Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

May Contain Traces Of Sickness

ErraticBinxie

Recommended Posts

ErraticBinxie Explorer
ErraticBinxie
Posted

I work at a seafood restuarant as a waitress and I often have people come in that have celiac disease and ask me what they can eat. I pretty much know all of the ingredients in salad dressings, sauces etc.

A few weeks ago, I told this mom (who's very young child has celiac disease) that the only dressings we have that are gluten-free are thousand island, italian, etc. She argues with me telling me that our ranch dressing is gluten-free. I was angry that she would fight with me. I told her that we use Hidden Valley that contains Modified food starch. She insisted it was made from corn and so I brought it to her anyways.

Later that night after I had clocked out, I decided to trust her and reunite with the best salad dressing of all time. I regretted it later.

I called the company to find out if Hidden Valley ranch is gluten-free. They said it is but it is produced in the same facility as things that do contain gluten so it may contain traces of gluten. That is enough to drive me away. I don't see a point in ever risking it when things "may contain traces."

But it made me wonder about this mom. Is she being responsible in the food that she is feeding her very small son? He can't advocate for himself and if she doesn't watch what he eats closely then who will?

I want to know what you all think. Do you risk it when it "may contain traces of" or "is produced in the same facility as"?

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Guest ~jules~
Guest ~jules~
Posted

Nope if its made on the same equipment thats making gluteny things I don't eat it....I don't see the difference, if 1 little molecule of gluten is the same as 10,000, then what is the difference if its made on the same equipment?

hez Enthusiast
hez
Posted

For me this is not a easy black and white issue. It really depends on the food and the company that produced it. I am sure for some this is a no brainer but for me it just depends.

For example, my nut thins have a legal statement about being produced in the same facility. However, other people have posted that they contacted the company and that the lines are sepearate. I have never had a problem with them. Others have. Each of us has to decide these things for themselves. And in the case of children it is up to the parent to make that judgement call. For this parent a shared facility was not an issue. For other parents it is an issue.

Hez

Corkdarrr Enthusiast
Corkdarrr
Posted

I agree with Hez. I think it is company specific and it can even be specific to that particular production of the product. I've eaten things that clearly are labelled they are produced in facilities containing gluten and been fine. And I've had things with the same warning and I've gotten ill.

It probably depends on how thoroughly they clean the line before and after running production.

As for the whole parental thing, I suppose that's the parent's decision to make until the child is old enough to know what's going on. I hope she's not messin' her kid up...

Although I do find it hard to believe that someone eating out at a restaurant would actually question a server so knowledgable about gluten and celiacs...I think most of us are just impressed if our plate doesn't come out with the standard issue roll on it!

-Courtney

ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted
I don't see a point in ever risking it when things "may contain traces."

But it made me wonder about this mom. Is she being responsible in the food that she is feeding her very small son? He can't advocate for himself and if she doesn't watch what he eats closely then who will?

I want to know what you all think. Do you risk it when it "may contain traces of" or "is produced in the same facility as"?

No she is not being responsible. Although I would prefer to think that she is just uneducated. Did you tell her that you are also celiac and know this isn't safe? As far as ignoring a CYA statement, every so often I will risk it and usually regret it.

2Boys4Me Enthusiast
2Boys4Me
Posted

My younger son is the only one in our family with celiac and he has no outward symptoms. That is, he never spends all day in the bathroom or has stomachaches. I will buy products for him that have no gluten-containing ingredients (items from Kraft, ConAgra, Hershey, etc.) including products that say "made in the same facility as wheat products." I will NOT buy anything that says "may contain traces of wheat." To me "may contain" is a red flag but the "produced in" is a CYA. I am sure they are very careful cleaning lines if they don't have dedicated lines, and I think some companies toss the first few items off the line just in case.

By the way I thought that since the U.S.'s new labelling law all modified food starch had to be corn unless otherwise specified.

psawyer Proficient
psawyer
Posted

I agree with Linda. There is only so far you can go unless you are prepared to live inside a bubble.

