Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Diagnosis


ADSayegh

Recommended Posts

ADSayegh Newbie

Okay, so my daughter was diagnosed with celiac disease 4 years ago at the age of 4. Now, through routine testing I was discovered to have some positive, some negative, and some equivocal results. I do not have symptoms that overwhelm me and make me feel like gluten is my enemy, but I do have mouth ulcers, etc. The doctor has scheduled a biopsy, which we all know is the definitive test. However, I was wondering if I should wait a few months, or until my tests are more positive. I'm just concerned that if I recently developed celiac disease, then the biopsy could still read negative and I would just have to get it redone in a few years anyway.

What do you think?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Deb O (UK) Apprentice
Okay, so my daughter was diagnosed with celiac disease 4 years ago at the age of 4. Now, through routine testing I was discovered to have some positive, some negative, and some equivocal results. I do not have symptoms that overwhelm me and make me feel like gluten is my enemy, but I do have mouth ulcers, etc. The doctor has scheduled a biopsy, which we all know is the definitive test. However, I was wondering if I should wait a few months, or until my tests are more positive. I'm just concerned that if I recently developed celiac disease, then the biopsy could still read negative and I would just have to get it redone in a few years anyway.

What do you think?

I'm not at all sure what to advise you really - I'm very new to all of this. But reading others' comments on this board and from my own experience I would say why bother with a biopsy? There's plenty of evidence that you have celiac / gluten intolerance - why not just try the diet and see how you feel?

Good luck ;)

gfp Enthusiast
I'm not at all sure what to advise you really - I'm very new to all of this. But reading others' comments on this board and from my own experience I would say why bother with a biopsy? There's plenty of evidence that you have celiac / gluten intolerance - why not just try the diet and see how you feel?

Good luck ;)

I agree and you can take a blood test anyway,

As a definitive test that we certainly don't all know is the biopsy.

The biopsy shows damage to your villi from the sample points at a point in time. If you go gluten-free then the villi repair (to differing extents) but celiac disease is a lifelong condition. Aiming to have a +ve biopsy is a little like waiting till you have cirrohsis to stop drinking.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,500
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Tylicee
    Newest Member
    Tylicee
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.2k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • robingfellow
      I can't edit my posts, but I forgot to note as well: I also had low iron and vitamin d according to my blood tests, despite already taking supplements for each
    • Scott Adams
      Hi @Soleihey, it looks like you are making great progress.  This study indicates that a majority of celiacs don't recover until 5 years after diagnosis and starting a gluten-free diet: Mucosal recovery and mortality in adults with celiac disease after treatment with a gluten-free diet However, it's also possible that what the study really shows is the difficulty in maintaining a 100% gluten-free diet. I suspect that if you looked closely at the diets of those who did not recover within 2 years might be that their diets were not 100% gluten-free. Perhaps they ate out more often, or didn't understand all of the hidden ingredients where gluten can hide. Either way, it shows how difficult recovery from celiac disease can be for most people. According to this study:    
    • robingfellow
      I've had symptoms of celiac disease since May 2022 (joint pain, severe migraines, digestive troubles, tachycardia, and hypothyroidism, fatigue) and couldn't figure out what was wrong, especially because I had no access to a doctor. In August of last year I tried a gluten free diet out of desperation and found all my symptoms clearing up! Especially the more of my diet I realized contained gluten and eliminated from my diet. I've even been able to maintain full-But just a couple weeks ago I had to have my gallbladder removed in am emergency surgery, and afterwards the surgeon suggested that a lot of my issues could have been caused by my gallbladder not working properly, but I haven't heard anything about that before. Any ideas? I don't want to try to reintroduce gluten without being certain it won't bring back my issues. It's already troubling enough to know I might have to reintroduce it to my diet just to be tested.
    • robingfellow
      I can also report from personally trying it that while not tasting quite as good as Spam, it is still very good especially compared to other Luncheon Loaf options that may not be gluten free 
    • Scott Adams
      This article might be helpful--it would be a good idea for you to get tested for celiac disease BEFORE you go gluten-free.    
×
×
  • Create New...