Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

My Son Is Not Alone!


momothree

Recommended Posts

momothree Apprentice

It's been a while since I posted, but I just had to now. After my 12 year old son was diagnosed by biopsy in May, I had the blood test and so did my 10 year old daughter. I can hardly believe it myself, but she came back positive. I came back negative. It's crazy--my son had virtually no symptoms, and my daughter doesn't either. I know her chances are greatly increased since my son has it, but what are the chances of having 2 silent celiacs? My husband still has to get his test done (tomorrow), and our 21 month old was tested and it came back negative. We have her on the diet anyhow since she is the only one of my kids that actually has symptoms (ironic :huh: ). We'll get her tested again in a couple of years, or, perhaps, do a gluten challenge on her in a year or so. In a way, as terrible as it sounds, I wish they had some symptoms, because I think it'll be that much more difficult for them to adhere to the diet. Hopefully, since it's the two of them, they will be encouragement for each other. I guess we'll have to wait and see. Thanks for listening. :(


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



celiacgirls Apprentice

My 2 daughters and I are all gluten intolerant. One daughter, 8, had tummy issues which led to the testing (by Enterolab). Since hers was positive, I tested myself and my other daughter, 10. We were both also positive. My older daughter and I both feel alot better emotionally even though I didn't think we had any symptoms. I don't have any trouble getting either of them to stay on the diet because they can both tell a difference. My oldest tried to eat a cupcake shortly after she started the diet and got a stomach ache and could tell a difference with energy level, mood, and brain fog.

I think it would be difficult for anyone to stay on this diet if they didn't see some improvement in some way. I would expect your children to do thier own gluten challenge by either cheating or making a mistake and maybe they will then notice a difference.

Ursa Major Collaborator

I agree. You kids will likely get a noticable reaction once they've been on the diet for a while. Many here actually got diarrhea and all the awful gastro problems when glutened, even if before the diet they hardly had any noticable symptoms.

Testing on toddlers is notoriously unreliable, and your little one (especially she has symptoms) was very likely a false positive. If you find she responds to the diet in a positive way and her symptoms disappear, you'll have your answer. No challenge needed, as it could make her quite ill.

Are you going gluten-free with the rest of them? You might be surprised at the difference it could make.

2Boys4Me Enthusiast

My younger son is the only one in our family with celiac. He didn't have any symptoms either, except anemia and he was at the lowest percentile for height and weight, but was still the same height as many of his classmates in the couple of months before diagnosis.

He has no problem sticking to the diet - I hope that continues when he's a teenager. I also have no idea if he's accidentally ingesting gluten via cross contamination because of the lack of symptoms, so I just assume that we are doing a good job.

Good luck on your gluten-free adventure.

floridanative Community Regular

I agree that is is easier to have at least two kids with Celiac if any of them have it. I don't have kids but I see my sisters kid fight and aggravate each other. I don't see how one would be gluten free without the other making them miserable about it.

2Boys4Me Enthusiast
I agree that is is easier to have at least two kids with Celiac if any of them have it. I don't have kids but I see my sisters kid fight and aggravate each other. I don't see how one would be gluten free without the other making them miserable about it.

Sounds like you've overheard my older son asking for "extra gluten sprinkled on" his supper :ph34r: . He has no problem eating gluten free - all our suppers are gluten-free except for pasta, pizza and hamburgers. Ty gets his own noodles, pizza and his own bun. Big brother just gets huffy when we can't stop at any old place to grab something to eat because there's nothing there for Ty. Most of the time he's good about it, but if he's in a contrary mood, watch out! <_< (He's a good kid, and he knows why we can't stop just anywhere, but he's not shy about complaining. Ty never does - he's a champ! :D )

momothree Apprentice

Thanks for all your input. We are just starting the gluten-free diet with our daughter today; she just returned from camp. I'm anticipating some difficult times ahead, but, yes, at least they'll both be experiencing the same things. Who knows, maybe it'll even make them closer--like a special bond (to try to put a positive spin on things ;) . Ursula--in regard to your comment about giving my toddler a gluten challenge in a year or so, could it really make her ill? What can you tell me about that? I would hate to make her sick, but I would really like to know before I have to send her off to her first little birthday party with her own "special" cupcake. Her symptoms are somewhat vague (especially compared to some I have hear of or read about), and it can sometimes feel like we are thinking we see improvement when there isn't really that much of any. I keep thinking--what are the odds that all three have celiac? It almost seems unlikely. I've hear that the blood test is accurate after 3, and I've also heard that it isn't accurate until after 5. Can anyone tell me when the best time to have her re-tested? I don't follow the gluten-free diet myself, but all of the dinners, and any other meals that we all eat together as a family are all gluten free. It's easier to prepare that way, and it makes it easier for my kids too. Who knows, maybe somewhere down the road we might all eat gluten-free (especially if my husbands tests come back positive), but it's hard to say just yet.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Ursa Major Collaborator

If your little one is gluten intolerant, and she is off gluten for a while, yes, it could make her very ill. Some people who never had any obvious symptoms before are reporting getting terrible reactions after being off gluten for a while.

