Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Weak positive


lorishaw
Go to solution Solved by trents,

Recommended Posts

lorishaw Newbie

Hi all! I  am new here. Recently I had a celiac blood panel done. Everything was normal except for two things. My tgg-iga was a weak positive (I had a 4.6 where <4.0 is negative) and my Immunoglobulin A (IgA), S was low (I had 60 where 61-356 is normal). With these results I thought I was surely negative. The GI said that these results are indicative of celiacs. I have an endoscopy Monday. Does anyone else have experience with this? Is a weak positive truly a positive? Could it just be a fluke? Thank you!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



  • Solution
trents Grand Master

Welcome to the forum, @lorishaw!

One factor you are likely not aware of is that your low Immunoglobulin A (IgA) (what we typically refer to as "total IGA") would cause the TTG-IGA test score to be artificially low. Low total IGA (or IGA deficiency) suppresses individual IGA test scores. It is not itself an antibody test for celiac disease but if it is low it will influence those that are. In other words, if your Immunoglobulin A (IGA) were within normal range your TTG-IGA score would likely have been more strongly positive. There are a number of antibody tests that can be run when diagnosing celiac disease and it is important to realize that it only takes one of them being positive in order to point to celiac disease. The TTG-IGA is the most popular test run by physicians and often the only one. Kudos to your doc for doing a more complete celiac panel. 

Celiac disease causes inflammation to the villous lining of the small bowel when gluten is consumed which eventually and over time damages the lining and inhibits nutrient absorption. The antibody tests are designed to detect the inflammation markers that show up in the blood. The endoscopy/biopsy is designed to visually (and microscopically) examine the damage to the villous lining and is used to confirm the results of a positive antibody test. Generous amounts of gluten should be consumed daily until both kinds of testing are complete. Beginning a gluten free diet weeks or months ahead of testing will sabotage the test results.

Scott Adams Grand Master

This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. 

 

 

lorishaw Newbie
  On 7/24/2024 at 4:46 PM, trents said:

Welcome to the forum, @lorishaw!

One factor you are likely not aware of is that your low Immunoglobulin A (IgA) (what we typically refer to as "total IGA") would cause the TTG-IGA test score to be artificially low. Low total IGA (or IGA deficiency) suppresses individual IGA test scores. It is not itself an antibody test for celiac disease but if it is low it will influence those that are. In other words, if your Immunoglobulin A (IGA) were within normal range your TTG-IGA score would likely have been more strongly positive. There are a number of antibody tests that can be run when diagnosing celiac disease and it is important to realize that it only takes one of them being positive in order to point to celiac disease. The TTG-IGA is the most popular test run by physicians and often the only one. Kudos to your doc for doing a more complete celiac panel. 

Celiac disease causes inflammation to the villous lining of the small bowel when gluten is consumed which eventually and over time damages the lining and inhibits nutrient absorption. The antibody tests are designed to detect the inflammation markers that show up in the blood. The endoscopy/biopsy is designed to visually (and microscopically) examine the damage to the villous lining and is used to confirm the results of a positive antibody test. Generous amounts of gluten should be consumed daily until both kinds of testing are complete. Beginning a gluten free diet weeks or months ahead of testing will sabotage the test results.

Expand Quote  

Thank you so much! This is actually really helpful. I was feeling as if maybe I was making it up in my head a little bit. I’m kind of a nervous Nancy so the sudden potential for something I have not considered is throwing me through a loop. I appreciate your response!

lorishaw Newbie
  On 7/24/2024 at 4:49 PM, Scott Adams said:

This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. 

 

 

Expand Quote  

It is! Thank you! I guess I’m still confused about why a weak positive is labeled as such. Does that mean it is less likely it is celiacs?

trents Grand Master

Lori, I suppose it is true that a weak positive antibody test score makes it less certain that it could be celiac disease and more likely something else. But because you are IGA deficient, the water is a little muddied in that regard. You will likely have some more definitive answers soon after your procedure on Monday, probably within a week or two. But let me ask you. What symptoms do you have? What prompted this testing for celiac disease in the first place?

Scott Adams Grand Master

In all honesty that designation is fairly recent, and very confusing--what I really think it means is that for patients OR doctors who really don't like the concept of a lifelong gluten-free diet it provides a way for either to "copout" on making an official diagnosis.

There isn't for example, a "strong-negative" designation, where you might score 19/20, for example, and you may actually have detected celiac disease early, before you have villi damage. I can't think of any reason for this designation, as there is no mild form of celiac disease. I suppose one possible reason for it might be that you could be catching the disease early, before serious villi damage, which is a good thing, however, this designation is being abused, which can be seen over and over in threads on this board. Many patients and doctors think they don't have it when they hear "weak positive."


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



lorishaw Newbie
  On 7/24/2024 at 5:14 PM, trents said:

Lori, I suppose it is true that a weak positive antibody test score makes it less certain that it could be celiac disease and more likely something else. But because you are IGA deficient, the water is a little muddied in that regard. You will likely have some more definitive answers soon after your procedure on Monday, probably within a week or two. But let me ask you. What symptoms do you have? What prompted this testing for celiac disease in the first place?

