Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Thoughts On My Test Results And Symptoms?


PaulW

Recommended Posts

PaulW Newbie

Hi, I'm looking for advice on what may be the proper interpretation of my test results and symptoms. Three antibody tests were performed on me: Antigliadin IgG was high at 25 units, whereas IgA for antigliadin and tissue transglutaminase were normal at 5 units. From the information I've browsed, it appears as though one interpretation is that in conjunction with the normal IgA tests, the high IgG test isn't diagnostic of proper celiac sprue, though it may instead be indicative other, non-celiac metabolic/immunological abnormalities I may have. On the other hand, I've come across information indicating that in some cases, celiac disease actually results in IgA deficiencies, in which case results like mine are exactly what would be expected. Are these both viable interpretations? Does one sound better than the other?

Additional information about my case: I don't have major, overt gastrointestinal symptoms, though probably an above average amount of GI distress. I have intermittent aching in my arms and legs, fatigue, and "brain fog" symptoms, which appear to result from multiple food/chemical sensitivities. Past experimental attempts I've made at gluten exclusion seem to have resulted in a decrease of abdominal cramping I otherwise have and a change in the character of my bowel movements, though not an overwhelming change in the more bothersome symptoms. Over the past year, I've been dabbling with an unconventional doctor who, with his tests, has found both malabsorption and leaky gut, as well as "detoxification abnormalities." So, one thought I have is that an inherent gluten intolerance may be behind all those symptoms and "alternative" test results, whereas on the other hand, I wonder if I may have other, non-celiac problems causing these symptoms, including perhaps some reactivity to gluten and elevated anti-gliadin IgG, but not proper celiac sprue.

I'll be grateful for any and all thoughts, thanks very much.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



judy04 Rookie

Hi Paul,

I'm not sure if I can help you but my IGA was elevated @74 but my

IGG was 16. I read somewhere that having 1 or more of these elevated

antibodies means that you are reacting to Gluten. It may be that you

don't have enough damage to cause both to rise. However, I had no

damage to the villi and a neg biopsy??? My GI doc said he can't prove

I have CS and he can't disprove it so for right now I have Gluten

Sensitivity.

Are you consuming dairy? After I stopped dairy my brain fog lifted

and after 9mos on this diet I am pain free. I think there needs to be

a lot more research on these diseases, I think we are seeing only

the tip of the iceberg. Good luck..

GEF Explorer

Paul,

I'm in the same boat as you. My IGG was 40 (positive), my IGA was 23 (I think that's borderline). Through all of my tests, the doctor is looking for something other than celiac, since my tests point mainly to the IGG's. There are other conditions, (intolerance included) that can cause an elevation in only the IGG's as well as I've heard that it can be elevated normally in some individuals. Best thing is to keep talking with your doctor about your symptoms and not give up. Better to error on the side of caution than to find something too late. I've read somewhere that "leaky gut" can result in higher levels of certain things, like IGG's to circulate in your blood. I also have high indirect bilirubin and I'm trying to find out why. Have they ruled out IBD for you?

Like you, if something bizzare shows up in my tests, I want to know why. If you're symptomatic, knowing why is important. Good luck to you.

