Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Travelling To Exotic Places


Huey Vincent

Recommended Posts

Huey Vincent Newbie

Hey,

I was just wondering about travel, especially to places like let's say Peru, Vietnam, Africa and all that. My girlfriend's can't eat the gluten and anyone here knows if we'll be able to someday travel to those places? Like is it actually possible to live without being sure that the things she's eating is completely gluten-free in places like those?

Did anyone travel to those places?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Mango04 Enthusiast

I haven't traveled to those places, but I would. It's hard to be gluten-free in the US becasue we rely so much on processed food.

I can't imagine a place where it would be impossible to find things like fruit, veggies, rice and meat. You can always get international dining cards to communicate with the local people about food if you need to. I'd imagine that it would be doable.

gfp Enthusiast
Peru, Vietnam, Africa and all that.

Haven't been to Peru but I have been to Venezuela and Columbia.

It all depends what you eat when you are there.

If you buy and cook your own food then no problems but eating in local places is risky.

Vietnam: Well they seem to have kept the French pencant for croissants and pastries. I haven't been back since diagnosis but I would say language is your biggest hurdle. The same can be said for laos and myanmar unless you stop in international hotels.

Africa is .. well large and diverse.

North Africa is heavily reliant on cous-cous and bread. Bread comes with everything ... indeed in Libya its a legal requirement any resto should supply bread and water for 20 pestari (a few cents depending on exchange) indeed when I lived there is was a common joke to send a newly arrived expat to the bakery with a dinar and ask for bread. The resulting bread would fill an average car.

Sub-saharan Africa is similarly mixed ... places like Kenya will tend to be more international and places like Nigeria simply a huge mess. There are at least two worlds in every African country depending on class but Nigeria is special. You have 9 official languages and most of the peoples hate everyone else. Culturally everyone is part of a tribe first, a race second and Nigerian last. In the North they still stone women for witchcraft and in the south everyone is continually trying to screw anyone who isn't in their tribe (and that includes you). I can think of no reason to go to Nigeria other than being paid a huge danger bonus.

You can't complain about being made ill by food when people are literally dying and rotting in the streets.

However go next door to Cameroon or Benin and they people are much more hospitable .. even though they are the same "peoples" that would kill you to steal a watch in Nigeria. The problem with Nigeria is Nigeria... not specifically any individual peoples.

Angola... not bad if you can manage not to get involved in the civil war although this periodically sums up most of Africa.

Congo is .. well pretty much a great tropical paradise and Zambia is nice of you stay where you should be!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,436
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Vivien Armstrong
    Newest Member
    Vivien Armstrong
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.