Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Genetic Testing


ashase

Recommended Posts

ashase Newbie

Just wondering if anyone else had had the genetic testing for Celiac? I did and received my results--positive for both markers....so I guess it's official now. Well at least the docs won't think it is all in my head anymore....


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Alexolua Explorer

How'd you get your testing done? I went through Enterolab.

Gene Test for Gluten Sensitivity

Molecular analysis:  HLA-DQB1*0602, 0301

Serologic equivalent:  HLA-DQ 1,3  (Subtype 6,7)

My results, LOL.

gf4life Enthusiast

ashase,

I also had myself and my children tested through Enterolab. Here are our results:

Me (32 year old female):

Gene Test for Gluten Sensitivity

Molecular analysis: HLA-DQB1*0201, 0301

Serologic equivalent: HLA-DQ 2,3 (Subtype 2,7)

HLA gene analysis reveals that you have the main gene that predisposes to gluten sensitivity and celiac sprue (HLA-DQ2). This genotype also can predispose to microscopic colitis and other autoimmune syndromes.

My 9 year old son:

Gene Test for Gluten Sensitivity

Molecular analysis: HLA-DQB1*0301, 0301

Serologic equivalent: HLA-DQ 3,3 (Subtype, 7,7)

Although you do not possess the main genes predisposing to celiac sprue (HLA-DQ2 or HLA-DQ3, subtype 8), HLA gene analysis reveals that you have two copies of a gene (HLA-DQ3 subtype 7) that predisposes to gluten sensitivity.

My 8 year old son:

Gene Test for Gluten Sensitivity

Molecular analysis: HLA-DQB1*0502, 0301

Serologic equivalent: HLA-DQ 1,3 (Subtype 5,7)

HLA gene analysis reveals that you have a genotype that predisposes to gluten sensitivity (HLA-DQ1, 3 especially that involving DQB1* 0301). This genotype also can predispose to microscopic colitis and other autoimmune syndromes.

My 5 year old daughter:

Gene Test for Gluten Sensitivity

Molecular analysis: HLA-DQB1*0201, 0301

Serologic equivalent: HLA-DQ 2,3 (Subtype 2,7)

HLA gene analysis reveals that you have the main gene that predisposes to gluten sensitivity and celiac sprue (HLA-DQ2). This genotype also can predispose to microscopic colitis and other autoimmune syndromes.

Based on our results I have to assume (since he won't get tested) that my husband would carry HLA-DQ 1,3 (Subtype 5,7) since that would be the only combo that would result in the mix of genetics that we have going. I would like to get him tested to confirm this, since he won't currently go on the diet. He eats gluten-free when he eats with us at family dinners, but he works through dinner 5 nights a week and so that means he is only getting a few gluten-free meals a week. He does also have symptoms, but is in denial that he is sick. He just thinks that he is getting old, and that is why he is having more health issues. 36 is NOT old!! He is physically fit, but his insides are falling apart!

Currently the only two genes that are being called Celiac Markers are the DQ2 & DQ8(or is it DQ3 subtype 8?). Anyhow, there may come a day when these other gluten intolerance genes are also recognised as Celiac markers. My middle boy has a lot of health issues and sees a lot of specialists in different areas. His Rheumatologist/Immunologist is not ruling out Celiac in him, since he has so many of the symptoms and those symptoms improve so dramatically when he is gluten-free that it can hardly be ignored. This doctor (Dr. Wright at Central California Children's Hospital) says that there has not been enough research on celiac disease and genetics to show that they have isolated ALL of the genes responsible for the disease. My son also has a rare varient of Familial Meditteranean Fever (for which they have not isolated all of those genes yet either!). We are just a little bit ahead of the researchers. Maybe someday they will catch up to us and realise that gluten free is best for almost all of the global population!! That might just be wishful thinking. I'd bet the government here would have to keep it quiet since wheat is such a big commodity in the USA. Maybe we should just turn all those wheat fields into rice paddies! :D

I hope this helps with your personal genetics research.

God bless,

Mariann

ashase Newbie

My Dr. a gastroentrologist that specializes in Celiac ordered the test through prometheus labs (in CA I think) It was a blood test. I came back positive for DQ2 & DQ8. Why did you go through enterolab and not through youor doc? just curious...

Thanks for all of the info. I am mgoing to have my kids tested...I am scared to death I gave it to them :(

Alexolua Explorer
Why did you go through enterolab and not through youor doc?

Because unfortunately, my doctor isn't a Celiac specialist. Though he did mention he heard of genetic testing done by a group in CA, when I showed him enterolabs' results. So guess he knows a little, lol.

gf4life Enthusiast

My insurance wouldn't pay for Promethius labs for my kids when they were ordered by the pediatric GI and they cost $750 for the gene test (which has to be done with the antibody blood tests and automatically is performed if the antibody tests are negative). It costs about $150 at Enterolab ($350 for complete stool/gene panel), and is performed at a top genetics lab in Colorado called Laboratories at Bonfils, so I was confident with the accuracy of the results. I am also glad I went through Enterolab since they also check for the lesser genes that cause non-celiac gluten intolerance. Two of my kids don't carry either of the two celiac genes, yet they are gluten intolerant. Promethius tests will miss those people who are gluten intolerant but not Celiac.

