Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Waiting For Results


super-sally888

Recommended Posts

super-sally888 Contributor

Hi All,

Just got back from the endoscopy and colonoscopy - all without sedation. The endoscopy was ok, other than the very unpleasant sensation of having a hard tube down my throat. At least I don't have a strong gag reflex.

The colonoscopy was VERY uncomfortable... I think this was mainly due to the air that they put in to expand everything.... They put it all the way in first and then withdraw slowly examining everything as they go out. The pushing it in is way uncomfortable. Think the worst tummy ache you have ever had. And you can't move. I was whimpering a little... but was bearable becuase I knew what was happening and why, and it was interesting to watch everything on the screen..

and the Dr. talked me though everything explaining where he was as he went along. Afterwards he said I have a very high pain tolerance - and the only reason he agreed to let me do it without anaesthesia is because he knows I am a triathlete and used to dealing with discomfort. If you have a low pain tolerance DO NOT do this without sedation. Benefit of this approach is no drugs and you can get up and walk out straight away. I also think the dr. will be more careful if he knows you can feel everything and won't just go pushing and shoving mindlessly. Am still expelling all that air!!! Also feeling really light! Nice feeling!

Findings: Gastritis, and erosions in the oesophagus (has given me omeprazole for 4 weeks). H-pyelori negative. Colonoscopy he said everything looks normal, other than diverticulitis. No obvious cause for the chronic diarrhoea. He did about 8 random biopsies. Will wait for results in about 10 days, and see him in two week's time .... So other than the chance something will show up on biopsy I am clear - he said still chance of celiac and/or some other stuff that shows up microscopically only. Particularly suspects celiac given family history (I have neices and nephew with celiac) ... but I am also prepared for a possible negative result.

Am starting trial of gluten free diet today. Will do for at least 3 months and see how it goes. And I am doing what I need to better manage my stress levels... Will keep lurking on this board and finding out more about how to manage the diet.

Thanks to everyone. Have a nice weekend.

Sally


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nikki-uk Enthusiast

Hi Sally,

It sounds as if your GI covered everthing and hope you gain some answers from the biopsies.

As you are also prepared for a negative it may be possible you still gain relief going gluten-free - even without 'classic' coeliac damage.

Good Luck! :)

Guest cassidy

Glad you got all that behind you.

Hope the diet makes you feel better. I wonder when people give it a time frame if they are going to fully commit to the diet. There is hidden gluten in all sorts of products and it takes time to find all of it. I was feeling better after about two weeks of being on a very simple diet. I still got myself sick a lot in the beginning but it got less and less over time. I hope you fully commit and see if the diet works for you. If it doesn't then you are still at the stage of trying to figure things out, which can be frustrating.

Good luck to you. There is a lot of great advice and helpful people on this board.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,131
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Itsabit
    Newest Member
    Itsabit
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Keep us posted and let us know the results of the biopsy. Your case is atypical in a way in that you have this high DGP-IGA but normal TTG-IGA so knowing how it turns out will give us more data for similar situations that may be posted in the future. 
    • Skg414228
      Fair enough! I very easily could have misread somewhere. Celiac is very confusing lol but I should know in a little over a month what the final verdict is. Just thought chatting with people smarter than myself would get me in the right mindset. I just thought that DGP IGA was pretty high compared to some stuff I had seen and figured someone on here would be more willing to say it is more than likely celiac instead of my doctor who is trying to be less direct. She did finally say she believes it is celiac but wanted to confirm with the biopsy. I did figure it wouldn't hurt seeing what other people said too just because not all doctors are the best. I think mine is actually pretty good from what I have seen but I don't know what I don't know lol. Sorry lot of rambling here just trying to get every thought out. Thanks again!
    • Scott Adams
      Yes, these articles may be helpful:    
    • trents
      No, you don't necessarily need multiple testing methods to confirm celiac disease. There is an increasing trend for celiac diagnoses to be made on a single very high tTG-IGA test score. This started in the UK during the COVID pandemic when there was extreme stress on the healthcare system there and it is spreading to the US. A tTG-IGA score of somewhere between 5x and 10x normal is good enough by itself for some physicians to declare celiac disease. And mind you, that is the tTG-IGA, not the DGP-IGA. The tTG-IGA is the centerpiece of celiac antibody testing, the one test most commonly ordered and the one that physicians have the most confidence in. But in the US, many physicians still insist on a biopsy, even in the event of high tTG-IGA scores. Correct, the biopsy is considered "confirmation" of the blood antibody testing. But what is the need for confirmation of a testing methodology if the testing methodology is fool proof? As for the contribution of genetic testing for celiac disease, it cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease since 40% of the general population has the genetic potential to develop celiac disease while only 1% of the general population actually develops celiac disease. But it can be used to rule out celiac disease. That is, if you don't have the genes, you don't have celiac disease but you might have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity).
    • Skg414228
      Okay yeah that helps! To answer your last bit my understanding was that you need to have multiple tests to confirm celiac. Blood, biopsy, dna, and then I think symptoms is another one. Either way I think everything has to be confirmed with the biopsy because that is the gold standard for testing (Doctors words). You also answered another question I forgot to ask about which is does a high value push to a higher % on those scales. I truly appreciate your answers though and just like hearing what other people think. Digging into forums and google for similar stuff has been tough. So thank you again!
×
×
  • Create New...