Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Endoscopy Results


Terch

Recommended Posts

Terch Apprentice

That's actually a play on a Seinfeld quote (prognosis negative) but it's true my biopsy results came back negative. He is now going to test me for small bowel Crohns. I read up on Crohns and don't have any of the symptoms except maybe the abdominal pain and diarrhea! I am positive I don't have Crohns but maybe something else will turn up in the meantime.

I must say I was rather dissapointed that my results came back negative, my GI was surprised by my reaction and he said and I quote " you don't want to have celiacs that disease is a real pain" hmmm

So on Wednesday I go for my small bowel follow through test and lots of bloodwork, I will see what that uncovers. I am still gluten free and it will be 5 weeks on Sunday and so far no improvement that I can see.

Oh one more thing, my GI also said that maybe my abdominal pain is from the Nexium!! He wants me to stay on it though.

Now for my enterolab question... Can they test for celiacs disease or do they test for gluten sensitivity? Is the testing that refined or not?

Terch


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



JenKuz Explorer
Now for my enterolab question... Can they test for celiacs disease or do they test for gluten sensitivity? Is the testing that refined or not?

Terch

Others around here will be able to say more about how Enterolab influenced their diagnosis, but what I do know is that they test for both gluten sensitivity and celiacs. Gluten sensitivity is measured by antibodies to gliadin, one of the components of gluten. Autoimmune celiac sprue is measured by testing for antibodies to tissue transglutaminase, which is the "self-protein" that the body is spurred to attack when wheat is ingested. Both can cause similar gastrointestinal symptoms, but the latters will most likely cause worse small bowel villi damage.

The antibody tests done by Enterolab are identical to the blood tests *except* that they test stool instead of blood. Because these are IgA tests, it makes more sense to test stool that blood (IgA is manufactured in the intestines). So the tests are more senstive than the blood tests, with comparable specificity. That makes them better. They also do the genetic testing, which is pretty reliable in general, and if I understand right Enterolab tests for an additional gene, identified by Dr. Fine, that other labs aren't testing for yet. The genes are helpful, because if you don't have any of them, you can rule out celiac a bit more confidently. If you do have them, however, then a gluten-free diet is worth considering, even if the primary problem is something else that is being exacerbated by gluten. I'm pretty sure that's what's going on in my case, though I don't have an official diagnosis of anything yet.

I sympathise with being disappointed that it "isn't" celiac. I was hoping my blood tests would come back positive, too; Celiac may be a pain, but at least it's a definitive answer and within one's own control. That's far better than something like Crohn's, which is unpredictable, and over which you have very little control. Personally, I'm really afraid of being diagnosed with that. I'm hoping against hope that my positive anti-gliadin will be enough to explain my problems, and eventually I'll get better on a gluten-free diet.

AndreaB Contributor

As far as I understand, Enterolab can't tell you you have Celiac. They tell you you have active gluten sensitivity. If you have 2 celiac genes than it would seem that it is definately celiac. Gluten Sensitivity/Intolerance and Celiac are pretty much the same thing. Gluten free for life.

CarlaB Enthusiast

I think the main problem with the conventional testing is that it misses those who are non-celiac gluten intolerant. I have two gluten intolerant genes, an active gluten sensitivity and and autoimmune response, but all my conventional tests came back negative. I went gluten-free again, I had been gluten-free but did a six week challenge for my biopsy, after my biopsy, started healing and gaining the weight I had lost, then after three months got tested by Enterolab. I am very sensitive to gluten and casein (milk). I had classic celiac symptoms, which cleared up by going gluten-free.

Enterolab does not differentiate between gluten sensitivity and celiac, but both require gluten-free for life, and they can tell you if you are having an autoimmune reaction and which genes you have.

JenKuz Explorer
As far as I understand, Enterolab can't tell you you have Celiac. They tell you you have active gluten sensitivity. If you have 2 celiac genes than it would seem that it is definately celiac. Gluten Sensitivity/Intolerance and Celiac are pretty much the same thing. Gluten free for life.

