Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Just Got Enterolab Results In, Confused!


mindypal

Recommended Posts

mindypal Rookie

Hi everyone,

Well after getting negative blood work from my gastro doctor, and doing a biopsy last week (still don't have the results from that yet), I just got results back from Enterolab for IgA. Mine was an 11 and they say normal is under 10 and suggested I avoid gluten permanently. For some reason that number makes it hard to think about doing that. If the number was higher I could see a problem, but it's just SOOOO close to normal. Do you all still think it's necessary?

What do you all do as far as restaurants? Just stay away from them altogether? Or are there certain things like french fries that are safe? Part of me wanted to get a positive diagnose just to have an answer but now it's still kinda unclear to me and a little weird to think about completely changing my lifestyle. I'm a single 28 year old gal so I'd be doing this on my own. Any suggestions???

Thanks!!!

:)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



celiacgirls Apprentice

I would try it for a while and see if you notice a difference. I got a 10 on my casein test from Enterolab and I think I notice a difference. My daughter got a 9 for soy and I'm pretty sure she needs to avoid it anyway. We are still trying to avoid both of these for a month at least before re-introducing but keep making mistakes and having a reaction.

Not all french fries are safe. They can be fried with the wheat-covered chicken nuggets or something else and be contaminated that way.

I don't like to eat at restaurants any more but it is hard to totally avoid. I try to eat at the ones with gluten free menus like Outback and PF Changs. Or restaurants with a chef who will make something especially for me.

Corkdarrr Enthusiast

I think the positive dietary response is the most important. I just received my Enterolab results and did not have either of the celiac genes, but did have two gluten sensitivity genes. While it's nice to know that I'm not doing any damage when I do mess up, I'm not going to go back to eating how I used to if it's going to make me feel like crap.

As for restaurants, I have found two in my area that work for me and I am pretty much afraid to go anywhere else because the odds of getting sick are REALLY high. I've worked in kitchens and the risk for CC is definately there - its' a gamble to eat out. If you do, I'd make sure to go when it's not busy so that the kitchen staff doesn't get distracted by everything else.

Courtney

mindypal Rookie

Thanks for your replies. I went ahead and have been doing the gluten-free diet, at least as best I can for now. I know it must take a while to get the hang of this stuff. Hopefully I'll notice a difference soon! :)

CarlaB Enthusiast
but did have two gluten sensitivity genes. While it's nice to know that I'm not doing any damage when I do mess up

Courtney, I don't believe this is necessarily true. I was having an autoimmune response and do not have the celiac genes ... I may not be damaging my intestine, but I'm damaging something. It's still very serious even if you "only" have the gluten intolerant genes. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong ....

AndreaB Contributor

Mindypal,

Did you have the complete panel done with the gene test?

My son tested at 10.5 with a malabsorption score just over 500. Enterolab has set the cut off at a point where people notice improvement. I'm assuming their cutoff point somewhat falls in line with a moderate IgG ELISA test. That's just based on my testing. I have yet to get the families results to see if it corresponds to them.

It is totally up to you whether you adopt the gluten free diet, but I would highly recommend it. If my family gets glutened, we have "d". Our numbers were all on the low end.

par18 Apprentice
Thanks for your replies. I went ahead and have been doing the gluten-free diet, at least as best I can for now. I know it must take a while to get the hang of this stuff. Hopefully I'll notice a difference soon! :)

Hi,

I can't tell you what a good blood test number would be in the beginning. I did not have the blood test because I was so sick I had a positive biopsy. I can tell you that after being 100% compliant on the diet for 14 months I had a follow-up blood test this past August. All my values from the complete panel were a "1". This did not surprise me as I feel perfectly healthy. You can play the numbers game until you start to get really sick but my advice to you would be to start adjusting your lifestyle. You remember the old saying "an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure", well that just about sums up what will happen it you are gluten intolerant and don't commit to this lifestyle. Good luck.

