Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Help vetting HLA-DQ typing provider


John1

Recommended Posts

John1 Newbie

My doctor said it is not available to them so I am looking for a private company to get it done.

I found "Intolerances & Sensitivities DNA Test" advertised by a well known pharmacy in the country I live.

Quote

What's analysed in our food sensitivities test

Gluten intolerance

rs2187668
rs2395182
rs4639334
rs4713586
rs7454108
rs7775228

Does this look right, are they testing for the correct genes, are there any that are missing?

I am not good with biology and really do not have a clue when it comes to this kind of stuff. I do know that HLA-DQ typing is not a diagnosis, I would like the test as a chance to exclude it as a possibility.

Any wisdom would be greatly appreciated!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Wends Rookie

I’ve done quite a bit of research reading and the science is ongoing, there’s new genes associated with Coeliac being discovered. It may come down to genetic ancestry as recently HLADQ7 is a new one that is not tested for in the standard test. This may account for the less than 1% of coeliacs without DQ2 or DQ8 high risk alleles. It’s true most Northern European Coeliacs (90%) have the HLADQ2, and HLADQ8 (9%). Its fascinating research and it just reinforces the gold standard of a biopsy in diagnosis at present in the absence of the standard DQ2 and 8 typing as the less than 1% may be missed. 

According to this company, these are the full susceptible genes presently known and tested for in the extended test. They do the standard test of the 2 markers (same as NHS hospital testing, I’ve had this done) most common high risk genes, HLADQ2 and HLADQ8.

16 markers in addition to the standard ones.

DQA1*01, DQA1*02:01, DQA1*03, DQA1*05, DQA1*06, DQB1*02, DQB1*03:01, DQB1*03:02,
DQB1*03:03, DQB1*03:04, DQB1*03:05, DQB1*04, DRB1*03, DRB1*04, DRB1*07, DRB1*11

Hope that’s helpful!

Wends Rookie

Hi John1.

My first reply was moderated because I mentioned a different company that test to the one you asked about. Not sure why. I’m newbie on here too! Anyway. And the one I was referring to is what lead me to research and read recent papers on Pubmed on the HLADQ7 allele, which is rarer. I’m awaiting results.

The markers are quoted from a different company, not the one you refer to (just so the first reply makes sense).

I only understand the celiac disease gene typing as referenced. And how the NHS hospital reported it. Sorry don’t know enough on how that relates to the genes beginning with rs… you list.

Hopefully you get some more replies on this one.

 

Scott Adams Grand Master

At this point all celiac disease markers haven't yet been discovered, so no genetic test could completely rule out celiac disease, although you might be 98%+ sure that you don't carry the genes if you tested negative. As for non-celiac gluten sensitivity, the research on this is just beginning, and as far as I know there may not yet be genetic markers identified for it, and they currently don't have an agreed upon way to diagnose it, other than with an elimination diet. 

John1 Newbie
On 8/11/2024 at 8:31 PM, Wends said:

Hi John1.

My first reply was moderated because I mentioned a different company that test to the one you asked about. Not sure why. I’m newbie on here too! Anyway. And the one I was referring to is what lead me to research and read recent papers on Pubmed on the HLADQ7 allele, which is rarer. I’m awaiting results.

The markers are quoted from a different company, not the one you refer to (just so the first reply makes sense).

I only understand the celiac disease gene typing as referenced. And how the NHS hospital reported it. Sorry don’t know enough on how that relates to the genes beginning with rs… you list.

Hopefully you get some more replies on this one.

 

Thanks for your sharing what you've learned so far, you have definitely gone deeper into the biological side of things than I have.

I emailed the company I'm looking into and they told me that they check for the following HLA alleles.

  • HLA-DQA1
  • HLA-DQB1
  • HLA-DQ7
  • HLA-DQB1
  • HLA-DQ 2.2
  • HLA-DQ 2.2

Any incite as to whether this is above or below what the average HLA typing checks for would very helpful.

