Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Confused


covsooze

Recommended Posts

covsooze Enthusiast

I did loads of socialising over the weekend and was extremely careful not to eat anything with gluten in. Everyone I was with was very helpful in providing me with gluten-free food and being careful about cc. And then I go and ruin it all, by drinking what I thought was ordinary orange squash (without checking - I always check!) and it turns out to be orange barley water. how stupid am I?!! But even stranger than me failing to check the ingredients is that I've (apparently) had no reaction :unsure: Even crazier still is that when I went to my first support group meeting, the cold drink that was available was barley water!! (I didn't drink it). Am I missing something here? Surely barley malt extract contains gluten?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Ursa Major Collaborator

I am totally stumped on this one, as it clearly contains barley and should have gluten! Here is a link to a recipe in case anyone has any doubt:

Open Original Shared Link

Maybe you're going to have a delayed reaction? Even though, of course, I hope you won't, it is possible.

gfp Enthusiast

Was this a Coeliac UK support meeting?

CUK seem determined to keep the 200ppm level regardless of other scientific evidence.

I would think this is an expression of "a little is OK" which should be their motto!

covsooze Enthusiast

gfp: yes it was a CUK meeting. the whole 200ppm is illogical to me. I appreciate we can't always be 100% certain that we've got no gluten at all in what we eat, but it makes no sense to go deliberately eating it! If I am very thirsty and drink loads and loads of barley water, there must become a point when I'll get ill from the gluten?!

Ursa Major Collaborator
gfp: yes it was a CUK meeting. the whole 200ppm is illogical to me. I appreciate we can't always be 100% certain that we've got no gluten at all in what we eat, but it makes no sense to go deliberately eating it! If I am very thirsty and drink loads and loads of barley water, there must become a point when I'll get ill from the gluten?!

You're right, it is totally illogical to consume any amount of gluten on purpose. What if in one day you drink barley water, eat something with wheat starch (which in Europe they claim is no problem), and eat several other things that have 'safe' levels of gluten in it (I personally don't believe there IS a safe level), eventually you should think you would react. And maybe you do at even the very low levels without obvious symptoms. It seems all wrong.

And serving barley water at a celiac disease support meeting sounds like an insane and irresponsible thing to do. Is there nothing else they could be serving, that is naturally gluten-free?

gfp Enthusiast
You're right, it is totally illogical to consume any amount of gluten on purpose. What if in one day you drink barley water, eat something with wheat starch (which in Europe they claim is no problem), and eat several other things that have 'safe' levels of gluten in it (I personally don't believe there IS a safe level), eventually you should think you would react. And maybe you do at even the very low levels without obvious symptoms. It seems all wrong.

And serving barley water at a celiac disease support meeting sounds like an insane and irresponsible thing to do. Is there nothing else they could be serving, that is naturally gluten-free?

Unfortunately that's the problem. They want to serve the stuff their advertisers sell. Their advertisers want 200ppm because they can make more profit than 100% gluten-free... in this case its a regional support group but they are put under pressure to play the advertisers game.

I expect they are trying to get the newish strict allergen European labelling law revoked in the UK which they campaigned and misadvised against but went through anyway.

CUK refuse to admit celiac disease has symptoms other than villi being damaged and refuse to accept blood testing ...

(Even though they contributed to research which has shown neurological symptoms to be fact they have buried the research and those in the know are banned from discussing it.

Ursa Major Collaborator
Unfortunately that's the problem. They want to serve the stuff their advertisers sell. Their advertisers want 200ppm because they can make more profit than 100% gluten-free... in this case its a regional support group but they are put under pressure to play the advertisers game.

I expect they are trying to get the newish strict allergen European labelling law revoked in the UK which they campaigned and misadvised against but went through anyway.

CUK refuse to admit celiac disease has symptoms other than villi being damaged and refuse to accept blood testing ...

(Even though they contributed to research which has shown neurological symptoms to be fact they have buried the research and those in the know are banned from discussing it.

Yuck, doesn't the safety and wellbeing of the many people with celiac disease mean a thing to them? I thought it's difficult here, but I see that living in the UK with celiac disease is much more of a challenge.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



chrissy Collaborator

serving barley water at a celiac support group meeting????!!!! maybe it was someone's idea of a sick joke? i'm just shaking my head in wonder over this one!!

covsooze Enthusiast

Well, I do feel like I've been glutened :( but is it likely that it's from Sunday's barley water this long afterwards?