The woman was eating in a restaurant. Surely the CC risk in doing that is at least as great as it is in a prepared food manufactured on clean lines from ingredients which do not contain gluten. She apparently knew that the modified food starch in the product in question was corn (as it almost always is). I don't find any fault at all in her actions.

If cross-contamination in a food prepared in a shared facility worries you, you should not even think about eating in a restaurant!

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


elonwy Enthusiast
elonwy
Posted

To me there is a difference in the following statements:

Prepared on shared lines: NOT okay

May contain traces: NOT okay

In the same facility: Maybe, I'll try it if its a trusted company.

If it was my kind though, and not me, I'd probably be much mroe protective than I am of myself. That's just speculative, since I don't have any yet. :)

Elonwy

Saz Explorer
Saz
Posted

As I'm not super sensitive I don't worry if it says it has been prepared on the same line. I have on occasion put things back that say May contain traces of wheat but again not an enormous issue for me.

sillyyak Enthusiast
sillyyak
Posted

I do NOT risk it when it says "may contain traces of....." Only because I know what would happen if the traces would get into my system.. For me, it is not worth it.

Matilda Enthusiast
Matilda
Posted

..

Lillyth Explorer
Lillyth
Posted
I work at a seafood restuarant as a waitress and I often have people come in that have celiac disease and ask me what they can eat. I pretty much know all of the ingredients in salad dressings, sauces etc.

A few weeks ago, I told this mom (who's very young child has celiac disease) that the only dressings we have that are gluten-free are thousand island, italian, etc. She argues with me telling me that our ranch dressing is gluten-free. I was angry that she would fight with me. I told her that we use Hidden Valley that contains Modified food starch. She insisted it was made from corn and so I brought it to her anyways.

Later that night after I had clocked out, I decided to trust her and reunite with the best salad dressing of all time. I regretted it later.

I called the company to find out if Hidden Valley ranch is gluten-free. They said it is but it is produced in the same facility as things that do contain gluten so it may contain traces of gluten. That is enough to drive me away. I don't see a point in ever risking it when things "may contain traces."

But it made me wonder about this mom. Is she being responsible in the food that she is feeding her very small son? He can't advocate for himself and if she doesn't watch what he eats closely then who will?

I want to know what you all think. Do you risk it when it "may contain traces of" or "is produced in the same facility as"?

My two cents: No, the mother was NOT being responsible.

I have been in a facility, personally, that says they use dedicated equipment for wheat & corn. All the equipment is wood, which, as we know, retains gluten. When I was witnessing the milling process, wheat flour was EVERYWHERE!!!!! The mills were one foot apart. I had a hard time even being in the room. They actually advised me to keep a wet papertowel over my face to keep the wheat flour out of my mucous membranes (which I appreciated).

It made me thing though, that the wood equipment, which was one foot away from the mill, MUST be getting wheat flour on it - I was in the back of the room, and had problems.

That being said, I know of at least one facility that uses only stainless steel for all production. It IS a shared facility, but they DO clean everything in between processing, and NEVER process more than one product at a time.

So - in short, some facilities may be safe, while others are not.

I think it is either trial & error, or "russian roulette" every so often.

I don't have a hard & fast rule, sometimes I go one way, sometimes the other.

But I DO keep note of which mfrs are on my "safe" list, and which are on my "no-way-in-hell-not-ever-not-even-if-i-were-starving" list... :D

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,571
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Catherine OBrien
    Newest Member
    Catherine OBrien
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Weakly positive DGP IgA

      By trents · Posted

      If your total IGA is low then the values for the other IGA tests cannot be trusted. They will be depressed. Celiacs who have the DQ2 gene typically are on the more sensitive side as opposed to those who only have the DQ8. But keep in mind that having either or both of those genes does not equate to having celiac disease as 40% of the general population have one or the other and only about 1% of the general population develops active celiac disease. Genetic typing can be used for ruling it out, however. Because of the low total IGA, symptoms and the possession of the DQ2 gene, my suggestion would be for you to go seriously gluten free for a few months and see if your symptoms improve. It may be the only way you can ascertain if you are gluten intolerant because of the low total IGA.
    • Cat M
      Weakly positive DGP IgA