On 8/12/2024 at 5:53 PM, Scott Adams said:

At this point all celiac disease markers haven't yet been discovered, so no genetic test could completely rule out celiac disease, although you might be 98%+ sure that you don't carry the genes if you tested negative. As for non-celiac gluten sensitivity, the research on this is just beginning, and as far as I know there may not yet be genetic markers identified for it, and they currently don't have an agreed upon way to diagnose it, other than with an elimination diet. 

Thanks for confirming!

I don't have a very strong suspicion of Celiac, I'm leaning more towards a fructan sensitivity at the moment as I have been reacting to certain fructan foods.

I know that HLA typing isn't a diagnosis, or even an absolute disqualifier, although having a completely negative result would definitely give me the extra confidence I need to attempt the gluten challenge, knowing that it's much more than likely not doing damage. Obviously if my symptoms don't go away even with small amounts I will have to ask my doctor for a referral.

Wends Rookie
23 hours ago, John1 said:

Thanks for your sharing what you've learned so far, you have definitely gone deeper into the biological side of things than I have.

I emailed the company I'm looking into and they told me that they check for the following HLA alleles.

  • HLA-DQA1
  • HLA-DQB1
  • HLA-DQ7
  • HLA-DQB1
  • HLA-DQ 2.2
  • HLA-DQ 2.2

Any incite as to whether this is above or below what the average HLA typing checks for would very helpful.

Hi John,

yes they are the alleles currently known that are associated with risk of Coeliac disease. So a useful test to know your susceptibility, including the newer DQ7 rarer allele.

I’m personally interested in the newer HLA-DQ7, as wasn’t tested for that on the NHS; they test for the standard High Risk alleles - HLA-DQA1, HLA-DQB1 (DQ2.5 and DQ8, and the DQ2.2 which is technically half and lower risk than having two copies. I’m not a geneticist but that was my understanding of reading scientific papers on it. The higher risk is HLA-DQ2.5, followed by DQ8 alleles - as reported in Europe and the US. Hope that makes sense. I’m still learning about this myself and just starting to get my head round it so to speak. I was never satisfied with the unconfirmed diagnosis of less than 1% risk of it being coeliac disease when I was so ill on a gluten containing diet and gluten challenge. I have a science and research background and love reading journals so started to look into it. It’s quoted from a European review study that 0.7% of biopsy diagnosed coeliacs disease patients do not have the DQ2 and DQ8 high risk alleles. In an Italian study the newer DQ7 quoted to be associated in patients not having the standard alleles. In addition the DQ7 is associated with milk protein sensitivity. (Research shows about 50% of coeliacs react to milk the same as gluten. I’m waiting for more research to be done on that one!).