Plus, if you want to do a gluten challenge to retest her, you'd need to have her eat gluten for at least six months, possibly up to a year to make the test valid.

If you really want to know, and can afford it, the best way to be sure is testing by Enterolab (Open Original Shared Link). Those tests are reliable no matter what age somebody is, are non-invasive (stool testing), and you don't have to be on gluten for them (even though after a few months they become unreliable, too, of course).

celiacgirls Apprentice

I agree with Ursula. If you can, test your daughter with Enterolab. My 8 year old daughter showed mild symptoms from the time she started eating wheat. We have a family history of celiac, so she was tested multiple times over the years with the blood tests. They were all negative.

Including my brother and sisters, and their children, 9 people in my family have been tested by Enterolab and all are positive. They all have some slight symptoms of celiac. My mother has not been tested but doesn't eat gluten because she feels better. Her mother had celiac disease. So, needless to say, I think it is possible your daughter has it, too, even though her blood test was negative.

momothree Apprentice

Thanks for the info. I had no idea that she would have to be back on gluten for such a long time in order for the test to make sense. I imagined it would only be a couple of weeks or a month. I checked out that link to enterolab, and it looks very interesting. The prices aren't even as bad as I thought they'd be (even with the Canadian exchange). Definitely worth looking into.

Karen-it's amazing that so many in your family have celiac. Wow! I know there is a strong genetic component to it, but that is quite a few. I guess my babe's chance of having it are greater than I thought. We are trying to convince others in our family to be tested too. Hopefully they will. Thanx :)

Raegan

AndreaB Contributor

Raegen,

I underwent allergy testing because of my infant son's eczema. After finding out what I was allergic to included gluten/gliadin/soy and dairy I made some diet changes. I had not been on dairy except for maybe 3-6 times a year at potlucks where nothing else was available and I lived off soy and gluten. I dropped soy completely and went mostly gluten free. The allergy test said I wasn't allergic to oats and barley. My son's eczema got a lot better but would not go away. I then took the plunge and had all of us tested with enterolab except the baby. No one had any symptoms...I was just going off my allergy test and had been looking at this site and seen references to enterolab. We opted for all the tests that they offer. I am gluten intolerant as well as my oldest son and my daughter. My husband and I are soy intolerant and my oldest son has mild malabsorption. That really surprised us since he had no symptoms. Both of the older kids has something that looks like real mild eczema that still has yet to go away, so eventually I need to find the money for allergy testing for them. All of us have 2 genes that either predispose to celiac or gluten intolerance. All of us are on the totally gluten free diet and my infant son's eczema has totally gone away. We are also all on the soy free diet. My children scored 9 on that with 10 being the intolerance level. I am very glad we got the tests. My mother has a hard enough time and thinks we are being too picky with cross contamination when we visit her as it is. At least with the tests I can show they need to have it that way. She's never asked to see the actual results though. My daughter got glutened twice in the last month and has had some tummy troubles and "d" with those.

GFBetsy Rookie

Also, if 2 siblings in a family have celiac, other siblings have a 40% chance of having the disease. In my mother's family, 4 of the 10 children have come up positive for celiac. So it's not that unlikely that your 3rd has the disease, considering that your first 2 do have it.

As far as gluten challenges go, there was a representative from iNOVA (they're the people who developed the test for tissue-trans-glutaminase) at the national GIG conference in Salt Lake last month. He told me that they recently had a new test for celiac pass the FDA (in just six weeks! that's got to be some kind of record). None of the labs have picked it up yet, but it should be readily available by the time you would consider a gluten challenge for your baby. This test is more accurate and specific than the other blood tests currently available, and he told me that it is even accurate on infants! Additionally, a gluten challenge would only be necessary for 3 - 4 weeks instead of 3 months. This could still seem like forever for those who experience a lot of negative symptoms, but it's certainly a lot shorter than current requirements. Good news for those of us with small children!

