Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Please Interpret Blood Results!


ptkds

Recommended Posts

ptkds Community Regular

Ok, so I got my dd's blood results as suggested by someone on here. So, someone please tell me what they mean!!! Here they are:

The first # is the result, and the second is the Referenc Range.

DD#1: Results Ref. Range

Endomysial IGA AB: <1:5 <1:5

Transglutaminase IGA AB: 6 <20

Gliadin IGG 35.8 <=25.0

Gliadin IGA 2.5 <=25.0

Reticulin IGA AB <1:5 <1:5

DD#2: Results Ref. Range

Endomysial IGA AB: <1:5 <1:5

Transglutaminase IGA AB: 6 <20

Gliadin IGG 45.6 <=25.0

Gliadin IGA 56.3 <=25.0

Reticulin IGA AB <1:5 <1:5

ONe dr told us that DD#2 was positive, then another said she was negative. But DD#1 has alot of Celiac disease symptoms. So, please help me ASAP! I am really confused!

Thanks,

ptkds


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Willow5 Rookie

I know these results can be sooo confusing, here is how I would conclude. (Can't claim to be an expert and am not sure if I really got it all together - it is hard to figure out)!

Transglutaminase IGA AB shows intestinal damage. Even though it is under normal limits, it still shows up and I would take it to mean that there is some damage in process. The Gliadin IgA and IgG measure the reaction to the gluten protein. Your kids show a high in one or both areas. I saw it stated once that these tests are very much like a pregnancy test, no mater how high the results are you are still positive. You cant be a little pregnant either!

Test interpretatons will state that with the Ig's, there are % of likelyness to whether or not you are celiac, - well whatever - there is still gluten sensitivety going on!

So that is how I see it - if anyone else has clearer insite, I could use more info too!

I found with my kids that the best indication was their reaction to a gluten-free diet. Can't go back - have to keep this up!

Best wishes!

Nikki2003 Contributor
Ok, so I got my dd's blood results as suggested by someone on here. So, someone please tell me what they mean!!! Here they are:

The first # is the result, and the second is the Referenc Range.

DD#1: Results Ref. Range

Endomysial IGA AB: <1:5 <1:5

Transglutaminase IGA AB: 6 <20

Gliadin IGG 35.8 <=25.0

Gliadin IGA 2.5 <=25.0

Reticulin IGA AB <1:5 <1:5

DD#2: Results Ref. Range

Endomysial IGA AB: <1:5 <1:5

Transglutaminase IGA AB: 6 <20

Gliadin IGG 45.6 <=25.0

Gliadin IGA 56.3 <=25.0

Reticulin IGA AB <1:5 <1:5

ONe dr told us that DD#2 was positive, then another said she was negative. But DD#1 has alot of Celiac disease symptoms. So, please help me ASAP! I am really confused!

Thanks,

ptkds

I think it means negative for celiac. The transglutaminase IGA is the celiac test and they look neg.

That's just my opinion though.

Celina

happygirl Collaborator

They are both indicative of having a problem with gluten.

They are ALL used for Celiac, not just the tissue transg, although it is a highly suggestive one. Please do not pass along incorrect information. It is a Celiac PANEL, not just one blood test.

Where do you live? I would recommend finding a dr. who is knowledgable about Celiac.

I'm sure others will chime in.

Rachel--24 Collaborator
I think it means negative for celiac. The transglutaminase IGA is the celiac test and they look neg.

That's just my opinion though.

Celina

I believe this is innacurrate.

As Happygirl posted....the tTG is only one part of the panel. Many Celiacs do not have a positive tTG...many do not have a positive biopsy as well. tTG is specific for damage. A negative tTG indicates that damage is likely very minimal or that damage has not yet occurred.

This is a good sign....meaning that if the girls have Celiac, you have caught this early on....before alot of damage has occurred.

I think its possible that both girls have Celiac. The testing points to dd#2 most likely having it since her anti-gliadin IgA was very high....along with the IgG.

DD#1 could have it as well but only her IgG came back positive and IgG can be elevated for reasons other than Celiac. These tests arent 100% accurate. The best test of all is dietary response. If DD#1 is having symptoms....these may very well resolve on the diet.

They are both clearly having an immune response to gluten. If you cant get a definate answer from the testing or from the doctors.....try putting both girls on the diet and you will get an answer.

Jestgar Rising Star

You might also want to consider having total IgA done to check for deficiencies.

Nikki2003 Contributor
They are both indicative of having a problem with gluten.

They are ALL used for Celiac, not just the tissue transg, although it is a highly suggestive one. Please do not pass along incorrect information. It is a Celiac PANEL, not just one blood test.