Good luck and hope you get answers you are looking for.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,952
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Althea W
    Newest Member
    Althea W
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      It's nice to see celiac-safe options out there for guest homes.
    • Scott Adams
      Your situation involves interpreting elevated Deamidated Gliadin Peptide (DGP) IgG levels, which can indeed be confusing without clear symptoms or additional diagnostic tools like a biopsy. Here’s a possible approach to help clarify your next steps: Understanding DGP IgG: DGP IgG is a blood test often used to help diagnose celiac disease, particularly in individuals with IgA deficiency. However, since you’ve confirmed you don’t have IgA deficiency, the focus should shift to other celiac-specific tests, such as tissue transglutaminase IgA (tTG-IgA) and endomysial antibodies (EMA-IgA), which are more specific for celiac disease. Elevated DGP IgG alone is not diagnostic of celiac disease but may indicate gluten-related immune activity. Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS): You’re correct that NCGS does not typically show abnormalities in blood tests like celiac disease does. NCGS is diagnosed based on symptoms (e.g., bloating, fatigue, brain fog) that improve on a gluten-free diet, after celiac disease and wheat allergy have been ruled out. Since you don’t currently have symptoms, NCGS seems less likely in your case. Possible Next Steps: Monitor Symptoms: If you remain asymptomatic, it’s reasonable to continue eating gluten and retest after some time. This is because celiac disease can develop or become symptomatic later, and ongoing gluten consumption is necessary for accurate testing. Repeat Testing: Consider repeating the tTG-IgA test, as it is the most sensitive and specific for celiac disease. If this is also elevated, it strengthens the case for further investigation. Genetic Testing: If available, HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8 genetic testing can help rule out celiac disease if negative, as nearly all celiac patients carry one or both of these genes. However, a positive result doesn’t confirm celiac disease, as these genes are common in the general population. Dietary Trial: If testing remains inconclusive and you develop symptoms, a supervised gluten-free diet trial might provide clarity. However, this should only be done after thorough testing, as going gluten-free prematurely can interfere with accurate diagnosis. Biopsy Limitation: Since a biopsy is not available in your town, you’ll need to rely on blood tests and clinical judgment. If your tests remain inconclusive but you develop symptoms, you may need to travel to a facility that can perform a biopsy for definitive diagnosis. In summary, if I were in your position, I would continue consuming gluten, monitor for symptoms, and retest with more specific celiac markers (tTG-IgA and EMA-IgA) in a few months. If symptoms develop or tests remain ambiguous, consulting a gastroenterologist for further guidance would be advisable. Always work with a healthcare provider to interpret results and tailor next steps to your specific situation.
    • trents
      The fact is, we know very little about the mechanism of NCGS at this point. We know much more about celiac disease. Some experts believe that NCGS can transition into celiac disease. And I do not agree with what you read about NCGS not producing any elevated antibody tests. IMO, and I have no scientific data to support this, it's just a hunch base on reading many, many forum contributor test result reports, elevated igg antibodies may signal a transition from NCGS to celiac disease.  But there are other things besides gluten that can cause elevated dgp igg and ttg igg antibody levels. So, yes. I would continue to monitor the situation if I were you and get regular testing. Not necessarily every 6 months but yearly anyway if you can. In the meantime, if you know gluten causes you unwellness, continue to avoid it.
    • Scott Adams
      Statins are a widely prescribed class of medications used to lower cholesterol levels and reduce the risk of cardiovascular events, such as heart attacks and strokes. Extensive scientific research, including large-scale randomized controlled trials, has demonstrated their efficacy and safety for most individuals. Statins work by inhibiting an enzyme involved in cholesterol production in the liver, thereby reducing low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, often referred to as "bad" cholesterol. Importantly, statins do not "remove all fats" from the body, as suggested in your post. They specifically target cholesterol synthesis and do not deplete essential fats, such as those required for brain function, hormone production, or nutrient absorption. The body still maintains its necessary fat reserves, including healthy fats, which are critical for physiological processes. Regarding the claim that statins cause internal bleeding by making blood vessels permeable, this is not supported by scientific evidence. Statins are not known to increase the risk of internal bleeding. However, like all medications, they can have side effects, such as muscle pain or, in rare cases, liver enzyme abnormalities. The benefits of statins in reducing cardiovascular risk generally outweigh the risks for most patients, particularly those with a history of heart disease or high cholesterol. The suggestion to use odorless garlic, magnesium, vitamin K, and calcium for heart health may have some merit, as these supplements can support cardiovascular function in certain contexts. For example, magnesium is involved in muscle and nerve function, while vitamin K plays a role in blood clotting and bone health. However, these should not replace evidence-based treatments like statins when prescribed by a healthcare provider. Always consult a medical professional before making changes to medication or starting new supplements, as individual health needs vary.
    • trents
      Just judging from the reports we get from forum members sharing their endoscopy results, very common. But we also get a lot of reports of inflammation in those areas coupled with a negative biopsy for celiac. But I wonder if in a lot of those latter cases we are seeing NCGS or a transition from NCGS to celiac. I have no scientific data to support that. It's just a hunch.
×
×
  • Create New...