Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Curious Question


num1habsfan

Recommended Posts

num1habsfan Rising Star

I have a question for everyone on this board:

If you were in a situation where you had no back-up gluten-free food, and had not eating for a long period of time...

Would you starve and be sick with increased nausea from hunger pains.....or would you eat something with gluten to fill the hunger, even though you know you'll pay for it later???

~lisa~


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Ursa Major Collaborator

Good question. I have done both, and found in the long run I was much happier being terribly hungry. Because you'll be okay once you eat. But if you eat something with gluten, you'll be sick for days or weeks afterwards!

A little fasting has never hurt anybody, as long as you drink enough.

frenchiemama Collaborator

Define "a long period of time". One day? Several days? A week? I have been caught out without any gluten-free supplies, and I went 20+ hours without a single bite to eat. Not once did I even contemplate eating something gluteny. I was hungry, but I would have to be absolutely desperate before I resorted to gluten.

ravenwoodglass Mentor
I have a question for everyone on this board:

If you were in a situation where you had no back-up gluten-free food, and had not eating for a long period of time...

Would you starve and be sick with increased nausea from hunger pains.....or would you eat something with gluten to fill the hunger, even though you know you'll pay for it later???

~lisa~

I would starve, literally, before I knowingly ate gluten. But for me glutening now causes severe pain and bleeding that does not stop usually for hours. To be truthful since I get that reaction from even trace amounts I would be to afraid to deliberately eat it.

Smunkeemom Enthusiast

Define "a long time"... I would probably have to be near death to even think about touching gluten again, I am pretty sure that if I was really starving to death though, gluten would push me to death faster than not eating.

Becky6 Enthusiast

I could not touch gluten again.

ebrbetty Rising Star

I'd stay hungry, not worth the pain


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



elye Community Regular

The answer for me is an easy one, being celiac and type one diabetic. I would HAVE to eat something eventually, and if all I had at my disposal was gluteny food, I'd be preparing for some pain later on. It's only happened a few times where I have had to eat quickly and there was no gluten-free choice. Such is another yucky thing about having these two diseases... :angry:

penguin Community Regular

I'd have only one choice also - EAT! I'm hypoglycemic and I could either 1: not eat, throw up, get shakey, pass out, and deal with blood sugar problems all week or 2: get glutened

I'd rather get glutened, but is there coke available? If there's coke available, I drink that to keep my blood sugar afloat until I got to some food. Unless that made me more sick, then I'd have to eat!

zip2play Apprentice

I would have to agree with Chelsea, being hypoglycemic I would have to eat something and if the low bloodsugar had already started, SUGAR would be necessary! But I would strive to find the coarse of least pain later!

Monica

mmaccartney Explorer

Eating gluten almost killed me. I would starve rather then eat that poison again.

There is always something one could eat...roots, berries, animals, etc.

jerseyangel Proficient

I've been thinking about this since I read your question earlier. I would not eat the gluten. If applicable, I would scrounge around for other things to stay alive (like Michael said) but I don't think I could bring myself to ever knowingly eat gluten after what it has done to me. Actually, if I really was half-starving and I ate gluten, the reaction would probably completely do me in!

schuyler Apprentice

I honestly don't know; I think it would depend on how I was feeling at the time. Yesterday, I had a seizure after mistakenly ingesting a small amount of gluten. But, at the same time, I've had low blood sugar problems in the past (not diagnosed as hypoglycemic yet, but drs are considering it). So it's a catch-22 situation for me.

elye Community Regular

This is slightly an aside, but something I always keep on hand for low blood sugars that is small and handy and VERY effective in a matter of seconds is glucose tablets. They are made up of 100% glucose, which gets into you bloodstream much faster than any other sugar source that is found in other I-need-to-grab-something-quick hypoglycemic choices like coke, fruit, candy, etc. I can't kid around, because my hypoglycemic reactions are caused by an overdose of insulin, so I have had to find the fastest thing to administer. They are gluten-free, too, of course. You can get them in the drug store, and while pricey, they are well worth it if you need your blood sugar up quickly.

tarnalberry Community Regular

I would not eat the gluten, and I've never found myself in a sitaution where I couldn't find a piece of fruit or nuts, even if it meant a very inconvenient drive to a grocery store, and some barely paletable fruit.

CarlaB Enthusiast

I would not eat gluten. I have blood sugar issues, not as bad as some, but bad enough. I would leave wherever I was, and I mean wherever, and go find something to eat. I usually carry food with me. I remind myself of my son we adopted from Russia who would practically hoard food because of his past. I find myself buying bags of Ruffles at gas stations when I'm not hungry in case I'm hungry later. I'm slowly getting over my compulsive behavior! :blink: I would literally have to be in a foreign country where I wouldn't be able to eat for days before I'd consider eating it again.