My GI doctor would not order the gene test for me. She doesn't think I have a problem with gluten, she still thinks it's IBS. I suffered for over 25 years and was not willing to go to yet another doctor and keep trying to get a diagnosis. I had already done a gluten free diet trial and the results were so dramatic that I just needed confirmation of what I already knew. That is when I did Enterolab for myself last October. I then went and got my kids blood tested and referred to a GI when they all came back positive on Gliadin IgG only. The GI wanted to do the Promethius tests since he trusts that lab, but the insurance wouldn't approve it. $750 x 3 was just too much to pay, so we chose to go with Enterolab. We had the complete stool and gene panel done on all three for around $1000, and found all three of them are gluten intolerant and casein intolerant. They are all doing so well on the diet that their GI wants to keep them on the diet and moniter their progress, even though they currently do not have a diagnosis of Celiac. Not a problem with me. The kids are so much healthier now, and that is all that I care about.

God bless,

Mariann :)

ashase Newbie

Why don't docs trust enterolab? Was the gene testing done with a blood orcheek sample?

Thanks,

Jessica


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Alexolua Explorer

Cheek sample.

I can't speak for all doctors. Mine had just never heard of Enterolab, so doesn't agree with his testing. Doctor Fine (at Enterolab) said he was working on a study to be published, which I'd hope would then give something for doctors to read about his work.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,015
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Carrie-S
    Newest Member
    Carrie-S
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      The NIH article you link actually supports what I have been trying to explain to you: "Celiac disease (celiac disease) is an autoimmune-mediated enteropathy triggered by dietary gluten in genetically prone individuals. The current treatment for celiac disease is a strict lifelong gluten-free diet. However, in some celiac disease patients following a strict gluten-free diet, the symptoms do not remit. These cases may be refractory celiac disease or due to gluten contamination; however, the lack of response could be related to other dietary ingredients, such as maize, which is one of the most common alternatives to wheat used in the gluten-free diet. In some celiac disease patients, as a rare event, peptides from maize prolamins could induce a celiac-like immune response by similar or alternative pathogenic mechanisms to those used by wheat gluten peptides. This is supported by several shared features between wheat and maize prolamins and by some experimental results. Given that gluten peptides induce an immune response of the intestinal mucosa both in vivo and in vitro, peptides from maize prolamins could also be tested to determine whether they also induce a cellular immune response. Hypothetically, maize prolamins could be harmful for a very limited subgroup of celiac disease patients, especially those that are non-responsive, and if it is confirmed, they should follow, in addition to a gluten-free, a maize-free diet." Notice that those for whom it is suggested to follow a maize-free diet are a "very limited subgroup of celiac disease patients". Please don't try to make your own experience normative for the entire celiac community.  Notice also that the last part of the concluding sentence in the paragraph does not equate a gluten-free diet with a maize-free diet, it actually puts them in juxtaposition to one another. In other words, they are different but for a "limited subgroup of celiac disease patients" they produce the same or a similar reaction. You refer to celiac reactions to cereal grain prolamins as "allergic" reactions and "food sensitivity". For instance, you say, "NIH sees all these grains as in opposition to celiacs, of which I am one and that is science, not any MD with a good memory who overprescribes medications that contain known food allergens in them, of which they have zero knowledge if the patient is in fact allergic to or not, since they failed to do simple 'food sensitivity' testing" and "IF a person wants to get well, they should be the one to determine what grains they are allergic to and what grains they want to leave out, not you. I need to remind you that celiac disease is not an allergy, it is an autoimmune disorder. Neither allergy testing nor food sensitivity testing can be used to diagnose celiac disease. Allergy testing and food sensitivity testing cannot detect the antibodies produced by celiac disease in reaction to gluten ingestion.  You say of me, "You must be one of those who are only gluten intolerant . . ." Gluten intolerance is synonymous with celiac disease. You must be referring to gluten sensitivity or NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). Actually, I have been officially diagnosed with celiac disease both by blood antibody testing and by endoscopy/positive biopsy. Reacting to all cereal grain prolamins does not define celiac disease. If you are intent on teaching the truth, please get it straight first.
    • Bebygirl01
      Perhaps you would still like to answer the questions I posed on this topic, because that is all I asked. I am curious to know the answers to those questions, I do not care about the background of Dr. Osborne as I am more aware of the situation than you are, and he is also one of the best known authors out there on Celiac disease. But did you even bother to read the three Research Papers I posted by NIH? You must be one of those who are only gluten intolerant and not yet reacting to all glutens aka grains, but I AM one of those who react to ALL the glutens, and again, that is one of the two questions I originally posted on this matter. NIH sees all these grains as in opposition to celiacs, of which I am one and that is science, not any MD with a good memory who overprescribes medications that contain known food allergens in them, of which they have zero knowledge if the patient is in fact allergic to or not, since they failed to do simple 'food sensitivity' testing. I started with the failed FDA explanation of what Gluten Free is and I stayed sick and got even sicker. It wasn't until I came across NIH's papers and went off all grains that I realized that in fact, I am Celiac and reacting to all the glutens. IF a person wants to get well, they should be the one to determine what grains they are allergic to and what grains they want to leave out, not you. Those who are just getting started with learning about grains etc., can take it easy by just being "grain free' and eating a lot of meat, vegetables, etc. or whole foods as God has intended, without buying so called gluten free garbage out there that is making them sick and the whole reason they are not better. I tried the stupid gluten free garbage and it didn't work, and that will make anyone want to give up, it is better to teach the entire truth and let the patient decide, rather than give them misinformation and lies.
    • Nicola McGuire
      Thank you so much I will speak to the doctor for dietician apt . Thank you for your advice Beth much appreciated 
    • Scott Adams
      Oh no, I'm sorry to hear about the accidental gluten! This article, and the comments below it, may be helpful:    
    • Karmmacalling
      I was born with celiac disease im 20 years old. And I've been gluten free my whole life. Yes my diet is 100 percent gluten free and no i don't eat at restaurants at all. I got glutened by a chips that was marked as gluten free but it wasn't the company said the packaging was old and the recipe was new. 
×
×
  • Create New...