Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Called To Go For Endoscopy

maribeth

By maribeth
in Coping with Celiac Disease

Recommended Posts

maribeth Apprentice
maribeth
Posted

Well I had a message on my AM from the dr that's going to do the endoscopy and a colonastomy. It's been 2 months since I was told by my dr that she would make an appointment with a specialist. I have called my dr and the specialist several times to find out when I could get an appt. and never heard back til now. I've been gluten-free for about 6 weeks now. I'm not going back to eating gluten!!! I was unable to get back to the dr as they were gone for the day and won't be able to call till monday now. Probably won't get in til the end of the month or even the new year and want to go while I'm off for the holidays instead of having to miss work again. Will anything abnormal show after 2-3 months of being gluten-free. Should I perhaps not have the endoscopy? I know you're supposed to be on gluten to have the test but I'm definately not going back on gluten as I feel so good now. Have a great day. Beth

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Guest nini
Guest nini
Posted

from what I understand if you are gluten free the endoscope won't show anything if there was damage to begin with. my personal opinion would be that you already have your answer and don't need to go through with the biopsy. I never had a biopsy and I do not doubt my dx one bit as I feel SOOOOOO much better off of gluten and I will never ever willingly go back to eating gluten again, especially not for any stupid test! You have your answer! Don't do it!

happygirl Collaborator
happygirl
Posted

If you want accurate tests, you must be eating gluten for an extended period of time.

I had positive bloodwork, and on the direction of my doctor, immediately went gluten free, had the biopsy five weeks later, and it was negative. I have since moved, and doctors look at my report and tell me I don't have Celiac...they dismiss me when I tell them the circumstances of the biopsy. They aren't interested.

Even if you go back on gluten now, it doesn't mean that damage will show up for them to diagnose.

Mary Contrary Rookie
Mary Contrary
Posted

Gee this sound just like me maribeth, I just made a thread in the wrong place..I put it in post diagnosis...but I am having my biopsy and a colonoscopy done on this Tuesday..I have however been off of wheat/gluten for 2 months now and I am finally starting to see a slowing down of my constant D...i am hoping something will still show up, surely if the villi of my small intestines is ruined it couldn't have healed up in 2 months, especially if i am still having D.

my regular Doc is awful..i made the appointment with the Gastro myself and was lucky enough to get in fairly soon...and he listened to me...i like the man alot..my regular Doc told me to go home and eat toast... :rolleyes:

oh by the way i did have blood work done and it was negative..but I am certain it is Celiacs..if you read my other post, I have had on going issues with wheat for along time...

daffadilly Apprentice
daffadilly
Posted

Everyone has to make their own decisions, I personally would skip it. Instead i would just get the Enterolab gene test... & maybe the fat absoption test, if that is clear then it really means that your villi are okay.

IMO biopsy is not necessary, if you want to a doctors permission to eat a healthy diet, then you will almost have to kill yourself first by eating gluten and then if you happen to have DQ1 genes you might not get the villi atrophy anyway - but you might get lots of other damage that they will not look for.

Even if you villi are damaged it can be spotty & if they do not take up to 15 biopsies they will surely miss it. Then there is the matter of the doctor "reading" the biopsy...

seems like a lot of trouble for nothing to me, but if you want an Official diagnosis then that is what you have to do, but you sound like you have your priorities all together already...

Helena Contributor
Helena
Posted
If you want accurate tests, you must be eating gluten for an extended period of time.

I had positive bloodwork, and on the direction of my doctor, immediately went gluten free, had the biopsy five weeks later, and it was negative. I have since moved, and doctors look at my report and tell me I don't have Celiac...they dismiss me when I tell them the circumstances of the biopsy. They aren't interested.

Even if you go back on gluten now, it doesn't mean that damage will show up for them to diagnose.

