Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Gluten Elimination Diet As A Test?


goldmama22

Recommended Posts

goldmama22 Newbie

Two weeks ago we removed gluten from my 3 year old's diet after inconclusive tests for Celiac. Her dr did not suggest it. Her dr suggested watchful waiting... oh gosh I will give background. First though let me say my questions are how long to keep her on the gluten-free diet before doing a reintroduction. I know allergies are two weeks but is it longer for celiac disease?

So the background is that at 19 months, right after we were told to see a nutritionist and run some blood tests b/c she was too skinny, she was hospitalized for a GI flu. She stayed 3 nights, went home, crashed and burned, got readmitted barely conscious the next day, and after CT and spinal tap they decided a combination of the GI flu and her low weight had shut down her digestive system. They put in an NG tube, she was discharged 4 days later, and she was on the NG tube for a total of 3 weeks. Since then we have been working with a ped GI'ist who has had her on a high calorie diet - lots of added fats and other nutrient-dense foods.

Since then she has been sick frequently, and she always loses weight really fast when sick, and a few weeks ago when my baby got Roseola (which she got as a baby already) she spiked a fever up to 104.3, and she had a fever between 100-103 for 12 days straight. Since then her temp has not gone below 99.3. She lost 2 lbs in the first week of the illness (and was at the lowest weight her dr was happy with before having lost the weight). On day 11 of the fever her dr ran blood tests for infection and for Celiac. One of the 3 celiac disease tests came back positive, but it is apparently the one that is most frequently a false positive compared to the other two - less specific but more sensitive, she said. So she said we should just see what happened with my dd's weight and if it rebounded to just assume it was a false positive and keep going forward with just a high calorie diet (and if it didn't rebound, do a biopsy).

I just wasn't comfortable doing nothing. (Watchful waiting sucks, but also, what if we're controlling her weight with fat when we could be increasing her absorption of nutrients by going gluten-free?) So we cut out gluten. But without her dr on board with us, I'm at sea. Help me out - how do we do this gluten-free test? How long for the gluten-free before reintroduction, and then how long after reintroduction would we wait to see symptoms?

Elly has gained a lot of weight back. I haven't gotten to weigh her yet but I can tell b/c her butt has a couple dimples. :) But I felt it was too risky to take her off the high calorie diet over the last couple weeks, so I can't rule that out as a cause - that is why reintroducing gluten is so important to us.

If you read all this, thanks, and if you didn't I totally understand but I hope you'll answer the questions about timing.

:) Megan


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



VydorScope Proficient

First off, skip the bisopy. :)

Second which test came back postive?

Third are you 100% sure she is 100% gluten-free? You can not make any mistakes or it will hinder your ablity to get results.

OKay that aside, the diet in may doctors opion is the best test for celiac disease. The Bisopy is ingrained as the "Gold Standard" here in America, but that is not true elsewhere, becuase its not a definitive test. Esply in a child so young it is almost garrenteed to be false. Also note the fact that she has been (I am assuming yes to the third question) gluten free for 2 weeks will increase the liklyhood non-postive result reguardless of wheter or not she has it. Simply put the bisopy looks for damage, and if there is not "enough" damage in the specific places the doc looks the test will be non-postive. A 19month old child has the ablity to heal that far excedes anything you could do your self, and that realy will make it hard for the bisopy. As a parent who had his son tested at 20months old, if I could go back I would skip the biospy.

I would give the diet at least a month of 100% perfect gluten free (make sure you check all soaps, skin care, hair care, personal products of all kinds, playdough, and esply cross contimation in things like butter, peanutbutter, pots, pans, etc, and dont forget all the hidden gluten soruces, lots of links on this site to help there. ) and then see if she is better.

How long it takes is an very uncertin varible. My son reacts at about 4-5 hours after getting gluten. Some take alot longer, some throw up imediatly. Esply in a child so young reactions could be subtle and it could take a while before they build up so that you notice them. Watch close for at least another month after re-introducing to see, but I would guess in a few days to a week you would get a recation.

TCA Contributor

My son also had inconclusive testing and we did a diet trial. It was about week 3 before we say drastic improvements. I echo what Vincent said. Make sure you're 100% gluten free. It's hard, but you'll get there! I hope she feels better soon!

goldmama22 Newbie

Thank you for the information. We will give it a couple more weeks for sure, then.

Oh, and I weighed her and she's half a lb above her highest weight ever. :)

:) Megan

VydorScope Proficient

Great ont eh wight gain, please keep us udpated!

Ursa Major Collaborator

Megan, from everything I have read, there is no such thing as a false positive on those blood tests, even though false negatives are very common.

