Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Health Letter About Celiac Disease


Ursa Major

Recommended Posts

Ursa Major Collaborator

I am subscribed to get several daily letters from alternative health sites, who will report on the nonsense from mainstream medicine, amongst other things.

This is an excerpt from today's daily dose (it starts out with a report on Merck's lawsuits, but keep reading).

Dear Reader,

You wake up. It's pouring rain. You jam your toe on the foot of the bed. You burn the toast. You open up the morning paper and your horoscope says: "Go back to bed. Things just aren't going to go your way."

That's what I imagine life must be like for executives at the drug giant Merck & Co. these days. A few months ago their best selling arthritis drug Vioxx had to be pulled from the market because of proven increased risks of heart attacks and strokes. This was followed by a perfect storm of Vioxx lawsuits (as many as 10,000 by some counts), along with accusations that Merck insiders knew about the drug's dangers for years.

And now Fosamax has taken a hit.

Fosamax is Merck's $3 billion per year osteoporosis drug that's drawing fresh controversy with a court battle over an unusual side effect. And then - as if all that weren't enough - along come alternative health care writers who tell their readers about safe, non-drug methods for treating and preventing osteoporosis.

--------------------------------------------

Rain, rain, rain

--------------------------------------------

According to the Associated Press (AP), a lawsuit filed in Florida claims that Merck has been negligent by attempting to downplay one of the drug's side effects.

In the e-Alert "Bad to the Bone" (4/30/03), I told you about a New England Journal of Medicine report that linked Fosamax (and other drugs in a class of pharmaceuticals known as bisphosphonates) with ocular inflammation. When untreated, this condition causes blurred vision, swelling and even blindness.

The Florida lawsuit highlights another unusual bisphosphonate side effect: osteonecrosis of the jaw; also known as "jaw necrosis" or "jaw death," prompted by a loss of blood supply to the jawbone. The suit has been filed on behalf of 250 Fosamax users who developed this condition.

The AP article notes that Merck representatives responded to the suit by stating that no cases of osteonecrosis of the jaw were reported among more than 17,000 subjects in clinical trials. Nevertheless, in January 2005 the FDA directed Merck to update the Fosamax label with a warning about the side effect. The company complied later in the year, but the lawsuit claims that the warning is not sufficient.

According to the Fosamax web site, other side effects include inflammation and ulceration of the esophagus, painful swallowing, stomach pain, indigestion and nausea.

--------------------------------------------

Grain drain

--------------------------------------------

When the subject of osteoporosis comes up, you'll rarely see any mainstream attention given to the fact that diet may be a key aggravating factor for many osteoporosis patients.

The problem: celiac disease (celiac disease), a condition in which gluten - a component of grains - reduces the small intestine's ability to absorb essential nutrients, such as calcium. The gluten dilemma is further complicated by the fact that celiac disease symptoms are so subtle that doctors often miss the diagnosis.

A 2005 study published in the Archives of Internal Medicine examined the link between celiac disease and osteoporosis in a test that compared 260 celiac patients with 580 healthy subjects. Blood tests revealed that celiac disease was much more common among subjects with osteoporosis. In addition, subjects with the most severe cases of celiac disease tended to have the most severe cases of osteoporosis.

Subjects who were diagnosed with celiac disease were asked to follow a gluten-free diet for one year. Bone mineral density (measured before and after the follow up year) was considerably improved in subjects who followed the non-gluten diet.

Barley, rye, oat and wheat are the four gluten-rich grains that celiac disease patients need to avoid. Unfortunately, gluten is hidden in many processed foods such as soups, soy sauce, low-fat or non-fat products, and even candy. Some common food ingredients that may contain gluten include modified food starch, hydrolyzed vegetable or plant protein, and some binders and fillers, as well as malt and natural flavorings.

Long-term calcium deficiency also plays a key role in osteoporosis. I'll address the calcium issue in an e-Alert next week.

From Jenny Thompson, from the Health Sciences Institute Open Original Shared Link


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



jerseyangel Proficient

Thanks Ursula--it's encouraging that in the study, bone mineral density improved after a year gluten-free. Good news!

flagbabyds Collaborator

that's cool, thatnks for posting it

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,986
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Vickie Clancy
    Newest Member
    Vickie Clancy
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Okay, it does make sense to continue the gluten challenge as long as you are already in the middle of it. But what will change if you rule it out? I mean, you have concluded that whatever label you want to give the condition, many of your symptoms improved when you went gluten free. Am I correct in that? According to how I understand your posting, the only symptom that hasn't responded to gluten free eating is the bone demineralization. Did I misunderstand? And if you do test positive, what will you do different than you are doing now? You have already been doing for years the main thing you should be doing and that is eating gluten free. Concerning how long you should stay on the gluten challenge, how many weeks are you into it already?
    • WildFlower1
      I mean that I will be re-taking the celiac blood test again while I am currently on the gluten challenge right now, but not sure how many weeks more to keep going, to ensure a false negative does not happen. Thank you.
    • WildFlower1
      Thank you for your help, I am currently in the middle of the gluten challenge. A bit over 6 weeks in. At 4 weeks I got the celiac blood tests and that is when they were negative. So to rule out the false negative, since I’m in the middle of the gluten challenge right now and will never do this again, I wanted to continue consuming gluten to the point to make sure the blood tests are not a false negative - which I did not receive a firm answer for how many weeks total.    My issue is, with these blood tests the doctors say “you are not celiac” and rule it out completely as a potential cause of my issues, when the symptoms scream of it. I want to rule out this 30 year mystery for my own health since I’m in the middle of it right now. Thank you!
    • trents
      I am a male and had developed osteopenia by age 50 which is when I finally got dx with celiac disease. I am sure I had it for at least 13 years before that because it was then I developed idiopathic elevated liver enzymes. I now have a little scoliosis and pronounced kyphosis (upper spine curvature).  All of your symptoms scream of celiac disease, even if the testing you have had done does not. You may be an atypical celiac, meaning the disease is not manifesting itself in your gut but is attacking other body systems. There is such a thing as sero negative celiac disease. But you still have not given me a satisfactory answer to my question of why do you need a differential dx between celiac disease and NCGS when either one would call for complete abstinence from gluten, which you have already been practicing except for short periods when you were undergoing a gluten challenge. Why do you want to put a toxic substance into your body for weeks when, even if it did produce a positive test result for celiac disease, neither you or your doctors would do anything different? Regardless of what doctors are recommending to you, it is your body it is affecting not theirs and they don't seem to have given you any good justification for starting another gluten challenge. Where you live, are doctors kings or something?
    • WildFlower1
      Sorry to put it clearly, at 15, infertility started (tried to word it nicely) meaning menstruation stopped. Which is in correlation to celiac I mean. Thank you. 
×
×
  • Create New...