I agree about the problems with being a coeliac in the UK. On the one hane, we can get quite a bit of stuff on prescription, but on the other, we don't know if we are being slowly glutened. My GI and the CUK magazine have both said that coeliacs don't have any more or less chance of having food intolerances than other people :unsure: I shall stick with reading this board for my advice :D

taz sharratt Enthusiast
Yuck, doesn't the safety and wellbeing of the many people with celiac disease mean a thing to them? I thought it's difficult here, but I see that living in the UK with celiac disease is much more of a challenge.

your not wrong there girlie. its the wheat thing i cant get my head around, they say that you CAN eat wheat if you are celiac.

VydorScope Proficient
Well, I do feel like I've been glutened :( but is it likely that it's from Sunday's barley water this long afterwards?

It could be, you would not be the first by a long shot to report a delayed reaction. My son usally reacts with in 4-6 hours, but everyone is a little different.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,387
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Tim Semas
    Newest Member
    Tim Semas
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.9k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      If you have been eating the gluten equivalent of 4-6 slices of wheat bread daily for say, 4 weeks, I think a repeat blood test would be valid.
    • englishbunny
      it did include Total Immunoglobin A which was 135, and said to be in normal range. when i did the blood test in January I would say I was on a "light' gluten diet, but def not gluten free.  I didn't have any clue about the celiac thing then.  Since then I have been eating a tonne of gluten for the purpose of the endoscopy....so I'm debating just getting my blood test redone right away to see if it has changed so I'm not waiting another month...
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @englishbunny! Did your celiac panel include a test for "Total IGA"? That is a test for IGA deficiency. If you are IGA deficient, other IGA test resultls will likely be falsely low. Were you by any chance already practicing a reduced gluten free diet when the blood draw was done?
    • englishbunny
      I'm upset & confused and really need help finding a new gastro who specializes in celiac in California.  Also will welcome any insights on my results. I tested with an isolated positive for deamidated IGA a few months ago (it was 124.3, all other values on celiac panel <1.0), I also have low ferritin and Hashimotos. Mild gastro symptoms which don't seem to get significantly worse with gluten but I can't really tell... my main issues being extreme fatigue and joint pain. The celiac panel was done by my endocrinologist to try and get to the bottom of my fatigue and I was shocked to have a positive result. Just got negative biposy result from endoscopy. Doctor only took two biopsies from small intestine (from an area that appeared red), and both are normal. Problem is his Physician's Assistant can't give me an answer whether I have celiac or not, or what possible reason I might have for having positive antibodies if I don't have it. She wants me to retest bloods in a month and says in the meantime to either "eat gluten or not, it's up to you, but your bloodwork won't be accurate if you don't" I asked if it could be I have early stage celiac so the damage is patchy and missed by only having two samples taken, and she said doctor would've seen damaged areas when performing endoscopy (?) and that it's a good sign if my whole intestine isn't damaged all over, so even if there is spotty damage I am fine.  This doesn't exactly seem satisfactory, and seems to be contrary to so much of the reading and research I have done. I haven't seen the doctor except at my endoscopy, and he was pretty arrogant and didn't take much time to talk. I can't see him or even talk to him for another month. I'm really confused about what I should do. I don't want to just "wait and see" if I have celiac and do real damage in the meantime. Because I know celiac is more that just 'not eating bread' and if I am going to make such a huge lifestyle adjustment I need an actual diagnosis. So in summary I want to find another doctor in CA, preferably Los Angeles but I don't care at this stage if they can do telehealth! I just need some real answers from someone who doesn't talk in riddles. So recommendations would be highly welcomed. I have Blue Shield CA insurance, loads of gastros in LA don’t take insurance at all 😣
    • trents
      Okay, Lori, we can agree on the term "gluten-like". My concern here is that you and other celiacs who do experience celiac reactions to other grains besides wheat, barley and rye are trying to make this normative for the whole celiac community when it isn't. And using the term "gluten" to refer to these other grain proteins is going to be confusing to new celiacs trying to figure out what grains they actually do need to avoid and which they don't. Your experience is not normative so please don't proselytize as if it were.
×
×
  • Create New...