Yeah, I understand why he does that...he's trying to redefine the disease conditions. But it seems a bit like splitting hairs, because he says that celiac itself can only be diagnosed through biopsy, and he advocates foregoing biopsy altogether. So he can't diagnose it, but he will diagnose every symptom and marker for it outside the biopsy, so in lay terms, it seems to me, if you have all those, it really is celiac. If you only have some of them, the matter is more complicated.

What I'm saying, is that even if Dr. Fine can't technically diagnose celiac, because of medical convention, that doesn't change how any individual defines his or her disease for him or herself. Even if Dr. Fine doesn't say it, if you feel comfortable saying it's celiac just for ease of explanation or any other reason, you can. It's hard enough to explain the disease to people who don't know about it, or convincing dr.s you have a problem, without having to meet the letter of archaic medical definitions, to boot...

(Again, not knocking Dr. Fine. He says it the way he has to.)

kbtoyssni Contributor

I would have been disappointed with a negative result, too. It's not the you WANT to have celiac, but you do want to know what's wrong and get back on track to good health again. A negative result doesn't necessarily mean you don't have it. It just means that if you do have it, you're lucky and don't have much intestinal damage yet. Were you gluten-free when you got the biopsy done? If you were your intestines had some time to heal and probably wouldn't show much damage.

Funny that you mention Nexium possibly causing your somach pain. My doctor gave me some a number of years ago to help with my chronic stomach issues and it only make my stomach feel worse. Looking back, I wonder if Nexium has gluten and was really just exaserbating the celiac.

I have not had Enterolab testing, but everyone around here seems to have had really good results with it. It won't tell you if you have celiac - it will only tell you if your gluten sensitive - but the two are practically the same. They have the same treatment.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,877
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    SamEsplanade
    Newest Member
    SamEsplanade
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Bebee
      I have been diagnosed with Microscopic Colitis (LC) for quite a few years, so I have been gluten-free and DF.  I would like to get tested for Celiac Disease because of the possibility of cross contamination and colon cancer.  And if you were hospitalized and didn't have a celiac diagnosis you could not get gluten-free food, I don't know if that is true or not.  Also because there is chance of colon cancer so I want to know if I have Celiac Disease and need to be on very restrictive diet.  The only testing I did was a sigmoid scope and Enter Lab but no gene testing.  I know I can go back to eating gluten for a few months, but I would worry you would have to stay home for the few months while getting gluten.  What other options do I have?  Should I do the gene testing?  Maybe through Entero Lab?  Any other tests?  How important is it to have Celiac diagnosed? Thank you! Barb
    • trents
      Take it easy! I was just prompting you for some clarification.  In the distillation process, the liquid is boiled and the vapor descends up a tube and condenses into another container as it cools. What people are saying is that the gluten molecules are too large and heavy to travel up with the vapor and so get left behind in the original liquid solution. Therefore, the condensate should be free of gluten, no matter if there was gluten in the original solution. The explanation contained in the second sentence I quoted from your post would not seem to square with the physics of the distillation process. Unless, that is, I misunderstood what you were trying to explain.
    • Mynx
      No they do not contradict each other. Just like frying oil can be cross contaminated even though the oil doesn't contain the luten protein. The same is the same for a distilled vinegar or spirit which originally came from a gluten source. Just because you don't understand, doesn't mean you can tell me that my sentences contradict each other. Do you have a PhD in biochemistry or friends that do and access to a lab?  If not, saying you don't understand is one thing anything else can be dangerous to others. 
    • Mynx
      The reason that it triggers your dermatitis herpetiformis but not your celiac disease is because you aren't completely intolerant to gluten. The celiac and dermatitis herpetiformis genes are both on the same chronometer. Dermatitis herpetoformus reacts to gluten even if there's a small amount of cross contamination while celiac gene may be able to tolerate a some gluten or cross contamination. It just depends on the sensitivity of the gene. 
    • trents
      @Mynx, you say, "The reason this is believed is because the gluten protein molecule is too big to pass through the distillation process. Unfortunately, the liquid ie vinegar is cross contaminated because the gluten protein had been in the liquid prior to distillation process." I guess I misunderstand what you are trying to say but the statements in those two sentences seem to contradict one another.
×
×
  • Create New...