Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

What Benefit Is It To Me To Know?


txnmaryann

Recommended Posts

txnmaryann Rookie

OK, newbie here.......I had a biopsy 2 weeks ago, the pictures of my duedoem (SP?) showed atrophy consistent with celiac disease. When I got home and saw the picture...it was so gross....I cut out all gluten immediately. I had been suffering w/D for a long time. It immediately cleared up. A week later, my biopsies came back normal. I continued the gluten free and continued to feel better. Went to dr. today, he wants to now have me do another test....swallow a camera....to verify if it's celiac....as well as do the blood test, which I haven't had done. I ask, what is the benefit to me, I know the diet is making me feel better. He says, well that other diseases can result from celiac, it's better for me to know one way or the other if I should be on the lookout for the other diseases. My husband and I are thinking, go gluten for another 2 weeks, spend half the day in the bathroom and in pain, spend more money at the doctor, to then go back on the diet??!! Is there really any benefit for me to know for sure one way or another?? I really have not had a hard time on the diet so far b/c it has made such a drastic difference in how I feel........Thanks in advance for any advice!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



eKatherine Apprentice

Going on the assumption you are either gluten intolerant or have celiac, you're already planning to treat it properly, and you can keep an eye out for any of those symptoms you should watch for. But if you're gluten-free, you should be minimizing your chances of complications anyway.

Ursa Major Collaborator

Your husband is right. Save yourself the agony and the expense, and keep doing what you're doing. It's obviously working, you're feeling much better, no need for further testing. Tell your doctor you're happy just staying on the gluten-free diet, and you have no intention whatsoever of making yourself purposely ill again.

It's often the hardest thing to get your spouse to be supportive without a 'proper' diagnosis. Your husband is obviously backing you 100%, be glad and keep up the good work.

Nancym Enthusiast

The only reason I got tested was so I could have a piece of paper to wave at my family and tell them they probably have it too. It didn't work though. They don't want to go gluten-free.

spunky Contributor

I agree with the others. It sounds pretty barbaric to purposely make yourself sick for a confirming diagnosis. Sometimes I wish I would've gone to doctors over this, rather than having totally treated myself, just so I could say "I've been diagnosed..." when people don't believe the importance of my dietary paranoia. "I think I'm celiac" just doesn't sound as convincing.

But maybe it really woudn't make that much difference. As far as watching for other diseases, from what I understand, the more time you are gluten free, the more likely you are to avoid these complications, if they didn't already occur before stopping the gluten.

When I first went gluten free, it seemed I had a cerain amount of new, strange symptoms, such as getting very shaky and hyper, and I wonder if my thyroid could've been rebounding or something. I was worried for a while, but those symptoms stopped on their own after a few weeks. I think I've read that in 2-5 years gluten free, the autoimmune disorders and all of that are no more likely than they would be with non-celiacs, and I just hope that's true!

eKatherine Apprentice
I agree with the others. It sounds pretty barbaric to purposely make yourself sick for a confirming diagnosis. Sometimes I wish I would've gone to doctors over this, rather than having totally treated myself, just so I could say "I've been diagnosed..." when people don't believe the importance of my dietary paranoia. "I think I'm celiac" just doesn't sound as convincing.

I just say, "I can't eat that, it makes me sick." How can anybody question that?

txnmaryann Rookie

I'd like to thank you all for replying. I have decided to not go further with testing. And, yes, since seeing the pictures of my endoscope, my DH is understanding......before that........

I'll be posting more as I continue to cope with this.........


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,981
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Mink38
    Newest Member
    Mink38
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @WildFlower1! The reason you are seeing conflicting results when you research the length of time recommended for doing the "gluten challenge" is that the guidelines have recently been under revision. So there are two components: 1. amount of daily gluten consumption and 2. duration of that amount of daily gluten consumption Recently, the guidelines have been under revision because the medical community was sensing the previous standards were too relaxed, particularly in the daily amount of recommended gluten consumption. The more recent guidelines seem to be calling for higher amounts of daily gluten consumption over (perhaps) as shorter period of time. So, it is becoming a daily minimum of 10g of gluten daily (about the amount in 4-6 slices of wheat bread) for a minimum of two weeks. Personally, I would recommend that amount of consumption be extended from two weeks to four weeks to ensure valid testing. Your Immunoglobulin IgA at 1.25. Was that within normal range? If that one is low, you are IgA deficient and other IgA test results cannot be trusted. But regardless of whether or not you have celiac disease or NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity) the antidote is the same, namely, a gluten free diet. What would you do different if you had a more confident differential diagnosis? And there are other reasons for the development of osteopenia/osteoporosis that you probably should explore. Are you on any serious supplementation for D3 and magnesium?
    • WildFlower1
      The results of my blood tests after 4 weeks: *Tissue Transglutaminase Ab IgA —->   “<0.5 NEGATIVE” *Immunoglobulin IgA —-> “1.25” *Deamidated Gliadin peptide Ab IgG —-> “<0.5 NEGATIVE”    
    • WildFlower1
      Hi there, I have been scouring the forums, medical journals, celiac websites, speaking to my doctor and there seems to be a contradiction in the exact amount of time one must do the gluten challenge for a blood test. Let me please express my gratitude for taking your time to help! I will try and keep this short. In a nutshell, I am positive genetically for celiac. Previously for many years 10+ I have been on a strict gluten free diet. At a very young age, I had infertility, hair loss, low iron, stomach problems, neurological symptoms, continued low bone density etc. etc. all the symptoms that line up with celiac.  I could never get an “official diagnosis” because I was not eating gluten for years.   Recently, I had a bone density scan, and was shocked at the results. I am young and my low bone density is continuously lowering. This lead me  to seriously consider doing the celiac blood test to confirm if I actually have celiac. Years ago, I had an endoscopy and they did a biopsy saying it was negative for celiac - but I had been on a gluten free diet for years. Now, I asked my doctor if I can start the gluten challenge and get this over with. My doctor said two weeks then get the blood test. I have been having 2-3 pieces of bread daily. After four weeks of doing this, I went for the bloodwork - it came back negative for celiac. I am continuing to eat bread daily, it has now been over 6 weeks. I am not able to get an endoscopy. Please, from your experience how long really must I eat bread daily to ensure I do not get a false negative blood test for celiac? I have read up to 12 weeks. One doctor advised this is foolish to even do this gluten challenge as I am damaging my body. My other doctor said 2 weeks eat it, but it showed negative. But with my recent continuous lowering of bone density I personally need to rule celiac out.   Thank you VERY much for your help, I truly appreciate it!!
    • Soleihey
    • Scott Adams
      It's possible he's in the early stages of celiac disease, and it has been caught before villi damage. The blood test results so far do indicate possible celiac disease, as well as his strong family history of celiac disease. If his symptoms get better on a gluten-free diet this would be another strong indication. Personally I think it's definitely better to proceed on the safe side and go gluten-free, rather than to risk severe villi damage and all that comes with it.
×
×
  • Create New...