Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Adrenal Fatigue And Food Allergy Tests/gi Stuff


majicbunnies

Recommended Posts

majicbunnies Contributor

Question #1: I looked up Adrenal Fatigue. Can you get tested for it? I didn't see anything about that.

Question #2, and 3, and 4...: I had a food allergy panel and celiac panel done earlier this week. They took blood, so I'm guessing it was all blood tests. I really hope I don't have anymore food allergies!! Anyway, I'm really confused about the testing done.

I tested positive for gluten intolerance from a blood test about a year ago. This time, I guess they did the same thing, just to do it..I told my doctor I wanted to be diagnosed officially with celiac, if I have it, so she ordered the blood test they did, and said weather it comes back positive or not, I'm going to get some kind of other test done with a GI doctor.

I was wondering if I really have to eat gluten to be tested however they'll be testing me? I don't understand what kinds of tests are out there either for diagnosing celiac. I heard you have to eat gluten for a while, and I hope that's not true. I could lose my job because I get sick for about 3 days if I get glutened!

I also hear that you can keep track of everything you buy that's gluten-free and get your money back from the whole tax thing..I don't completely understand all of that stuff yet..heh. I hear that's only true though if you've been diagnosed with celiac and not just intolerance.

ANDDD you can be intolerant and not have celiac???

If anyone can clear any of this up, it'd be a big help. Thanks =)

ALSO..sorry..can you get glutened from hair dye? Lotions? Shampoos? Body Wash?

I hear you can, but doesn't the damage happen in your intestines?? Skin doesn't seem like an issue...

Thank you very much =)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Ursa Major Collaborator

Hi, and welcome to this board.

First of all, if you tested positive a year ago, and you know that gluten makes you terribly sick, there is absolutely no reason to be tested for celiac disease again. And yes, if your doctor wants you to have a biopsy, you will have to eat at least four slices of bread a day for at least six months to a year, to even have a remote chance of a positive biopsy. Which would be insane, as you would have to severely damage your intestines again, just to maybe confirm what you already know (and most likely, you'd get a false negative, and it would all be for nothing).

Please, don't do it! It might make you incredibly sick, and possibly even lead to other severe health problems.

As to getting your money in taxes back, if you have been officially diagnosed, that is very overrated. Some people here have tried that. You can only claim the difference between what 'normal' food and gluten-free food costs. So, if you buy a loaf of gluten-free bread, you can claim the difference between the price of wheat bread and gluten-free bread. You would have to keep track of every single loaf of bread, cookies, cake mixes, pasta etc., and find out the price of the non-gluten-free stuff, figure out the difference, and claim it.

It's an insane amount of time you'll spend on that, and unless you eat a ton of those types of foods, it won't be worth it.

Yes, you can be intolerant to gluten, without officially having celiac disease. Which doesn't mean that you won't be just as sick if you ingest gluten.

And you can definitely get glutened from shampoo, conditioner, lipstick, soap, lotions etc. You will inevitably eat some lipstick when you eat. If you wash your hands with soap that contains gluten, and eat finger food.....bingo, glutened. If you put lotion containing gluten on your hands, or apply it with your hands to another body part, same thing. You run your fingers through your hair that's been washed with gluteny shampoo...........I guess you get the idea. Toothpaste can also contain gluten.

If you see wheat germ oil, barley extract, oat bran etc. on a product, don't use it. Also, vitamin E can be made from wheat germ oil.

And skin is an issue with me, I get insanely itchy from gluten containing shampoo or lotion, and they will give me rashes, too (not necessarily DH, but I can't be sure).

As to adrenal fatigue, your regular GP is not likely going to diagnose you, or even test for it. You'd have to see a naturopathic doctor, or at least a doctor who will practice both mainstream and alternative healthcare.