Happygirl,

I know you're seeing some specialists at well known research centres---are these the dr's who are telling you that you don't have celiac?!? I could see a GP who doesn't really know that much about celiac doing so . . . but I would expect people who are actively engaged in medical research to listen to what you have to say especially since you really know what you are talking about. Have you brought in journal articles to prove your point? How can they ignore what experts on celiac say on the matter?

Am feeling good about my decision not to go through with the biopsy at the moment (and I've been feeling ambivalent). . . . I might not have given the villi enough of a chance to get damaged and if I had gone through with it it could very well have been negative. But as is, the blood tests are strongly suggestive of celiac and my GI doc has recommended we skip the biopsy I hope that dr's I deal with in the future take that seriously.

Mary Contrary Rookie
Mary Contrary
Posted
Everyone has to make their own decisions, I personally would skip it. Instead i would just get the Enterolab gene test... & maybe the fat absoption test, if that is clear then it really means that your villi are okay.

IMO biopsy is not necessary, if you want to a doctors permission to eat a healthy diet, then you will almost have to kill yourself first by eating gluten and then if you happen to have DQ1 genes you might not get the villi atrophy anyway - but you might get lots of other damage that they will not look for.

Even if you villi are damaged it can be spotty & if they do not take up to 15 biopsies they will surely miss it. Then there is the matter of the doctor "reading" the biopsy...

seems like a lot of trouble for nothing to me, but if you want an Official diagnosis then that is what you have to do, but you sound like you have your priorities all together already...

I really appreciate your opinion, I have everything scheduled for tomorrow and am going to have it done, the colonoscopy is my main objective, I want the piece of mind that there isn't something else going on, even though I am quite sure there isn't.

And if the biopsys are negative, which it sounds like they will be, well so be it. If there is nothing else wrong with me, then that will be my answer regardless. I'll know for sure it is Celiacs, because I am already, after my two months off of gluten, starting to get. I don't need a test to verify it for me, I won't eat gluten again just for the sake of a positive test. Atleast with this disease you don't need anybody's permission or diagnosis to take care of yourself.

I'll just feel better, mentally atleast, after the colonoscopy, because there is always that nagging feeling that it could be something serious or life threatening. And as long as I'm there and prepared for it I'll, go ahead with the endoscopy as well.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


happygirl Collaborator
happygirl
Posted
Happygirl,

I know you're seeing some specialists at well known research centres---are these the dr's who are telling you that you don't have celiac?!? I could see a GP who doesn't really know that much about celiac doing so . . . but I would expect people who are actively engaged in medical research to listen to what you have to say especially since you really know what you are talking about. Have you brought in journal articles to prove your point? How can they ignore what experts on celiac say on the matter?

Am feeling good about my decision not to go through with the biopsy at the moment (and I've been feeling ambivalent). . . . I might not have given the villi enough of a chance to get damaged and if I had gone through with it it could very well have been negative. But as is, the blood tests are strongly suggestive of celiac and my GI doc has recommended we skip the biopsy I hope that dr's I deal with in the future take that seriously.

Let's see....my doc at JH (that I love!) says that no matter what we want to call it, gluten is a problem for me (Celiac vs. gluten intolerance vs. sensitivity vs. allergy, he doesn't care).

my doc at NIH was kind of on the fence....he recognized that gluten bothered me, but didn't know about "intolerance."

a doc who used to be a leading armed forces doc (i'll leave it at that) told me basically it was all in my head

none of these are Celiac specialists...if you aren't a Celiac specialist/take a specific interest in Celiac...they don't care. I could tell you athe worst story about doc #3....it was not a pleasant app't.

And people wonder why I'm disillusioned sometimes :P

Helena Contributor
Helena
Posted

Gotta love those docs whose explanation for everything they don't know about is 'it's all in your head'! I think it is an ego thing----this way they have an explanation for everything. There's *nothing* they can't diagnose.

Well, at least the other docs believed that you shouldn't be eating gluten even if they aren't informed about diagnosing celiac.