Just some information . . . hope it's helpful!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Clear2me replied to Clear2me's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Gluten free nuts

    2. - Mmoc replied to Mmoc's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      Blood tests low iGA 4 years later digestive issues

    3. - Aretaeus Cappadocia replied to Clear2me's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Gluten free nuts

    4. - trents replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,388
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Whirlwind acres
    Newest Member
    Whirlwind acres
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Clear2me
      Thanks for the info. I recently moved to CA from Wyoming and in that western region the Costco and Sam's /Walmart Brands have many nuts and more products that are labeled gluten free. I was told it's because those products are packaged and processed  in different  plants. Some plants can be labeled  gluten free because the plant does not also package gluten products and they know that for example the trucks, containers equipment are not used to handle wheat, barely or Rye. The Walmart butter in the western region says gluten free but not here. Most of The Kirkland and Members Mark brands in CA say they are from Vietnam. That's not the case in Wyoming and Colorado. I've spoken to customer service at the stores here in California. They were not helpful. I check labels every time I go to the store. The stores where I am are a Sh*tshow. The Magalopoly grocery chain Vons/Safeway/Albertsons, etc. are the same. Fishers and Planters brands no longer say gluten free. It could be regional. There are nuts with sugar coatings and fruit and nut mixes at the big chains that are labeled gluten free but I don't want the fruit or sugar.  It's so difficult I am considering moving again. I thought it would be easier to find safe food in a more populated area. It's actually worse.  I was undiagnosed for most of my life but not because I didn't try to figure it out. So I have had all the complications possible. I don't have any spare organs left.  No a little gluten will hurt you. The autoimmune process continues to destroy your organs though you may not feel it. If you are getting a little all the time and as much as we try we probably all are and so the damage is happening. Now the FDA has pretty much abandoned celiacs. There are no requirements for labeling for common allergens on medications. All the generic drugs made outside the US are not regulated for common allergens and the FDA is taking the last gluten free porcine Thyroid med, NP Thyroid, off the market in 2026. I was being glutened by a generic levothyroxin. The insurance wouldn't pay for the gluten free brand any longer because the FDA took them all off their approved formulary. So now I am paying $147 out of pocket for NP Thyroid but shortly I will have no safe choice. Other people with allergies should be aware that these foreign generic pharmaceutical producers are using ground shellfish shell as pill coatings and anti-desicants. The FDA knows this but  now just waits for consumers to complain or die. The take over of Wholefoods by Amazon destroyed a very reliable source of good high quality food for people with allergies and for people who wanted good reliably organic food. Bezos thought  he could make a fortune off people who were paying alot for organic and allergen free food by substituting cheap brands from Thailand. He didn't understand who the customers were who were willing to pay more for that food and why. I went from spending hundreds to nothing because Bezo removed every single trusted brand that I was buying. Now they are closing Whole foods stores across the country. In CA, Mill Valley store (closed July 2025) and the National Blvd. store in West Los Angeles (closed October 2025). The Cupertino store will close.  In recent years I have learned to be careful and trust no one. I have been deleberately glutened in a restaurant that was my favorite (a new employee). The Chef owner was not in the kitchen that night. I've had  a metal scouring pad cut up over my food.The chain offered gluten free dishes but it only takes one crazy who thinks you're a problem as a food fadist. Good thing I always look. Good thing they didn't do that to food going to a child with a busy mom.  I give big tips and apologize for having to ask in restaurants but mental illness seem to be rampant. I've learn the hard way.          I don't buy any processed food that doesn't say gluten free.  I am a life long Catholic. I worked for the Church while at college. I don't go to Church anymore because the men at the top decided Jesus is gluten. The special hosts are gluten less not gluten free. No I can't drink wine after people with gluten in their mouth and a variety of deadly germs. I have been abandoned and excluded by my Church/Family.  Having nearly died several times, safe food is paramount. If your immune system collapses as mine did, you get sepsis. It can kill you very quickly. I spent 5 days unconscious and had to have my appendix and gall bladder removed because they were necrotic. I was 25. They didn't figure out I had celiac till I was 53. No one will take the time to tell you what can happen when your immune system gets overwhelmed from its constant fighting the gluten and just stops. It is miserable that our food is processed so carelessly. Our food in many aspects is not safe. And the merging of all the grocery chains has made it far worse. Its a disaster. Krogers also recently purchased Vitacost where I was getting the products I could no longer get at Whole Foods. Kroger is eliminating those products from Vitacost just a Bezos did from WF. I am looking for reliable and certified sources for nuts. I have lived the worst consequences of the disease and being exposed unknowingly and maliciously. Once I was diagnosed I learned way more than anyone should have to about the food industry.  I don't do gray areas. And now I dont eat out except very rarely.  I have not eaten fast food for 30 years before the celiac diagnosis. Gluten aside..... It's not food and it's not safe.  No one has got our backs. Sharing safe food sources is one thing we can do to try to be safe.        