CarlaB Enthusiast

I got diagnosed by hair analysis for adrenal fatigue. They can also diagnose by saliva testing. As Ursula said, it is not often looked at by a regular physician as it's "sub-clinical" meaning that you are not actually diseased, you just feel really bad and are probably on your way there. Same with gluten intolerance. Many of us with gluten intolerance just caught it before it was full-blown celiac disease.

I use all gluten-free products, but I do not worry about hair dye -- my stylist dyes my hair, then washes it off, so other than touching my head, it doesn't touch me and is washed off immediately. I do not know if it has gluten or not.

Like Ursula said, if you were tested last year and have been off gluten, your test this year will be negative. You would have to go on a long gluten challenge to do the biopsy and at great risk to your health and comfort. Your first test along with dietary response is enough for diagnosis. The only thing a test now could tell you is whether all gluten is out of your diet or not, if you don't have any gluten in your diet, after 1 year gluten-free, your blood test should be negative.

majicbunnies Contributor
I got diagnosed by hair analysis for adrenal fatigue. They can also diagnose by saliva testing. As Ursula said, it is not often looked at by a regular physician as it's "sub-clinical" meaning that you are not actually diseased, you just feel really bad and are probably on your way there. Same with gluten intolerance. Many of us with gluten intolerance just caught it before it was full-blown celiac disease.

I use all gluten-free products, but I do not worry about hair dye -- my stylist dyes my hair, then washes it off, so other than touching my head, it doesn't touch me and is washed off immediately. I do not know if it has gluten or not.

Like Ursula said, if you were tested last year and have been off gluten, your test this year will be negative. You would have to go on a long gluten challenge to do the biopsy and at great risk to your health and comfort. Your first test along with dietary response is enough for diagnosis. The only thing a test now could tell you is whether all gluten is out of your diet or not, if you don't have any gluten in your diet, after 1 year gluten-free, your blood test should be negative.

First of all, if you tested positive a year ago, and you know that gluten makes you terribly sick, there is absolutely no reason to be tested for celiac disease again. And yes, if your doctor wants you to have a biopsy, you will have to eat at least four slices of bread a day for at least six months to a year, to even have a remote chance of a positive biopsy. Which would be insane, as you would have to severely damage your intestines again, just to maybe confirm what you already know (and most likely, you'd get a false negative, and it would all be for nothing).

Please, don't do it! It might make you incredibly sick, and possibly even lead to other severe health problems.

As to getting your money in taxes back, if you have been officially diagnosed, that is very overrated. Some people here have tried that. You can only claim the difference between what 'normal' food and gluten-free food costs. So, if you buy a loaf of gluten-free bread, you can claim the difference between the price of wheat bread and gluten-free bread. You would have to keep track of every single loaf of bread, cookies, cake mixes, pasta etc., and find out the price of the non-gluten-free stuff, figure out the difference, and claim it.

It's an insane amount of time you'll spend on that, and unless you eat a ton of those types of foods, it won't be worth it.

Yes, you can be intolerant to gluten, without officially having celiac disease. Which doesn't mean that you won't be just as sick if you ingest gluten.

And you can definitely get glutened from shampoo, conditioner, lipstick, soap, lotions etc. You will inevitably eat some lipstick when you eat. If you wash your hands with soap that contains gluten, and eat finger food.....bingo, glutened. If you put lotion containing gluten on your hands, or apply it with your hands to another body part, same thing. You run your fingers through your hair that's been washed with gluteny shampoo...........I guess you get the idea. Toothpaste can also contain gluten.

If you see wheat germ oil, barley extract, oat bran etc. on a product, don't use it. Also, vitamin E can be made from wheat germ oil.

And skin is an issue with me, I get insanely itchy from gluten containing shampoo or lotion, and they will give me rashes, too (not necessarily DH, but I can't be sure).

As to adrenal fatigue, your regular GP is not likely going to diagnose you, or even test for it. You'd have to see a naturopathic doctor, or at least a doctor who will practice both mainstream and alternative healthcare.