If in two weeks gluten-free she has already surpassed her highest weight ever, I think you pretty much have your answer. The high calorie diet wouldn't do any good if her intestines wouldn't absorb any of it. Keep up the good work! And I agree with Vincent on the biopsy, don't bother with it. The diet test is the best test, especially with young children. You don't need a doctor's permission to go on a gluten-free diet, as it's a very healthy diet.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,014
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Beki
    Newest Member
    Beki
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      The NIH article you link actually supports what I have been trying to explain to you: "Celiac disease (celiac disease) is an autoimmune-mediated enteropathy triggered by dietary gluten in genetically prone individuals. The current treatment for celiac disease is a strict lifelong gluten-free diet. However, in some celiac disease patients following a strict gluten-free diet, the symptoms do not remit. These cases may be refractory celiac disease or due to gluten contamination; however, the lack of response could be related to other dietary ingredients, such as maize, which is one of the most common alternatives to wheat used in the gluten-free diet. In some celiac disease patients, as a rare event, peptides from maize prolamins could induce a celiac-like immune response by similar or alternative pathogenic mechanisms to those used by wheat gluten peptides. This is supported by several shared features between wheat and maize prolamins and by some experimental results. Given that gluten peptides induce an immune response of the intestinal mucosa both in vivo and in vitro, peptides from maize prolamins could also be tested to determine whether they also induce a cellular immune response. Hypothetically, maize prolamins could be harmful for a very limited subgroup of celiac disease patients, especially those that are non-responsive, and if it is confirmed, they should follow, in addition to a gluten-free, a maize-free diet." Notice that those for whom it is suggested to follow a maize-free diet are a "very limited subgroup of celiac disease patients". Please don't try to make your own experience normative for the entire celiac community.  Notice also that the last part of the concluding sentence in the paragraph does not equate a gluten-free diet with a maize-free diet, it actually puts them in juxtaposition to one another. In other words, they are different but for a "limited subgroup of celiac disease patients" they produce the same or a similar reaction. You refer to celiac reactions to cereal grain prolamins as "allergic" reactions and "food sensitivity". For instance, you say, "NIH sees all these grains as in opposition to celiacs, of which I am one and that is science, not any MD with a good memory who overprescribes medications that contain known food allergens in them, of which they have zero knowledge if the patient is in fact allergic to or not, since they failed to do simple 'food sensitivity' testing" and "IF a person wants to get well, they should be the one to determine what grains they are allergic to and what grains they want to leave out, not you. I need to remind you that celiac disease is not an allergy, it is an autoimmune disorder. Neither allergy testing nor food sensitivity testing can be used to diagnose celiac disease. Allergy testing and food sensitivity testing cannot detect the antibodies produced by celiac disease in reaction to gluten ingestion.  You say of me, "You must be one of those who are only gluten intolerant . . ." Gluten intolerance is synonymous with celiac disease. You must be referring to gluten sensitivity or NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). Actually, I have been officially diagnosed with celiac disease both by blood antibody testing and by endoscopy/positive biopsy. Reacting to all cereal grain prolamins does not define celiac disease. If you are intent on teaching the truth, please get it straight first.
    • Bebygirl01
      Perhaps you would still like to answer the questions I posed on this topic, because that is all I asked. I am curious to know the answers to those questions, I do not care about the background of Dr. Osborne as I am more aware of the situation than you are, and he is also one of the best known authors out there on Celiac disease. But did you even bother to read the three Research Papers I posted by NIH? You must be one of those who are only gluten intolerant and not yet reacting to all glutens aka grains, but I AM one of those who react to ALL the glutens, and again, that is one of the two questions I originally posted on this matter. NIH sees all these grains as in opposition to celiacs, of which I am one and that is science, not any MD with a good memory who overprescribes medications that contain known food allergens in them, of which they have zero knowledge if the patient is in fact allergic to or not, since they failed to do simple 'food sensitivity' testing. I started with the failed FDA explanation of what Gluten Free is and I stayed sick and got even sicker. It wasn't until I came across NIH's papers and went off all grains that I realized that in fact, I am Celiac and reacting to all the glutens. IF a person wants to get well, they should be the one to determine what grains they are allergic to and what grains they want to leave out, not you. Those who are just getting started with learning about grains etc., can take it easy by just being "grain free' and eating a lot of meat, vegetables, etc. or whole foods as God has intended, without buying so called gluten free garbage out there that is making them sick and the whole reason they are not better. I tried the stupid gluten free garbage and it didn't work, and that will make anyone want to give up, it is better to teach the entire truth and let the patient decide, rather than give them misinformation and lies.
    • Nicola McGuire
      Thank you so much I will speak to the doctor for dietician apt . Thank you for your advice Beth much appreciated 
    • Scott Adams
      Oh no, I'm sorry to hear about the accidental gluten! This article, and the comments below it, may be helpful:    
    • Karmmacalling
      I was born with celiac disease im 20 years old. And I've been gluten free my whole life. Yes my diet is 100 percent gluten free and no i don't eat at restaurants at all. I got glutened by a chips that was marked as gluten free but it wasn't the company said the packaging was old and the recipe was new. 
×
×
  • Create New...