Gretchen

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,014
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Beki
    Newest Member
    Beki
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      The NIH article you link actually supports what I have been trying to explain to you: "Celiac disease (celiac disease) is an autoimmune-mediated enteropathy triggered by dietary gluten in genetically prone individuals. The current treatment for celiac disease is a strict lifelong gluten-free diet. However, in some celiac disease patients following a strict gluten-free diet, the symptoms do not remit. These cases may be refractory celiac disease or due to gluten contamination; however, the lack of response could be related to other dietary ingredients, such as maize, which is one of the most common alternatives to wheat used in the gluten-free diet. In some celiac disease patients, as a rare event, peptides from maize prolamins could induce a celiac-like immune response by similar or alternative pathogenic mechanisms to those used by wheat gluten peptides. This is supported by several shared features between wheat and maize prolamins and by some experimental results. Given that gluten peptides induce an immune response of the intestinal mucosa both in vivo and in vitro, peptides from maize prolamins could also be tested to determine whether they also induce a cellular immune response. Hypothetically, maize prolamins could be harmful for a very limited subgroup of celiac disease patients, especially those that are non-responsive, and if it is confirmed, they should follow, in addition to a gluten-free, a maize-free diet." Notice that those for whom it is suggested to follow a maize-free diet are a "very limited subgroup of celiac disease patients". Please don't try to make your own experience normative for the entire celiac community.  Notice also that the last part of the concluding sentence in the paragraph does not equate a gluten-free diet with a maize-free diet, it actually puts them in juxtaposition to one another. In other words, they are different but for a "limited subgroup of celiac disease patients" they produce the same or a similar reaction. You refer to celiac reactions to cereal grain prolamins as "allergic" reactions and "food sensitivity". For instance, you say, "NIH sees all these grains as in opposition to celiacs, of which I am one and that is science, not any MD with a good memory who overprescribes medications that contain known food allergens in them, of which they have zero knowledge if the patient is in fact allergic to or not, since they failed to do simple 'food sensitivity' testing" and "IF a person wants to get well, they should be the one to determine what grains they are allergic to and what grains they want to leave out, not you. I need to remind you that celiac disease is not an allergy, it is an autoimmune disorder. Neither allergy testing nor food sensitivity testing can be used to diagnose celiac disease. Allergy testing and food sensitivity testing cannot detect the antibodies produced by celiac disease in reaction to gluten ingestion.  You say of me, "You must be one of those who are only gluten intolerant . . ." Gluten intolerance is synonymous with celiac disease. You must be referring to gluten sensitivity or NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). Actually, I have been officially diagnosed with celiac disease both by blood antibody testing and by endoscopy/positive biopsy. Reacting to all cereal grain prolamins does not define celiac disease. If you are intent on teaching the truth, please get it straight first.
    • Bebygirl01
      Perhaps you would still like to answer the questions I posed on this topic, because that is all I asked. I am curious to know the answers to those questions, I do not care about the background of Dr. Osborne as I am more aware of the situation than you are, and he is also one of the best known authors out there on Celiac disease. But did you even bother to read the three Research Papers I posted by NIH? You must be one of those who are only gluten intolerant and not yet reacting to all glutens aka grains, but I AM one of those who react to ALL the glutens, and again, that is one of the two questions I originally posted on this matter. NIH sees all these grains as in opposition to celiacs, of which I am one and that is science, not any MD with a good memory who overprescribes medications that contain known food allergens in them, of which they have zero knowledge if the patient is in fact allergic to or not, since they failed to do simple 'food sensitivity' testing. I started with the failed FDA explanation of what Gluten Free is and I stayed sick and got even sicker. It wasn't until I came across NIH's papers and went off all grains that I realized that in fact, I am Celiac and reacting to all the glutens. IF a person wants to get well, they should be the one to determine what grains they are allergic to and what grains they want to leave out, not you. Those who are just getting started with learning about grains etc., can take it easy by just being "grain free' and eating a lot of meat, vegetables, etc. or whole foods as God has intended, without buying so called gluten free garbage out there that is making them sick and the whole reason they are not better. I tried the stupid gluten free garbage and it didn't work, and that will make anyone want to give up, it is better to teach the entire truth and let the patient decide, rather than give them misinformation and lies.
    • Nicola McGuire
      Thank you so much I will speak to the doctor for dietician apt . Thank you for your advice Beth much appreciated 
    • Scott Adams
      Oh no, I'm sorry to hear about the accidental gluten! This article, and the comments below it, may be helpful:    
    • Karmmacalling
      I was born with celiac disease im 20 years old. And I've been gluten free my whole life. Yes my diet is 100 percent gluten free and no i don't eat at restaurants at all. I got glutened by a chips that was marked as gluten free but it wasn't the company said the packaging was old and the recipe was new. 
×
×
  • Create New...