out.  For these 6 weeks I have not been eating enough gluten then it seems, if 2-3 slices of bread a day is not really enough. I should increase my intake of gluten then and extend the test time?   Thank you very much for your help!! The test for Immunoglobulin IgA being a value of —> “1.25” shows it is in the normal range of 0.54-4.17 g/L on the test. 
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @WildFlower1! The reason you are seeing conflicting results when you research the length of time recommended for doing the "gluten challenge" is that the guidelines have recently been under revision. So there are two components: 1. amount of daily gluten consumption and 2. duration of that amount of daily gluten consumption Recently, the guidelines have been under revision because the medical community was sensing the previous standards were too relaxed, particularly in the daily amount of recommended gluten consumption. The more recent guidelines seem to be calling for higher amounts of daily gluten consumption over (perhaps) as shorter period of time. So, it is becoming a daily minimum of 10g of gluten daily (about the amount in 4-6 slices of wheat bread) for a minimum of two weeks. Personally, I would recommend that amount of consumption be extended from two weeks to four weeks to ensure valid testing. Your Immunoglobulin IgA at 1.25. Was that within normal range? If that one is low, you are IgA deficient and other IgA test results cannot be trusted. But regardless of whether or not you have celiac disease or NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity) the antidote is the same, namely, a gluten free diet. What would you do different if you had a more confident differential diagnosis? And there are other reasons for the development of osteopenia/osteoporosis that you probably should explore. Are you on any serious supplementation for D3 and magnesium?
×
×
  • Create New...