I just thought that doctors who are at the top of their field would tend to realize that their understanding of everything that isn't in their particular research area is sketchy and that they'd look things up if they didn't know them off the top of their head. But I guess that's overly idealistic!

happygirl Collaborator
happygirl
Posted

girl, i would've thought so too.....but it is not the case for all of them, unfortunately!

hopefully, word will get out....

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      125,929
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Robert Osborne
    Newest Member
    Robert Osborne
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69k
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • glucel
      Refractory or super sensitive?

      By glucel · Posted

      That's interesting because I think that the lousy 81 mg irritates my gut. I'm sensitive to drugs in general and blood thinners are all the same to me so aspirin necessary evil. As they say, better to be a live chicken than a dead duck. 
    • Scott Adams
      Water filters and gluten

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I've been using a Brita water filter for well over a decade without any issues. I seriously doubt that these water filter companies would use glues that would end up in your water, as that would be counter to what they are trying to do, which is to purify tap water. Please provide some specific evidence to back this claim up, as such speculation can cause undo fear, as well as reputational damage to these companies. Don't get me wrong here, I am not saying that this isn't possible, but is very unlikely.
    • trents
      2 months in... struggling with symptoms

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the forum, @aperlo34! You said you had a colonoscopy "ordered" in July? Has that procedure happened yet? A colonoscopy cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease so I assume the order for the colonoscopy is to check for something else. The procedure used to diagnose celiac disease is the endoscopy. So, I assume you have had blood antibody testing done and it was positive and then you had an endoscopy/biopsy done to confirm those results? That is the normal process for diagnosing celiac disease. Have your constipation/irregularity problems improved since going gluten free? Some of the continuing symptoms you describe would seem to fall into the category of neurological effects (muscle twitching, shakiness, weakness and headaches) and others such as dry eyes, fatigue, stiffness and joint aches sound like they could be autoimmune effects. Are you taking any high potency to vitamin and mineral supplements? Celiac disease often/typically results in vitamin and mineral deficiencies due to malabsorption from the damage to the small bowel lining it causes. I note that your vitamin D levels are barely within normal range and the only B vitamin testes is B12. The B vitamins and D3 are very important to neurological health. And the several B vitamins all work together synergistically. So, they all need to be up to snuff, not just B12. I would suggest starting on D3 supplementation in the amount of about 5000 IU daily and also a high potency B-complex. Costco's Nature Made and Kirkland brand products are good quality and priced well and usually gluten free (and will state so on the packaging). Realize also that gluten free flours and facsimile foods are not fortified as are their FDA mandated gluten equivalents. So, when you cut out gluten, you cut out a significant source of vitamins. One thing to be aware of is that Celiac disease is an autoimmune disorder and autoimmune disorders tend to cluster. That is, when you have one you there is a good chance you will develop others in time. I don't wish to alarm you because I know you have said you already struggle with heath anxiety but many of your symptoms make me think you have some other autoimmune condition going on in addition to celiac disease. Have you been checked for Sjogren's or lupus for instance?  Finally, I am including an article that is helpful to newly diagnosed celiacs in getting a head start on the learning curve of eating gluten free:   
    • Scott Adams
      Raw Meat Craving

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      This article may also be helpful as it offers various ways to relieve the itch:  
    • Scott Adams
      Gluten Ataxia

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      The most common nutrient deficiencies associated with celiac disease that may lead to testing for the condition include iron, vitamin D, folate (vitamin B9), vitamin B12, calcium, zinc, and magnesium.  Unfortunately many doctors, including my own doctor at the time, don't do extensive follow up testing for a broad range of nutrient deficiencies, nor recommend that those just diagnosed with celiac disease take a broad spectrum vitamin/mineral supplement, which would greatly benefit most, if not all, newly diagnosed celiacs. Because of this it took me decades to overcome a few long-standing issues I had that were associated with gluten ataxia, for example numbness and tingling in my feet, and muscle knots--especially in my shoulders an neck. Only long term extensive supplementation has helped me to resolve these issues.      
×
×
  • Create New...