Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Rash Testing


aswolf

Recommended Posts

aswolf Newbie

I'm new here so please forgive me if this question is redundant. I have recently been diagnosed with IBS but I'm wondering if I might have celiac disease or gluten sensitivity. My GI ran two blood tests. I don't know the specifics. I just know the numbers were 3 and 6 with a 20 being positive. When I see him in two weeks I plan to ask him for details and numbers. I am probably just crazy and a hypochondriac, but who knows. I am wondering if a biopsy can be taken of my rashes to diagnose celiac disease? I have 3-4 patches of intensely itchy and scaly rashes on my scalp. I've had 2 of these for going on 10 years now. The last two popped up in the last two weeks. And they started out as painful bumps with a tip that sloughed off, leaving behind this scaly rash. I also have a rash on my upper arm but it isn't too itchy. It just looks like a lot of little raised blood vessels. I guess I could ask for a referral to a dermatologist.

I have a history of depression, anxiety and stomach problems. I've been lactose intolerant for the same 10 years. Also have migraines and unexplainable fatigue. My skin is extremely sensitive - I cannot wear makeup. I have found that certain shampoos and conditioners make the rashes worse. Neutregena T gel makes is even more worse. I think I'll check their ingredients for gluten.

Please help! I think I'm crazy and so does my doctor and family. My sister and mom have the lactose intolerance too. This makes me wonder, since I know celiac disease is inherited.

Thanks so much!!!! :(


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



burdee Enthusiast

My 'stomach problems' were also diagnosed as 'lactose intolerance' and 'IBS' but following the IBS diet just exacerbated my pains and using 'lactaid supplements' didn't resolve all my symptoms (even after I finally tried a gluten free diet when I suspected celiac). :blink: If you suspect you are celiac, don't settle for anything less that blood tests and/or biopsies for celiac. If your GI has already tested for celiac, but you're waiting to see him to get results, don't wait. Call and keep calling until they tell you your results. If you are celiac, the longer you keep eating gluten the more you damage your intestines. :o If your tests come back negative, don't let your doctor dismiss your symptoms as 'IBS' or lactose intolerance. I didn't return to the doctor who gave me those diagnoses. Instead I tested through Enterolab and learned I have autoimmune reactions to BOTH gluten AND caseine (the milk protein for which 'lactaid' supplements do zip) as well as the celiac gene which my doctor never considered. You're not crazy, so don't let doctors, family and friends (??) discount your symptoms with that label. <_<

BURDEE

smg9755 Newbie

I started getting the same rashes 6 years ago. I was eating tuna on wheat and a stack of wheat thins when I realized I started getting red blistering itchy bumbs on one of my legs. I've been eating tuna on wheat for years with no problems. Eventually the rashes went to both legs and after a while the hair fell out in the same place on both legs and the rashes kept getting bigger. I started to develop the same rash around my neck just this past year.. Its great, I have to go to work everyday like this. It never goes away. Around january 3rd, I was told I have an auto-immune problem by yet another doctor.. you have lupus. tested for lupus, no lupus, bone marrow cancer and anything else they could come up with. All came back negative. Finally, there was no cancer, only allergies to soy, vasculitis in both of of my legs and no explanation for the rashes. They claim the rashes are vaculities, I say they are stupid. The rash appears after consuming corn , wheat or soy. What I think is funny, all along I said it was something in the food doing this to me. Little by little, I got the same reaction eating cereals, fig newtons, pretzels, crackers, corn on the cob, soups, gravy, spaghetti and so on.

Its true, by trial and error, I was able to weed out each food and find the rashes stop or start depending on what I ate. I just ate 4 fig newtons at my desk, sorry for being human, I wanted a snack.. and guess what.. both my legs are compelety inflamed again. For a few days I suggest. Eat only grilled chicken or steak, potatoes or rice and vegtables and fruits. I bet the rashes go away. These are the only things I can eat now to control it. i figured this out myself. Not any doctor.

Do a test for me.. after you do the above for a few days, pop a few fig newtons or whats that popcorn, smartcorn and check out what happens. Did the rash come back?