Ursula and CarlaB-Thank you for the info. I had the blood test and that tested positive for gluten INTOLERANCE, so I've never been tested or diagnosed with the disease. If it's going to be trouble to get the biopsy and I have to eat gluten, I'm not doing it. And if that's true about getting back the difference of the cost of food, I'm not doing it for that reason. I was pretty much wanting to get diagnosed for that reason only, but not anymore.

I'll look into the Adrenal thing, too (look for a doctor, etc.)

Thank you!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,911
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Deborah anne
    Newest Member
    Deborah anne
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Jack Common
      Hello! I want to share my situation. I had symptoms like some food intolerance, diarrhea, bloating, belching one year ago. I thought I could have celiac disease so I did the blood tests. The results were ambiguous for me so I saw the doctor and he said I needed to do tests to check whether I had any parasites as well. It turned out I had giardiasis. After treating it my symptoms didn't disappear immediately. And I decided to start a gluten free diet despite my doctor said I didn't have it. After some time symptoms disappeared but that time it wasn't unclear whether I'd had them because of eliminating gluten or that parasite. The symptoms for both are very similar. Giardiasis also damages the small intestine. The only way to check this was to start eating bread again as I thought. Now about my results.   These are my first test results (almost a year ago) when I had symptoms: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgA antibody - 0.5 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 3.0 is normal) The Tissue Transglutaminase IgG antibody - 6.6 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 3.0 is normal) Immunoglobulin A - 1.91 g/l (for the lab I did the tests 0.7 to 4 g/l is normal) IgA Endomysial antibody (EMA) - < 1:10 titer (for the lab I did the tests < 1:10 titer is normal) IgG Endomysial antibody (EMA) - < 1:10 titer (for the lab I did the tests < 1:10 titer is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgA - 0.3 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 6.0 is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 46.1 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 6.0 is normal)   Then I didn't eat gluten for six months. Symptoms disappeared. And I started a gluten challenge. Before the challenge I did some tests. My results: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgG antibody - 0.5 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 28 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)   During the challenge I ate 6 slices of wheat bread. After the challenge my results are: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgA antibody - 2.0 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) The Tissue Transglutaminase IgG antibody - 2.0 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) Immunoglobulin A - 1.31 g/l (for the lab I did the tests 0.7 to 4 g/l is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgA - 2.0 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 2.13 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)   To be sure I continued consuming gluten. I ate a lot each day. Two months after I did the tests again. My results I got today are: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgA antibody - 0.7 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) Immunoglobulin A - 1.62 g/l (for the lab I did the tests 0.7 to 4 g/l is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 25.6 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)   Nowadays I didn't have any symptoms except tiredness but I think it's just work. I think it was this parasite because two years ago, for example, and before I didn't have these symptoms and I always ate gluten food. But I'm still not sure especially because the Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG results are sometimes high. What do you think? @Scott Adams
    • Jack Common
      My old results (almost a year ago) are: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgA antibody - 0.5 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 3.0 is normal) The Tissue Transglutaminase IgG antibody - 6.6 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 3.0 is normal) Immunoglobulin A - 1.91 g/l (for the lab I did the tests 0.7 to 4 g/l is normal) IgA Endomysial antibody (EMA) - < 1:10 titer (for the lab I did the tests < 1:10 titer is normal) IgG Endomysial antibody (EMA) - < 1:10 titer (for the lab I did the tests < 1:10 titer is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgA - 0.3 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 6.0 is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 46.1 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 6.0 is normal)   Then I didn't eat gluten for six months and after I started a gluten challenge. Before the challenge I did some tests. My results: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgG antibody - 0.5 