Where do you live? I would recommend finding a dr. who is knowledgable about Celiac.

I'm sure others will chime in.

Sorry about the info. That is what I got from the results she had. All her other tests were neg. and the Ttg was the only positive one. I just thought that that was the one that was to be positive for celiac. Guess I was wrong,sorry.

Celina


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



tarnalberry Community Regular

Here's the thing... all the IgA's were negative, and IgG's were positive, but you don't have a total IgA test for either to tell you whether or not the standard reference ranges are valid for either girl! So those 'negative' IgA results may not *in actuality* be negatives. They need a total IgA test in order to properly read those results.

chrissy Collaborator

i can just about guarantee you they are not IgA deficient-----their numbers would most likely be ALOT lower than theirs are. my son is IgA deficient, and he hardly even registered on testing. TTG showing, but still in the normal range, does not indicate damage. raised levels of AGA can indicate other things than celiac. if it were me, i would not assume that my children had celiac disease based on thosed test results----i would want to investigate things more.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      125,882
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    tina.walstad
    Newest Member
    tina.walstad
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • gregoryC
      Just finished my second celebrity cruise. My first was on one of their oldest ships, it was awesome! Now we have sailed on the edge class. Wow! Not only do they have so many gluten-free options but the selection is mind blowing! Any given day you will have between 5 to 7 different gluten-free cakes to try. Yes that is right, one day at the coffee shop I had to choose between 5 gluten-free cakes not including the several puddings on display. So they gave me a small piece of each. 2 were great, 2 were just good, and 1 I did not enjoy. But never have I had the tough decision of which cake to eat?  These selections are from their normal options available for all guest. In the main dining room they always surprised me with some awesome desserts.  In my opinion the best pizza was on the Millennium class and best buffet on the Edge class. Although these two ship vary in size they are both consistent and serving high quality food from the main dinning room. The edge class gives you 4 “main” dining rooms (all included). I was unsure how this would work with my gluten-free diet? It worked great! I was able to order or see the next night’s menu for each of the four dinning venues finding that very little to no modifications needed to be made due to their extensive gluten free options.  The Millennium and Edge class ships provide the best gluten-free options from any of the cruise lines I have sailed with. You will find a larger selection and options on the edge class ships, however you will not be disappointed with the smaller Millennium class. Which is still my favorite cruise ship to date.   
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @ABP! We can't comment on the test numbers you give as you didn't include the range for negative. Different labs use different units and different ranges. There are no industry standards for this so we need more information. If your daughter doesn't have celiac disease she still could have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity) which some experts believe can be a precursor to celiac disease and is 10x more common than celiac disease. However, there is no test for it yet but it does share many of the same symptoms with celiac disease. Both require complete abstinence from gluten.  It is seldom the case during testing where all tests are positive, even for those who do have celiac disease. This is no different than when diagnosing other medical conditions and that is why it is typical to run numbers of tests that come at things from different angles when seeking to arrive at a diagnosis. It seems like you are at the point, since you have had both blood antibody testing and endoscopy/biopsy done, that you need to trial the gluten free diet. If her symptoms improve then you know all you need to know, whatever you label you want to give it. But given that apparently at least one celiac antibody blood test is positive and she has classic celiac symptoms such as slow growth, constipation and bloating, my money would be on celiac disease as opposed to NCGS.
    • ABP
      My nine-year-old daughter has suffered with severe constipation and bloating for years as well as frequent mouth sores, and keratosis Polaris on her arms. She also has recently decreased on her growth curve her % going down gradually.  After seeing a gastroenterologist, her IgG GLIADIN (DEAMIDATED) AB (IGG) was 22.4 while her IGA was normal. Her TISSUE TRANSGLUTAMINASE AB, IGA was 11.9.  Most recently her genetic test for celiac was positive.  After an endoscopy her tissue showed inflammation of the tissue as well as , increased intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) but there was no blunting of the change in the villi.    It seems that every result that we get one out of two things positive rather than all leading to an inconclusive diagnosis. While we do have another appointment with the doctor to go over the results. I'm curious based on this information what others think.    I would hate to have her eliminate gluten if not necessary- but also don't want to not remove if it is necessary.    Signed Confused and Concerned Mama
    • Scott Adams
      I guess using "GF" instead of "PL" would have been too easy! 😉
    • trents
      I was wrong, however, about there being no particular health concerns associated with high total IGA: https://www.inspire.com/resources/chronic-disease/understanding-high-iga-levels-causes-impacts/ So maybe the physician's "borderline" remark is relevant to that.
×
×
  • Create New...