Tom


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Corkdarrr Enthusiast
Courtney, I don't believe this is necessarily true. I was having an autoimmune response and do not have the celiac genes ... I may not be damaging my intestine, but I'm damaging something. It's still very serious even if you "only" have the gluten intolerant genes. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong ....

Carla, I'm still unclear on a lot of things. Hence my enormous amount of posts lately!

From what I understand, because I did not have eitehr of the celiac genes, I do NOT have celiac. But I do have gluten intolerance. And again, from what I understand, if I eat gluten it's going to make me sick - obviously! :P But if I go gluten-free for a long while and then mess up now and again, it won't do any permenant damage. I think the autoimmune thing only happens when there's a decent amount of gluten going on - not just a small amount of CC, for example.

I don't know exactly where I gathered the info to make such a decision, in fact it's entirely possible that I've just made it all up! So please - anyone - correct me if I'm wrong.

Either way, I'm pretty much set on being gluten-free for the rest of my life so I guess it doesn't matter all that much.

Yenni Enthusiast

This is from EnteroLabs page:

Our antibody tests range numerically from a positive value of 10 to as high as 350 Units. The average positive value is about 45 Units. The "units" are based on the amount of antibody detected in the assay which is reflected by more color developing as the result of a color-generating chemical reaction. Thus, the more antibody present, the higher the units of positivity. However, the amount of antibody present is not a measure of clinical severity, but rather, the amount of antibody being produced by the plasma cells in the intestine in response to gluten at that site. A positive value of any degree means your immune system is reacting to dietary gluten in the way the immune system reacts to an infection. With an infection, this immune reaction ultimately kills and clears the infectious organism. But with gluten, the reaction continues as long as it is eaten. Thus, the only way to halt this immune reaction is to remove all gluten from the diet. This is true whether your positive test is 10 units, 350 units, or anything in between.

Are the numeric values of antigliadin antibody a measure of severity?

As mentioned above, the numeric value of antibody is not necessarily a measure of severity of how your body is reacting to gluten, or the resultant damage of the reaction. This is because the main perpetrator of the immune response to gluten is not antibody but T lymphocytes (T cells) producing tissue-damaging chemicals called cytokines and chemokines. How much antibody is produced at the stimulus of T cells differs in different people. Furthermore, some people simply do not or cannot make alot of intestinal IgA antibody even though gluten may be stimulating a severe T cell-mediated immune response. Unlike antibody levels, the numeric value of malabsorption test results are an indicator of severity of intestinal damage (see below).

So as far as I understand it it doesn't matter if your result is low or high. You are gluten intolerant no matter what as long as it is positive.

AndreaB Contributor

Thanks for that post Jenny. :)

I had read that before.....but it's nice to be reminded.

Guest Kathy Ann

My enterolab numbers were on the low positive side as well. But I had a mild malabsorption, which told me that I definitely had some active damage going on.

Furthermore, I had previously had a saliva test including a "Total Secretory IgA." It was borderline low which might explain my lower numbers on the stool test. If I had never done the saliva test, I might not have realized that I was one of those people (2% of the population) who just don't put out much IgA and will always show lower numbers on those tests no matter how much damage is going on.

It looks to me like ANY antibody activity must be paid attention to. It's like pass or fail college courses or like pregnancy tests. You either pass or you fail, you either are or you aren't.

Corkdarrr Enthusiast
This is from EnteroLabs page:

So as far as I understand it it doesn't matter if your result is low or high. You are gluten intolerant no matter what as long as it is positive.

Okay, so then what this means is that ANY time I eat either gluten or casein it will create an autoimmune reaction in my body? And this is why I can never, ever eat these things again, right?

Clearly, I am still in some sort of rationalization stage!!

-Courtney

Yenni Enthusiast
Okay, so then what this means is that ANY time I eat either gluten or casein it will create an autoimmune reaction in my body? And this is why I can never, ever eat these things again, right?

Clearly, I am still in some sort of rationalization stage!!

-Courtney

I am very new at this too and just got my results the other week. My Gluten was 12 and my casein was 11. On top of that my soy was 9 but I am pretty sure I have a problem with soy still, so I don't eat that either.

