Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

What Do These Results Mean?


mskelly

Recommended Posts

mskelly Rookie

I just picked up a copy of DS's (22 months) bloodwork. From what I understand his IgA was 6.3 and his IgG is a 30.5 on a range of 0 - 24.9. So the IgG level is high, but the IgA level is OK. THere is another spot on the report listing TTG @ 0.1 and anything less than 5.0 is negative.

So, what does all of this mean? Anything?

Thanks in advance for your help.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular

My results were almost identical to your son's. The dermatologist insisted that the results meant that I do not have celiac. The endocrinologist insisted that it meant that I have celiac. The rheumatologist said to stay off gluten and took 10 tubes of blood--I'm still waiting for the results.

That wasn't very helpful to you, was it? :(

key Contributor

My son's IGg was also the only thing elevated. He was 14 months old. We just removed gluten and the difference in him was night and day! No question on our minds. He started gaining weight and quit having diarhea, etc. Testing isn't accurate in young children. You could do the biopsy if you think you should.

Monica

mskelly Rookie

There's not much of a doubt in my mind either. I'm just waiting to hear from the GI to see if I need to take him off the gluten now or wait until our appt. July 20th. I tried it for a few days and really liked what I was seeing, but then I got nervous that I'd mess up the results if we do further testing. The dr. would have to give me a very strong argument for doing the biopsy though. I'm not sure if there are any other tests he would want to do.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      126,515
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Katrina01
    Newest Member
    Katrina01
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Newhere19
      Thank you both. I haven't had access to the test results but will get them and post here.
    • jjiillee
      The ulcers are prepyloric ulcers. Not sure if that makes any difference. 
    • trents
      Duodenal ulcers are not uncommon either and often result from H.Pylori infections. https://www.healthdirect.gov.au/duodenal-ulcer
    • trents
    • Scott Adams
      I had what was termed "lesions," and normally ulcers are in the stomach, rather than the small intestines. I'm not sure why they would want you to have her continue to eat gluten, since she had a positive blood test, but as her doctor said, if she is uncomfortable and having symptoms why not have her go gluten-free at this point? If her symptoms improve, it would be another indicator that she has celiac disease and/or gluten sensitivity. This article has some detailed information on how to be 100% gluten-free, so it may be helpful (be sure to also read the comments section.):    
×
×
  • Create New...