Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Biopsy


ogrestrength

Recommended Posts

ogrestrength Newbie

My father has had problems for ten or more years but refuses to get tested. To this date, he has never changed his diet. My older sister was diagnosed with celiac sprue post pregnancy about 6 years ago with blood test and biopsy, she "cheats" frequently and contacts wheat all the time. I developed symptoms about 2 years ago and initially took care of the discomfort with prevacid. Later, I tested positive with the blood test but fought the doctors when they tried to do the upper G.I. I left without one being done. I have a lot of pain when I eat products containing wheat. Sometimes within 5 minutes, sometimes within 5 hours. However, it isn't a sure thing. I don't have problems touching breads or crackers ect.. either. I read these boards and second guess my "diagnosis". I frequently eat small amounts of wheat products such as corn or rice chex cereal or a single wheat thin cracker. So I ask, should I get tested with a biopsy or are there different "levels" of intolerance? Are the increased adverse reactions due to length of time g.f.?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



CarlaB Enthusiast

The longer I've been gluten-free, the more sensitive I seem to it.

If I had it to do over, I would not have tortured myself and my family with the gluten challenge required for the biopsy. It ended up being negative anyway. It probably wasn't long enough, and the wheat was making me so sick, I ate small amounts of it and skipped some days entirely. I ended up getting tested by Enterolab just to be sure I wasn't imagining it all.

You just need to decide whether you need the biopsy to prove it to yourself. If you feel better gluten-free, and have tested positive with the blood test, I'd say you definately have a problem. Would it make a difference to you if the test was negative? It didn't for me; I still knew gluten was making me ill (my blood test was negative, too, but had not taken a gluten challenge prior to it). Since I went to all that trouble and expense, I kind of wish the biopsy had been positive, in some sort of strange kind of way. I understand you thinking you need it for your own peace of mind, I felt the same way.

Carolann1217 Newbie

Hello, I am a new member and have so many questions I really don't know where to start. For one thing, I have had many of the symptoms of Celiac for many years. It goes back to pregnancy 14 years ago. I had major platelet problems during pregnancy and child birth....then within a year was diagnosed lactose intolerant. From there, I can't remember ever really feeling good again. I just thought it was due to the change in my body but I developed all kinds of stomach pains, seemed like no matter what I ate never really sat right. In addition I developed all kinds of allergies and Asthma! Anyway.... fast forward about 11 years or so and I decided to try the Atkins diet to drop 10 pounds before a vacation. Well... I felt GREAT! I couldn't believe it. I haven't felt so good in years. I continued with the low carb diet for the next 2 years, "cheating" on weekends but being very good during the week. I never felt great when I would cheat....but in my head thought it was worth it and it was probably just due to my body not being used to the carbs anymore. Anyway... to try to make a long story short... even cheating only on weekends was still making me wonder about other symptoms. I have ITP an autoimmune disease of low platelets, in addition I am 36 and have very low bone density, I also have MANY of the stomach symptoms listed on all the sites for Celiac. So... not only all that, but my mother has ALL THE SAME THINGS. Not so much the gut issues, but the low bone density and the ITP, which is very unusual. So, we decided to have the blood work done. Her's came out positive, but mine was negative. I believe it was mainly due to my low carb diet for the past 2 years. I wasn't consuming a normal amount of gluten when I had the blood work done, I was still on the low carb diet and only had the occasional weekend cheat.... so, my doctor has recommended the biopsy. Due to the fact that my mother has tested positive through the blood test and I have so many symptoms. My question/problem is.... he told me to eat a "regular" diet for 6 weeks before the test. First of all, what is regular???? I have read so many things, some say a minimum of 2 slices of bread a day, others say 4. Some say minimum of 6 weeks others say 12. My fear is that I will have the test done and it will come back negative due to the fact that it hasn't caused enough damage in the amount of time he has given me. Unfortunately, I can NOT handle eating this way for longer than the 6 weeks. I'm counting down the days at this point...... it has made me feel awful 24 hours a day. Since I can never give my body a break for a day, I never feel good. I am so bloated, have neck and back pain, major stomach pain and almost a feeling of MSG...not sure if anyone can relate...but kind of heart racing kind of feeling. I'm looking for opinions from any of you that have been through the gluten challenge that can help me through this. I'm worried that if the test is negative....that's it and I won't really ever know. Have any of you been through it and if so... how long did you eat the gluten products before your biopsy? And did it come back positive? I truly believe I have Celiac......... but I am one of those people that would really like an official diagnosis. Please help......

Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular

I asked for a skin biopsy because of a DH-type rash. The biopsy came back negative (this might have been because it was done 3 weeks after 1)going off gluten and 2) a 10-day course of prednisone). The fact that it came back negative doesn't bother me so much. What bothers me is that the biopsy sites did not heal well--they itch like mad (4 months after the biopsy!) , and are hardened with quite a lot of scar tissue. They are also still quite red, and if I wear a T-shirt (it was on my arms), people look like they're really grossed out by the sight of my arm. In 20-20 hindsight, I would not do it again. Biopsies don't necessarily heal well--but I didn't know that at the time.