Even if my results were low there is no doubt in my mind that I am not intolerant to these things because I have been very sick for almost 5 years now and I noticed changes right away after I stopped.

So yes, I would have to say that every time you eat those things there will be an autoimmune reaction.

I am pretty sure I am in the same stage as you. ;) I am trying to make sence of all of this.

CarlaB Enthusiast
Carla, I'm still unclear on a lot of things. Hence my enormous amount of posts lately!

From what I understand, because I did not have eitehr of the celiac genes, I do NOT have celiac. But I do have gluten intolerance. And again, from what I understand, if I eat gluten it's going to make me sick - obviously! :P But if I go gluten-free for a long while and then mess up now and again, it won't do any permenant damage. I think the autoimmune thing only happens when there's a decent amount of gluten going on - not just a small amount of CC, for example.

I don't know exactly where I gathered the info to make such a decision, in fact it's entirely possible that I've just made it all up! So please - anyone - correct me if I'm wrong.

Either way, I'm pretty much set on being gluten-free for the rest of my life so I guess it doesn't matter all that much.

I am like you in that I do not have the celiac genes, but I do have an autoimmune reaction to gluten. Even for a celiac, the damage heals .... and I know a small amount of cc makes me very ill for over a week. I wouldn't assume that the autoimmune reaction depends on the quantity of gluten consumed.

I think the reason we're so confused is that there doesn't seem to be much research on gluten itolerance vs. celiac. I think both are basically the same. I know that I've been every bit as ill as a celiac!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,138
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Mamaof3
    Newest Member
    Mamaof3
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Zuma888
      Thank you for your response. You are right, this is not worth the damage to my thyroid since I know gluten is bad for me anyway. I stopped the challenge and did the IgA and tTG-IGA tests and am waiting for results, although I know it is likely they will be false negative anyway. I figured since I wasn't ever really strict about cross contamination, they might show positive if I do have celiac. I did the genetic testing a few months ago and was positive for DQ8.
    • Scott Adams
      I’m so sorry you’re going through this—it sounds like your body is sending a clear signal that gluten is a major trigger for your Hashimoto’s. The dramatic spike in your anti-TPO (from 50 to 799!) and the severe symptoms you’re experiencing suggest a strong immune reaction, even if celiac testing wasn’t done earlier. While a formal diagnosis would clarify cross-contamination risks, continuing the challenge may not be worth the damage to your thyroid and quality of life, especially since you already know gluten worsens your antibodies and symptoms. If you need answers, you could discuss genetic testing (HLA-DQ2/DQ8 genes) with your doctor—this can rule out celiac predisposition without a gluten challenge. For now, prioritizing your health by quitting gluten again (strictly, given your sensitivity) and supporting gut healing (like probiotics, L-glutamine, or zinc carnosine) might be the wisest path. Your thyroid will thank you!
    • trents
      Well then, I'd say he's making excellent progress. It can take some time for antibody numbers to normalize. Even though new antibodies are no longer being produced, it takes a while for the old ones to be disposed of. Make sure you keep an eye on the alkaline phosphatase levels. It is probably true that is tied to his adolescent growth spurt but it's worth tracking. Thirteen years of elevated liver enzymes was what eventually led to my celiac disease diagnosis. But I was 50 years old by that time and it was my ALT and AST that were mildly elevated all that time, not my alk phos. I just found out last week from an ultrasound that my liver is 20% larger than normal and I'm hoping that is a legacy effect. I have more testing lined up. 
    • CeliacMom79
      Hi. Sorry, his previous levels were >250 and we do not know how high they were. So yes, "off the chart". By 'detectable' I just meant that at 234 we now actually have a number as a baseline that we can measure future labs against. All his other liver test functions have been normal.  Just the elevated ALP. Thank you.
    • NoGlutenCooties
      Hi all I'm looking for a safe place to eat in Wilmington, DE. Any ideas? Thanks Jenny
×
×
  • Create New...