Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Testing Questions


wacky~jackie

Recommended Posts

wacky~jackie Rookie

Hi all! First I just want you to know that I have found this message board very informative.

Here's a short bio. Older sister diagnosed by positive blood tests and positive biopsy. She recommended that I be tested as I have many symptoms (bloating, joint pain, thyroid, depression, gall bladder, headaches - just to name a few!!). After much research I decided to ask my doctor to do blood tests. She really listened to what I had researched and my symptoms and ordered blood tests. After waiting almost 2 weeks for the results (which I didn't expect such a long wait.) they came back negative (IGG of 4 and IGA of 5, iron ok, B12 ok) but she only did those four tests.

My question is should I have her do further testing based on some of the posts I have read? Should I keep the appointment that I have scheduled with a GI and request a biopsy? Or do I just go gluten-free?

In the past I was on the Atkins diet and felt 100% better - which I now believe is because my gluten consumptions was definitely dramatically reduced (although probably not 100% gluten free). I'm ready to cut-out gluten completely to feel better but I don't want to do a gluten challenge for more tests so I just keep eating like I always have. I feel like I'm in limbo!!

Any suggestions?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



plantime Contributor

It is your choice what to do next. Your bloodwork was negative, but that could mean that there just is not enough damage to show up. You can still get the biopsy if you want to. You say you felt better on the Atkins diet, so I recommend you try the gluten-free diet for 6 weeks. A doctor's diagnosis is not needed to eat gluten-free, so if you feel better on a gluten-free diet, there is no reason why you can't remain on it. The dietary response is a test in and of itself.

AndreaB Contributor

If you can swing the money I would recommend Enterolab. They can catch the intolerance before it hits the blood as they test stool. Open Original Shared Link for more info.

mle-ii Explorer

I too noticed how much my symptoms improved when doing Atkins, I didn't make the link to gluten until I found out I had Lymphocytic Colitis and found that others with my disease had improvement with going gluten free. I had Enterolab test me and found that I had gluten sensitivity as well as the genes.

wacky~jackie Rookie
I too noticed how much my symptoms improved when doing Atkins, I didn't make the link to gluten until I found out I had Lymphocytic Colitis and found that others with my disease had improvement with going gluten free. I had Enterolab test me and found that I had gluten sensitivity as well as the genes.

It was amazing. I only ate when I was hungry. No more cravings. I had no bloating and my knees and back felt 100% better. I ended up going off it after some complications from my gall bladder removal and the hospital put me on a clear liquid diet (all sugar!!! which is a major no-no on Atkins) I tried to go back on it when I started gaining the weight back but I haven't had much success because it's too strict. At least on a gluten-free diet I can try corn, potatoes and rice and I can have fruit - none of that is allowed on Atkins. So I think I'll be able to stick to gluten-free pretty easily, especially if I feel better. I guess I was hoping for a definite positive diagnosis. I figured that I could stay away from the bread and stuff easier if I knew it would damage my intestine. I'm worried that I'll be more apt to cheat without the diagnosis. :(

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,731
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    synjadanynja
    Newest Member
    synjadanynja
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.4k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Wheatwacked
      Are You Confused About Your Celiac Disease Lab Results? Some people test negative but have a positive biopsy, others test positive but negative biopsy.  This is why it can take years and misdiagnosis of other diseases that Celiac Disease can mimic. The above link is a good read with real life examples. Something I find interesting is that in 1980 or so a new diagnosis was created, Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity, only 10 years after Norman Borlaug won the Nobel Peace Prize for creating our modern wheat and the Green Revolution.    
    • trents
      @Steve-n-Portland, there is a difference in the requirements to use the label "Gluten Free" and the label "Certified Gluten Free". "Gluten Free" is governed by FDA regulations and has a ceiling of 20 ppm. "Certified Gluten Free" is a labeling convention used by the GFCO, an independent international third party certifying group that uses 10 ppm as its standard.
    • trents
      We have had numerous reports from forum participants experiencing gluten reactions from Trader Joe "gluten-free" products. It seems it's not a good place for the celiac/gluten sensitive community to shop.
    • Steve-n-Portland
      Also, a class action lawsuit was launched in 2024 against Trader Joe's re: their " gluten free" everything bagels. They tested at 269ppm. (Personally, I am not sure they will win. The FDA says that the *ingredients* have to be less than 20ppm for a company to label something "gluten-free."  In order to be certified as gluten-free by the GFCO, the *final product* needs to be less than 20ppm. That said, the lawsuit is arguing that most people read that label and assume the final product is safe for people with celiac. Thus, many people were made sick. And being sick can have costly consequences in regard to work or school, depending when one becomes ill.)
    • Steve-n-Portland
      Correction: My previous post refers to hickory products when I actually meant bakery products.
×
×
  • Create New...