      By Cat M · Posted

      Ah ok, I just saw didn’t even post the DGP IgA at all. 😫 I started with itching and hives Jan 2024, been taking a ton of meds and on Xolair and even that is not providing total relief. The other primary symptoms: intermittent but worsening abdominal pain, diarrhea and bloating. This summer I am just exhausted. I uploaded my 23andMe data to genetic lifehacks and discovered quite a few variations, including DQ2, MTHFR, VDR and I have always had very low ferritin, vitamin D and B12. I still think that mast cell disease makes the most sense, but latest labs show I am barely in range for thiamine, zinc and vitamin A, so the GI stuff feels more important to figure out than the hives right now. I did SIBO testing this morning. TTG IGA <2   0-3 is negative TTG IGG  3   0-5 is neg DGP IGA 21    20-30 is weak positive DGP IGG 4    0-19 is negative Although total IGA is not resulted, there is a footnote stating it was low and the reason they ran IGG.  
    • Scott Adams
      Positive TTG antibody and negative EMA antibody

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      This is an interesting case. A positive tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibody with a negative endomysial antibody (EMA) and normal duodenal histology can present a diagnostic challenge, especially in an asymptomatic patient. While the absence of villous atrophy and negative EMA suggest that the likelihood of active celiac disease is low at this time, such serological discordance may still warrant monitoring. Some individuals may be in the early stages of celiac disease, often referred to as potential celiac disease, particularly if they carry the HLA-DQ2 or DQ8 haplotypes. HLA typing can be quite helpful in this situation; a negative result would virtually rule out celiac disease, whereas a positive result may justify periodic follow-up to monitor for evolving disease. The risk of progression to overt celiac disease is not well defined but appears to be higher in children, those with a family history, or those with autoimmune conditions. In this case, routine follow-up including repeat serology and consideration of symptoms or new risk factors over time would be a reasonable and cautious approach. For people with celiac disease hidden gluten in their diets is the main cause of elevated Tissue Transglutaminase IgA Antibodies (tTG-IgA), but there are other conditions, including cow's milk/casein intolerance, that can also cause this, and here is an article about the other possible causes:      
    • Scott Adams
      Old to diagnosis

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Have you tried to start a gluten-free diet since your diagnosis in 2019?
    • trents
      Positive TTG antibody and negative EMA antibody

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to celiac.com, @Wamedh Taj-Aldeen! Just curious, what is your relationship to the patient? Are you the attending physician? A medical student? A consulted physician? Was a total IGA test ordered? Some physicians are under the dated and mistaken impression that such is only necessary in young children. If total IGA is low, other IGA antibody numbers will be artificially depressed. By the way, it is not unusual to have a positive TTG-IGA and a negative EMA. Are the TTG-IGA numbers borderline high or unequivocally high? There are other diseases and medical conditions that can cause elevated TTG-IGA numbers besides celiac disease but when this is the case, the numbers are usually not dramatically elevated. It can also be the case that villous damage was patchy and affected areas were missed during the biopsy. Or, onset of celiac disease was very recent and villous atrophy has not yet progressed to the point of detectability.  We also have occasional anecdotal reports in this online community of positive antibody testing with negative histology, as you report. But we also know that gluten intolerance can manifest itself apart from enteropathy. It can damage other organ systems. Many celiacs are of the "silent" type, meaning there is an absence or a relative absence of symptoms until the disease has become advanced and there is significant damage to the villous lining or other organ systems. But to answer your questions: 1. I would definitely pursue a routine follow-up and recheck of the antibodies. And, I would order a complete celiac panel including total IGA and IGG stuff in say, six months. Sooner if symptoms manifest. 2. It is impossible to say what is the risk of the future development of over celiac disease. I refer you back to my #1 above concerning rechecking.  3. I would definitely pursue HLA DQ2/DQ8 typing as it can be used as a rule out for celiac disease, though not quite with 100% dependability. I hope my thoughts prove helpful to you.
×
×
  • Create New...