Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Moose Munch Bars


mellajane

Recommended Posts

mellajane Explorer

They really did not make me feel 100% so if i really need them its one of those things you take a chance eating. But on the lighter note.... I am a chocolate addict... If chocolate got taken away i would be very sad. Yes I have given up some favorites but I am excited about moving on........You'll rock for Recommendations.. Im check them out.

Dear Ms. Quartieri:

Thank you for contacting us.

Below is the requested information for our regular Moose Munch.

Unfortunately, we are not able to guarantee food products we sell as free from peanuts or other allergens. The following disclaimer is added to all ingredient lists: "May contain trace amounts of other nuts or allergens not listed in the ingredients".

We are very sorry for any inconvenience this may have caused. If we may be of any further assistance, please let us know.

Best Wishes,

Alia H.

Harry and David

E-Commerce Sales and Service


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



jerseyangel Proficient

Yes, we have one of their stores nearby, and was there recently, as my husband loves their truffles. I was browsing, seeing if there was anything there I could eat, and I noticed that a lot of their items have that allergen statement. :angry:

  • 1 year later...
andreagrant Apprentice

Someone just sent me some Harry and David truffles as part of a craft swap, and I see that CYA disclaimer on the package. I never really know what that means--just that they want to avoid lawsuits, or that they really DO have a big old dirty, messy plant with wheat flour floating all over.

  • 1 year later...
Porkwa Newbie

Having spoken with them recently, the reason they do not currently print their specific allergens on packaging is due to the fact that they cannot guarantee 100% flour free environment in all points of their products journey to packaging. Some companies choose to allow a certain amount of gluten to get into their food and still call it gluten free but Harry and David has thus far opted for a policy that only foods that have no potential contact with any gluten can be labeled gluten free. As far as I know, they are working to make this more clear and are certainly aware of the need for more concise ingredient lists for those who cannot process gluten.

  • 1 year later...
GDol Newbie

Thank you for contacting us.

Harry and David Operations, Inc. is in compliance with the Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act of 2004 (Title II of Public Law 108-282) as of January 1, 2006. Harry and David is 100% compliant with the new Act as currently defined.

We have contacted our ingredient suppliers to insure that all ingredients, including gluten-related ingredients, are declared on the label. Therefore, to the best of our knowledge, our labels list all ingredients. Because Gluten is found in wheat and some other grain products we encourage you to read the ingredient information carefully and determine if the product is appropriate for your consumption. Our Moose Munch is unfortunately not gluten free.

If we may be of any further assistance, please let us know.

Best Wishes,

Jessica S.

Harry & David E-Services

2500 S Pacific Hwy, Medford OR 97501

Call Toll Free 1-877-322-1200

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,110
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    nrthcntrygrl
    Newest Member
    nrthcntrygrl
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Soleihey
      My TTG was 167 one year ago. Recently had it retested one month ago and it went down to 16. I only recently had an endoscopy done as I was pregnant within the last year. I did not eat gluten prior to this endoscopy as I get very sick. Prior to obtaining the biopsies, the endoscopy said “ diffuse moderately erythematous mucosa to the second part of the duodenum without bleeding.” However, the biopsy came back negative. I assume it’s a false negative as I have also had genetic testing to confirm celiac. However, what would cause the inflammation to the second part of the duodenum and continued positive blood markers if the intestines have healed?
    • TerryinCO
      Thank you for direction.  Eating out is a concern though we rarely do, but I'm prepared now.
    • trents
      This might be helpful to you at this point:   
    • cristiana
      Thank you for the update.  So interesting to know how things are changing, when I was diagnosed I had very similar blood results but still had to have the endoscopy.  Glad you know where you stand.  As your father has celiac disease you probably already know a lot about it, but do contact us if we can help further.
    • trents
      But isn't it easier to just take a D3 supplement? Is the D light somehow a superior source? Links?
×
×
  • Create New...