Guest nini

I didn't have a biopsy at all, Dr. said it wasn't needed cos my antibodies were sooooo high that there was no doubt, that and the fact that I've responded miraculously to the diet and feel terrible when exposed to even a molecule of gluten, I know for sure I have Celiac. My daughter's blood test was negative but with genetic predisposition (ME) and extremely positive dietary response, We are also convinced she has it as well. In my personal opinion biopsies are irrelevent. They can only confirm the dx IF you are consuming enough gluten IF the Dr. takes enough samples, IF the Dr. takes samples from damaged areas and IF the Lab knows how to read the test results... too many IF's for me. Listen to your bodies, if you feel better off gluten then by all means, stay off gluten. It's that simple.

CarlaB Enthusiast

CarolAnn, you sound just like me. I had figured out about carbs causing my troubles, then cut them out, not to lose weight, but because my joint pain would go away. So, after years not eating much wheat, my blood test came out negative. I tortured myself with the 6 weeks, and it still came out negative. I was so sick by the end I could hardly get out of bed. Looking back, I find it almost humorous that I felt it necessary to have the biopsy while it was quite obvious what was making me sick!!! I think we are all conditioned to feel like we need a doctor to tell us we're ill.

I did end up testing with Enterolab because their tests are more sensitive. I also got the genetic testing from them. They didn't tell me anything I didn't know, but I knew for sure it was really a life-long gluten problem, not just an allergy which might allow me to eat some occassionally. It also let me know that all my kids have the genetic tendency to the same problem.

Nancym Enthusiast
My older sister was diagnosed with celiac sprue post pregnancy about 6 years ago with blood test and biopsy, she "cheats" frequently and contacts wheat all the time.

Well, it depends on you. Your sister had postive diagnosis and still can't stay gluten free. Some people can go gluten-free without a positive diagnosis, just based on their own dietary testing. What does it take for you to make the changes you need to make? Someone in a white lab coat? Lots of people can't even adhere to the diet with a biopsy.

That was the question I asked myself. Do I know my body better than the guy in the lab coat?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams commented on dixonpete's blog entry in Pete Dixon
      2

      An early incubation and inoculation

    2. - Scott Adams replied to Woodster991's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      8

      Is it gluten?

    3. - Scott Adams replied to Woodster991's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      8

      Is it gluten?

    4. - Scott Adams replied to Mantooth's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      4

      Anyone Else Experiencing These Symptoms?

    5. - trents replied to Kipman's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Indeterminate transglutaminase iga


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      126,583
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Angela77
    Newest Member
    Angela77
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      @Woodster991, were you eating lots of daily gluten in the 6-8 weeks leading up to your blood test for celiac disease? If not, then your results could be false negative. Many of your symptoms are identical to mine before I was diagnosed, with the exception of constipation. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
    • Scott Adams
      Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.   
    • Scott Adams
      Welcome to the forum @Mantooth, your symptoms are very common in people with undiagnosed celiac disease (I had most of your symptoms as well), and this article talks about the various symptoms of celiac disease:  When you were tested in the past for celiac disease were you on a gluten-free diet? In order to properly test anyone for celiac disease you need to be eating lost of gluten everyday for 6-8 weeks before being screened, otherwise your results could be false negative. Feel free to share your old blood test results if you have them. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Kipman! When you say your Iga is low I assume you are referring to total IGA. Can you confirm this? If so, the antibody test score for the transglutaminase iga (what we generally refer to as tTG-IGA) test score cannot be trusted. Low total IGA (i.e., being "IGA deficient) will drive down the scores in the tTG-IGA test and can cause false negatives. Ask your physician to run a more complete celiac antibody panel which would include the DGP-IGA test as well as the DGP-IGG and TTG-IGG tests as well as the total IGA and the tTG-IGA. You must not be engaging in the gluten free diet until all testing is completed, both the serum antibody testing and the endoscopy/biopsy, if the phyiscian should refer you for a GI doc consult who may want to do that procedure. Being on a gluten free diet or a reduced gluten diet will sabotage any testing. Here is an article presenting an overview of the various tests that can be run when checking for celiac disease: From the above article:  IgA Levels/Deficiency Blood Test This should always be included in any blood panel for celiac disease, but it does not test directly for celiac disease, and is done to determine the accuracy of the other blood tests. People who are IgA deficient may score lower, of have no measurable levels on certain celiac disease blood tests. This test measures the levels of Immunoglobulin A (IgA) in the bloodstream. IgA is an important antibody that plays a significant role in the immune system, particularly in protecting the body's mucosal surfaces (e.g., respiratory and digestive tracts). Low IgA levels can indicate IgA deficiency, a condition where the body does not produce enough IgA, leading to an increased risk of infections and other health issues. The IgA Levels/Deficiency Test helps healthcare providers diagnose and monitor IgA-related conditions. Other Names for the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test: Immunoglobulin A (IgA) Test Total IgA Test Serum IgA Test IgA Serum Levels Test IgA Blood Test IgA Quantitative Test IgA Antibody Test IgA Immunodeficiency Test
    • nanny marley
      Oh yes same here I've been called a weirdo and health aniexty nut even at first my own daughter's were making fun of me but now they have seen the results there's too doing the gluten and lactose free has they both now older have realised they have problems too and threw me ranting on and changing it's helped them to stop suffering early so you keep doing what your doing a true friend will always understand you and help you I couldn't dream of making someone eat something they can't my granddaughter has a bit allergy imagine he saying it's just a nut build your immunity people can be so self centred wen it comes to compromise around food your not crazy your a human being with a different need hold your head up for all the ones in the same boat and you look after yourself regardless of wat anyone says or thinks  a good saying I like the rainbow has many different colours that's why it's so beautiful so shine your colour 🤗
×
×
  • Create New...