Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Diagnosis Question


Riayn

Recommended Posts

Riayn Newbie

I got the results of my blood test today and they came back negative for Celiac Disease. However, my doctor is sending me off to a gastroendologist to have more tests done and for him to have a look at my GI tract. I was curious as to whether it is possible to test negative for Celiac on the blood test but have a positive biopsy.

I must admit I was upset that it came back negative as I was hoping that was the answer to all my health concerns, but it may be that I have to keep on looking.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Guest nini

yes it's entirely possible, a lot of people on here have had that happen. But the other thing to keep in mind is that even if your biopsy comes back negative, that doesn't really mean you don't have it either. As damage could be sporadic or in early stages. So, regardless of the results of your tests, after your biopsy is done, go ahead and try the diet and see if it helps. Positive dietary response is the most valid indicator anyway, and honestly it doesn't matter if it's Celiac, Gluten intolerance or whatever, if you feel better off gluten then stay off gluten. You don't need a Dr.s permission to eat gluten free.

If the results of your tests are positive then it's positive, but a negative just means "not positive" or we didn't find anything yet. Lots of people have had negative tests many times, been told they don't have Celiac and to continue eating wheat, only to continue to get sicker and then end up with full blown villous atrophy as well as multiple other autoimmune disorders that require medication or treatment for the rest of their lives.

If you feel better off gluten, then gluten is poison to your body and you need to eliminate it completely, it's that simple.

kasia Rookie

Hi,

Yes I did. Fortunately my biopsy results came back before the blood test (had blood on National Health & they lost them, but decided to go privately to see GI as I felt so rough).

So it's definitely possible - I posted the same question a while back & got some great replies.

Good luck

Kate

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,878
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Lbf
    Newest Member
    Lbf
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Bebee
      I have been diagnosed with Microscopic Colitis (LC) for quite a few years, so I have been gluten-free and DF.  I would like to get tested for Celiac Disease because of the possibility of cross contamination and colon cancer.  And if you were hospitalized and didn't have a celiac diagnosis you could not get gluten-free food, I don't know if that is true or not.  Also because there is chance of colon cancer so I want to know if I have Celiac Disease and need to be on very restrictive diet.  The only testing I did was a sigmoid scope and Enter Lab but no gene testing.  I know I can go back to eating gluten for a few months, but I would worry you would have to stay home for the few months while getting gluten.  What other options do I have?  Should I do the gene testing?  Maybe through Entero Lab?  Any other tests?  How important is it to have Celiac diagnosed? Thank you! Barb
    • trents
      Take it easy! I was just prompting you for some clarification.  In the distillation process, the liquid is boiled and the vapor descends up a tube and condenses into another container as it cools. What people are saying is that the gluten molecules are too large and heavy to travel up with the vapor and so get left behind in the original liquid solution. Therefore, the condensate should be free of gluten, no matter if there was gluten in the original solution. The explanation contained in the second sentence I quoted from your post would not seem to square with the physics of the distillation process. Unless, that is, I misunderstood what you were trying to explain.
    • Mynx
      No they do not contradict each other. Just like frying oil can be cross contaminated even though the oil doesn't contain the luten protein. The same is the same for a distilled vinegar or spirit which originally came from a gluten source. Just because you don't understand, doesn't mean you can tell me that my sentences contradict each other. Do you have a PhD in biochemistry or friends that do and access to a lab?  If not, saying you don't understand is one thing anything else can be dangerous to others. 
    • Mynx
      The reason that it triggers your dermatitis herpetiformis but not your celiac disease is because you aren't completely intolerant to gluten. The celiac and dermatitis herpetiformis genes are both on the same chronometer. Dermatitis herpetoformus reacts to gluten even if there's a small amount of cross contamination while celiac gene may be able to tolerate a some gluten or cross contamination. It just depends on the sensitivity of the gene. 
    • trents
      @Mynx, you say, "The reason this is believed is because the gluten protein molecule is too big to pass through the distillation process. Unfortunately, the liquid ie vinegar is cross contaminated because the gluten protein had been in the liquid prior to distillation process." I guess I misunderstand what you are trying to say but the statements in those two sentences seem to contradict one another.
×
×
  • Create New...