    • Mmoc
      Thank you kindly for your response. I have since gotten the other type of bloods done and am awaiting results. 
    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      I wanted to respond to your post as much for other people who read this later on (I'm not trying to contradict your experience or decisions) > Kirkland Signature Super Extra-Large Peanuts, 2.5 lbs, are labeled "gluten free" in the Calif Costcos I've been in. If they are selling non-gluten-free in your store, I suggest talking to customer service to see if they can get you the gluten-free version (they are tasty) > This past week I bought "Sliced Raw Almonds, Baking Nuts, 5 lbs Item 1495072 Best if used by Jun-10-26 W-261-6-L1A 12:47" at Costco. The package has the standard warning that it was made on machinery that <may> have processed wheat. Based on that alone, I would not eat these. However, I contacted customer service and asked them "are Costco's Sliced Almonds gluten free?" Within a day I got this response:  "This is [xyz] with the Costco Member Service Resolutions Team. I am happy to let you know we got a reply back from our Kirkland Signature team. Here is their response:  This item does not have a risk of cross contamination with gluten, barley or rye." Based on this, I will eat them. Based on experience, I believe they will be fine. Sometimes, for other products, the answer has been "they really do have cross-contamination risk" (eg, Kirkland Signature Dry Roasted Macadamia Nuts, Salted, 1.5 lbs Item 1195303). When they give me that answer I return them for cash. You might reasonably ask, "Why would Costco use that label if they actually are safe?" I can't speak for Costco but I've worked in Corporate America and I've seen this kind of thing first hand and up close. (1) This kind of regulatory label represents risk/cost to the company. What if they are mistaken? In one direction, the cost is loss of maybe 1% of sales (if celiacs don't buy when they would have). In the other direction, the risk is reputational damage and open-ended litigation (bad reviews and celiacs suing them). Expect them to play it safe. (2) There is a team tasked with getting each product out to market quickly and cheaply, and there is also a committee tasked with reviewing the packaging before it is released. If the team chooses the simplest, safest, pre-approved label, this becomes a quick check box. On the other hand, if they choose something else, it has to be carefully scrutinized through a long process. It's more efficient for the team to say there <could> be risk. (3) There is probably some plug and play in production. Some lots of the very same product could be made in a safe facility while others are made in an unsafe facility. Uniform packaging (saying there is risk) for all packages regardless of gluten risk is easier, cheaper, and safer (for Costco). Everything I wrote here is about my Costco experience, but the principles will be true at other vendors, particularly if they have extensive quality control infrastructure. The first hurdle of gluten-free diet is to remove/replace all the labeled gluten ingredients. The second, more difficult hurdle is to remove/replace all the hidden gluten. Each of us have to assess gray zones and make judgement calls knowing there is a penalty for being wrong. One penalty would be getting glutened but the other penalty could be eating an unnecessarily boring or malnourishing diet.
    • trents
      Thanks for the thoughtful reply and links, Wheatwacked. Definitely some food for thought. However, I would point out that your linked articles refer to gliadin in human breast milk, not cow's milk. And although it might seem reasonable to conclude it would work the same way in cows, that is not necessarily the case. Studies seem to indicate otherwise. Studies also indicate the amount of gliadin in human breast milk is miniscule and unlikely to cause reactions:  https://www.glutenfreewatchdog.org/news/gluten-peptides-in-human-breast-milk-implications-for-cows-milk/ I would also point out that Dr. Peter Osborne's doctorate is in chiropractic medicine, though he also has studied and, I believe, holds some sort of certifications in nutritional science. To put it plainly, he is considered by many qualified medical and nutritional professionals to be on the fringe of quackery. But he has a dedicated and rabid following, nonetheless.
    • Scott Adams
      I'd be very cautious about accepting these claims without robust evidence. The hypothesis requires a chain of biologically unlikely events: Gluten/gliadin survives the cow's rumen and entire digestive system intact. It is then absorbed whole into the cow's bloodstream. It bypasses the cow's immune system and liver. It is then secreted, still intact and immunogenic, into the milk. The cow's digestive system is designed to break down proteins, not transfer them whole into milk. This is not a recognized pathway in veterinary science. The provided backup shifts from cow's milk to human breastmilk, which is a classic bait-and-switch. While the transfer of food proteins in human breastmilk is a valid area of study, it doesn't validate the initial claim about commercial dairy. The use of a Dr. Osborne video is a major red flag. His entire platform is based on the idea that all grains are toxic, a view that far exceeds the established science on Celiac Disease and non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and a YouTube video from a known ideological source is not that evidence."  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.