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 28 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)   During the challenge I ate 6 slices of wheat bread. After the challenge my results are: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgA antibody - 2.0 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) The Tissue Transglutaminase IgG antibody - 2.0 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) Immunoglobulin A - 1.31 g/l (for the lab I did the tests 0.7 to 4 g/l is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgA - 2.0 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 2.13 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)   To be sure I continued consuming gluten. I ate a lot each day. Two months after I did the tests again. My results I got today are: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgA antibody - 0.7 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) Immunoglobulin A - 1.62 g/l (for the lab I did the tests 0.7 to 4 g/l is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 25.6 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)   I didn't have any symptoms now except tiredness but I think it's just work. I'm not IgA deficient as you can see so I don't need to do this Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG test. But I do because it's sometimes not in the normal range. What do you think this time? I think I don't have celiac disease. But this test... 
    • Wheatwacked
      @plumbago, I found a good PDF on cholesterol:  Unlocking the mysteries of VLDL: exploring its production, intracellular trafficking, and metabolism as therapeutic targets I just started it, but it may have answers for us, with whacky cholesterol.  The pharmaceuticals don't seem to be interested in anything but statins.   "The nicotine in tobacco causes a decrease in the HDL cholesterol level. " Maybe you should start smoking? 🤪 I have high LDL and low HDL.  It is genetic mutations in the LDLR, APOB, PCSK9, or LDLRAP1 genes. My whole family is on statins for Familial Hyperliperdemia except me.  December I had ultrasound and cat scan for Carotid Artery blockage and both sides are above 85% blockage.  I started on Atorvastatin and that made me weaker than ever, even with CoQ10.  I asked for and got prescription for 2000 mg/day Nicotinic Acid B3 and in the 3 weeks my numbers changed. I am feeling realy good lately.  Stronger and more flexible.  Sleeping better.  Getting roto router (TCar) as soon as I get clearance from a cardiologist.  I expect that by my next blood panels in April to be even better. I am beginning to believe that like vitamin D where the RDA only accounts for preventing Rickets, the RDA for B3 is way underestimated.   From Oct 22 to Jan 17: A1c from 13.5 to 10.2 eGFR from 55 to 79 Triglyeride from 458 to 362 Total cholesterol from 245 to 264 HDL from 27 to 44 VLDL from 84 to 68 LDL from 134 to 154
    • plumbago
      I have taken thiamine on and off (just not at this exact moment), and I’m not sure it's made any difference. Yes, I almost always “fast” (12 hours NPO) for blood tests, as do a great many other Americans, so I tend to think that’s not it. All I can say is that the mystery continues. I could do some speculating here…well, heck, let me go ahead and speculate now: The lab ranges we all see on our reports are more or less the averages of Americans who have had those blood tests. Now, it’s up to you and me whether or not to think of the average American as healthy. I can make arguments both ways, more often than not, on the negative. My point here is that maybe the current range of HDL is somewhat skewed (ie, low), and maybe just maybe my super high (plus 100s) HDL results are not something to worry about; the range just needs updating. Why do I say this? Because pre-celiac disease diagnosis, my HDL values were in the normal range, but post celiac disease diagnosis, my HDL levels are way above average. See where I’m going? My trusty guidebook on celiac disease, Recognizing Celiac Disease by Cleo Libonati, RN, BSN, says that HDL increases after being on the gluten free diet. Or can increase, I guess. Then again, it could be something else. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ In thinking of going to a cardiologist, I sort of fear that he/she will be dismissive of a link to celiac disease, treated celiac disease, and would not therefore be considering all possibilities. @trents I'm sorry you've been diligently working on your numbers to no effect. That must be frustrating. LDL is a world that is far better understood than HDL, so for you there's maybe less "mystery." Familial hypercholesterolemia is for sure something that can be tested. Outside of that, you're right, genetics can determine a general pattern.
    • trents
      Well, I have the opposite problem. My LDL has been moderately high for years. I eat healthy and exercise regularly but can't seem to move that meter. I used to be on a statin (and my doctors want me to go back on one) and it brought both HDL and LDL down but the ratios never changed. I think a lot of that cholesterol stuff is just baked into the genes.
×
×
  • Create New...