Expand Quote  

I’ve always had what I call ‘Tummy troubles’. But more specifically gas, bloating, issues in the bathroom, stomach aches, etc. The celiac panel was actually run by my GP as a way to better prepare me for my GI visit. We were not exactly suspecting celiacs, more so looking to cross it off the list and move towards a different diagnosis (we had though IBS). Which is why I’m so suprised after meeting with the GI. I guess, after reading much in this thread, I  am very thankful for my doctors to have taken the time to do a full celiac panel and ordered the endoscopy. It seems that many doctors do not take such steps.

lorishaw Newbie
  On 7/24/2024 at 5:15 PM, Scott Adams said:

In all honesty that designation is fairly recent, and very confusing--what I really think it means is that for patients OR doctors who really don't like the concept of a lifelong gluten-free diet it provides a way for either to "copout" on making an official diagnosis.

There isn't for example, a "strong-negative" designation, where you might score 19/20, for example, and you may actually have detected celiac disease early, before you have villi damage. I can't think of any reason for this designation, as there is no mild form of celiac disease. I suppose one possible reason for it might be that you could be catching the disease early, before serious villi damage, which is a good thing, however, this designation is being abused, which can be seen over and over in threads on this board. Many patients and doctors think they don't have it when they hear "weak positive."

Expand Quote  

When you put it into the perspective of a strong/weak negative, that does make the ‘weak positive’ sound odd. I have scoured the internet and have been unable to find a statistic that will tell me who often a weak positive is a confirms case of celiacs after biopsy. I just assumed, as you have noted here, that I was likely fine. Interesting enough I had elevated liver enzymes in my blood work as well. My GP found it strange, but there was no indication why this would be. Upon further research, I have found that elevated liver enzymes can be correlated to celiacs. Very crazy. I’m nervous to see what the biopsy says.

trents Grand Master

Lori, elevated liver enzymes was what led eventually to my celiac diagnosis. This is experienced in about 20% of those with celiac disease but most general medicine doctors would not know that. It is not a "classic" celiac disease symptom and most GPs are not trained beyond an awareness of the classic GI symptoms along with maybe anemia and osteoporosis. There are over 200 symptoms and associated diseases that have now been associated with celiac disease but there is still a lot of ignorance in the medical community at large with regard to all this. That's what makes an online community like this one with a special focus so valuable.

Scott Adams Grand Master

There is definitely a connection between celiac disease and liver issues, and we have a category of research summaries on this topic:
https://www.celiac.com/celiac-disease/celiac-disease-amp-related-diseases-and-disorders/liver-disease-and-celiac-disease/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - fritz2 replied to VinnieVan's topic in Introduce Yourself / Share Stuff
      13

      Question

    2. - trents replied to Nikki03's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Confused about test results.

    3. - Nikki03 posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Confused about test results.

    4. - trents replied to VinnieVan's topic in Introduce Yourself / Share Stuff
      13

      Question

    5. - fritz2 replied to VinnieVan's topic in Introduce Yourself / Share Stuff
      13

      Question


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,767
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Sharon Bing
    Newest Member
    Sharon Bing
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      71.2k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • fritz2
      So what relieves the joint pain?
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Nikki03! What was the other result from the other physician's lab work? The test result you report in your post is not a celiac disease diagnostic test. It is a test for IGA deficiency. It is also known as "total IGA". There are other IGA antibody tests that are used to diagnose celiac disease but if you are IGA deficient, their scores will be artificially low. Obviously, you are not IGA deficient so if there were other IGA antibody tests run they should be trusted as accurate unless you had been on a gluten free or reduced gluten diet before the blood sample was taken. So, if you have other test results, please post them along with (this is important) their reference ranges. Raw...
    • Nikki03
      I had celiac labs done and got two different result from two physicians. I have tons of celiac symptoms and suspected it for a while now but this has me so confused can you help?    my labs results read as follows  immunoglobulin A QN =419 which was off the chart high but everything but that was in normal range.               Thanks sincerely confused!   
    • trents
      As I mentioned above, NCGS stands for Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity. Celiac disease and NCGS share many of the same GI distress symptoms but NCGS does not damage the lining of the small bowel as does celiac disease and is not an autoimmune condition, as is celiac disease. NCGS is 10x more common than celiac disease but there are no tests for it. Celiac disease must first be ruled out. We actually know much more about celiac disease than we do about NCGS. Some experts believe NCGS can be a precursor to celiac disease. The only known antidote for either is total abstinence from gluten. Joint pain is a well-established symptom of celiac disease, one of the more than 200...
    • fritz2
      Well, as much pain as gluten has caused in the past, there's no way in hell I'm taking gluten on purpose.  What is NCGS?  And are there any remedies to quickly get over the swollen joints? My joints are swollen and hot to the touch and hurt.  For about two weeks they were too painful to even think about using them.  Six weeks later, I still can barely use my hands.  I struggle to get a bottle cap unscrewed they hurt so badly.  Edema in my legs and the knees hurt to walk.  And that was probably a minor exposure as the wheat was listed towards the end of the "contains" list in very fine print we couldn't read without a magnifying glass.
×
×
  • Create New...