Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Who Do I Talk To?


Thomas

Recommended Posts

Thomas Apprentice

gluten-free sunscreen info?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



lovegrov Collaborator

Have her try the Gluten Intolerance Group at www.gluten.net. There's contact information. Personally, I find the CSA nearly useless. They were even opposed to the recently passed allergy ingredient bill.

richard

celiac3270 Collaborator
Personally, I find the CSA nearly useless. They were even opposed to the recently passed allergy ingredient bill.

Wow.....that stinks....why the hell wouldn't they want this allergy bill? :angry: I don't get it.........

lovegrov Collaborator

They didn't want the bill at least in part because it didn't require companies to clearly list barley, rye and oats (there are other reasons but I don't pretend to understand them all). The rest of the celiac community decided to go with the bill that passed because it became apparent that any insistence on listing barley, rye and oats would kill the allergen bill. In addition, hidden wheat is 95-98 percent of our problem. Rye and oats just aren't ever hidden ingredients.

CSA was the ONLY major celiac group that didn't join with the celiac task force in trying to pass this legislation, although if you go to their web site their announcement about the legislation almost makes it look like they were responsible for it. CSA's president-elect has also recently been embroiled is some major public dustups lately, including one at the recent NIH consensus conference on celiac. It's a personal decision for anybody, but my membership money goes to GIG, not CSA.

richard

Boojca Apprentice

Unfortunately barley is frequently hidden...in caramel coloring. I wish they would've included all of these in the bill. Talk about making life REALLY much more simple! Sigh....baby steps I guess...

Bridget

lovegrov Collaborator

If the caramel color is made in the U.S. it will not have barley. In fact, I can't remember the last time I found caramel color with barley. I'm not saying barley is never hidden, but wheat is really more than 95 percent of our problem.

richard

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      125,877
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    hannahc
    Newest Member
    hannahc
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @ABP! We can't comment on the test numbers you give as you didn't include the range for negative. Different labs use different units and different ranges. There are no industry standards for this so we need more information. If your daughter doesn't have celiac disease she still could have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity) which some experts believe can be a precursor to celiac disease and is 10x more common than celiac disease. However, there is no test for it yet but it does share many of the same symptoms with celiac disease. Both require complete abstinence from gluten.  It is seldom the case during testing where all tests are positive, even for those who do have celiac disease. This is no different than when diagnosing other medical conditions and that is why it is typical to run numbers of tests that come at things from different angles when seeking to arrive at a diagnosis. It seems like you are at the point, since you have had both blood antibody testing and endoscopy/biopsy done, that you need to trial the gluten free diet. If her symptoms improve then you know all you need to know, whatever you label you want to give it. But given that apparently at least one celiac antibody blood test is positive and she has classic celiac symptoms such as slow growth, constipation and bloating, my money would be on celiac disease as opposed to NCGS.
    • ABP
      My nine-year-old daughter has suffered with severe constipation and bloating for years as well as frequent mouth sores, and keratosis Polaris on her arms. She also has recently decreased on her growth curve her % going down gradually.  After seeing a gastroenterologist, her IgG GLIADIN (DEAMIDATED) AB (IGG) was 22.4 while her IGA was normal. Her TISSUE TRANSGLUTAMINASE AB, IGA was 11.9.  Most recently her genetic test for celiac was positive.  After an endoscopy her tissue showed inflammation of the tissue as well as , increased intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) but there was no blunting of the change in the villi.    It seems that every result that we get one out of two things positive rather than all leading to an inconclusive diagnosis. While we do have another appointment with the doctor to go over the results. I'm curious based on this information what others think.    I would hate to have her eliminate gluten if not necessary- but also don't want to not remove if it is necessary.    Signed Confused and Concerned Mama
    • Scott Adams
      I guess using "GF" instead of "PL" would have been too easy! 😉
    • trents
      I was wrong, however, about there being no particular health concerns associated with high total IGA: https://www.inspire.com/resources/chronic-disease/understanding-high-iga-levels-causes-impacts/ So maybe the physician's "borderline" remark is relevant to that.
    • trents
      Sometimes that is the case but what is curious to me is the remark by your physician about being "borderline". I assume he was referring to the total IGA score but it just seems like an irrelevant remark when it is on the high side rather than being deficient.
×
×
  • Create New...