I will leave you with this thought. Hasn't are food supply been introduced to gentically altered corn, wheat and so on. Seems to me, all of a sudden one day, 5 or 6 years ago, little by little, more and more foods starting causing allergic reations to my body. Seems a little odd to me.. Could it be my immune system doesn't understand gentectically altered proteins. Isn't that why we have immune systems. The only thing I can get out of a doctor is.. you have an auto-immune system problem. Wake up everybody. Something else is going on here. I am sure of it and I am tired of people telling me I am crazy. I am right and I know it.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,014
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Beki
    Newest Member
    Beki
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      The NIH article you link actually supports what I have been trying to explain to you: "Celiac disease (celiac disease) is an autoimmune-mediated enteropathy triggered by dietary gluten in genetically prone individuals. The current treatment for celiac disease is a strict lifelong gluten-free diet. However, in some celiac disease patients following a strict gluten-free diet, the symptoms do not remit. These cases may be refractory celiac disease or due to gluten contamination; however, the lack of response could be related to other dietary ingredients, such as maize, which is one of the most common alternatives to wheat used in the gluten-free diet. In some celiac disease patients, as a rare event, peptides from maize prolamins could induce a celiac-like immune response by similar or alternative pathogenic mechanisms to those used by wheat gluten peptides. This is supported by several shared features between wheat and maize prolamins and by some experimental results. Given that gluten peptides induce an immune response of the intestinal mucosa both in vivo and in vitro, peptides from maize prolamins could also be tested to determine whether they also induce a cellular immune response. Hypothetically, maize prolamins could be harmful for a very limited subgroup of celiac disease patients, especially those that are non-responsive, and if it is confirmed, they should follow, in addition to a gluten-free, a maize-free diet." Notice that those for whom it is suggested to follow a maize-free diet are a "very limited subgroup of celiac disease patients". Please don't try to make your own experience normative for the entire celiac community.  Notice also that the last part of the concluding sentence in the paragraph does not equate a gluten-free diet with a maize-free diet, it actually puts them in juxtaposition to one another. In other words, they are different but for a "limited subgroup of celiac disease patients" they produce the same or a similar reaction. You refer to celiac reactions to cereal grain prolamins as "allergic" reactions and "food sensitivity". For instance, you say, "NIH sees all these grains as in opposition to celiacs, of which I am one and that is science, not any MD with a good memory who overprescribes medications that contain known food allergens in them, of which they have zero knowledge if the patient is in fact allergic to or not, since they failed to do simple 'food sensitivity' testing" and "IF a person wants to get well, they should be the one to determine what grains they are allergic to and what grains they want to leave out, not you. I need to remind you that celiac disease is not an allergy, it is an autoimmune disorder. Neither allergy testing nor food sensitivity testing can be used to diagnose celiac disease. Allergy testing and food sensitivity testing cannot detect the antibodies produced by celiac disease in reaction to gluten ingestion.  You say of me, "You must be one of those who are only gluten intolerant . . ." Gluten intolerance is synonymous with celiac disease. You must be referring to gluten sensitivity or NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). Actually, I have been officially diagnosed with celiac disease both by blood antibody testing and by endoscopy/positive biopsy. Reacting to all cereal grain prolamins does not define celiac disease. If you are intent on teaching the truth, please get it straight first.
    • Bebygirl01
      Perhaps you would still like to answer the questions I posed on this topic, because that is all I asked. I am curious to know the answers to those questions, I do not care about the background of Dr. Osborne as I am more aware of the situation than you are, and he is also one of the best known authors out there on Celiac disease. But did you even bother to read the three Research Papers I posted by NIH? You must be one of those who are only gluten intolerant and not yet reacting to all glutens aka grains, but I AM one of those who react to ALL the glutens, and again, that is one of the two questions I originally posted on this matter. NIH sees all these grains as in opposition to celiacs, of which I am one and that is science, not any MD with a good memory who overprescribes medications that contain known food allergens in them, of which they have zero knowledge if the patient is in fact allergic to or not, since they failed to do simple 'food sensitivity' testing. I started with the failed FDA explanation of what Gluten Free is and I stayed sick and got even sicker. It wasn't until I came across NIH's papers and went off all grains that I realized that in fact, I am Celiac and reacting to all the glutens. IF a person wants to get well, they should be the one to determine what grains they are allergic to and what grains they want to leave out, not you. Those who are just getting started with learning about grains etc., can take it easy by just being "grain free' and eating a lot of meat, vegetables, etc. or whole foods as God has intended, without buying so called gluten free garbage out there that is making them sick and the whole reason they are not better. I tried the stupid gluten free garbage and it didn't work, and that will make anyone want to give up, it is better to teach the entire truth and let the patient decide, rather than give them misinformation and lies.
    • Nicola McGuire
      Thank you so much I will speak to the doctor for dietician apt . Thank you for your advice Beth much appreciated 
    • Scott Adams
      Oh no, I'm sorry to hear about the accidental gluten! This article, and the comments below it, may be helpful:    
    • Karmmacalling
      I was born with celiac disease im 20 years old. And I've been gluten free my whole life. Yes my diet is 100 percent gluten free and no i don't eat at restaurants at all. I got glutened by a chips that was marked as gluten free but it wasn't the company said the packaging was old and the recipe was new. 
×
×
  • Create New...