Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Endoscopy


barilla

Recommended Posts

barilla Explorer

I just cancelled my endoscopy for monday morning because I'm scared. Is it necessary? What does it show? I do plan to reschedule the procedure..... I think.

Does it just show that I have the disease or does it show damage? In any case, I am gluten free and that's all they can do is to tell me to stay gluten free. So I wonder why get it done.

They already checked my levels with a blood test and they were high ( 96 and 154).

Do you all think I should get it done??


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



CarlaB Enthusiast

If you want a diagnosis, this is the way they do it. There is no reason to be scared, the worst part is the IV, not the procedure! If you've not been gluten-free for long, I'd do it now if you want a diagnosis. I was gluten-free for too long and it came back negative since my gluten challenge was too short with not enough gluten because it was making me sick (thinking back, just the fact that it made me sick should have been enough to convince me of my problem!!!).

Basically, it's up to you, but don't skip it for fear of it! It's not bad at all.

dlp252 Apprentice
If you want a diagnosis, this is the way they do it. There is no reason to be scared, the worst part is the IV, not the procedure! If you've not been gluten-free for long, I'd do it now if you want a diagnosis. I was gluten-free for too long and it came back negative since my gluten challenge was too short with not enough gluten because it was making me sick (thinking back, just the fact that it made me sick should have been enough to convince me of my problem!!!).

Basically, it's up to you, but don't skip it for fear of it! It's not bad at all.

Yep, I tend to agree with this. If you've been gluten free for long, it probably won't show any damage though, but if it will give you peace of mind, do it before you've been gluten-free TOO long. TO show damage the doctor would need to take a biopsy...which isn't painful either.

I've had two endoscopes within one week of each other. The absolute worst part was the IV.

During the first scope they did a biopsy on my esophagus, a biopsy in my small intestine for celiac and removed a polyp in my stomach. I didn't feel any of that...was asleep during the whole thing and when I woke up the only thing I felt was a very slight sore throat. During teh second scope they took a biopsy of my bile duct...again didn't feel a thing and slept through the whole thing...didn't even have a sore throat afterward. I'm due to have a third scope in a month or so to do another biopsy on my duct...I feel like an old pro, lol.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,552
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    ABA Steps LLC
    Newest Member
    ABA Steps LLC
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.3k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @TexasCeliacNewbie! The test results you posted strongly point to celiac disease. It is likely that your physician will want to perform an endoscopy with biopsy of the small bowel lining to confirm the results of the celiac antibody bloodwork results you just posted. It is important that you not cut back on gluten consumption until the endoscopy/biopsy is complete, assuming, that is, one is forthcoming.  Can you post the actual reference ranges used by the lab for the tests to determine positive/negative/normal/high/low? Scales used by these labs are different from one place to the other so the raw numbers don't mean much without the scale used by the lab. There aren't industry standards for this. By the way, you probably won't be able to edit the original post so please post the extra info in new post. May we ask about the cancer you mentioned? There are some things that can elevate the antibody test scores, at least mildly, besides celiac disease.
    • TexasCeliacNewbie
      Hi, I have been having a lot of back pain and gut issues for 8 weeks or so.  I saw the GI on Monday and my results just came in from the lab.  Some of these number are high and off the little chart from the lab.  I am reading this correctly that I most likely have Celiac, right???  It would explain a lot of things for me that otherwise are worrying me that my previous cancer is recurring.  Thank you for all of your expertise in this area! Immunoglobulin A, Qn, Serum 140 (normal) Deamidated Gliadin Abs, IgA 256 (High) Deamidated Gliadin Abs, IgG 65 (High) t-Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA 31 (High) t-Transglutaminase (tTG) IgG 10 (High)
    • trents
      So, I would assume it means that if the risk of developing celiac disease in the general population is 1%, people with the DQ2 gene have a 10% risk of developing celiac disease. So, have you or your physician concluded that you have celiac disease?
    • TerryinCO
      Here's the test result I was refering to.  I may not be understanding this correctly.
    • trents
      Thanks for the update @TerryinCO! Would you elaborate what you mean when you say your genetic tests show that you are "10x higher" for developing celiac disease? 10x higher than what? There are two main genes, HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8, that have been identified as providing the potential for developing celiac disease. Since 40% of the population carries one or both of these genes but only 1% of the population actually develops celiac disease, the genetic test cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease, simply to establish the potential for developing it. Gene testing is usually done to rule out celiac disease vs. NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). In other words, if gluten consumption is definitely causing someone problems but they don't have the genetic potential for developing celiac disease then the diagnosis would be NCGS. We also know that having both DQ2 and DQ8 puts one at higher risk for developing celiac disease than having just one or the other. But I'm not sure I've ever seen it quantified as in "10x higher". Not sure what you mean by this.
×
×
  • Create New...