Can you believe I talk like this, yet I'm still in denial over this whole thing, questioning it every day?? LOL

corinne Apprentice

I almost had that decision to make on a snowshoe trip this winter. I accidentally left my lunch on the table in the morning DUH! and didn't realise it until we were was 7 miles up the trail. I skipped lunch but by 3 pm I was getting really weak and shaky. It was absolutely necessary to eat or I wouldn't be able to walk fast enough that we could make it back to the trailhead before dark. It was also minus 30 and with 40 mph I was having a hard time staying warm without food in my system. Fortunately, my snowshoe buddies dug through their packs and found a banana. I think I would have eaten a granola bar or something with gluten just to make it back safely even if I had to pay the consequences later.

eleep Enthusiast

I've thought about this one too -- partly because my brother is big on the "we'd all better learn to grown our own food" scenario (he's an ecological economist). All I can think is that -- should that actually be a necessity for me some day -- it's a whole lot easier to grow potatoes and beans in a home garden than it is to grow wheat!

I wouldn't eat the gluten -- not anymore.

natalunia Rookie

I wouldn't eat anything with gluten in that case, unless you put a big bowl of mac & cheese from Luby's in front of me. I'd cave in that case. I really miss their mac & cheese...

lorka150 Collaborator

assuming this is not a death situation, i would not touch anything. like tarnalberry mentioned, i really don't think that there would be NO possibilities... even if it's a rank one! i'd probably swallow gum if need be.

Guest nini

I would not willingly put that poison in my mouth... I'd rather starve than willingly be glutened! LOL! Seriously, I don't think I could do it. No matter how hungry I was.

DingoGirl Enthusiast

If I'm about to pass out from hunger or low blood sugar, I need PROTEIN, and in a big and satisfying amount.....but, I think I would go up to only 24 hours without food, and then would consume whatever was around, gluten or not. Nobody wants to see me when I'm starving....

Rachel--24 Collaborator

I would have to be pretty bad off to willingly put gluten into my mouth. I cant see that I'd ever be that desperate but thats pretty much the only way I could see myself doing it...if I had no choice.

Guest Robbin
I've thought about this one too -- partly because my brother is big on the "we'd all better learn to grown our own food" scenario (he's an ecological economist). All I can think is that -- should that actually be a necessity for me some day -- it's a whole lot easier to grow potatoes and beans in a home garden than it is to grow wheat!

I wouldn't eat the gluten -- not anymore.

Your brother sounds like me--I grew up hearing stories about the Depression from my Grandma and I think about this a lot--(pantry has a huge stockpile of dried beans and rice!!) I probably would cave and eat it if there were nothing else. I 'd resign myself to the idea that I lived through the sickness for 20 plus years, I can do it to survive a little longer. This would only be if there were no alternatives whatsoever, though, those were not pleasant times :blink:

prinsessa Contributor

I would probably eat the gluten if I was really, really hungry. I don't get many bad symptoms besides bloating and gas unless I eat gluten for a couple of days in a row (I did that about a month ago and had gas pains so bad I though I was going to die). I can handle small amounts of gluten as long as I don't eat any more for a long time. I still avoid gluten because I know it could cause damage without any symptoms....but I might cave if I was so hungry I felt weak. I try to remember to carry a Lara bar with me just in case that happens though.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      126,817
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Terry49
    Newest Member
    Terry49
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69.7k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      Welcome to the forum, @Kiwifruit, I agree further testing is needed.  Disaccharidase deficiency is a symptom of Celiac disease.   On your test results, this line  "IgA: 0.9 g/l (norm 0.8 - 4.0)" is referring to Total IgA and it's very low.  People with low or deficient Total IgA should also have DGP IgG test done.  Low Total IgA means you are making low levels of tTg  IgA as well, leading to false negatives or "weak positives".  Maybe a DNA test for known Celiac genes.   Anemia, diabetes, and thiamine deficiency can cause test results like these.  Get checked for B12 deficiency anemia and have your iron (ferritin) checked.  Vitamin D deficiency is common, too.   Might be time to find a gastrointestinal doctor who is more familiar with diagnosing Celiac Disease.   Best wishes on your journey!  Please keep us posted on your progress.  
    • trents
      Yes, there is a trend in the medical community to forego the endoscopy/biopsy and grant an official celiac diagnosis based on high tTG-IGA antibody scores alone. This trend started in the UK and is spreading to the USA medical community. And yes, 5-10x the normal level is what I have been seeing as the threshold as well. Here is the relevant section dealing from the article above dealing with the importance of the total IGA test being ordered. See the embedded attachment.
    • hmkr
      Ok, interesting. Not what I was thinking that meant. I'm reading the article and trying to understand. I see this “According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy” My IgG is 90, which is 6 times. So to me that means it's highly likely I do have it. 
    • trents
      It just means you aren't IGA deficient, i.e., that IGA deficiency cannot have given you artificially low scores in the individual IGA celiac antibody tests. This is explained in the article Scott linked above.
    • hmkr
      Normal range: 70 - 400 mg/dL, a little above middle of the range. So what does that mean? Thank you! I will check out that page you linked. Appreciate it! 
×
×
  • Create New...